Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaPhase 2REMoDL-ANCT04546620
Acalabrutinib in Combination With R-CHOP for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
A Phase 2 study testing R-CHOP and R-CHOP + acalabrutinib in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 33 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the addition of Acalabrutinib to current standard therapy of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone (R-CHOP) for patients with previously untreated CD20 positive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) requiring full course chemoimmunotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- R-CHOP and R-CHOP + acalabrutinib
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 453 participants
- Where
- 33 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 19 Oct 2021to May 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed DLBCL, expressing CD20. Sufficient diagnostic material must be available to forward to HMDS for gene expression profiling and central pathology review. The following diagnoses by 2016 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms may be included:
- DLBCL, not otherwise specified (NOS)
- T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma
- Epstein-Barr virus positive DLBCL, NOS
- ALK-positive large B-cell lymphoma
- HHV8-positive DLBCL, NOS
Show all 21Show fewer
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (double-hit or triple-hit lymphoma)
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma, NOS
- At least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, defined as >1.5 cm in its longest dimension as measured by CT.
- Not previously treated for lymphoma and fit enough to receive combination chemoimmunotherapy with curative intent.
- Stage IAX (bulk defined as lymph node mass [either single or conglomerate] diameter >7.5cm) to stage IV disease and deemed to require a full course of chemotherapy. Patients with non-bulky IE disease will not be eligible.
- ECOG performance status 0-2 or 3 if this is directly attributable to lymphoma.
- Adequate bone marrow function with platelets > 100x109/L; neutrophils > 1.0x109/L at study entry, unless lower figures are attributable to lymphoma.
- Measured or calculated creatinine clearance > 30mls/min, (calculated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault [(140-Age) x Mass (kg) x (1.04 (for women) or 1.23 (for men))/Serum Creatinine (μmolL)]).
- Serum bilirubin < 35μmol/L and transaminases < 1.5x upper limit of normal at time of study entry.
- Cardiac function sufficient to tolerate 300mg/m2 of doxorubicin. A pre-treatment echocardiogram or MUGA is required to establish baseline LVEF equal to or greater than institutional normal range.
- No concurrent uncontrolled medical condition.
- Life expectancy > 3 months.
- Aged 16 years or above.
- Willing and able to participate in all required evaluations and procedures in this study protocol including swallowing capsules without difficulty.
- Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Previous history of treated or untreated indolent lymphoma. However newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who are found to also have small cell infiltration of the bone marrow or other diagnostic material (discordant lymphoma) will be eligible.
- Patients who have received immunisation with a live vaccine within four weeks prior to enrolment will be ineligible.
- Diagnosis of primary mediastinal lymphoma.
- Diagnosis of primary Central Nervous System lymphoma or secondary CNS involvement. Those patients presenting with neurological symptoms should be investigated for CNS involvement. Routine CNS imaging or diagnostic lumbar puncture will not be required in the absence of symptoms.
- History of stroke or intracranial haemorrhage in preceding 6 months.
- History of bleeding diathesis (eg, haemophilia, von Willebrand disease).
Show all 28Show fewer
- History of drug-specific hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to any study drug (including active product or excipient components).
- Requires or receiving anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent antagonists (eg, phenprocoumon) within 7 days of first dose of acalabrutinib. However patients using therapeutic low molecule weight heparin or low dose aspirin will be eligible as will those receiving direct oral anticoagulants.
- Prior exposure to an inhibitor in the BCR pathway (eg, Btk inhibitors, phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K), or Syk inhibitors) or BCL-2 inhibitor (eg, ABT-199).
- Requires treatment with a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitor/inducer.
- Requires treatment with proton pump inhibitors (eg, omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, rabeprazole, or pantoprazole). Patients receiving proton pump inhibitors should switch to short-acting H2-receptor antagonists or antacids prior to the commencement of acalabrutinib, if randomised to receive acalabrutinib.
- Active significant infection (e.g. progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)).
- Uncontrolled autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP).
- Major surgery in the preceding 4 weeks of first dose of acalabrutinib (if applicable). If a subject had major surgery, they must have recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from the intervention before the first dose of acalabrutinib (if applicable).
- Corticosteroid use >30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, for purposes other than for lymphoma symptom control. Patients receiving corticosteroid treatment with <30 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent must be documented to be on a stable dose of at least 4 weeks' duration prior to the start of Cycle 1. If glucocorticoid treatment is urgently required for lymphoma symptom control prior to the start of study treatment, prednisone 100 mg or equivalent could be given for a maximum of 14 days as a prephase. A dose of up to 30mg or prednisolone or equivalent may be used during the screening phase to control symptoms.
- Significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, or any Class 3 or 4 cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification.
- Serological positivity for Hepatitis B, C, or known HIV infection. As per standard of care, prior to initiation of immunochemotherapy, the results of hepatitis serology should be known prior to commencement of therapy.
- Positive test results for chronic HBV infection (defined as positive HBsAg serology) will not be eligible. Patients with occult or prior HBV infection (defined as negative HBsAg and positive total HBcAb) will not be eligible. Patients who have protective titres of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) after vaccination will be eligible.
- Patients positive for HCV antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is negative for HCV RNA.
- Women who can bear children must agree to use two highly effective forms of contraception or abstinence during the study and for 12 months after the last treatment dose.
- Breastfeeding or pregnant women.
- Men who can father children must agree to use two highly effective forms of contraception with additional barrier or abstinence during the study and for 12 months after the last treatment dose.
- Men must agree to refrain from sperm donation during the study and for 12 months after the last treatment dose.
- Serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to affect participation or that may compromise the ability to give informed consent.
- Prior malignancy (other than DLBCL), except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer from which the subject has been disease free for ≥ 2 years or which will not limit survival to < 2 years.
- Has difficulty with or is unable to swallow oral medication, or has significant gastrointestinal disease, resection of the stomach or small bowel, partial or complete bowel obstruction or gastric restrictions and bariatric surgery, such as gastric bypass that would limit absorption of oral medication.
- Any immunotherapy within 4 weeks of 1st dose of the study.
- Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
33 sites in 1 country.
33 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom33 sites
Monklands Hospital
Airdrie
Victoria Hospital
Blackpool
University Hospital Dorset NHS Foundation Trust (Bournemouth and Poole Hospitals)
Bournemouth
Queens Hospital
Burton-on-Trent
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge
East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Canterbury, Kent
Colchester General Hospital
Colchester, Essex
Royal Derby Hospital
Derby
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
Exeter
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow
Ipswich Hospital
Ipswich
St James Hospital
Leeds
Leicester Royal Infirmary
Leicester
Chase Farm and Barnet Hospitals
London
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust
London
University College London Hospital
London
Maidstone Hospital
Maidstone
The Christie Hospital
Manchester
Milton Keynes University Hospital
Milton Keynes
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
Norwich
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham
Royal Oldham Hospital
Oldham
Churchill Hospital
Oxford
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth
Queen's Hospital
Romford
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton
Royal Stoke University Hospital
Stoke-on-Trent
Singleton Hospital
Swansea
Torbay Hospital
Torquay
Royal Cornwall Hospital
Truro
Worthing and St Richards Hospitals
Worthing
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Phase II Evaluation of Molecular Guided Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Acalabrutinib
This study evaluates the addition of Acalabrutinib to current standard therapy of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone (R-CHOP) for patients with previously untreated CD20 positive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) requiring full course chemoimmunotherapy.
All patients will receive one cycle of R-CHOP. Two thirds of patients (Arm B) will go on to receive a further 5 cycles (every 21 days) of R-CHOP with Acalabrutinib. Acalabrutinib will be taken orally twice daily continuously in 21 day cycles.
Read more
One third of patients (Arm A) will continue with 5 cycles of R-CHOP.
Patients will be followed up initially for 24 months and then for disease status and survival until 114 progression events have been observed.
Read the detailed description
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Whilst the majority of patients will respond well to conventional treatment (R-CHOP - rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone), a significant number of patients lymphoma will not respond to initial therapy or their disease will return after completion of therapy. In a number of B-cell diseases an enzyme called, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prevents death of tumour cells, including in DLBCL. Acalabrutinib is an orally active BTK-inhibitor and it is thought that stopping BTK being activated may help in treating B-cell diseases. It is hypothesised that the addition of Acalabrutinib to standard R-CHOP immunochemotherapy may improve outcomes of patients with DLBCL.
REMoDL-A is a randomised, phase II, open label, multicentre study that will be open in up to 50 centres. Up to 553 patients (453 randomised) will be recruited.
Following informed consent all patients will receive 1 cycle of conventional R-CHOP chemotherapy. At the same time the diagnostic pathology block will be sent for molecular profiling by the Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS). The delivery of the first cycle of R-CHOP will allow a sufficient interval for real time determination of molecular phenotype. Patients whose biopsies yield sufficient tumour material for profiling will be randomised 2:1 in favour of the experimental arm (R-CHOP + acalabrutinib).
The primary objective will be to establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to R-CHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Being tested
- R-CHOP, R-CHOP + acalabrutinib
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Acalabrutinib, R-CHOP, DLBCL, Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, Haematological cancer, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase, Molecular Profiling, Chemoimmunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
R-CHOPDrug
Also called Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine
Arm A patients will receive R-CHOP alone.
R-CHOP + acalabrutinibDrug
Also called Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine
Arm B patients will receive R-CHOP in combination with acalabrutinib.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A Control | Active comparator | 6 cycles of standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) immunochemotherapy every 21 days. Receives: Drug: R-CHOP |
| Arm B Experimental | Experimental | 1 cycle of standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) immunochemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of R-CHOP + acalabrutinib taken twice daily for 21 day cycles. Receives: Drug: R-CHOP + acalabrutinib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to RCHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as time from registration to progression/death from any cause.
Measured: Last patient's last follow up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a PFS event will be censored at the date of last follow up.
Secondary outcomes (10)
To compare PFS between molecular groups.
PFS interaction with cell of origin phenotype (ABC, GCB and unclassifiable).
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare PFS between treatment groups.
PFS interaction with clinical variables, including for example IPI, bulk, components of IPI, age and others to be determined in the SAP.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare overall survival (OS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Overall survival (OS), defined as time from registration to death from any cause.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an OS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare event free survival (EFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Event-free survival (EFS), or time to treatment failure, defined as time from registration to any treatment failure including disease progression, or discontinuation of treatment for any reason.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an EFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare disease free survival (DFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time of documentation of disease-free state to disease recurrence or death as a result of lymphoma or acute toxicity of treatment.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a DFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare time to progression (TTP) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time to progression (TTP), defined as time from registration until documented lymphoma progression or death as a result of lymphoma. Deaths from other causes are censored at the time of death.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a TTP event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare duration of response (DoR) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Response duration (DoR), defined as the time from documentation of response until the documentation of relapse or progression.
Measured: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a RD event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CR) between both treatment groups.
Assessment using the Lugano Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.
Measured: Complete and overall response rates, as recorded at the end of treatment (up to 21 weeks) .
To assess differences in toxicity between assigned treatments.
Evaluation of toxicity according to CTCAE version 5.
Measured: At all visits up to 24 months follow-up.
To assess differences in quality of life between treatment arms.
Application of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Lym questionnaires.
Measured: At baseline, cycle 2 day 1, cycle 3 day 1, cycle 5 day 1, end of treatment and at 3, 6, 12, 20 and 24 month follow-ups. Each cycle is 21 days.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2020
- Study start19 Oct 2021
- Primary completionNov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew Davies, Principal investigator, University of Southampton
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RHM CAN1500
- Acronym
- REMoDL-A
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Phase II Evaluation of Molecular Guided Therapy for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma With Acalabrutinib
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REMoDL-A / RHM CAN1500
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Acalabrutinib, R-CHOP, DLBCL, Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, Haematological cancer, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase, Molecular Profiling
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 453 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- AstraZeneca
- Study start
- 19 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the addition of Acalabrutinib to current standard therapy of Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisolone (R-CHOP) for patients with previously untreated CD20 positive Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) requiring full course chemoimmunotherapy.
All patients will receive one cycle of R-CHOP. Two thirds of patients (Arm B) will go on to receive a further 5 cycles (every 21 days) of R-CHOP with Acalabrutinib. Acalabrutinib will be taken orally twice daily continuously in 21 day cycles.
One third of patients (Arm A) will continue with 5 cycles of R-CHOP.
Patients will be followed up initially for 24 months and then for disease status and survival until 114 progression events have been observed.
Detailed description
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Whilst the majority of patients will respond well to conventional treatment (R-CHOP - rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone), a significant number of patients lymphoma will not respond to initial therapy or their disease will return after completion of therapy. In a number of B-cell diseases an enzyme called, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prevents death of tumour cells, including in DLBCL. Acalabrutinib is an orally active BTK-inhibitor and it is thought that stopping BTK being activated may help in treating B-cell diseases. It is hypothesised that the addition of Acalabrutinib to standard R-CHOP immunochemotherapy may improve outcomes of patients with DLBCL.
REMoDL-A is a randomised, phase II, open label, multicentre study that will be open in up to 50 centres. Up to 553 patients (453 randomised) will be recruited.
Following informed consent all patients will receive 1 cycle of conventional R-CHOP chemotherapy. At the same time the diagnostic pathology block will be sent for molecular profiling by the Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS). The delivery of the first cycle of R-CHOP will allow a sufficient interval for real time determination of molecular phenotype. Patients whose biopsies yield sufficient tumour material for profiling will be randomised 2:1 in favour of the experimental arm (R-CHOP + acalabrutinib).
The primary objective will be to establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to R-CHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A Control | Active comparator | Drug: R-CHOP6 cycles of standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) immunochemotherapy every 21 days. |
| Arm B Experimental | Experimental | Drug: R-CHOP + acalabrutinib1 cycle of standard R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone) immunochemotherapy followed by 5 cycles of R-CHOP + acalabrutinib taken twice daily for 21 day cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Histologically confirmed DLBCL, expressing CD20. Sufficient diagnostic material must be available to forward to HMDS for gene expression profiling and central pathology review. The following diagnoses by 2016 WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms may be included:
- At least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, defined as >1.5 cm in its longest dimension as measured by CT.
- Not previously treated for lymphoma and fit enough to receive combination chemoimmunotherapy with curative intent.
- Stage IAX (bulk defined as lymph node mass [either single or conglomerate] diameter >7.5cm) to stage IV disease and deemed to require a full course of chemotherapy. Patients with non-bulky IE disease will not be eligible.
- ECOG performance status 0-2 or 3 if this is directly attributable to lymphoma.
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- Previous history of treated or untreated indolent lymphoma. However newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who are found to also have small cell infiltration of the bone marrow or other diagnostic material (discordant lymphoma) will be eligible.
- Patients who have received immunisation with a live vaccine within four weeks prior to enrolment will be ineligible.
- Diagnosis of primary mediastinal lymphoma.
- Diagnosis of primary Central Nervous System lymphoma or secondary CNS involvement. Those patients presenting with neurological symptoms should be investigated for CNS involvement. Routine CNS imaging or diagnostic lumbar puncture will not be required in the absence of symptoms.
- History of stroke or intracranial haemorrhage in preceding 6 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| R-CHOPAlso: Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, VincristineArm A patients will receive R-CHOP alone. | Drug | Arm A Control |
| R-CHOP + acalabrutinibAlso: Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, VincristineArm B patients will receive R-CHOP in combination with acalabrutinib. | Drug | Arm B Experimental |
Primary outcome
To establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to RCHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a PFS event will be censored at the date of last follow up.
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as time from registration to progression/death from any cause.
10 secondary outcomes
To compare PFS between molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare PFS between treatment groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years.
To compare overall survival (OS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an OS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare event free survival (EFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience an EFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare disease free survival (DFS) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a DFS event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare time to progression (TTP) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a TTP event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare duration of response (DoR) between both treatment and molecular groups.
Time frame: Last patient's last follow-up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a RD event will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
To compare overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CR) between both treatment groups.
Time frame: Complete and overall response rates, as recorded at the end of treatment (up to 21 weeks) .
To assess differences in toxicity between assigned treatments.
Time frame: At all visits up to 24 months follow-up.
To assess differences in quality of life between treatment arms.
Time frame: At baseline, cycle 2 day 1, cycle 3 day 1, cycle 5 day 1, end of treatment and at 3, 6, 12, 20 and 24 month follow-ups. Each cycle is 21 days.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Rituximab and Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Stage II-IV Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
KSV01 Injection for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Cellular Immunotherapy Following Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, or B-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia
B-Cell Lymphoma, Unclassifiable, With Features Intermediate Between Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma, B-Cell Prolymphocytic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
HEME-25 Open-Label Feasibility Study of Elranatamab Utilized as Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed Plasmablastic Lymphoma With or Without HIV
Plasmablastic Lymphoma, HIV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew Davies principal investigator
University of Southampton
33 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing R-CHOP and R-CHOP + acalabrutinib in people with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 33 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 33 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To establish if combining acalabrutinib with R-CHOP improves efficacy, compared to RCHOP alone, for the treatment of previously untreated patients with DLBCL to a degree that justifies further development of this approach. (time frame: Last patient's last follow up, approximately 4.5 years. Patients who do not experience a PFS event will be censored at the date of last follow up.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.