Arthroplasty ComplicationsPhase 4NCT04539730
Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Blocks (ACB)
A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal bupivacaine and Drug: SoC Ropivacaine in people with Arthroplasty Complications and Adductor Canal Block, run by University of Miami.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether liposomal bupivacaine is superior to normal bupivacaine in terms of providing better pain control postoperatively after total knee arthroplasty. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty Complications, Adductor Canal Block, Peripheral Nerve Block
- What is being tested?
- Liposomal bupivacaine and Drug: SoC Ropivacaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2021to 1 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject is scheduled for elective unilateral primary TKA
- The subject is ≥ 18 years
- The subject's primary anesthesia care team has planned for a neuraxial anesthetic (i.e. spinal, epidural or combined-spinal epidural)
- The patient consents for an adductor canal block
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients unwilling or unable to consent to participate in the study.
- Prisoners.
- Pregnancy.
- Reported to have mental illness or belonging to a vulnerable population.
- Subject is < 18 years of age.
- Patients receiving general anesthesia for the total knee arthroplasty.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Subject has impaired decision-making capacity per discretion of the Investigator.
- Any condition for which the primary anesthesia care team deems neuraxial anesthesia inappropriate.
- Significant pre-existing neuropathy on the operative limb.
- Significant chronic pain disorders (i.e. fibromyalgia, complex regional pain syndrome I \& II, among others).
- Subject has sustained a significant trauma to the operative knee.
- Chronic Opioid Use (daily or almost daily use of opioids for > 3 months).
- Known hypersensitivity and/or allergies to local anesthetics.
- Previous surgery on the affected knee excluding arthroscopic or open meniscectomy.
- Patients with impaired renal function such that they cannot receive IV Toradol.
About this study
Official title: Does the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine to the Adductor Canal Block Impact Narcotic Use After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Blind Randomized Control Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether liposomal bupivacaine is superior to normal bupivacaine in terms of providing better pain control postoperatively after total knee arthroplasty.
- Being tested
- Liposomal bupivacaine, Drug: SoC Ropivacaine
- Keywords
- Total knee arthroplasty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liposomal bupivacaineDrug
Also called Exparel
266 mg or 20 ml Liposomal Bupivacaine injectable solution
Drug: SoC RopivacaineProcedure or surgery
0.5% (5mg/mL) 20 mL single dose SOC anesthetic Ropivacaine.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine Standard of Care Group | Active comparator | Participants undergoing elective Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) surgery that are randomized to the control group will undergo an ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) with standard of care (SoC) Ropivacaine post TKA surgery. Receives: Procedure: Drug: SoC Ropivacaine |
| Liposomal Bupivacaine Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants undergoing elective TKA surgery that are randomized to the intervention group will undergo an ultrasound-guided ACB with Liposomal Bupivacaine post TKA surgery. Receives: Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine; Procedure: Drug: SoC Ropivacaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Opioid Use
Opioid use after SoC TKA surgery will be evaluated as morphine milligram equivalents
Measured: Up to 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
Distance Ambulated with physical therapist
Average daily distance ambulated using the 6 minute walk test
Measured: Up to 5 days
Length of hospitalization
Number of days of hospitalization after elective admission for TKA surgery
Measured: Up to 5 days
Incidence of events of PONV
Incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be reported throughout the duration of hospitalization
Measured: Up to 5 days
Number of participants requiring narcotic prescriptions
The number of participants that require further narcotic prescriptions will be reported
Measured: 2 weeks
Incidence of urinary retention from narcotic use
Incidence of urinary retention from narcotic use will be measured via the need for urethral catheterization.
Measured: 2 Weeks
Post-Operative Pain Score
Post-Operative Pain will be measured via a self-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. The VAS Pain score ranges from 1-10 with 1 being free of pain and 10 being the most pain.
Measured: Up to 5 days
Patient Satisfaction as per the Knee Society Score
The Knee society score has a total score ranging from 100-0. Scores between 100 and 85 points are considered excellent results, scores between 84 and 70 points are considered good results. Scores between 69 and 60 points are considered fair, and scores less than 60 are considered poor results
Measured: Up to Week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Sep 2020
- Study start1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Did not acquire funding to pursue study
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of MiamiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Miami
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jaime Carvajal Alba, University of Miami
- Investigators
- Jaime Carvajal, MD, Principal investigator, University of Miami
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04539730
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20200003
- Status last verified
- Dec 2021
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Dec 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
PubMed 25376972Thacher RR, Hickernell TR, Grosso MJ, Shah R, Cooper HJ, Maniker R, Brown AR, Geller J. Decreased risk of knee buckling with adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.008. eCollection 2017 Dec.
PubMed 29204497Singh PM, Borle A, Trikha A, Michos L, Sinha A, Goudra B. Role of Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):675-688.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
PubMed 28029532Schroer WC, Diesfeld PG, LeMarr AR, Morton DJ, Reedy ME. Does Extended-Release Liposomal Bupivacaine Better Control Pain Than Bupivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
PubMed 26117072Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, Reid JJ, Post RE, Schoifet SD. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Liposomal Bupivacaine and Periarticular Injection Are Not Superior to Single-Shot Intra-articular Injection for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
PubMed 27113945Bagsby DT, Ireland PH, Meneghini RM. Liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional periarticular injection for pain control after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1687-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
PubMed 24793570Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):574-81. doi: 10.1177/000313481207800540.
PubMed 22546131Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
PubMed 25282071Zhao B, Ma X, Zhang J, Ma J, Cao Q. The efficacy of local liposomal bupivacaine infiltration on pain and recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14092. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014092.
PubMed 30653126
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Dec 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does the Addition of Liposomal Bupivacaine to the Adductor Canal Block Impact Narcotic Use After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective, Blind Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04539730
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20200003
- Keywords
- Total knee arthroplasty
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Did not acquire funding to pursue study
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MiamiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether liposomal bupivacaine is superior to normal bupivacaine in terms of providing better pain control postoperatively after total knee arthroplasty.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine Standard of Care Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Drug: SoC RopivacaineParticipants undergoing elective Total Knee Arthoplasty (TKA) surgery that are randomized to the control group will undergo an ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) with standard of care (SoC) Ropivacaine post TKA surgery. |
| Liposomal Bupivacaine Intervention Group | Experimental | Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine, Procedure: Drug: SoC RopivacaineParticipants undergoing elective TKA surgery that are randomized to the intervention group will undergo an ultrasound-guided ACB with Liposomal Bupivacaine post TKA surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The subject is scheduled for elective unilateral primary TKA
- The subject is ≥ 18 years
- The subject's primary anesthesia care team has planned for a neuraxial anesthetic (i.e. spinal, epidural or combined-spinal epidural)
- The patient consents for an adductor canal block
- Willing and able to sign an informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patients unwilling or unable to consent to participate in the study.
- Prisoners.
- Pregnancy.
- Reported to have mental illness or belonging to a vulnerable population.
- Subject is < 18 years of age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liposomal bupivacaineAlso: Exparel266 mg or 20 ml Liposomal Bupivacaine injectable solution | Drug | Liposomal Bupivacaine Intervention Group |
| Drug: SoC Ropivacaine0.5% (5mg/mL) 20 mL single dose SOC anesthetic Ropivacaine. | Procedure or surgery | Liposomal Bupivacaine Intervention Group, Ropivacaine Standard of Care Group |
Primary outcome
Opioid Use
Time frame: Up to 2 weeks
Opioid use after SoC TKA surgery will be evaluated as morphine milligram equivalents
7 secondary outcomes
Distance Ambulated with physical therapist
Time frame: Up to 5 days
Length of hospitalization
Time frame: Up to 5 days
Incidence of events of PONV
Time frame: Up to 5 days
Number of participants requiring narcotic prescriptions
Time frame: 2 weeks
Incidence of urinary retention from narcotic use
Time frame: 2 Weeks
Post-Operative Pain Score
Time frame: Up to 5 days
Patient Satisfaction as per the Knee Society Score
Time frame: Up to Week 6
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Dec 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25376972Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
- Background: PubMed 29204497Thacher RR, Hickernell TR, Grosso MJ, Shah R, Cooper HJ, Maniker R, Brown AR, Geller J. Decreased risk of knee buckling with adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 15;3(4):281-285. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.008. eCollection 2017 Dec.
- Background: PubMed 28029532Singh PM, Borle A, Trikha A, Michos L, Sinha A, Goudra B. Role of Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Infiltration in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):675-688.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.042. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 26117072Schroer WC, Diesfeld PG, LeMarr AR, Morton DJ, Reedy ME. Does Extended-Release Liposomal Bupivacaine Better Control Pain Than Bupivacaine After Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Sep;30(9 Suppl):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 27113945Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, Reid JJ, Post RE, Schoifet SD. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Liposomal Bupivacaine and Periarticular Injection Are Not Superior to Single-Shot Intra-articular Injection for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 24793570Bagsby DT, Ireland PH, Meneghini RM. Liposomal bupivacaine versus traditional periarticular injection for pain control after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Aug;29(8):1687-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Apr 4.
- Background: PubMed 22546131Haas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):574-81. doi: 10.1177/000313481207800540.
- Background: PubMed 25282071Surdam JW, Licini DJ, Baynes NT, Arce BR. The use of exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) to manage postoperative pain in unilateral total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 30653126Zhao B, Ma X, Zhang J, Ma J, Cao Q. The efficacy of local liposomal bupivacaine infiltration on pain and recovery after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e14092. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014092.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Arthroplasty Complications
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Wound Surgical, Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadro-Iliac Plane Block in Elective Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
Postoperative Pain, Hip Arthroplasty, Total
Recruiting
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Post-knee Arthroplasty Chronic Pain.
Chronic Post-surgical Pain, Chronic Post Operative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaime Carvajal, MD principal investigator
University of Miami
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal bupivacaine and Drug: SoC Ropivacaine in people with Arthroplasty Complications and Adductor Canal Block, run by University of Miami.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Opioid Use (time frame: Up to 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04539730, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2021.