Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT04536844
Telehealth Follow-up in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
A study testing Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants) and Conventional prescheduled follow-up in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Treatment Compliance, run by Vestre Viken Hospital Trust at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The main objective of the present project is to test the effect of a customized Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO)-based telehealth follow-up compared to a conventional pre-scheduled outpatient follow-up to monitor disease activity and expenses associated with the follow-up in patients with RA Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Treatment Compliance
- What is being tested?
- Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants) and Conventional prescheduled follow-up
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2020to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >18 years
- Fulfilling the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) / American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 classification criteria for RA
- Being in remission (RAPID 3 score <=3)
- Able to use the electronic app
- Able to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- <18 years
- Severe cognitive failure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Telehealth Follow-up in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. A Noninferiority Randomized Control Trial
The main objective of the present project is to test the effect of a customized Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO)-based telehealth follow-up compared to a conventional pre-scheduled outpatient follow-up to monitor disease activity and expenses associated with the follow-up in patients with RA
Read the detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease with a high burden both for the patient and society. Outcomes for the individuals living with RA have been improved and the majority of RA patients are now in remission or low disease activity status. RA patients continue to be followed up by pre-scheduled visits, which may compromise accessibility for the sickest and thus, quality of care. The introduction of patient-initiated follow-up leads to a reduction in the use of outpatient clinic services without compromising outcomes. Self-monitoring and remote patient monitoring are facilitated by electronic innovative health tools. Among RA patients with low disease activity or remission, a Patient-Reported Outcome-based telehealth follow-up for tight control of disease activity in RA can achieve similar disease control as conventional outpatient follow-up and is likely to reduce the costs. Thus, the main objective of the present project is to test the effect of a customized PRO-based telehealth follow-up compared to a conventional prescheduled outpatient follow-up to monitor disease activity and expenses associated with the follow-up in Norwegian RA patients.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Treatment Compliance
- Being tested
- Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants), Conventional prescheduled follow-up
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Patient Compliance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants)Device
An electronic application available both on Apple store and Android play which the patients can download for free will be used to collect data from the Telehealth follow up group. This group will be compared to conventional outpatient clinic follow-up group.
Conventional prescheduled follow-upOther
Patients will be followed in the outpatient clinic by prescheduled follow-up
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Telehealth follow-up group | Experimental | Rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission who will be followed by an electronic app Receives: Device: Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants) |
| Conventional follow-up group | Placebo comparator | Rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission who will attend conventional prescheduled visits in the outpatient clinic Receives: Other: Conventional prescheduled follow-up |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of patients suffering a flare
comparison of the number of patients suffering a flare in each group (Flare is defined as a routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3) score >=3)
Measured: 52 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Satisfaction rates
Compare satisfaction rates (as measured by Visual analog scale (VAS) satisfaction with the follow-up procedures) among the 2 patient groups
Measured: 52 weeks
Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)
CDAI for both groups at baseline and at 52 weeks
Measured: 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Sep 2020
- Study start15 Jun 2020
- Primary completion15 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a pragmatic noninferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Norwegian RA patients in clinical remission (based on RAPID3 score). The patients will be allocated to 2 groups. One group will be followed up by an electronic app, while the second group will attend conventional prescheduled visits in the outpatient clinic of Martina Hansens Hospital. A computer-generated random number sequence will be used for the randomization of the RA patients.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- London School of Economics and Political Science, Helse Sor-Ost
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anne Bull Haaversen, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
- Investigators
- Andreas Diamantopoulos, MD, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Martina Hansens Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04536844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 33172
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T, Williams B, Gabriel S, Lassere M, Johns N, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1316-22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
PubMed 24550173McBain H, Shipley M, Olaleye A, Moore S, Newman S. A patient-initiated DMARD self-monitoring service for people with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis on methotrexate: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1343-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207768. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
PubMed 26290587Haugeberg G, Hansen IJ, Soldal DM, Sokka T. Ten years of change in clinical disease status and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: results based on standardized monitoring of patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Aug 20;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0716-0.
PubMed 26290061de Jong MJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Romberg-Camps MJ, Becx MC, Maljaars JP, Cilissen M, van Bodegraven AA, Mahmmod N, Markus T, Hameeteman WM, Dijkstra G, Masclee AA, Boonen A, Winkens B, van Tubergen A, Jonkers DM, Pierik MJ. Telemedicine for management of inflammatory bowel disease (myIBDcoach): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):959-968. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31327-2. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PubMed 28716313de Thurah A, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Axelsen M, Fredberg U, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NHI, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Laurberg TB, Tarp U, Lomborg K, Maribo T. Tele-Health Followup Strategy for Tight Control of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):353-360. doi: 10.1002/acr.23280. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
PubMed 28511288van Riel P, Alten R, Combe B, Abdulganieva D, Bousquet P, Courtenay M, Curiale C, Gomez-Centeno A, Haugeberg G, Leeb B, Puolakka K, Ravelli A, Rintelen B, Sarzi-Puttini P. Improving inflammatory arthritis management through tighter monitoring of patients and the use of innovative electronic tools. RMD Open. 2016 Nov 24;2(2):e000302. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000302. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27933206Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M, Swearingen C, Harrington T. A proposed approach to recognise "near-remission" quantitatively without formal joint counts or laboratory tests: a patient self-report questionnaire routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) score as a guide to a "continuous quality improvement" s. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl 43):S-60-5; quiz S-66-73.
PubMed 17083765
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Telehealth Follow-up in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. A Noninferiority Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04536844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 33172
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis, Treatment Compliance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vestre Viken Hospital TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- London School of Economics and Political Science, Helse Sor-Ost
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the present project is to test the effect of a customized Patient-Reported-Outcome (PRO)-based telehealth follow-up compared to a conventional pre-scheduled outpatient follow-up to monitor disease activity and expenses associated with the follow-up in patients with RA
Detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease with a high burden both for the patient and society. Outcomes for the individuals living with RA have been improved and the majority of RA patients are now in remission or low disease activity status. RA patients continue to be followed up by pre-scheduled visits, which may compromise accessibility for the sickest and thus, quality of care. The introduction of patient-initiated follow-up leads to a reduction in the use of outpatient clinic services without compromising outcomes. Self-monitoring and remote patient monitoring are facilitated by electronic innovative health tools. Among RA patients with low disease activity or remission, a Patient-Reported Outcome-based telehealth follow-up for tight control of disease activity in RA can achieve similar disease control as conventional outpatient follow-up and is likely to reduce the costs. Thus, the main objective of the present project is to test the effect of a customized PRO-based telehealth follow-up compared to a conventional prescheduled outpatient follow-up to monitor disease activity and expenses associated with the follow-up in Norwegian RA patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a pragmatic noninferiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Norwegian RA patients in clinical remission (based on RAPID3 score). The patients will be allocated to 2 groups. One group will be followed up by an electronic app, while the second group will attend conventional prescheduled visits in the outpatient clinic of Martina Hansens Hospital. A computer-generated random number sequence will be used for the randomization of the RA patients.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Telehealth follow-up group | Experimental | Device: Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants)Rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission who will be followed by an electronic app |
| Conventional follow-up group | Placebo comparator | Other: Conventional prescheduled follow-upRheumatoid arthritis patients in remission who will attend conventional prescheduled visits in the outpatient clinic |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- >18 years
- Fulfilling the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) / American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2010 classification criteria for RA
- Being in remission (RAPID 3 score <=3)
- Able to use the electronic app
- Able to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- <18 years
- Severe cognitive failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants)An electronic application available both on Apple store and Android play which the patients can download for free will be used to collect data from the Telehealth follow up group. This group will be compared to conventional outpatient clinic follow-up group. | Device | Telehealth follow-up group |
| Conventional prescheduled follow-upPatients will be followed in the outpatient clinic by prescheduled follow-up | Other | Conventional follow-up group |
Primary outcome
Number of patients suffering a flare
Time frame: 52 weeks
comparison of the number of patients suffering a flare in each group (Flare is defined as a routine assessment of patient index data 3 (RAPID3) score >=3)
2 secondary outcomes
Satisfaction rates
Time frame: 52 weeks
Clinical disease activity index (CDAI)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 24550173Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Carmona L, Wolfe F, Vos T, Williams B, Gabriel S, Lassere M, Johns N, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of rheumatoid arthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1316-22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204627. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 26290587McBain H, Shipley M, Olaleye A, Moore S, Newman S. A patient-initiated DMARD self-monitoring service for people with rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis on methotrexate: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1343-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207768. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 26290061Haugeberg G, Hansen IJ, Soldal DM, Sokka T. Ten years of change in clinical disease status and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: results based on standardized monitoring of patients in an ordinary outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Aug 20;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0716-0.
- Background: PubMed 28716313de Jong MJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Romberg-Camps MJ, Becx MC, Maljaars JP, Cilissen M, van Bodegraven AA, Mahmmod N, Markus T, Hameeteman WM, Dijkstra G, Masclee AA, Boonen A, Winkens B, van Tubergen A, Jonkers DM, Pierik MJ. Telemedicine for management of inflammatory bowel disease (myIBDcoach): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):959-968. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31327-2. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
- Background: PubMed 28511288de Thurah A, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Axelsen M, Fredberg U, Schougaard LMV, Hjollund NHI, Pfeiffer-Jensen M, Laurberg TB, Tarp U, Lomborg K, Maribo T. Tele-Health Followup Strategy for Tight Control of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Mar;70(3):353-360. doi: 10.1002/acr.23280. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
- Background: PubMed 27933206van Riel P, Alten R, Combe B, Abdulganieva D, Bousquet P, Courtenay M, Curiale C, Gomez-Centeno A, Haugeberg G, Leeb B, Puolakka K, Ravelli A, Rintelen B, Sarzi-Puttini P. Improving inflammatory arthritis management through tighter monitoring of patients and the use of innovative electronic tools. RMD Open. 2016 Nov 24;2(2):e000302. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000302. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 17083765Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M, Swearingen C, Harrington T. A proposed approach to recognise "near-remission" quantitatively without formal joint counts or laboratory tests: a patient self-report questionnaire routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) score as a guide to a "continuous quality improvement" s. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl 43):S-60-5; quiz S-66-73.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Diamantopoulos, MD, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Martina Hansens Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile application MyDignio (follow disease activity by assigning questionnaires to participants) and Conventional prescheduled follow-up in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Treatment Compliance, run by Vestre Viken Hospital Trust at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of patients suffering a flare (time frame: 52 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04536844, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2020.