Infection, BacterialNCT04555252
Colonization of Bile Ducts and Infectious Complications in Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy
An observational study of Infection, Bacterial, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is part of the curative treatment for pancreatic cancer of the head and peri-ampullary area. The mortality of the procedure is around 5%, with a morbidity ranging from 30 to 50%. Infectious complications account for 35% of overall morbidity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Infection, Bacterial
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2020to 31 May 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study will be offered to the patient who has benefited from a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy programmed and hospitalized in CHRU Nancy's ICU
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Patient operated for a planned cephalic duodenopancreatectomy
- Post-operative hospitalisation in ICU
- Information leaflet given to the patient and the support person, with oral information, during the post-operative period
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years
- Emergency duodenopancreatectomy (surgical indication period less than 48 hours)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Colonization of Bile Ducts and Post-operative Infectious Complications of Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy : A Prospective Observational Study
Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is part of the curative treatment for pancreatic cancer of the head and peri-ampullary area. The mortality of the procedure is around 5%, with a morbidity ranging from 30 to 50%. Infectious complications account for 35% of overall morbidity.
One of the risk factors for postoperative complications is the existence of preoperative retentional jaundice, due to tumoral obstruction of the main bile duct In these cases, it is proposed to perform preoperative bile duct drainage, preferably by endoscopic stenting (ERCP).
Read more
However, several studies have shown these procedures to cause biliary contamination which could be responsible for an increase in post-operative morbidity such as infectious complications and increased length of stay in hospital..
Thus, the biliary microbial flora is more often multi-microbial and may contain multidrug-resistant nosocomial germs,
The study carried out by Cortes et al., based on a control case study design, also showed that a correlation between biliary colonization and postoperative infectious complications existed in patients who benefited from a preoperative biliary drainage technique. In fact, the bacteria isolated during intraoperative bile sampling were similar, in 49% of cases, to those isolated during bacteriological samples collected postoperatively during infectious complications.
The work carried out by Krüger and al has shown that the spectrum of bacteria found in the preoperative bile samples from patients who have undergone bile duct dilation is potentially not covered by standard antibiotic therapy.
The aim of this observational prospective study is to investigate this correlation between biliary colonization and postoperative infectious complications, to evaluate the morbidity and postoperative mortality of cephalic duodenopancreatectomies performed at the CHRU of Nancy and to study a possible adaptation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
- Conditions
- Infection, Bacterial
- Keywords
- Bile colonization, Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Bacterial Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy | Patients who underwent scheduled cephalic duodenopancreatectomy and hospitalized in intensive care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of preoperative Bile and postoperative infection sites microbiology results
bacterial count in log10 bacteria/ml and identification
Measured: from date of initial bile sample up to 30 days of postoperative period
Secondary outcomes (9)
Impact of prior biliary drainage on the intraoperative bile microbiological results bacteriological results obtained
bacterial count in log10 bacteria/ml and species identification
Measured: from date of initial bile sampling to date of surgery (up to 90 days)
Microbial flora in clinical specimens obtained from different sites
bacterial count in log10 bacteria/ml and species identification
Measured: from date of initial bile sample up to 90 postoperative days
Non infectious surgical complications using scores
Clavien-Dindo Classification, SOFA score
Measured: from date of surgery up to 30 postoperative days
postoperative infectious complications as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Ga)
number of event occurence
Measured: During hospital stay (up to 90 days after surgery)
Implication of bacteria found in biliculture as causative agent in post-operative infections
incidence in percentage
Measured: During hospital stay (up to 90 days after surg
length of stay in intensive care and hospital
Number of days in ICU and hospital
Measured: During the ICU stay and hospital
mortality rate
number of death at 28 days and 90 days
Measured: At day +28 and day +90
Description of nutrition assistance
Parenteral, enteral, oral feeding in days and calories
Measured: from date of initial bile sample up to 30 days of postoperative period
Nutritional status measured by nutritional risk index (NRI)
Body mass index (BMI) and albuminemia computation
Measured: preoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Sep 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2020
- Primary completion28 Mar 2021
- Study completion31 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infection, BacterialStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, France
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MARIE-REINE LOSSER, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, CHRU Nancy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04555252
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHRU NANCY : 2019PI249
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Jul 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):509-14. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000059981.13160.97.
PubMed 12677147DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Clavien PA. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
PubMed 17122618Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M, Fujii T, Yoshitomi H, Suzuki S, Satoi S, Takahashi S, Kainuma O, Suzuki Y. Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1551-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9919. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
PubMed 26387569Yu L, Huang Q, Xie F, Lin X, Liu C. Risk factors of postoperative complications of pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Oct;61(135):2091-5.
PubMed 25713915Lermite E, Pessaux P, Teyssedou C, Etienne S, Brehant O, Arnaud JP. Effect of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on infectious morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-control study. Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.016.
PubMed 18304506Scheufele F, Aichinger L, Jager C, Demir IE, Schorn S, Sargut M, Erkan M, Kleeff J, Friess H, Ceyhan GO. Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on bacterial flora in bile of patients with periampullary cancer. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e182-e188. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10450.
PubMed 28121036Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, Janny S, Sockeel P, Kianmanesh R, Ponsot P, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J. Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
PubMed 16377502Kruger CM, Adam U, Adam T, Kramer A, Heidecke CD, Makowiec F, Riediger H. Bacterobilia in pancreatic surgery-conclusions for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 7;25(41):6238-6247. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6238.
PubMed 31749594
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jul 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Colonization of Bile Ducts and Post-operative Infectious Complications of Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy : A Prospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04555252
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CHRU NANCY : 2019PI249
- Conditions
- Infection, Bacterial
- Keywords
- Bile colonization, Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cephalic duodenopancreatectomy is part of the curative treatment for pancreatic cancer of the head and peri-ampullary area. The mortality of the procedure is around 5%, with a morbidity ranging from 30 to 50%. Infectious complications account for 35% of overall morbidity.
One of the risk factors for postoperative complications is the existence of preoperative retentional jaundice, due to tumoral obstruction of the main bile duct In these cases, it is proposed to perform preoperative bile duct drainage, preferably by endoscopic stenting (ERCP).
However, several studies have shown these procedures to cause biliary contamination which could be responsible for an increase in post-operative morbidity such as infectious complications and increased length of stay in hospital..
Thus, the biliary microbial flora is more often multi-microbial and may contain multidrug-resistant nosocomial germs,
The study carried out by Cortes et al., based on a control case study design, also showed that a correlation between biliary colonization and postoperative infectious complications existed in patients who benefited from a preoperative biliary drainage technique. In fact, the bacteria isolated during intraoperative bile sampling were similar, in 49% of cases, to those isolated during bacteriological samples collected postoperatively during infectious complications.
The work carried out by Krüger and al has shown that the spectrum of bacteria found in the preoperative bile samples from patients who have undergone bile duct dilation is potentially not covered by standard antibiotic therapy.
The aim of this observational prospective study is to investigate this correlation between biliary colonization and postoperative infectious complications, to evaluate the morbidity and postoperative mortality of cephalic duodenopancreatectomies performed at the CHRU of Nancy and to study a possible adaptation of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy | – | –Patients who underwent scheduled cephalic duodenopancreatectomy and hospitalized in intensive care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study will be offered to the patient who has benefited from a cephalic duodenopancreatectomy programmed and hospitalized in CHRU Nancy's ICU
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Patient operated for a planned cephalic duodenopancreatectomy
- Post-operative hospitalisation in ICU
- Information leaflet given to the patient and the support person, with oral information, during the post-operative period
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age < 18 years
- Emergency duodenopancreatectomy (surgical indication period less than 48 hours)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Comparison of preoperative Bile and postoperative infection sites microbiology results
Time frame: from date of initial bile sample up to 30 days of postoperative period
bacterial count in log10 bacteria/ml and identification
9 secondary outcomes
Impact of prior biliary drainage on the intraoperative bile microbiological results bacteriological results obtained
Time frame: from date of initial bile sampling to date of surgery (up to 90 days)
Microbial flora in clinical specimens obtained from different sites
Time frame: from date of initial bile sample up to 90 postoperative days
Non infectious surgical complications using scores
Time frame: from date of surgery up to 30 postoperative days
postoperative infectious complications as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, Ga)
Time frame: During hospital stay (up to 90 days after surgery)
Implication of bacteria found in biliculture as causative agent in post-operative infections
Time frame: During hospital stay (up to 90 days after surg
length of stay in intensive care and hospital
Time frame: During the ICU stay and hospital
mortality rate
Time frame: At day +28 and day +90
Description of nutrition assistance
Time frame: from date of initial bile sample up to 30 days of postoperative period
Nutritional status measured by nutritional risk index (NRI)
Time frame: preoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jul 2021.
- Background: PubMed 12677147Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):509-14. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000059981.13160.97.
- Background: PubMed 17122618DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Clavien PA. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: A novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246856.03918.9a.
- Background: PubMed 26387569Okano K, Hirao T, Unno M, Fujii T, Yoshitomi H, Suzuki S, Satoi S, Takahashi S, Kainuma O, Suzuki Y. Postoperative infectious complications after pancreatic resection. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1551-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9919. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
- Background: PubMed 25713915Yu L, Huang Q, Xie F, Lin X, Liu C. Risk factors of postoperative complications of pancreatoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2014 Oct;61(135):2091-5.
- Background: PubMed 18304506Lermite E, Pessaux P, Teyssedou C, Etienne S, Brehant O, Arnaud JP. Effect of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on infectious morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy: a case-control study. Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.03.016.
- Background: PubMed 28121036Scheufele F, Aichinger L, Jager C, Demir IE, Schorn S, Sargut M, Erkan M, Kleeff J, Friess H, Ceyhan GO. Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on bacterial flora in bile of patients with periampullary cancer. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e182-e188. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10450.
- Background: PubMed 16377502Cortes A, Sauvanet A, Bert F, Janny S, Sockeel P, Kianmanesh R, Ponsot P, Ruszniewski P, Belghiti J. Effect of bile contamination on immediate outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumor. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jan;202(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 31749594Kruger CM, Adam U, Adam T, Kramer A, Heidecke CD, Makowiec F, Riediger H. Bacterobilia in pancreatic surgery-conclusions for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Nov 7;25(41):6238-6247. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i41.6238.
Related trials for Infection, Bacterial
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About How a New Pneumococcal Vaccine Works in Infants
Pneumococcal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Early Pathophysiology of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Prediction of the Risk of Progression: a Prospective Cohort
Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Safety of an Expanded Pneumococcal Vaccine in Healthy Infants
Pneumococcal Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Modeling Host-Pathogen Interaction Using Lymphoid Organoids
Staphylococcal Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MARIE-REINE LOSSER, MD,PhD principal investigator
CHRU Nancy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Infection, Bacterial, run by Central Hospital, Nancy, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of preoperative Bile and postoperative infection sites microbiology results (time frame: from date of initial bile sample up to 30 days of postoperative period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04555252, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2021.