Hypovitaminosis DNCT04556136
Comparing a Novel Phototherapy Kiosk to Oral Vitamin D Supplementation
A study testing Standing Phototherapy Kiosk and D3 Oral supplement in people with Hypovitaminosis D, run by Madigan Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this project is to demonstrate the capability of a standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK) to stimulate cutaneous vitamin D3 and subsequent production of 25 Hydroxyvitamin (OH) D safely and as efficiently as an oral vitamin D3 supplement of 600 IU taken daily over a 10 week intervention period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 69 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypovitaminosis D
- What is being tested?
- Standing Phototherapy Kiosk and D3 Oral supplement
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Apr 2018to 1 Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 69 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults, age 18 - 69 years
- Ability to read and understand English
- Subjectively in good health
- Able to stand without assistance for ~10 minutes
Who cannot join
- Any volunteer with relocation, deployment, or release from active duty in the next 4 months
- Pregnant, or currently breastfeeding, females
- Anyone with chronic health problems (e.g. kidney disease, liver disease, intestinal malabsorption)
- Any volunteer currently taking vitamin D supplementation
- Taking medications for an endocrine disorder, such as Synthroid or oral hypoglycemic agents
- Sarcoidosis
Show all 9Show fewer
- Medications having a high potential for interaction with vitamin D:
- anti-seizure medications, cyclosporine, indinavir (Crixivan) • Adults diagnosed with light allergies: Actinic prurigo, Polymorphous light eruption, Solar urticaria
- Adults diagnosed with light sensitivities: Protoporphyria, Photodermatitis, Xeroderma pigmentosum, Lupus erythematosus, Actinic dermatitis, UV-sensitive syndrome
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Madigan Army Medical Center
Tacoma, Washington, 98431
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Feasibility Study Comparing a Novel Phototherapy Kiosk to Supplementation to Promote Vitamin D Sufficiency
The purpose of this project is to demonstrate the capability of a standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK) to stimulate cutaneous vitamin D3 and subsequent production of 25 Hydroxyvitamin (OH) D safely and as efficiently as an oral vitamin D3 supplement of 600 IU taken daily over a 10 week intervention period. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms; ~120 volunteers will be assigned to either the SPK or to a 600 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplement for 10 weeks. The SPK is an innovative, networked, self-care technology that stimulates endogenous vitamin D production with two ~2-minute treatments per month. It will be tested in an ambulatory setting where enrolled/assigned participants of various baseline levels of 25(OH)D will present for a treatment dose, based on Fitzpatrick skin type category, every other week for 10 weeks. The SPK does not produce a cosmetic tan or dispense pills.
Read the detailed description
The proposed pilot study uses a prospective, longitudinal, randomized design with repeated measures to address vitamin D sufficiency in Active Duty (AD), retiree, beneficiary, and Department of Army civilian populations. It is important and necessary to conduct this study with adult humans, military personnel in particular, to determine acceptability and feasibility of this phototherapy kiosk as an addition to existing Warfighter resources to promote health and resilience. Anticipating 20% attrition, approximately 120 volunteers will be recruited from Madigan Army Medical Center and Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), a large joint base in the Pacific Northwest, where over 25,000 Soldiers and Airmen train every day and regional beneficiaries number ~98,000. Recruiting efforts will attempt to capture a representative sample of the population including genders, diverse ethnicities, and a range of age (18-70 years) and body mass index, who have no contraindication for Ultraviolet (UV) B exposure or oral vitamin D supplementation. Using a computer-generated block design, volunteers will be randomized to one of two treatment groups; 1) oral vitamin D supplementation, or 2) standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK) with UVB exposure, for a 10 week period.
Group 1- Supplement: A Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) Research Pharmacist will dispense a 10-week supply of the vitamin D3 600 International Units (IU) oral supplement to subjects assigned to this group one time. The Project Coordinator will work with the pharmacist to coordinate pick-up of supplement bottles for subjects or optimal in-person dispensing times.
Group 2 - SPK: The Project Coordinator will oversee the phototherapy treatment. Spectrum isolation modules in the kiosk will deliver the UVB dose under supervised conditions over a 2-5 minute interval based on the Fitzpatrick skin type category with the subject wearing minimal or no clothing, preferably no more than a bathing suit and protective eye-wear. The experience in the SPK is designed to be comfortable.
We will enroll all eligible adult volunteers regardless of their baseline 25(OH)D level; it is important to show there is no potential for harm from phototherapy, even if the baseline 25(OH)D level is above 30 ng/mL. We also must learn the trajectory of vitamin D absorption and availability over a 3-4 month period in order to make evidence-based therapeutic recommendations. It is not possible to blind the subjects or research team to the group assignment. Serum levels of 25(OH)D, calcium, and parathyroid hormone will be drawn at baseline (T0), and immediately following the intervention at 10 weeks (T6); at 14 weeks (T8), 25(OH) D will be drawn to document sustainment of treatment effect. A survey will be completed at T1 to capture relevant demographic, medical history, sun exposure, travel, daily activities, and dietary data. Active duty participants will also report the number of days on profile for the previous three months, at T1 and T6. A survey regarding Device Usability will be administered upon kiosk protocol completion. We will analyze data using repeated measures analysis of variance adjusting for significant covariates such as 25(OH)D level at baseline. Logistic regression analyses will be used to predict outcomes and explain the interrelationships among variables, i.e. age, gender, body fat, BMI, ethnicity, and sun exposure relationship to 25(OH)D serum levels.
Outcomes:
- Serum 25(OH)D level. This primary outcome will be crucial to establishing whether the device, a standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK), is equivalent to oral vitamin D3 supplementation which is currently the standard of care prescribed by licensed providers to address vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency. We will establish a baseline 25(OH)D level for both study arms.
- Change in serum 25(OH)D at 10 weeks to reflect adequacy of SPK and supplement treatment.
- Change in serum 25(OH)D at 14 weeks will evaluate sustainment of the post-SPK treatment level.
- Device acceptability by Device Usability Scale. To properly evaluate the outcome of acceptability of this demonstration project involving two arms, one an SPK and the other an oral vitamin D supplement, the research team will administer the Device Usability Scale upon study completion at 14 weeks.
- Device feasibility will be assessed by meticulously tracking of the number of potential participants screened, the number of enrolled subjects, and attrition from each arm. Reasons for attrition will be documented following a discussion with the subject, if possible.
- Conditions
- Hypovitaminosis D
- Being tested
- Standing Phototherapy Kiosk, D3 Oral supplement
- Keywords
- VitaminD, UVBPhototherapy, Military
- Medical subject headings
- Vitamin D Deficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standing Phototherapy KioskDevice
Also called Phototherapy Booth
Benesol is a freestanding booth designed to deliver a small amount of targeted UVB with an interactive user interface and cloud-based software that enables patient self-care. The treatment delivery mechanism uses a metal halide lamp with a series of filters and a lens to optimize full-body exposure to the narrow spectrum (293 - 303nm) of UVB light most efficient at producing vitamin D3. The device uses software to identify patients, establish individual skin types and determine dosage. The system has been designed to manage exposure time and frequency and deliver 60% of a skin-type-adjusted Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED). The expected result for users is a rise in blood levels of 25(OH)D via the endogenous pathway.
D3 Oral supplementDietary supplement
Also called Vitamin D
Each subject assigned to the comparison group was instructed to take one vitamin D3 pill, dispensed by the research pharmacist, each day with a meal for 70 days. Subjects were instructed not to take any additional vitamin D supplementation during the study period. This dosing frequency is consistent with the RDA recommendation. Subjects were instructed to bring their pill bottle with them when returning for their follow up appointment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standing Phototherapy Kiosk (SPK) | Experimental | Volunteers assigned to this group were administered phototherapy treatments in a standing phototherapy kiosk once every other week, for 10 weeks. The treatment usually lasts no more than 10 minutes and is based on the Fitzpatrick skin type classification tool, which is self-reported via the computer touch screen in the kiosk. Receives: Device: Standing Phototherapy Kiosk |
| Oral Supplement | Active comparator | Volunteers assigned to this group were provided with a 10-week supply (70 pills) of a vitamin D3 supplement. Consented subjects were instructed to take one 600 IU pill by mouth each day for ten weeks. They were instructed to take this with a meal. This dose is the RDA for adults between 18 and 70 years old according to the Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. Receives: Dietary Supplement: D3 Oral supplement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Serum Vitamin D Level
25 Hydroxyvitamin D level in the blood
Measured: 10 weeks
Change in Serum Vitamin D Level From Baseline to Week 14
Change over time in 25(OH)D from baseline to week 14 in kiosk group versus supplement group.
Measured: Baseline and 14 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Adherence
Percentage of participants with adherence to daily supplement, and Percentage of phototherapy treatments received.
Adherence to daily supplement was calculated as the percentage of participants who consumed all 70 pills.
Adherence to phototherapy treatments was calculated as the percentage of participants who received all 6 treatments according to protocol.
Measured: 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Device Acceptability Using Device Usability Scale
User acceptability and satisfaction with the novel kiosk on the Device Usability Scale (DUS), also referred to as System Usability Scale. The DUS was administered to the SPK Group upon completion of the study to assess user acceptability of the intervention. This 12-item Likert-type scale assessed cleanliness, ease of use, and comfort of the kiosk with a Likert-type scale where 1= Strongly disagree to 5 = Strongly agree. Minimum score = 12, maximum score = 60. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability and satisfaction with the device.
Measured: 14 weeks
Number of Subjects Retained at 14 Weeks
We examined the number of subjects remaining at 14 weeks.
Measured: Baseline to 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2020
- Study start30 Apr 2018
- Primary completion22 Jan 2019
- Study completion1 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypovitaminosis DStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- For volunteers assigned to the phototherapy kiosk, a measured dose of UVB was administered under conditions of full body exposure of 0.6 minimal erythemal dose (MED) every other week for 10 weeks. The stimulation of cutaneous vitamin D and subsequent 25(OH)D production from phototherapy was compared to the effect of a Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) based dose of 600 IU vitamin D3 supplement daily for 10 weeks.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Madigan Army Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mary S McCarthy, Madigan Army Medical Center
- Investigators
- Mary S McCarthy, PhD, Principal investigator, Nurse Scientist, CNSCI
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04556136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 217121
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Koutkia P, Lu Z, Chen TC, Holick MF. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency due to Crohn's disease with tanning bed ultraviolet B radiation. Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1485-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29686.
PubMed 11729127He CS, Aw Yong XH, Walsh NP, Gleeson M. Is there an optimal vitamin D status for immunity in athletes and military personnel? Exerc Immunol Rev. 2016;22:42-64.
PubMed 26853300Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1911-30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
PubMed 21646368Chen TC, Chimeh F, Lu Z, Mathieu J, Person KS, Zhang A, Kohn N, Martinello S, Berkowitz R, Holick MF. Factors that influence the cutaneous synthesis and dietary sources of vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Apr 15;460(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.12.017. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
PubMed 17254541Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. No abstract available.
PubMed 3377516Bogh MK, Schmedes AV, Philipsen PA, Thieden E, Wulf HC. A small suberythemal ultraviolet B dose every second week is sufficient to maintain summer vitamin D levels: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Feb;166(2):430-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10697.x.
PubMed 22013924
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Feasibility Study Comparing a Novel Phototherapy Kiosk to Supplementation to Promote Vitamin D Sufficiency
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04556136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 217121
- Conditions
- Hypovitaminosis D
- Keywords
- VitaminD, UVBPhototherapy, Military
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Madigan Army Medical CenterUS federal agency
- Study start
- 30 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 12 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this project is to demonstrate the capability of a standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK) to stimulate cutaneous vitamin D3 and subsequent production of 25 Hydroxyvitamin (OH) D safely and as efficiently as an oral vitamin D3 supplement of 600 IU taken daily over a 10 week intervention period. We will conduct a randomized controlled trial with two treatment arms; ~120 volunteers will be assigned to either the SPK or to a 600 IU daily oral vitamin D3 supplement for 10 weeks. The SPK is an innovative, networked, self-care technology that stimulates endogenous vitamin D production with two ~2-minute treatments per month. It will be tested in an ambulatory setting where enrolled/assigned participants of various baseline levels of 25(OH)D will present for a treatment dose, based on Fitzpatrick skin type category, every other week for 10 weeks. The SPK does not produce a cosmetic tan or dispense pills.
Detailed description
The proposed pilot study uses a prospective, longitudinal, randomized design with repeated measures to address vitamin D sufficiency in Active Duty (AD), retiree, beneficiary, and Department of Army civilian populations. It is important and necessary to conduct this study with adult humans, military personnel in particular, to determine acceptability and feasibility of this phototherapy kiosk as an addition to existing Warfighter resources to promote health and resilience. Anticipating 20% attrition, approximately 120 volunteers will be recruited from Madigan Army Medical Center and Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM), a large joint base in the Pacific Northwest, where over 25,000 Soldiers and Airmen train every day and regional beneficiaries number ~98,000. Recruiting efforts will attempt to capture a representative sample of the population including genders, diverse ethnicities, and a range of age (18-70 years) and body mass index, who have no contraindication for Ultraviolet (UV) B exposure or oral vitamin D supplementation. Using a computer-generated block design, volunteers will be randomized to one of two treatment groups; 1) oral vitamin D supplementation, or 2) standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK) with UVB exposure, for a 10 week period.
Group 1- Supplement: A Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC) Research Pharmacist will dispense a 10-week supply of the vitamin D3 600 International Units (IU) oral supplement to subjects assigned to this group one time. The Project Coordinator will work with the pharmacist to coordinate pick-up of supplement bottles for subjects or optimal in-person dispensing times.
Group 2 - SPK: The Project Coordinator will oversee the phototherapy treatment. Spectrum isolation modules in the kiosk will deliver the UVB dose under supervised conditions over a 2-5 minute interval based on the Fitzpatrick skin type category with the subject wearing minimal or no clothing, preferably no more than a bathing suit and protective eye-wear. The experience in the SPK is designed to be comfortable.
We will enroll all eligible adult volunteers regardless of their baseline 25(OH)D level; it is important to show there is no potential for harm from phototherapy, even if the baseline 25(OH)D level is above 30 ng/mL. We also must learn the trajectory of vitamin D absorption and availability over a 3-4 month period in order to make evidence-based therapeutic recommendations. It is not possible to blind the subjects or research team to the group assignment. Serum levels of 25(OH)D, calcium, and parathyroid hormone will be drawn at baseline (T0), and immediately following the intervention at 10 weeks (T6); at 14 weeks (T8), 25(OH) D will be drawn to document sustainment of treatment effect. A survey will be completed at T1 to capture relevant demographic, medical history, sun exposure, travel, daily activities, and dietary data. Active duty participants will also report the number of days on profile for the previous three months, at T1 and T6. A survey regarding Device Usability will be administered upon kiosk protocol completion. We will analyze data using repeated measures analysis of variance adjusting for significant covariates such as 25(OH)D level at baseline. Logistic regression analyses will be used to predict outcomes and explain the interrelationships among variables, i.e. age, gender, body fat, BMI, ethnicity, and sun exposure relationship to 25(OH)D serum levels.
Outcomes:
- Serum 25(OH)D level. This primary outcome will be crucial to establishing whether the device, a standing phototherapy kiosk (SPK), is equivalent to oral vitamin D3 supplementation which is currently the standard of care prescribed by licensed providers to address vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency. We will establish a baseline 25(OH)D level for both study arms.
- Change in serum 25(OH)D at 10 weeks to reflect adequacy of SPK and supplement treatment.
- Change in serum 25(OH)D at 14 weeks will evaluate sustainment of the post-SPK treatment level.
- Device acceptability by Device Usability Scale. To properly evaluate the outcome of acceptability of this demonstration project involving two arms, one an SPK and the other an oral vitamin D supplement, the research team will administer the Device Usability Scale upon study completion at 14 weeks.
- Device feasibility will be assessed by meticulously tracking of the number of potential participants screened, the number of enrolled subjects, and attrition from each arm. Reasons for attrition will be documented following a discussion with the subject, if possible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- For volunteers assigned to the phototherapy kiosk, a measured dose of UVB was administered under conditions of full body exposure of 0.6 minimal erythemal dose (MED) every other week for 10 weeks. The stimulation of cutaneous vitamin D and subsequent 25(OH)D production from phototherapy was compared to the effect of a Recommended Daily Allowance (RDA) based dose of 600 IU vitamin D3 supplement daily for 10 weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standing Phototherapy Kiosk (SPK) | Experimental | Device: Standing Phototherapy KioskVolunteers assigned to this group were administered phototherapy treatments in a standing phototherapy kiosk once every other week, for 10 weeks. The treatment usually lasts no more than 10 minutes and is based on the Fitzpatrick skin type classification tool, which is self-reported via the computer touch screen in the kiosk. |
| Oral Supplement | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: D3 Oral supplementVolunteers assigned to this group were provided with a 10-week supply (70 pills) of a vitamin D3 supplement. Consented subjects were instructed to take one 600 IU pill by mouth each day for ten weeks. They were instructed to take this with a meal. This dose is the RDA for adults between 18 and 70 years old according to the Institute of Medicine Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults, age 18 - 69 years
- Ability to read and understand English
- Subjectively in good health
- Able to stand without assistance for ~10 minutes
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Any volunteer with relocation, deployment, or release from active duty in the next 4 months
- Pregnant, or currently breastfeeding, females
- Anyone with chronic health problems (e.g. kidney disease, liver disease, intestinal malabsorption)
- Any volunteer currently taking vitamin D supplementation
- Taking medications for an endocrine disorder, such as Synthroid or oral hypoglycemic agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standing Phototherapy KioskAlso: Phototherapy BoothBenesol is a freestanding booth designed to deliver a small amount of targeted UVB with an interactive user interface and cloud-based software that enables patient self-care. The treatment delivery mechanism uses a metal halide lamp with a series of filters and a lens to optimize full-body exposure to the narrow spectrum (293 - 303nm) of UVB light most efficient at producing vitamin D3. The device uses software to identify patients, establish individual skin types and determine dosage. The system has been designed to manage exposure time and frequency and deliver 60% of a skin-type-adjusted Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED). The expected result for users is a rise in blood levels of 25(OH)D via the endogenous pathway. | Device | Standing Phototherapy Kiosk (SPK) |
| D3 Oral supplementAlso: Vitamin DEach subject assigned to the comparison group was instructed to take one vitamin D3 pill, dispensed by the research pharmacist, each day with a meal for 70 days. Subjects were instructed not to take any additional vitamin D supplementation during the study period. This dosing frequency is consistent with the RDA recommendation. Subjects were instructed to bring their pill bottle with them when returning for their follow up appointment. | Dietary supplement | Oral Supplement |
Primary outcome
Serum Vitamin D Level
Time frame: 10 weeks
25 Hydroxyvitamin D level in the blood
Change in Serum Vitamin D Level From Baseline to Week 14
Time frame: Baseline and 14 weeks
Change over time in 25(OH)D from baseline to week 14 in kiosk group versus supplement group.
Percentage of Participants With Adherence
Time frame: 10 weeks
Percentage of participants with adherence to daily supplement, and Percentage of phototherapy treatments received. Adherence to daily supplement was calculated as the percentage of participants who consumed all 70 pills. Adherence to phototherapy treatments was calculated as the percentage of participants who received all 6 treatments according to protocol.
2 secondary outcomes
Device Acceptability Using Device Usability Scale
Time frame: 14 weeks
Number of Subjects Retained at 14 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11729127Koutkia P, Lu Z, Chen TC, Holick MF. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency due to Crohn's disease with tanning bed ultraviolet B radiation. Gastroenterology. 2001 Dec;121(6):1485-8. doi: 10.1053/gast.2001.29686.
- Background: PubMed 26853300He CS, Aw Yong XH, Walsh NP, Gleeson M. Is there an optimal vitamin D status for immunity in athletes and military personnel? Exerc Immunol Rev. 2016;22:42-64.
- Background: PubMed 21646368Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, Murad MH, Weaver CM; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jul;96(7):1911-30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
- Background: PubMed 17254541Chen TC, Chimeh F, Lu Z, Mathieu J, Person KS, Zhang A, Kohn N, Martinello S, Berkowitz R, Holick MF. Factors that influence the cutaneous synthesis and dietary sources of vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2007 Apr 15;460(2):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.12.017. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 3377516Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988 Jun;124(6):869-71. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22013924Bogh MK, Schmedes AV, Philipsen PA, Thieden E, Wulf HC. A small suberythemal ultraviolet B dose every second week is sufficient to maintain summer vitamin D levels: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012 Feb;166(2):430-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10697.x.
Related trials for Hypovitaminosis D
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
REducing Systemic Inflammation With LOw-dose Colchicine to ImproVE Cardiovascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Randomized Open-Label Trial
Chronic Kidney Disease Mineral and Bone Disorder, Cognitive Function
Recruiting
Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Vitamin D Deficiency
RecruitingObservational study
Post Marketing Surveillance Study to Observe Safety and Effectiveness of CRYSVITA® in S. Korean Patients
FGF23-related Hypophosphataemic Rickets and Osteomalacia
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation Added to Iron Therapy in Children With Iron Deficiency Anemia
Iron Deficiency Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary S McCarthy, PhD principal investigator
Nurse Scientist, CNSCI
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standing Phototherapy Kiosk and D3 Oral supplement in people with Hypovitaminosis D, run by Madigan Army Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Serum Vitamin D Level (time frame: 10 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04556136, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2024.