Mood DisordersNCT04551027
Assessing the Effect of Compensatory Cognitive Intervention Among People With Severe Mental Illness
A study testing compensatory cognitive treatment in people with Mood Disorders and Schizophrenia, run by Shalvata Mental Health Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a short term compensatory cognitive group intervention - the Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) among people with severe mental illnesses, receiving ambulatory treatment Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mood Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder
- What is being tested?
- compensatory cognitive treatment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Sep 2020to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- basic knowledge in Hebrew
- diagnosed according to the ICD -10 with severe mental illness: schizophrenia, bipolar disease, schizoaffective disorder or major depression
- Patients are treated with neuroleptic medication for at least four weeks.
Who cannot join
- acquired neurological disorders including dementia and brain injury.
- Developmental neurological disorders including developmental intellectual disability and autistic spectrum disorders.
- Regular Electro convulsive therapy treatment with frequency of twice a month or more.
- People to whom a guardian has been appointed
- Current addiction
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Israel1 site
Shalvata mental health center
Hod HaSharon, 4534708
Miryam ben zaken, B.O.T, +972-546305247, miryambz@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Assessing the Effect of Compensatory Cognitive Intervention for Functional Capacity, Cognitive Functions and Severity of Symptoms Among People With Severe Mental Illness
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a short term compensatory cognitive group intervention - the Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) among people with severe mental illnesses, receiving ambulatory treatment
Read the detailed description
This study includes two experimental arms to research cognitive compensatory group treatment in severe mental illness population. The study consists of 4 primary phases: recruitment, assessment, intervention and post-intervention assessment. Two arms involve an ambulatory participants. participants are assigned to an intervention or control group according to the order of recruitment. Assessment and post-assessment phases include assessments of functional capacity, cognitive functions and severity of symptoms.
Intervention includes 12 group sessions in a small group of five participants, focusing on learning compensatory strategies aimed to improve attention, concentration, learning, memory, organization, and problem-solving in order to improve everyday functioning. Interventions will be performed in addition to standard ambulatory treatment. The control group will receive standard ambulatory treatment only.
- Conditions
- Mood Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder
- Being tested
- compensatory cognitive treatment
- Keywords
- compensatory cognitive treatment, mental illness, cognitive strategies, everyday functioning
- Medical subject headings
- Mood Disorders, Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, Mental Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
compensatory cognitive treatmentBehavioural
a brief group compensatory cognitive intervention including 12 meetings of 1 hour in a group of five and focuses on these cognitive domains: prospective memory, vigilance and attention, memory and learning and executive functions
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| compensatory cognitive treatment | Experimental | compensatory cognitive treatment intervention, focusing on learning cognitive strategies to overcome cognitive deficits. Receives: Behavioral: compensatory cognitive treatment |
| control group | No intervention | standard ambulatory treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline functional capacity at 12 weeks : The Observed Tasks of Daily Living-Revised (OTDL-R)
OTDL-R is an objective, performance-based evaluation of the subjects' ability to perform daily life activities in the following areas: Medication management, communication and finances management. The final score ranges from 0 (not independent) to 28 (independent).
Measured: 30 min duration at week 0 ; week 12
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: The Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment (CPSA)
CPSA is a self-reported questionnaire on personal experience of cognitive difficulties and usage of cognitive strategies. The final score for each scale ranges from 0 (Rarely/ Never) to 3 (always)
Measured: 10 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline severity of clinical symptoms at 12 weeks: Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
a scale used by the clinician to assess the severity of symptoms according to symptoms, behaviour and function in the last week. The final score ranges from 1 (Normal, not at all ill) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill patients)
Measured: week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (COGNISTAT)
COGNISTAT is a cognitive screening test for 3 basic cognitive functions: Orientation, Attention, Memory Registration and 5 major cognitive functions: Language (Comprehension, Repetition, Naming), Constructional Ability, Memory, Calculation Skills, Executive Skills (Reasoning, Judgment). The final scores for the subtests ranges from 0 (severe impairment) to 4, 6, 8 or 12 (average range)
Measured: 20 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Rey- Ostereich Complex Figure
a cognitive performance test evaluating instant visual memory and visual organization. The final score for accuracy ranges from 0-36 as higher score indicate better accuracy. The final score for the general performance of the task ranges from 1 (very reasonable) to 7 (not at all reasonable).
Measured: 20 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Trail Making Test A & B (TMT)
Paper and pencil neuropsychological test that evaluating processing speed and shifting. The final score represents the time length in which the subject completed the test.
Measured: 3 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): key searching test
a cognitive performance test evaluating problem solving, regulating and monitoring behavior. The final score ranges from 0-4, Higher score is a better result.
Measured: 1 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Category Fluency Test (CFT)
A neuropsychological test evaluating the ability to retrieve information from memory in a limited amount of time. The final score represents the number of words the subject succeeded to retrieve in the limited time. Higher score is a better result.
Measured: 1 min at week 0 ; week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2020
- Study startSep 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completionSep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mood DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shalvata Mental Health Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tel Aviv University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, ido lurie, Shalvata Mental Health Center
- Investigators
- Ido Lurie, M.D, Principal investigator, Director of Adult clinic, Shalvata Mental Health CenterLena Lipskaya, P.H.D, Study director, The Department of Occupational Therapy, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551027
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0003-20-SHA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Twamley EW, Burton CZ, Vella L. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: who benefits? Who stays in treatment? Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S55-62. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr059.
PubMed 21860048Twamley EW, Savla GN, Zurhellen CH, Heaton RK, Jeste DV. Development and Pilot Testing of a Novel Compensatory Cognitive Training Intervention for People with Psychosis. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2008 Apr;11(2):144-163. doi: 10.1080/15487760801963678.
PubMed 19198664Twamley EW, Thomas KR, Burton CZ, Vella L, Jeste DV, Heaton RK, McGurk SR. Compensatory cognitive training for people with severe mental illnesses in supported employment: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PubMed 28823720Twamley EW, Vella L, Burton CZ, Heaton RK, Jeste DV. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: effects in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;73(9):1212-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07686. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
PubMed 22939029
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Effect of Compensatory Cognitive Intervention for Functional Capacity, Cognitive Functions and Severity of Symptoms Among People With Severe Mental Illness
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551027
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0003-20-SHA
- Conditions
- Mood Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder
- Keywords
- compensatory cognitive treatment, mental illness, cognitive strategies, everyday functioning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Shalvata Mental Health CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tel Aviv University
- Study start
- Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a short term compensatory cognitive group intervention - the Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) among people with severe mental illnesses, receiving ambulatory treatment
Detailed description
This study includes two experimental arms to research cognitive compensatory group treatment in severe mental illness population. The study consists of 4 primary phases: recruitment, assessment, intervention and post-intervention assessment. Two arms involve an ambulatory participants. participants are assigned to an intervention or control group according to the order of recruitment. Assessment and post-assessment phases include assessments of functional capacity, cognitive functions and severity of symptoms.
Intervention includes 12 group sessions in a small group of five participants, focusing on learning compensatory strategies aimed to improve attention, concentration, learning, memory, organization, and problem-solving in order to improve everyday functioning. Interventions will be performed in addition to standard ambulatory treatment. The control group will receive standard ambulatory treatment only.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| compensatory cognitive treatment | Experimental | Behavioral: compensatory cognitive treatmentcompensatory cognitive treatment intervention, focusing on learning cognitive strategies to overcome cognitive deficits. |
| control group | No intervention | –standard ambulatory treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- basic knowledge in Hebrew
- diagnosed according to the ICD -10 with severe mental illness: schizophrenia, bipolar disease, schizoaffective disorder or major depression
- Patients are treated with neuroleptic medication for at least four weeks.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- acquired neurological disorders including dementia and brain injury.
- Developmental neurological disorders including developmental intellectual disability and autistic spectrum disorders.
- Regular Electro convulsive therapy treatment with frequency of twice a month or more.
- People to whom a guardian has been appointed
- Current addiction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| compensatory cognitive treatmenta brief group compensatory cognitive intervention including 12 meetings of 1 hour in a group of five and focuses on these cognitive domains: prospective memory, vigilance and attention, memory and learning and executive functions | Behavioural | compensatory cognitive treatment |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline functional capacity at 12 weeks : The Observed Tasks of Daily Living-Revised (OTDL-R)
Time frame: 30 min duration at week 0 ; week 12
OTDL-R is an objective, performance-based evaluation of the subjects' ability to perform daily life activities in the following areas: Medication management, communication and finances management. The final score ranges from 0 (not independent) to 28 (independent).
7 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: The Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment (CPSA)
Time frame: 10 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline severity of clinical symptoms at 12 weeks: Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Time frame: week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (COGNISTAT)
Time frame: 20 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Rey- Ostereich Complex Figure
Time frame: 20 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Trail Making Test A & B (TMT)
Time frame: 3 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS): key searching test
Time frame: 1 min at week 0 ; week 12
Change from baseline cognitive functions at 12 weeks: Category Fluency Test (CFT)
Time frame: 1 min at week 0 ; week 12
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21860048Twamley EW, Burton CZ, Vella L. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: who benefits? Who stays in treatment? Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S55-62. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbr059.
- Background: PubMed 19198664Twamley EW, Savla GN, Zurhellen CH, Heaton RK, Jeste DV. Development and Pilot Testing of a Novel Compensatory Cognitive Training Intervention for People with Psychosis. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2008 Apr;11(2):144-163. doi: 10.1080/15487760801963678.
- Background: PubMed 28823720Twamley EW, Thomas KR, Burton CZ, Vella L, Jeste DV, Heaton RK, McGurk SR. Compensatory cognitive training for people with severe mental illnesses in supported employment: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2019 Jan;203:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 22939029Twamley EW, Vella L, Burton CZ, Heaton RK, Jeste DV. Compensatory cognitive training for psychosis: effects in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;73(9):1212-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07686. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
- A website which gives free access to the manuals of the CCT interventionLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Mood Disorders
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ido Lurie, M.D principal investigator
Director of Adult clinic, Shalvata Mental Health Center
Lena Lipskaya, P.H.D study director
The Department of Occupational Therapy, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine,Tel Aviv University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing compensatory cognitive treatment in people with Mood Disorders and Schizophrenia, run by Shalvata Mental Health Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Miryam Ben Zaken, B.O.T (+972- 546305247, miryambz@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline functional capacity at 12 weeks : The Observed Tasks of Daily Living-Revised (OTDL-R) (time frame: 30 min duration at week 0 ; week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04551027, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2020.