DepressionNCT04561544
Pilot Test of a Cultural Intervention to Enhance Alaska Native Students' Behavioral Health
A study testing Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention in people with Depression and Anxiety, run by University of Alaska Anchorage at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This project aims to enhance AN university students' behavioral health by supporting their cultural identity development. While the connection between cultural identity and behavioral health is becoming clearer, comparably less research has explored methods of enhancing identity development. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation
- What is being tested?
- Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 30 Aug 2020to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- self-identify as Alaska Native,
- are registered as an undergraduate student at UAA,
- are at least 18 years old,
- speak English
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Alaska Anchorage
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
About this study
This project aims to enhance AN university students' behavioral health by supporting their cultural identity development. While the connection between cultural identity and behavioral health is becoming clearer, comparably less research has explored methods of enhancing identity development. Consequently, the investigators will pilot a cultural identity development program for AN students at the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA). This intervention is based on extant scientific literature, local findings from focus group with AN students, and traditional wisdom from AN Elders. The eight-week Elder-facilitated program incorporates storytelling, experiential learning, connection, exploration, and sharing of identity, cultural strengths, life paths, and rootedness in who they are in order to remain grounded when they face changes and challenges. Approximately 40 to 50 AN university students will be recruited for the intervention. Participants will be randomized, with half the participants receiving the intervention in the Fall 2020 semester and half the students receiving the intervention in the Spring 2021 semester. We hypothesize that engaging in this intervention will strengthen AN students' cultural identities, strengths, and sense of community; improve their behavioral health, as evidenced in higher self-reported wellbeing, and lower substance use, depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation symptoms; and support their academic persistence and achievement. Outcomes will be tested via mixed design analyses of covariance. Moreover, program feasibility will be examined through a process evaluation, which will entail thematic analyses of six focus groups with program participants (n=40-50) and with the Elders who facilitated the program (n=5).
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, Substance Use
- Being tested
- Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention
- Keywords
- Cultural Identity, Sense of Community, Wellbeing, Alaska Native
- Medical subject headings
- Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Suicidal Ideation, Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity InterventionBehavioural
8-week cultural identity development program led by Alaska Native Elders
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention in Fall 2020 | Experimental | Participants will receive the intervention in Fall 2020 Receives: Behavioral: Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention |
| Intervention in Spring 2021 | Other | Control in Fall 2020 Receives: Behavioral: Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity at Baseline
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity Immediately Following Intervention
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity at 6-Month Follow-Up
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths at Baseline
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths Immediately Following Intervention
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths at 6-Month Follow-Up
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University at Baseline
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University Immediately Following Intervention
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University at 6-Month Follow-Up
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Wellbeing at Baseline
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Wellbeing Immediately Following Intervention
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Wellbeing at 6-Month Follow-Up
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Anxiety Symptoms at Baseline
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Anxiety Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Anxiety Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Depression Symptoms at Baseline
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Depression Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Depression Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Suicidality Symptoms at Baseline
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Suicidality Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Suicidality Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Degree of Substance Use at Baseline
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Degree of Substance Use Immediately Following Intervention
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Substance Use at 6-Month Follow-Up
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Secondary outcomes (6)
Academic Achievement at Baseline
Grade point average (GPA) for a given semester.
Measured: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Academic Achievement Immediately Following Intervention
Grade point average (GPA) for a given semester.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Academic Achievement at 1-Year Follow-Up
Grade point average (GPA) for a given semester.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 12 Months After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment Semester of Intervention
Enrollment for a given semester.
Measured: Immediately After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment Semester after Intervention
Enrollment for a given semester.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment One Year Post-Intervention
Enrollment for a given semester.
Measured: Follow-Up, Approximately 12 Months After Intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2020
- Study start30 Aug 2020
- Primary completion5 May 2021
- Study completion31 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alaska Anchorage
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sara Buckingham, University of Alaska Anchorage
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04561544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1210302
- Other IDs
- U54GM115371
- Status last verified
- Dec 2023
- First submitted
- 30 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Test of a Cultural Intervention to Enhance Alaska Native Students' Behavioral Health
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04561544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1210302
- Conditions
- Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, Substance Use
- Keywords
- Cultural Identity, Sense of Community, Wellbeing, Alaska Native
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alaska AnchorageUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Study start
- 30 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to enhance AN university students' behavioral health by supporting their cultural identity development. While the connection between cultural identity and behavioral health is becoming clearer, comparably less research has explored methods of enhancing identity development. Consequently, the investigators will pilot a cultural identity development program for AN students at the University of Alaska Anchorage (UAA). This intervention is based on extant scientific literature, local findings from focus group with AN students, and traditional wisdom from AN Elders. The eight-week Elder-facilitated program incorporates storytelling, experiential learning, connection, exploration, and sharing of identity, cultural strengths, life paths, and rootedness in who they are in order to remain grounded when they face changes and challenges. Approximately 40 to 50 AN university students will be recruited for the intervention. Participants will be randomized, with half the participants receiving the intervention in the Fall 2020 semester and half the students receiving the intervention in the Spring 2021 semester. We hypothesize that engaging in this intervention will strengthen AN students' cultural identities, strengths, and sense of community; improve their behavioral health, as evidenced in higher self-reported wellbeing, and lower substance use, depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation symptoms; and support their academic persistence and achievement. Outcomes will be tested via mixed design analyses of covariance. Moreover, program feasibility will be examined through a process evaluation, which will entail thematic analyses of six focus groups with program participants (n=40-50) and with the Elders who facilitated the program (n=5).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention in Fall 2020 | Experimental | Behavioral: Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity InterventionParticipants will receive the intervention in Fall 2020 |
| Intervention in Spring 2021 | Other | Behavioral: Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity InterventionControl in Fall 2020 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- self-identify as Alaska Native,
- are registered as an undergraduate student at UAA,
- are at least 18 years old,
- speak English
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention8-week cultural identity development program led by Alaska Native Elders | Behavioural | Intervention in Fall 2020, Intervention in Spring 2021 |
Primary outcome
Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Change in Baseline Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (Roberts et al., 1999), a 12-item self-report measure developed for diverse groups that has been validated with Native people (e.g., Moran et al., 1999) to measure cultural identity. Range = 6-30, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural identity
Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Change in Baseline Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Identification with Cultural Strengths at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Native Cultural Health Assessment Tool (White Shield, 2013), a 10-item self-report measure of cultural strengths in given time period (past month for project) that was developed for Native people to measure cultural strengths. Range = 10-50, higher scores indicate greater identification with cultural strengths.
Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Change in Baseline Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Change in Post-Intervention Strength of Sense of Community with Alaska Native People at University at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Sense of Community Index, Second Edition (Chavis et al., 2008), a 24-item self-report measure of membership in, shared emotional connection with, fulfillment of needs from, and mutual influence on a given community (e.g., Alaska Native community at UAA) that has been used with diverse populations. Range = 0-72, higher scores indicate greater sense of community.
Degree of Wellbeing at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Change in Baseline Degree of Wellbeing Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Wellbeing at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Wellbeing scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate greater wellbeing.
Degree of Anxiety Symptoms at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Change in Baseline Degree of Anxiety Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Anxiety Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Anxiety scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Degree of Depression Symptoms at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Change in Baseline Degree of Depression Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Depression Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Depression scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more depression.
Degree of Suicidality Symptoms at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Change in Baseline Degree of Suicidality Symptoms Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Suicidality Symptoms at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Suicidality scale of the Mental Health Inventory (Veit \& Ware, 1983). Converted scores range from 0-100, higher scores indicate more suicidality.
Degree of Substance Use at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
Change in Baseline Degree of Substance Use Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
Change in Post-Intervention Degree of Substance Use at 6-Month Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Items from the Monitoring the Future Survey (U. Michigan), a 9-item self-report measure of tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, inhalants, sedatives, hallucinogens, and opioid use in past 30 days. Higher scores indicate greater substance use.
6 secondary outcomes
Academic Achievement at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention
Change in Baseline Academic Achievement Immediately Following Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Change in Post-Intervention Academic Achievement at 1-Year Follow-Up
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 12 Months After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment Semester of Intervention
Time frame: Immediately After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment Semester after Intervention
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 6 Months After Intervention
Rate of Students Maintaining University Enrollment One Year Post-Intervention
Time frame: Follow-Up, Approximately 12 Months After Intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Knowing Who You Are (Becoming): Cultural Identity Intervention in people with Depression and Anxiety, run by University of Alaska Anchorage at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Degree of Identification with Cultural Identity at Baseline (time frame: Baseline, Pre-Intervention). The study lists 24 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2023.