Postherpetic NeuralgiaNCT04560361
The Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia
A study testing Electroacupuncture treatment in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine at 7 sites in China.
Trial summary
The investigators designed the multicenter randomized parallel controlled clinical trial of electroacupuncture on PHN which is rigorously designed and have an appropriate sample size, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in pain relieving and pain removing in the treatment of patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- What is being tested?
- Electroacupuncture treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 448 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 14 Oct 2020to 28 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for postherpetic neuralgia (with a clear history of acute herpes zoster, and the duration of postherpetic pain exceeds 90 days)
- Aged 45 to 75 years old
- Patients who were diagnosed with moderate or above pain during the observation period (the daily pain score was continuously collected within 7 days during the observation period, and the average NRS-11 pain score was >=4)
- Subjects who did not participate in other ongoing clinical studies
- Sign informed consent and volunteer to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Patients who are currently receiving or receiving more than one of the "permitted combinations" or any "prohibited combination and treatment" for PHN listed in the following part at least 14 days before screening, and are unwilling to undergo washout period, or patients with serious safety problems during washout period or observation period
- Patients who are expected to receive any new prescription drug or other treatment for PHN after the start of the trial
- Patients with serious uncontrolled medical conditions, such as cardiovascular, lung, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, metabolism, endocrine, nervous system, respiratory system, urogenital system and other serious diseases, or systemic organ dysfunction, malignant tumor, hematologic disease such as bleeding tendency or coagulation dysfunction, serious mental illness such as depression or schizophrenia Symptoms, hepatitis B antigen or hepatitis C antibody positive known state or history of immune dysfunction, history of HIV infection, etc.
- Patients with severe pain unrelated to PHN, such as after surgery for clinical major diseases
- Patients with PHN who have received nerve intervention or other neurosurgical treatment, such as selective nerve damage, percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation or pulsed nerve modulation technology, etc.
- Patients with some special types of herpes zoster, such as those with meninges, cornea, conjunctiva, ear involvement, visceral herpes zoster, generalized herpes zoster
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with skin ulceration, new herpes, or skin infection
- Patients with cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or severe fear of needle
- Patients who are unable to give full informed consent or cannot cooperate with pain scale assessment due to mental, mental, linguistic or behavioral disorders
- Patients who have poor compliance or are prone to fall off due to other reasons, such as the current residence is not in the city where the recruitment hospital is located, or the working environment changes frequently
- Pregnant and lactating women
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
China7 sites
Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Huai'an, Jiangsu, 223001
Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Lianyungang, Jiangsu, 222004
Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210001
Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001
Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Suqian, Jiangsu, 223600
Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214071
About this study
Official title: The Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
The investigators designed the multicenter randomized parallel controlled clinical trial of electroacupuncture on PHN which is rigorously designed and have an appropriate sample size, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in pain relieving and pain removing in the treatment of patients with PHN.
Read the detailed description
Postherpetic neuralgia(PHN) is the most common complication of herpes zoster, is a severe and intractable pain with a high incidence. Nearly 50% of PHN patients have experienced persistent pain for more than one year. Although it is not directly life-threatening, will lead to sleep disorders, even depression, seriously affecting the quality of life of patients. This project is a multi-center randomized controlled trial, which will recruit 448 patients with PHN in 7 hospitals, aiming to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of electroacupuncture on postherpetic neuralgia, and provide evidence-based medical evidence for electroacupuncture treatment of PHN.
- Conditions
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- Being tested
- Electroacupuncture treatment, Sham electroacupuncture treatment
- Keywords
- Electroacupuncture, Postherpetic Neuralgia, Analgesic effect
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia, Postherpetic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Electroacupuncture treatmentOther
Continue the electroacupuncture treatment as described above for 30 minutes.
Sham electroacupuncture treatmentOther
Continue the sham electroacupuncture treatment as described above for 30 minutes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Electroacupuncture group | Experimental | Choose the appropriate position according to the patient's herpes site, and routinely disinfect the skin. Paste the fixed insulating pad on the acupoint, and use a 0.30×40mm acupuncture needle to penetrate the skin 10mm obliquely through the fixed insulating gasket at Ashi point; According to the above operation, the SJ6 and GB34 point of the affected side are directly penetrated into the skin 15-20mm. The local Ashi point connects the two poles of the electroacupuncture device according to the first and last points of the long axis of the painful part, and the SJ6 and GB34 point on the affected side are connected to the poles of the electroacupuncture device. Electroacupuncture waveform is continuous wave, frequency is 2Hz, and current intensity is 1-5mA (causing slight tremor of the skin around the acupuncture point without pain). Continue the electroacupuncture treatment for 30 minutes. Receives: Other: Electroacupuncture treatment |
| Sham electroacupuncture group | Sham comparator | Participants randomly assigned to the sham electroacupuncture (SA) group received sham electroacupuncture by using placebo blunt needles at the same acupoints. After disinfecting the skin and placing the sterile insulating adhesive pads on unilateral Zhigou, Yanglingquan and Ashi points, placebo blunt needles are inserted through the pads and reach the insulating adhesive layer, causing the participants to feel the needle resistance (a sensation of needle insertion). Other procedures, electrode placements, parameter of electroacupuncture apparatus and treatment settings are the same as in the EA group, but with no skin penetration or electricity output. Receives: Other: Sham electroacupuncture treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in pain intensity (NRS-11)
11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11): range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with 1-3 points representing mild pain, 4-6 points representing moderate pain, and 7-10 points representing severe pain. A reduction of ≥30% in NRS-11 scores from baseline were considered responders.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in pain intensity (NRS-11)
The NRS-11 score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with 1-3 points representing mild pain, 4-6 points representing moderate pain, and 7-10 points representing severe pain.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1-month follow-up.
Change in pain intensity (VAS)
Visual analogue scale (VAS): a horizontal line without verbal descriptors or numbers at intermediate points (0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Interference of pain on sleep
Verbal rating scale (VRS): 4 levels.
- Level 0: No pain.
- Level I (mild): Pain but tolerable, normal life, no interference with sleep.
- Level II (moderate): Pain is obvious, unbearable, requires analgesic medication, and sleep is disturbed.
- Level III: Severe pain, unbearable, analgesic medication, severe interference with sleep, accompanied by autonomic dysfunction or passive positions.
Measured: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in mechanical pain threshold (MPT)
Stimulated the most painful central part of PHN with a series of von Frey hairs (0.008-300 g).
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in pain area of PHN (PAP)
calculated by the researcher based on 45 body areas rating scale (BARS-45) which requires the use of height and weight of the patient.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Average number of pain episodes per day
Painless: 0 times; Intermittent pain: 1-50 times (1-2, 3-5, 6-10, 11-50 optional); Persistent pain: >50 times.
Measured: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Average duration of each pain episode (ADEPE)
Duration ranges from 0 minutes (no pain) to 24 hours (persistent pain).
Measured: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in the nature and intensity of pain
short form of McGill pain questionnaire 2 (SF-MPQ-2): includes 22 items.
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in degree of pain and its impact on work life, interpersonal relationships and sleep
Zoster brief pain inventory (ZBPI)
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in depression, anxiety and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)
11 items, combines depression (5 items), anxiety (3 items) and positive outlook (3 items).
Measured: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Overall impression of PHN
Patient global impression of change (PGIC): Participants were asked to describe their overall impression of change of their condition/pain by answering the following question: "Compared to your pain at admission to the project, how much has it changed?" (categories: much improved = 1, mildly improved = 2, unchanged = 3, mildly worsened = 4, much worsened = 5).
Measured: Week 4 and week 8.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2020
- Study start14 Oct 2020
- Primary completion27 Aug 2022
- Study completion28 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postherpetic NeuralgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Using the center stratification block randomization method, the center is used as the stratification factor, and subjects were randomly assigned to the electroacupuncture group and the sham electroacupuncture group at a ratio of 1:1. The central randomization system is used for randomization operations.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Qianyan Liu, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Investigators
- Jianhua Sun, Study director, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineWenping Yao, Principal investigator, Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineYongtao Liu, Principal investigator, Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineJuanjuan Shi, Principal investigator, Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese MedicineHua Feng, Principal investigator, Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineChunxia Lu, Principal investigator, Nantong Hospital of Traditional Chinese MedicineYanfang Liu, Principal investigator, Shuyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04560361
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020NL-103-02
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Case Report Form, Electronic Data Capture(EDC)
Publications
van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):654-662. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
PubMed 24291734Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 10;4(6):e004833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004833.
PubMed 24916088Wang L, Qiu L, Zheng X, Ouyang J, Zhang M, He L, Zeng S, Liu B, Peng J. Effectiveness of electroacupuncture at Jiaji acupoints (EX-B2), plus moxibustion and intermediate on postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. 2020 Feb;40(1):121-127.
PubMed 32227773Wu CH, Lv ZT, Zhao Y, Gao Y, Li JQ, Gao F, Meng XF, Tian B, Shi J, Pan HL, Li M. Electroacupuncture improves thermal and mechanical sensitivities in a rat model of postherpetic neuralgia. Mol Pain. 2013 Apr 3;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-9-18.
PubMed 23551937Pei W, Zeng J, Lu L, Lin G, Ruan J. Is acupuncture an effective postherpetic neuralgia treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 16;12:2155-2165. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S199950. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31410050Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, Schafer M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Agius AM, Bata-Csorgo Z, Breuer J, Girolomoni G, Gross GE, Langan S, Lapid-Gortzak R, Lesser TH, Pleyer U, Sellner J, Verjans GM, Wutzler P, Dressler C, Erdmann R, Rosumeck S, Nast A. European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 1: Diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Jan;31(1):9-19. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13995. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PubMed 27804172Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
PubMed 21621130Chen L, Liu Q, Pei L, Geng H, Liu Y, Yang Z, Ding M, Shen R, Chen M, Lu J, You D, Wu X, Zhou J, Hu L, Guo B, Sun S, Chen F, Zhao Z, Zhai Y, Chen Z, Li Z, Yao W, Feng H, Lu C, Liu Y, Shi J, Guo J, Sun J. Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2026 Jul 1;83(7):667-676. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.1443.
PubMed 42189557Liu Q, Wu X, Guo J, Gao J, Liu B, Wang Y, Xia M, Pei L, Sun J. Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Trial Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1755-1771. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00283-8. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
PubMed 34254233
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04560361
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020NL-103-02
- Conditions
- Postherpetic Neuralgia
- Keywords
- Electroacupuncture, Postherpetic Neuralgia, Analgesic effect
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 448 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 14 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators designed the multicenter randomized parallel controlled clinical trial of electroacupuncture on PHN which is rigorously designed and have an appropriate sample size, aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in pain relieving and pain removing in the treatment of patients with PHN.
Detailed description
Postherpetic neuralgia(PHN) is the most common complication of herpes zoster, is a severe and intractable pain with a high incidence. Nearly 50% of PHN patients have experienced persistent pain for more than one year. Although it is not directly life-threatening, will lead to sleep disorders, even depression, seriously affecting the quality of life of patients. This project is a multi-center randomized controlled trial, which will recruit 448 patients with PHN in 7 hospitals, aiming to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of electroacupuncture on postherpetic neuralgia, and provide evidence-based medical evidence for electroacupuncture treatment of PHN.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Using the center stratification block randomization method, the center is used as the stratification factor, and subjects were randomly assigned to the electroacupuncture group and the sham electroacupuncture group at a ratio of 1:1. The central randomization system is used for randomization operations.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Electroacupuncture group | Experimental | Other: Electroacupuncture treatmentChoose the appropriate position according to the patient's herpes site, and routinely disinfect the skin. Paste the fixed insulating pad on the acupoint, and use a 0.30×40mm acupuncture needle to penetrate the skin 10mm obliquely through the fixed insulating gasket at Ashi point; According to the above operation, the SJ6 and GB34 point of the affected side are directly penetrated into the skin 15-20mm. The local Ashi point connects the two poles of the electroacupuncture device according to the first and last points of the long axis of the painful part, and the SJ6 and GB34 point on the affected side are connected to the poles of the electroacupuncture device. Electroacupuncture waveform is continuous wave, frequency is 2Hz, and current intensity is 1-5mA (causing slight tremor of the skin around the acupuncture point without pain). Continue the electroacupuncture treatment for 30 minutes. |
| Sham electroacupuncture group | Sham comparator | Other: Sham electroacupuncture treatmentParticipants randomly assigned to the sham electroacupuncture (SA) group received sham electroacupuncture by using placebo blunt needles at the same acupoints. After disinfecting the skin and placing the sterile insulating adhesive pads on unilateral Zhigou, Yanglingquan and Ashi points, placebo blunt needles are inserted through the pads and reach the insulating adhesive layer, causing the participants to feel the needle resistance (a sensation of needle insertion). Other procedures, electrode placements, parameter of electroacupuncture apparatus and treatment settings are the same as in the EA group, but with no skin penetration or electricity output. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who meet the diagnostic criteria for postherpetic neuralgia (with a clear history of acute herpes zoster, and the duration of postherpetic pain exceeds 90 days)
- Aged 45 to 75 years old
- Patients who were diagnosed with moderate or above pain during the observation period (the daily pain score was continuously collected within 7 days during the observation period, and the average NRS-11 pain score was >=4)
- Subjects who did not participate in other ongoing clinical studies
- Sign informed consent and volunteer to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients who are currently receiving or receiving more than one of the "permitted combinations" or any "prohibited combination and treatment" for PHN listed in the following part at least 14 days before screening, and are unwilling to undergo washout period, or patients with serious safety problems during washout period or observation period
- Patients who are expected to receive any new prescription drug or other treatment for PHN after the start of the trial
- Patients with serious uncontrolled medical conditions, such as cardiovascular, lung, liver, kidney, gastrointestinal tract, metabolism, endocrine, nervous system, respiratory system, urogenital system and other serious diseases, or systemic organ dysfunction, malignant tumor, hematologic disease such as bleeding tendency or coagulation dysfunction, serious mental illness such as depression or schizophrenia Symptoms, hepatitis B antigen or hepatitis C antibody positive known state or history of immune dysfunction, history of HIV infection, etc.
- Patients with severe pain unrelated to PHN, such as after surgery for clinical major diseases
- Patients with PHN who have received nerve intervention or other neurosurgical treatment, such as selective nerve damage, percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation or pulsed nerve modulation technology, etc.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Electroacupuncture treatmentContinue the electroacupuncture treatment as described above for 30 minutes. | Other | Electroacupuncture group |
| Sham electroacupuncture treatmentContinue the sham electroacupuncture treatment as described above for 30 minutes. | Other | Sham electroacupuncture group |
Primary outcome
Change in pain intensity (NRS-11)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment
11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11): range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), with 1-3 points representing mild pain, 4-6 points representing moderate pain, and 7-10 points representing severe pain. A reduction of ≥30% in NRS-11 scores from baseline were considered responders.
11 secondary outcomes
Change in pain intensity (NRS-11)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 1-month follow-up.
Change in pain intensity (VAS)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Interference of pain on sleep
Time frame: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in mechanical pain threshold (MPT)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in pain area of PHN (PAP)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Average number of pain episodes per day
Time frame: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Average duration of each pain episode (ADEPE)
Time frame: 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in the nature and intensity of pain
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in degree of pain and its impact on work life, interpersonal relationships and sleep
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Change in depression, anxiety and positive outlook scale (DAPOS)
Time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment and 1-month follow-up.
Overall impression of PHN
Time frame: Week 4 and week 8.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 24291734van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, Smith BH, Torrance N. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain. 2014 Apr;155(4):654-662. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 24916088Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 10;4(6):e004833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004833.
- Background: PubMed 32227773Wang L, Qiu L, Zheng X, Ouyang J, Zhang M, He L, Zeng S, Liu B, Peng J. Effectiveness of electroacupuncture at Jiaji acupoints (EX-B2), plus moxibustion and intermediate on postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial. J Tradit Chin Med. 2020 Feb;40(1):121-127.
- Background: PubMed 23551937Wu CH, Lv ZT, Zhao Y, Gao Y, Li JQ, Gao F, Meng XF, Tian B, Shi J, Pan HL, Li M. Electroacupuncture improves thermal and mechanical sensitivities in a rat model of postherpetic neuralgia. Mol Pain. 2013 Apr 3;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-9-18.
- Background: PubMed 31410050Pei W, Zeng J, Lu L, Lin G, Ruan J. Is acupuncture an effective postherpetic neuralgia treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 16;12:2155-2165. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S199950. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 27804172Werner RN, Nikkels AF, Marinovic B, Schafer M, Czarnecka-Operacz M, Agius AM, Bata-Csorgo Z, Breuer J, Girolomoni G, Gross GE, Langan S, Lapid-Gortzak R, Lesser TH, Pleyer U, Sellner J, Verjans GM, Wutzler P, Dressler C, Erdmann R, Rosumeck S, Nast A. European consensus-based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster - guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 1: Diagnosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Jan;31(1):9-19. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13995. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Background: PubMed 21621130Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42189557Chen L, Liu Q, Pei L, Geng H, Liu Y, Yang Z, Ding M, Shen R, Chen M, Lu J, You D, Wu X, Zhou J, Hu L, Guo B, Sun S, Chen F, Zhao Z, Zhai Y, Chen Z, Li Z, Yao W, Feng H, Lu C, Liu Y, Shi J, Guo J, Sun J. Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2026 Jul 1;83(7):667-676. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2026.1443.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34254233Liu Q, Wu X, Guo J, Gao J, Liu B, Wang Y, Xia M, Pei L, Sun J. Analgesic Effect of Electroacupuncture on Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Trial Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):1755-1771. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00283-8. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Case Report Form, Electronic Data Capture(EDC)
Related trials for Postherpetic Neuralgia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Simultaneous Engagement of Networks for Alleviating Pain (SENAP)
Neuropathic Pain, Postherpetic Neuralgia
Active, not recruiting
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Post-Stroke Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Obesity and Obesity-Related Factors and Risk of Herpes Zoster (Shingles) and Postherpetic Neuralgia
Herpes Zoster (HZ)
Recruiting
The Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Venlafaxine for Prevention of Postherpetic Neuralgia in Patients With Acute Herpes Zoster
Herpes Zoster, Pain
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Dexamethasone Palmitate Treatments in Acute and Subacute Herpes Zoster Pain
Herpes Zoster Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jianhua Sun study director
Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Wenping Yao principal investigator
Lianyungang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Yongtao Liu principal investigator
Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Electroacupuncture treatment in people with Postherpetic Neuralgia, run by Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine at 7 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in pain intensity (NRS-11) (time frame: Change from Baseline at 4 weeks after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04560361, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.