HealthyNCT04551118
Efficacy of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) on Emotion Processing
A study testing Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -active and Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-active in people with Healthy, run by Tianjin Anding Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) on emotion processing of healthy participants. Meanwhile, the investigators evaluate the effect of tES on electroencephalography (EEG) of both resting and task-related signal. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -active and Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-active
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2019to 1 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- age between 18 and 35 years
- with normal or corrected to normal vision
- participant or guardian need to sign informed consent
Who cannot join
- reported neurological or psychiatric disorders
- history of any form of transcranial electrical stimulation experience
- use of mood stabilizer
- history of substance abuse or dependence
- severe somatic diseases that might interfere with regular antidepressant treatment including conditions such as kidney and liver failure, uncontrolled hypertension, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and pulmonary disease, thyroid disease, diabetes, epilepsy and asthma
- use of anti-inflammatory medication for longer than 7 days in the last two months preceding the trial
- use of immunosuppressive medication such as oral steroid hormones women in pregnancy or lactation period
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) of Dorsolateral- Prefrontal Cortex on Emotion Processing: A Randomized, Single-blind, Sham-controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) on emotion processing of healthy participants. Meanwhile, the investigators evaluate the effect of tES on electroencephalography (EEG) of both resting and task-related signal. The hypothesis of this study is that tES can improve the cognitive function of emotion by modulating brain activity.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study using transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) for 7-day treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) group, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) group or sham-control group. Active tES comprised 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA peak-to-peak current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. Sham group was administered similarly, but with current turned off after 30s. Apart from studying the effects of tES on physiology signals, subjective scale assessments and behavioral data are performed before and after the treatment.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -active, Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-active, Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-sham
- Keywords
- transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -activeDevice
Also called tACS active
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with an AC micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA alternating current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-activeDevice
Also called tDCS active
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non- invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with a DC micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA direct current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days.
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-shamDevice
Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive sham stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with current turned off after 30 second. The session last 20 min for 7 consecutive days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tACS group | Experimental | Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA alternating current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. Receives: Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -active |
| tDCS group | Experimental | Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA direct current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. Receives: Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-active |
| Sham group | Sham comparator | Participants receive sham stimulation that administered similarly, but with current continued less than 30s. Receives: Device: Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The change of event-related potentials (ERPs) before and after stimulation.
The aim is to explore whether tES have a regulation effect on emotion processing of dynamic course. In the task, participants need to concentrate on the emotional picture with positive, negative and neutral faces. Then, different ERP components elicited by positive, negative and neutral faces using the signals recorded during facial emotion identification task. The investigators will analyze the ERP components change before and after stimulation to access tES effect on emotion processing.
Measured: Day1, Day7
The change of resting EEG power and lateralization index before and after stimulation.
The aim is to explore whether tES have a regulation effect at-risk of frequency domain. In the resting task, 8 mins resting EEG will be recorded. During recording, participants need to remain still and relaxed with their eyes open (O) and closed (C) in two alternating orders. In order to access tES effect on resting EEG, spectral analysis will be executed after the experiment. Analysis in frequency domain also contributed to expound the brain mechanism related cerebral cortex in emotion processing. In specific, EEG power of delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma band would be calculated after recording. Besides, the EEG lateralization index also be analyzed between left and right brain.
Measured: Day1, Day7
Secondary outcomes (4)
The change of scores in subjective scale measurement of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory from pre- to post-stimulation.
The main objective is to explore whether tES has an effect on subjective scale after stimulation. The scales include State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). The STAI is a brief self-report assessment for trait anxiety and state measurement. The scales contain two 20-item pools of emotional state and personality trait, each item rated on a 4-point intensity scale ranging from not at all to very much so or from never to almost always respectively. DERS, on the other hand, is also a self-report measure function to assess the emotion regulation.
Measured: Day1, Day7
The change of scores in subjective scale measurement of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) from pre- to post-stimulation.
The main objective is to explore whether tES has an effect on subjective scale after stimulation. Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), which is also a self-report measure function to assess the emotion regulation.
Measured: Day1, Day7
The change of behavioral data from pre- to post-stimulation.
The aim is to explore whether tES have a regulation effect on emotion identification task. During the task, participants need to respond as quickly as probable to emotional stimuli by pressing the space bar. Reaction time and accuracy from the facial emotion identification task pre- and post-stimulation would be recorded. After the experiment, the investigators will access the stimulation effect on their behavioral data change.
Measured: Day1, Day7
Adverse events from baseline to Day1.
The aim is to evaluate the adverse effects during the stimulation.
Measured: Day2, Day3, Day4, Day5, Day6, Day7
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2019
- Primary completion20 Aug 2020
- Study completion1 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Anding Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- tES-2019-TJAH
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) of Dorsolateral- Prefrontal Cortex on Emotion Processing: A Randomized, Single-blind, Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tES-2019-TJAH
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Anding HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) on emotion processing of healthy participants. Meanwhile, the investigators evaluate the effect of tES on electroencephalography (EEG) of both resting and task-related signal. The hypothesis of this study is that tES can improve the cognitive function of emotion by modulating brain activity.
Detailed description
This is a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled study using transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) for 7-day treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) group, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) group or sham-control group. Active tES comprised 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA peak-to-peak current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. Sham group was administered similarly, but with current turned off after 30s. Apart from studying the effects of tES on physiology signals, subjective scale assessments and behavioral data are performed before and after the treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tACS group | Experimental | Device: Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -activeParticipants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA alternating current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. |
| tDCS group | Experimental | Device: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-activeParticipants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA direct current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. |
| Sham group | Sham comparator | Device: Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-shamParticipants receive sham stimulation that administered similarly, but with current continued less than 30s. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age between 18 and 35 years
- with normal or corrected to normal vision
- participant or guardian need to sign informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- reported neurological or psychiatric disorders
- history of any form of transcranial electrical stimulation experience
- use of mood stabilizer
- history of substance abuse or dependence
- severe somatic diseases that might interfere with regular antidepressant treatment including conditions such as kidney and liver failure, uncontrolled hypertension, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and pulmonary disease, thyroid disease, diabetes, epilepsy and asthma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -activeAlso: tACS activeTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with an AC micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA alternating current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. | Device | tACS group |
| Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-activeAlso: tDCS activeTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non- invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with a DC micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive 20 min sessions of 1.5 mA direct current delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for 7 consecutive days. | Device | tDCS group |
| Transcranial electrical stimulation (TES)-shamTranscranial electrical stimulation (TES) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique of the brain with micro-electrical stimulator, two rubber electrodes in saline-soaked sponges, and a control software to set the output of the stimulation type. Participants receive sham stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with current turned off after 30 second. The session last 20 min for 7 consecutive days. | Device | Sham group |
Primary outcome
The change of event-related potentials (ERPs) before and after stimulation.
Time frame: Day1, Day7
The aim is to explore whether tES have a regulation effect on emotion processing of dynamic course. In the task, participants need to concentrate on the emotional picture with positive, negative and neutral faces. Then, different ERP components elicited by positive, negative and neutral faces using the signals recorded during facial emotion identification task. The investigators will analyze the ERP components change before and after stimulation to access tES effect on emotion processing.
The change of resting EEG power and lateralization index before and after stimulation.
Time frame: Day1, Day7
The aim is to explore whether tES have a regulation effect at-risk of frequency domain. In the resting task, 8 mins resting EEG will be recorded. During recording, participants need to remain still and relaxed with their eyes open (O) and closed (C) in two alternating orders. In order to access tES effect on resting EEG, spectral analysis will be executed after the experiment. Analysis in frequency domain also contributed to expound the brain mechanism related cerebral cortex in emotion processing. In specific, EEG power of delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma band would be calculated after recording. Besides, the EEG lateralization index also be analyzed between left and right brain.
4 secondary outcomes
The change of scores in subjective scale measurement of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory from pre- to post-stimulation.
Time frame: Day1, Day7
The change of scores in subjective scale measurement of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) from pre- to post-stimulation.
Time frame: Day1, Day7
The change of behavioral data from pre- to post-stimulation.
Time frame: Day1, Day7
Adverse events from baseline to Day1.
Time frame: Day2, Day3, Day4, Day5, Day6, Day7
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2020.
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Survey to Determine Incarcerated Persons' Views on Surrogate Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Amounts of the Study Medicine Called PF-07985631 Are Tolerated and Act in the Body of Healthy Adults
Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
Recruiting
Metabolic Impact of VLCPUFA-Rich Fish Oil: A Clinical Study on Omega-3 Index Enhancement in Healthy Individuals
Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Fish Oils
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) -active and Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)-active in people with Healthy, run by Tianjin Anding Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The change of event-related potentials (ERPs) before and after stimulation. (time frame: Day1, Day7). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2020.