2DR Versus 3DR in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Switch Trial

In HIV care we have been facing a paradigm change over the last years, reaching an ultimatum with the reimbursement of a 2DR regimen both in naïve as in switch patients.

The rationale behind dual therapy is interesting, namely lower cost, less side-effects, more preserved treatment options, less interactions.

However, from a patient and clinician's perspective this requires a paradigm change after an era of successful treating patient with 3DR.

In the past 2DR and even 1DR treatments have been proposed as an alternative for 3DR, however results were often disappointing and these regimens were only suitable for a selection of patients, often requiring intensification of follow-up.

Recently dual therapy with integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has shown very promising results both in switch (TANGO study) with no virological failure related to this regimen over 48 weeks and in naïve patients (GEMINI study) with no resistance mutations at 96 weeks. Moreover, time to undectability was statistically not different from the 3DR group and the small amount of data available on in depth analysis of the reservoir and immunological parameters were reassuring.

Comparative data however on immunological and virological parameters are lacking therefore we want to conduct the present clinical trial to further elaborate on this important question.

Recent data show that newer ARVs, among which integrase inhibitors and TAF, are associated with weight gain. Further data is required to investigate the patterns of weight change with these ARVs and any associated metabolic impact.

So far, DTG/3TC has been assessed in 3 phase III clinical trials: GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2 and TANGO. GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 are two large identically designed phase 3 studies that compare the 2DR DTG+3TC once daily with a first-line recommended 3DR DTG + 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) (tenofovir disoproxil (TDF)/FTC) once daily in treatment-naïve People living with HIV (PLHIV) (Cahn 2019). The primary objective of TANGO is to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to DTG+3TC once daily compared to the continuation of TAF-based regimens (TBR) over 48 weeks in ART-experienced, virologically suppressed PLHIV (Van Wyk 2020). The primary results of these trials have been published (Cahn 2019, Van Wyk 2020) while the trials continue in order to collect longer-term data.

GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2 are 2 twin phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group, noninferiority studies conducted in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 RNA of 1000 to ≤500,000 c/mL at screening. Patients are randomised 1:1 to receive DTG+3TC once daily or DTG plus FDC tablet of TDF/FTC once daily. The results of GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2, and the pooled analysis demonstrated that DTG+3TC has a high level of efficacy and safety and is noninferior to 3DR DTG+TDF/FTC. In the pooled analysis, 91% of patients in the DTG+3TC arm and 93% of patients in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL by Week 48. The Week 96 secondary efficacy analysis demonstrated that DTG+3TC continued to provide a high level of clinical efficacy. A similar proportion of subjects in each treatment group achieved the secondary efficacy endpoint of plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 96 for GEMINI-2 and pooled analysis. Based on the Food and drug administration (FDA) Snapshot algorithm, DTG+3TC is noninferior to DTG+TDF/FTC in the individual studies as well as the pooled analysis at Week 48 and at Week 96. The subgroup analyses further supported the noninferiority of DTG+3TC at both Week 48 and Week 96. Moreover, few patients experienced CVW by Week 48, with comparable rates across treatment arms (<1% in each) and fewer AEs were observed in the DTG+3TC arm compared to DTG+TDF/FTC. No treatment-emergent resistance mutation were observed in these patients up to Week 96, demonstrating DTG+3TC's high barrier to resistance. The incidence of drug-related AEs at Week 48 in the DTG+3TC arm was low (126/716; 18%) and lower than that in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm (169/717; 24%). The most common (≥1%) drug-related Grade 2-4 AE in both arms was headache (1% in both arms). Low rates of drug-related AEs were also observed at Week 96 for both arms, with slightly more but comparable overall AEs and slightly more drug-related AEs in the DTG+TDF/FTC arm compared with the DTG+3TC arm.

TANGO is a 200-week, phase 3, randomised, open-label, active-controlled, multicentre, parallel-group study to assess the noninferior antiviral activity and safety of replacing a TBR with a 2DR of DTG+3TC in HIV-infected adults who are virologically suppressed and stable on TBR (Van Wyk 2020). The results of TANGO demonstrate that DTG+3TC has a high level of efficacy and safety for patients switching from TBR. Based on the FDA Snapshot virologic failure, DTG+3TC is noninferior to TBR at Week 24 (Ait-Khaled 2019, Van Wyk 2020). Very few (<1%) patients experienced virologic failure in both treatment arms. Only one patient in the TBR arm had a CVW by Week 24. A greater proportion of patients in the DTG+3TC arm experienced Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (but not drug-related SAEs), drug-related adverse events (AEs), and AEs leading to withdrawal from the study compared with the TBR arm in the first 24 weeks of the study as expected due to the switch study design.

The various clinical trials ongoing and planned for DTG/3TC are further supported by real-world evidence. These real-world studies have findings consistent with the results observed in clinical trials.

The primary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority at W48 of the 2DR DTG/3TC (Dovato) regimen compared to BIC/TAF/FTC (Biktarvy) in HIV-1 infected individuals in terms of the amount of intact replication-competent HIV-1 sequences with a non-inferiority margin of 12% quantified by the fraction intact HIV viral sequences quantified by IPDA, present in blood CD4 cells.

1. Quantification of immune activation markers in both arms, will be explored as secondary objective and should not differ more than 20%. The power calculation is however calculated based on the primary objective. Assessment at baseline, W48 and W144.

• Inflammation markers: IL-6, hs-CRP (of CRP) (other: IL_8, IP10, TNF, B2M, CXCL1, IL21, Hyaluric acid)
• Markers of coagulopathy: D-Dimers
• T cell activation markers: HLA-DR, CD38 on both CD4 and CD8; soluble markers: sCD27, sCH40 ligand
• T cell exhaustion markers: PD-1, CD28, CD57
• Markers of microbial translocation: sCD14
• CD4/CD8 ratio

1. In addition, the secondary objective is to assess impact of the DTG/3TC vs BIC/FTC/TAF on metabolic health. Therefore, as secondary endpoint metabolic health will be assessed through incidence of metabolic syndrome, weight/BMI change, waist circumference, and insulin resistance. Finally, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans will be performed to assess body composition and fat distribution and bone mineral density and FibroScans will be performed to assess liver steatosis and fibrosis.
2. As a third secondary objective we will assess the impact of switching through a patient questionnaire.
3. The fourth secondary objective is to demonstrate non inferiority at W144 of the 2DR DTG/3TC (Dovato) regimen compared to BIC/TAF/FTC (Biktarvy) in HIV-1 infected individuals in terms of the amount of intact replication-competent HIV-1 sequences with a non-inferiority margin of 12% quantified by the fraction intact HIV viral sequences quantified by IPDA, present in blood CD4 cells.