RSV InfectionNCT04531735
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection May be More Dangerous in Neonate
An observational study of RSV Infection and Covid19, run by Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Investigators aimed to compare clinical and radiographic markers between SARS-CoV-2 positive and RSV positive infants Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 days to 1 month
- Conditions the study is for
- RSV Infection, Covid19
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2020to 31 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 days to 1 month
- All sexes
- Child
Study population: Newborns with respiratory symptoms
Who may be able to join
- During the study period respiratory symptoms at the NICU admission will be included
Who cannot join
- Congenital abnormalities
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
İzmir Dr. Behcet Uz Training and Research Hospital
Izmir
Behçet Uz Children's Hospital
İzmirli, İzmir, 35210
About this study
Official title: Is Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection More Dangerous Than Covid 19 in the Neonatal Period?
Investigators aimed to compare clinical and radiographic markers between SARS-CoV-2 positive and RSV positive infants
Read the detailed description
This single center cross-sectional study was conducted in University of Health Sciences Dr Behçet Uz Children's Hospital with a 400-bed tertiary care hospital in İzmir, Turkey, during the period of March 11 - April 30, 2020. This hospital is a pediatric referral center in the Aegean Region of Turkey with annual approximately 600,000 outpatients and 24,000 hospitalizations. All children with fever and cough who were tested by taken nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV2 and common human respiratory tract pathogens were included in the study.
The clinician responsible for taking the respiratory samples were trained by the infection control committee on sampling and using personal protective equipment. Firstly, an oropharyngeal sampling was taken, and then a nasopharyngeal sampling was taken using the same swab from patient with fever and cough/shortness of breath for SARS-CoV-2 PCR. The same swab was used and placed in the same transport medium. The samples were sent to the laboratory determined by the Ministry of Health, following the cold chain rules. The protocol of Real Time-PCR was consistent with the recommendation of the WHO. Real time-PCR was performed at the local governmental centers for disease control and prevention. The kit wasapplied to nucleic acid isolates from nasopharyngeal aspirate/lavage, bronchoalveolar lavage, nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab and sputum samples. Rapid diagnosis with the kit is achieved via one-step reverse transcription (RT) and real-time PCR (qPCR) (RT-qPCR) targeting SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV)-specific RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene fragment. The RdRp gene-targeted Wuhan-RdRp oligonucleotide set gives positive results only with SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV)( Bio-Speedy®, Turkey SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) qPCR Detection Kit)
Respiratory samples taken by nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for common human respiratory tract pathogens. For the testing of samples, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed. In the assay a commercial multiplex real-time PCR kit (Bosphore Respiratory Pathogens Panel Kit V4, Anatolia Geneworks, Turkey) was used to investigate the presence of Influenza viruses ( Influenza A, Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A, Seasonal H1N1 Influenza A and Influenza B), Parainfluenza (PIV) viruses (PIV-1, PIV-2, PIV-3 and PIV-4), Human Coronaviruses (HCoV) (CoV OC43, CoV NL63, CoV HKU1 and CoV 229E), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) A/B, Rhinovirus, Metapneumovirus, Enterovirus, Bocavirus, Adenovirus, Parechovirus and bacterial pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumonia, Moraxella catarrhalis, Bordetella pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type B in the clinical samples.
Demographic, epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from hospital electronic information system medical records. For the statistical evaluation of the data, SPSS 20.0 Microsoft for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). was used and P <0.05 value was considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- RSV Infection, Covid19
- Keywords
- newborn, covid infection, viral infection, RSV infection
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections, COVID-19, Virus Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | COVID positive infants | |
| Group 2 | RSV positive infants |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Oxygen status and evaluation of neonatal intensive care stay
Total neonatal intensive care duration, total duration of oxygen supplement
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2020
- Primary completion1 Aug 2020
- Study completion31 Aug 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RSV InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Senem Alkan Özdemir, Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04531735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020/522
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Is Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection More Dangerous Than Covid 19 in the Neonatal Period?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04531735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020/522
- Conditions
- RSV Infection, Covid19
- Keywords
- newborn, covid infection, viral infection, RSV infection
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Behcet Uz Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigators aimed to compare clinical and radiographic markers between SARS-CoV-2 positive and RSV positive infants
Detailed description
This single center cross-sectional study was conducted in University of Health Sciences Dr Behçet Uz Children's Hospital with a 400-bed tertiary care hospital in İzmir, Turkey, during the period of March 11 - April 30, 2020. This hospital is a pediatric referral center in the Aegean Region of Turkey with annual approximately 600,000 outpatients and 24,000 hospitalizations. All children with fever and cough who were tested by taken nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV2 and common human respiratory tract pathogens were included in the study.
The clinician responsible for taking the respiratory samples were trained by the infection control committee on sampling and using personal protective equipment. Firstly, an oropharyngeal sampling was taken, and then a nasopharyngeal sampling was taken using the same swab from patient with fever and cough/shortness of breath for SARS-CoV-2 PCR. The same swab was used and placed in the same transport medium. The samples were sent to the laboratory determined by the Ministry of Health, following the cold chain rules. The protocol of Real Time-PCR was consistent with the recommendation of the WHO. Real time-PCR was performed at the local governmental centers for disease control and prevention. The kit wasapplied to nucleic acid isolates from nasopharyngeal aspirate/lavage, bronchoalveolar lavage, nasopharyngeal swab, oropharyngeal swab and sputum samples. Rapid diagnosis with the kit is achieved via one-step reverse transcription (RT) and real-time PCR (qPCR) (RT-qPCR) targeting SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV)-specific RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene fragment. The RdRp gene-targeted Wuhan-RdRp oligonucleotide set gives positive results only with SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV)( Bio-Speedy®, Turkey SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) qPCR Detection Kit)
Respiratory samples taken by nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for common human respiratory tract pathogens. For the testing of samples, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was performed. In the assay a commercial multiplex real-time PCR kit (Bosphore Respiratory Pathogens Panel Kit V4, Anatolia Geneworks, Turkey) was used to investigate the presence of Influenza viruses ( Influenza A, Pandemic H1N1 Influenza A, Seasonal H1N1 Influenza A and Influenza B), Parainfluenza (PIV) viruses (PIV-1, PIV-2, PIV-3 and PIV-4), Human Coronaviruses (HCoV) (CoV OC43, CoV NL63, CoV HKU1 and CoV 229E), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) A/B, Rhinovirus, Metapneumovirus, Enterovirus, Bocavirus, Adenovirus, Parechovirus and bacterial pathogens such as Mycoplasma pneumonia, Moraxella catarrhalis, Bordetella pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae type B in the clinical samples.
Demographic, epidemiological and clinical data were obtained from hospital electronic information system medical records. For the statistical evaluation of the data, SPSS 20.0 Microsoft for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). was used and P <0.05 value was considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | – | –COVID positive infants |
| Group 2 | – | –RSV positive infants |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 days to 1 month
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Newborns with respiratory symptoms
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- During the study period respiratory symptoms at the NICU admission will be included
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Congenital abnormalities
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Oxygen status and evaluation of neonatal intensive care stay
Time frame: 3 months
Total neonatal intensive care duration, total duration of oxygen supplement
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for RSV Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study on the Immune Response and Safety of Vaccine Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Given to Chinese Adults 18 to 59 Years of Age at Increased Risk of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate JCXH-108, an mRNA-based Vaccine Against RSV
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Infectious Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of a Recombinant Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine in Older Adults Aged 60 Years and Older
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes and Pharmacotherapy Effectiveness in the VA Health Care System (COPE-VA)
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 Infection, RSV
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Zelicapavir Compared With Placebo in Adults With RSV Who Are at High Risk for Severe Disease
RSV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of RSV Infection and Covid19, run by Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Oxygen status and evaluation of neonatal intensive care stay (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2020.