Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver DiseaseNCT04546360
Spleen Stiffness Combined With Liver Stiffness Measured by 2D-SWE for the Screening of High-risk Varices in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2004)
An observational study of Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease and Variceal Hemorrhage, run by Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province at 6 sites in China.
Trial summary
Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease, Variceal Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 381 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 8 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2022
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Day
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
Who may be able to join
- age 18-75 years;
- confirmed cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
- without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
- scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement;
- estimated survival time>24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease score<19, and without liver transplant;
- with written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
- accepted primary prevention (non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation);
- time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodenoscopy>14 days;
- diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma;
- absence of spleen or splenectomy.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
China6 sites
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Guangxi
Lanzhou University
Lanzhou
The Central Hospital of Lishui City
Lishui
Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang
Shenyang
Tianjin Second People's Hospital
Tianjin
Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region
Xi'zang
About this study
Official title: Spleen Stiffness Combined With Liver Stiffness Measured by Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for the Screening of High-risk Varices in Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2004)
Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.
Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.
Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Meanwhile, numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on 2D-SWE is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.
Read the detailed description
Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.
Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.
Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study in seven centers including LanZhou University, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region, The Central Hospital of Lishui City and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.
- Being tested
- Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.
- Keywords
- Spleen stiffness, Liver stiffness, Two-dimensional shear wave elastography, High-risk varices
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.Procedure or surgery
Time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodendoscopy is within 2 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Overall eligible participants | Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography, gallbladder wall thickness, spleen thickness, spleen long diameter and serological examination (platelet count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, creatinine, albumin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio). Receives: Procedure: Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness
To assess the accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness to avoid unnecessary esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
Measured: 1 day
Secondary outcomes (2)
Accuracy of LSPS model base on two-dimensional shear wave elastography
To assess the accuracy of LSPS (liver stiffness-spleen size- to platelet ration risk score) base on two-dimensional shear wave elastography for high-risk varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
Measured: 1 day
Rate of hemodynamic responder of patients receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy
Rate of hemodynamic responder of patients receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy assessed by spleen stiffness
Measured: 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2020
- Study start8 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2022
- Study completion31 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 381 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Day
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LanZhou University, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Shenyang Sixth People's Hospital, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region, The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xiaolong Qi, Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province
- Investigators
- Xiaolong Qi, MD, Study chair, LanZhou UniversityLinxue Qian, MD, Study chair, Beijing Friendship HospitalFengmei Wang, MD, Principal investigator, Tianjin Second People's HospitalYe Gu, MD, Principal investigator, Shenyang Sixth People's HospitalChao Liu, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous RegionChuxiao Shao, MD, Principal investigator, The Central Hospital of Lishui CityGuo Zhang, MD, Principal investigator, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous RegionSumei Ma, MD, Principal investigator, LanZhou University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546360
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHESS2004
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 5 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Qi X, Berzigotti A, Cardenas A, Sarin SK. Emerging non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;3(10):708-719. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30232-2.
PubMed 30215362de Franchis R; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 26047908Maurice JB, Brodkin E, Arnold F, Navaratnam A, Paine H, Khawar S, Dhar A, Patch D, O'Beirne J, Mookerjee R, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis E, Westbrook RH. Validation of the Baveno VI criteria to identify low risk cirrhotic patients not requiring endoscopic surveillance for varices. J Hepatol. 2016 Nov;65(5):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
PubMed 27388923Augustin S, Pons M, Maurice JB, Bureau C, Stefanescu H, Ney M, Blasco H, Procopet B, Tsochatzis E, Westbrook RH, Bosch J, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG, Genesca J. Expanding the Baveno VI criteria for the screening of varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2017 Dec;66(6):1980-1988. doi: 10.1002/hep.29363. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
PubMed 28696510Hirooka M, Ochi H, Koizumi Y, Kisaka Y, Abe M, Ikeda Y, Matsuura B, Hiasa Y, Onji M. Splenic elasticity measured with real-time tissue elastography is a marker of portal hypertension. Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):960-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110156. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
PubMed 21926379Cooke GS, Andrieux-Meyer I, Applegate TL, Atun R, Burry JR, Cheinquer H, Dusheiko G, Feld JJ, Gore C, Griswold MG, Hamid S, Hellard ME, Hou J, Howell J, Jia J, Kravchenko N, Lazarus JV, Lemoine M, Lesi OA, Maistat L, McMahon BJ, Razavi H, Roberts T, Simmons B, Sonderup MW, Spearman CW, Taylor BE, Thomas DL, Waked I, Ward JW, Wiktor SZ; Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commissioners. Accelerating the elimination of viral hepatitis: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):135-184. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30270-X.
PubMed 30647010Kim HY, So YH, Kim W, Ahn DW, Jung YJ, Woo H, Kim D, Kim MY, Baik SK. Non-invasive response prediction in prophylactic carvedilol therapy for cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. J Hepatol. 2019 Mar;70(3):412-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
PubMed 30389550
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spleen Stiffness Combined With Liver Stiffness Measured by Two-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for the Screening of High-risk Varices in Patients With Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease (CHESS2004)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546360
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHESS2004
- Keywords
- Spleen stiffness, Liver stiffness, Two-dimensional shear wave elastography, High-risk varices
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 381 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu ProvinceUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- LanZhou University, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Shenyang Sixth People's Hospital, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region, The Central Hospital of Lishui City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
- Study start
- 8 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.
Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.
Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Meanwhile, numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on 2D-SWE is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.
Detailed description
Variceal hemorrhage is the serious complication in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). To evaluate the bleeding risk of varices, esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) should be performed. However, EGD is limited by its invasiveness and uncomfortableness. The Baveno VI criteria recommended that EGD could be spared in patients with liver stiffness (LS) based on transient elastography (TE) < 20 kPa and platelet count >150000/mm3. However, only 30% of patients can spare EGD. In order to expand the screening criteria, Expanded-Baveno VI proposed that by using LS (TE)<25 kPa and platelet count >110000/mm3, 40% of patients can safely avoid EGD. It is worth noting that the Baveno VI criteria is based on the European and American compensatory cirrhosis cohort (55% for hepatitis C, 14% for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 13% for alcoholic hepatitis, 8% for hepatitis B), Expanded-Baveno VI is also of good diagnostic value for hepatitis C, alcoholic, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis of cACLD. About 257 million people worldwide are infected with hepatitis B virus, and about 80 million people in China alone are infected with hepatitis B virus. Infected with hepatitis B virus is the main etiology of patients with cACLD in china. Hence, Baveno VI and Expanded-Baveno VI may not be suitable for patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD.
Previous studies have shown that LS has a significant correlation with the severity of portal hypertension. Nevertheless, LS only has a good correlation with portal pressure in the early stage of portal hypertension (hepatic vein pressure gradient ≤10mm Hg), because liver fibrosis is the main cause of portal hypertension in this period. In the late stage of liver cirrhosis, the involvement of hyperdynamic circulation and increased portal blood flow, spleen stiffness (SS) may have a better correlation with HVPG than that of LS. Therefore, SS provides a reliable basis for the hemodynamic changes that occur during the development of liver cirrhosis and avoids the limitations caused by the measurement of LS. Previous study has found that changes in SS before and after non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) as primary prophylaxis may be a promising non-invasive tool for predicting hemodynamic response in patients with high-risk varices.
Since SS is much higher than LS, the maximum threshold of 75 kPa measured with TE may not be sufficient to evaluate the hardness of the spleen. Numerous studies have found that the success rate of measuring SS and LS based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography is higher than that of TE. Hence, CHESS2004 study in seven centers including LanZhou University, Tianjin Second People's Hospital, Sixth People's Hospital of Shenyang, Hospital of the Chengdu Office of the People's Government of Tibet Autonomous Region, The Central Hospital of Lishui City and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, aims to establish a standard for predicting high-risk varices that is more suitable in patients with hepatitis B virus-dominant cACLD. In addition, non-invasive means of SS is used to evaluate the hemodynamic response of patients with high-risk varices receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Day
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Overall eligible participants | – | Procedure: Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.Eligible participants will receive standard esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography, gallbladder wall thickness, spleen thickness, spleen long diameter and serological examination (platelet count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, creatinine, albumin, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- age 18-75 years;
- confirmed cirrhosis based on liver biopsy or clinical findings;
- without decompensated events (e.g. ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy);
- scheduled to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement;
- estimated survival time>24 months, and model for end-stage liver disease score<19, and without liver transplant;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- contradictions for esophagogastroduodenoscopy;
- accepted primary prevention (non-selective beta blockers or endoscopic variceal ligation);
- time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodenoscopy>14 days;
- diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma;
- absence of spleen or splenectomy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy, spleen stiffness measurement and liver stiffness measurement.Time frame between elastography measurement and esophagogastroduodendoscopy is within 2 weeks. | Procedure or surgery | Overall eligible participants |
Primary outcome
Accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness
Time frame: 1 day
To assess the accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness to avoid unnecessary esophagogasrtoduodendoscopy in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease
2 secondary outcomes
Accuracy of LSPS model base on two-dimensional shear wave elastography
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of hemodynamic responder of patients receiving prophylaxis NSBBs therapy
Time frame: 1 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Sep 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30215362Qi X, Berzigotti A, Cardenas A, Sarin SK. Emerging non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and monitoring of portal hypertension. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;3(10):708-719. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30232-2.
- Background: PubMed 26047908de Franchis R; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):743-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27388923Maurice JB, Brodkin E, Arnold F, Navaratnam A, Paine H, Khawar S, Dhar A, Patch D, O'Beirne J, Mookerjee R, Pinzani M, Tsochatzis E, Westbrook RH. Validation of the Baveno VI criteria to identify low risk cirrhotic patients not requiring endoscopic surveillance for varices. J Hepatol. 2016 Nov;65(5):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.021. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
- Background: PubMed 28696510Augustin S, Pons M, Maurice JB, Bureau C, Stefanescu H, Ney M, Blasco H, Procopet B, Tsochatzis E, Westbrook RH, Bosch J, Berzigotti A, Abraldes JG, Genesca J. Expanding the Baveno VI criteria for the screening of varices in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease. Hepatology. 2017 Dec;66(6):1980-1988. doi: 10.1002/hep.29363. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 21926379Hirooka M, Ochi H, Koizumi Y, Kisaka Y, Abe M, Ikeda Y, Matsuura B, Hiasa Y, Onji M. Splenic elasticity measured with real-time tissue elastography is a marker of portal hypertension. Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):960-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110156. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 30647010Cooke GS, Andrieux-Meyer I, Applegate TL, Atun R, Burry JR, Cheinquer H, Dusheiko G, Feld JJ, Gore C, Griswold MG, Hamid S, Hellard ME, Hou J, Howell J, Jia J, Kravchenko N, Lazarus JV, Lemoine M, Lesi OA, Maistat L, McMahon BJ, Razavi H, Roberts T, Simmons B, Sonderup MW, Spearman CW, Taylor BE, Thomas DL, Waked I, Ward JW, Wiktor SZ; Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commissioners. Accelerating the elimination of viral hepatitis: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;4(2):135-184. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30270-X.
- Background: PubMed 30389550Kim HY, So YH, Kim W, Ahn DW, Jung YJ, Woo H, Kim D, Kim MY, Baik SK. Non-invasive response prediction in prophylactic carvedilol therapy for cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. J Hepatol. 2019 Mar;70(3):412-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Liver Stiffness Changes by iLivTouch to Predict Liver-Related Events in MAFLD
MAFLD
RecruitingPhase 4
Non-selective Beta-blocker in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
Portal Hypertension, Hepatic Decompensation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Baveno VIII Criteria for Portal Hypertension in Egyptian Patients
Compensated Liver Disease, Esophageal Varices
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of Metabolic Disorders on cACLD Outcomes
Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease
RecruitingObservational study
2D-shear Wave Spleen Elastography in Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension and High-risk Varices
Portal Hypertension Related to Cirrhosis, Esophageal Varices
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaolong Qi, MD study chair
LanZhou University
Linxue Qian, MD study chair
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Fengmei Wang, MD principal investigator
Tianjin Second People's Hospital
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease and Variceal Hemorrhage, run by Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Institute of Gansu Province at 6 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of combined model of spleen stiffness and liver stiffness (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04546360, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2024.