AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Pelvic PainNCT04553562

Acupuncture for Female With Non-cyclic Chronic Pelvic Pain

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Chronic Pelvic Pain, run by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is one of the common symptoms of women at childbearing age. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for female with non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pelvic Pain
What is being tested?
Acupuncture
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
150 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Meet the diagnostic criteria of non-cyclic CPP.
  • Age 18 to 50 years.
  • Have moderate to severe pain in pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, lower back, or buttocks lasting at least six months.
  • The mean degree of pelvic pain in the past week rated by Visual Analogue Scale is ≥40 scores.
  • Sign informed consent and participate in the study voluntarily.

Who cannot join

  • Have endometriosis (including adenomyosis), ovarian cyst (larger than 3cm), hysteromyoma (larger than 3cm), severe pelvic adhesion, pelvic malignant tumor (relevant examination must be within the last 6 months).
  • Have acute pelvic/urinary tract infection.
  • Have pain after pelvic surgery.
  • Have recurrent gastrointestinal or bladder diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome, interstitial cystitis / bladder pain syndrome, etc.
  • During pregnancy or in lactation or have a pregnancy plan within 8 months.
  • Have heart, lung, liver, kidney, mental disorders or cognitive dysfunction.
  • Have acupuncture treatment in recent 3 months.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Zhishun Liu, PhD contact

86-010-88002331

liuzhishun@aliyun.com

Jing Zhou, PhD contact

86-010-15650729586

zjinbj@sina.com

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Acupuncture for Female With Non-cyclic Chronic Pelvic Pain: a Three-armed Randomized Controlled Trial

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is one of the common symptoms of women at childbearing age. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of acupuncture for female with non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain. A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) using acupuncture, sham acupuncture and waiting list with a total sample of 150 will be conducted.

Read the detailed description

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a persistent pain in pelvis, anterior abdominal wall, lower back, or buttocks lasting at least six months. According to a WHO epidemiological study, the worldwide prevalence rate of CPP in childbearing age women was 2.1%-24%. At present, nearly 55% of the patients had unclear etiology, and there is no universally accepted diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. CPP is often associated with gynecological and non gynecological diseases, including endometriosis, abdominal visceral adhesion, myofascial pain and dysfunction, irritable bowel syndrome and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. CPP are also accompanied by psychological and physiological dysfunction, the most common is depression and anxiety, which seriously affects the quality of life of patients.

Acupuncture may have effect on non-cyclic CPP in female, however, there is a lack of evidence of effectiveness of acupuncture. A multi-center randomized three-armed controlled trial will be conducted. The aim of this study is assess the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for female patients with non-cyclic CPP.

Being tested
Acupuncture, Sham acupuncture
Keywords
Acupuncture, Sham acupuncture, Randomized controlled trial, Non-cyclic chronic pelvic pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AcupunctureDevice

    Sterile adhesive pads will be placed after skin disinfection on the acupoints. Guanyuan (CV4),Qihai (CV6),bilateral Sanyinjiao (SP6), Yinbao (LR9), Qixue (KI13) and Fujie (SP14) will be inserted through the pads by the needles (0.30mm in diameter, 40 mm in length, Hwato Brand, Suzhou Medical Appliance Factory, China) to a depth of 25-30mm. Yintang (GV4) will be inserted through the pads by the needle (0.30mm in diameter, 25mm in length, Hwato Brand, Suzhou Medical Appliance Factory, China) to a depth of 10-15mm. The needles at all points will be lightly lifting, thrusting, and twirling every 10 minutes during each session with the sensation of sourness, achiness, heaviness and numbness (deqi). The participants will be treated three times a week, on alternate days (ideally), for 6 successive weeks; 18 sessions for each patient in total.

  • Sham acupunctureDevice

    Sterile adhesive pads will be placed after skin disinfection on the acupoints. Needles (0.30 mm in diameter, 25 mm in length) with a blunt tip will be inserted at the Guanyuan (CV4),Qihai (CV6),bilateral Sanyinjiao (SP6), Yinbao (LR9), Qixue (KI13) and Fujie (SP14) without penetrating the skin. The participants will be treated three times a week, on alternate days (ideally), for 6 successive weeks; 18 sessions for each patient in total.

Study groups in NCT04553562
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acupuncture groupExperimentalFor acupuncture group, sterile adhesive pads will be placed after skin disinfection on the acupoints. Guanyuan (CV4),Qihai (CV6),bilateral Sanyinjiao (SP6), Yinbao (LR9), Qixue (KI13) and Fujie (SP14) will be inserted through the pads. The participants will be treated three times a week, on alternate days, for 6 successive weeks; 18 sessions for each patient in total.
Receives: Device: Acupuncture
Sham acupuncture groupSham comparatorFor the sham acupuncture group, aterile adhesive pads will be placed after skin disinfection on the acupoints and needles with a blunt tip will be inserted at the same acupoints in the acupuncture group without penetrating the skin.No manipulation of needles will be conducted. The participants will be treated three times a week, on alternate days (ideally), for 6 successive weeks; 18 sessions for each patient in total.
Receives: Device: Sham acupuncture
Waiting list groupNo interventionFor the waiting list group, patients will receive no treatment in the first 6 weeks and will receive the same treatment used in the acupuncture group according to patients' preference.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change from baseline of the mean score in the past week of the Visual Analogue Scale

    The scores of the Visual Analogue Scale range from 0 to 10,higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. The change from baseline of the Brief Pain Inventory score

    The Brief Pain Inventory score uses 0-10 numeric scales for item rating with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "pain as bad as you can imagine". The pain severity score is calculated from the four items about pain intensity with a range from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference with a range from 0 to 70. Higher scores of the Brief Pain Inventory mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  2. The change from baseline of the pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory

    The pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from "no pain" to "pain as bad as you can imagine", and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. Higher scores of the The pain severity score mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  3. The change from baseline of the pain interference score of the Brief Pain Inventory

    The pain interference score of the Brief Pain Inventory corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven subitems are rated from "does not interfere" to "completely interferes", and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. Higher scores of the pain interference score mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  4. The proportion of patients with decrease of 0.6 score or more from baseline of the pain interference score of the Brief Pain Inventory

    The pain interference score of the Brief Pain Inventory corresponds to the item on pain interference. The seven subitems are rated from "does not interfere" to "completely interferes", and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 70. Higher scores of the pain interference score mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  5. The proportion of patients with decrease of 20% or more from baseline of the pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory

    The pain severity score of the Brief Pain Inventory is calculated from the four items about pain intensity. Each item is rated from "no pain" to "pain as bad as you can imagine", and contributes with the same weight to the final score, ranging from 0 to 40. The pain interference score corresponds to the item on pain interference. Higher scores of the The pain severity score mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  6. The change from baseline of the Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire score

    The Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire is a validated scale with 13 items, each scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) with a total score range of 0-52, across three domains: rumination (0-16); magnifications (0-12); and helplessness (0-24).Higher scores of the Pain Catastrophising Questionnaire mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  7. The change from baseline of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score

    the score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ranges from 0 to 42. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  8. The change from baseline of the World Health Organisation Quality of life - Bref Questionnaire score

    Domain scores for the World Health Organisation Quality of life-Bref Questionnaire score are calculated by taking the mean of all items included in each domain and multiplying by a factor of four. These scores are then transformed to a 0-100 scale.Higher scores denote higher quality of life.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  9. The proportions of participants in each response category of the Patient global impression of change

    Patient global impression of change consists of 7 response categories with a range of 1-7: "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse." Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

  10. The proportion of subjects using rescue medications and the duration of medication use

    The use of medications during this trial. However, medication use is allowed for intolerable symptoms as long as it is recorded accordingly, including the name, the dosage, and the duration of the medication use.

    Measured: Week 6, 18 and 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2020
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04553562
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-248-KY
Status last verified
Nov 2021
First submitted
6 Sep 2020
Last updated
23 Nov 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acupuncture in people with Chronic Pelvic Pain, run by Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhishun Liu, PhD (86-010-88002331, liuzhishun@aliyun.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change from baseline of the mean score in the past week of the Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: Week 6, 18 and 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in