AzTrials
AzTrials

FractureNCT04564625

Relationships Between Vitamin D and Orthopedic Trauma

An observational study of Fracture and Fracture Nonunion, run by Methodist Health System at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Vitamin D is an essential hormone involved in bone metabolism, bone mineral density maintenance, and bone health. Vitamin D deficiency is putatively linked to poor pediatric orthopedic outcomes [1]. Further, the risk of low vitamin D associated fractures may be greater in minority pediatric populations [2]. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Fracture, Fracture Nonunion, Fractures, Bone
What is being tested?
Vitamin D Assessment and Fracture
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Mar 2020to 26 Feb 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: All patients between 18 and 25 years treated for fractures at Methodist Dallas Medical Center (MDMC) with an index admission vitamin D assessment will be enrolled. This study will consider any patients with an index admission occurring between February 2016 and February 2020.We will also consider patient demographics as practice suggests minority patients may be disproportionally affected.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be >18 years old and ≤25 years old
  • Patients must have any fracture requiring follow-up
  • Patients must have received vitamin-D assessment

Who cannot join

  • Patients aged >25yrs
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Methodist Health System Clinical Research Institute

    Dallas, Texas, 75203

Other trials in United States

About this study

Vitamin D is an essential hormone involved in bone metabolism, bone mineral density maintenance, and bone health. Vitamin D deficiency is putatively linked to poor pediatric orthopedic outcomes [1]. Further, the risk of low vitamin D associated fractures may be greater in minority pediatric populations [2]. In adults, utility of vitamin D alleles as a biomarker for bone density and fracture risk has been debated for over 10 years [3-5]. Peak bone density is achieved at 25 years old; however, most orthopedic trauma patients less than 25 years of age present with substantial vitamin D deficiencies.

Read the detailed description
  1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Vitamin D is an essential hormone involved in bone metabolism, bone mineral density maintenance, and bone health. Vitamin D deficiency is putatively linked to poor pediatric orthopedic outcomes [1]. Further, the risk of low vitamin D associated fractures may be greater in minority pediatric populations [2]. In adults, utility of vitamin D alleles as a biomarker for bone density and fracture risk has been debated for over 10 years [3-5]. Peak bone density is achieved at 25 years old; however, most orthopedic trauma patients less than 25 years of age present with substantial vitamin D deficiencies. 1.2. Aim(s)
  • Identify the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in young trauma patients with fractures.
  • Describe the merits of vitamin D supplementation in healing and long-term outcomes ≤25 year old trauma patients with fractures. 1.3. Rationale for the study Occurrence of stress and low energy mechanism fractures within a population at peak bone density is troubling and suggestive of underlying pathology. Understanding how to combat vitamin D deficiency, and improve outcomes, is essential in the development of comprehensive and preventative trauma care. 1.4. Hypothesis 1.4.1. Primary Hypothesis Patients aged ≤25yrs old with fractures will have low vitamin-D levels.
  1. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY OUTCOME MEASURES 2.1. Study Objectives 2.1.1. Primary Objective Determine the frequency of vitamin D deficiency in fracture patients aged less than 25 years old. 2.1.2. Secondary Objective Report the long-term (one year) outcomes for fracture healing relative to baseline and therapeutic vitamin D levels. 2.2. Study Outcome Measures 2.2.1. Primary Outcome Vitamin D levels at the time of the index injury through one year post-operative follow up. 2.2.2. Secondary Outcomes Patient demographics (age, sex, ethnicity), injury characteristics, lab values, rate of nonunion (i.e., failure of a fractured bone to heal), admit information, discharge disposition, payer type, and mortality.
  2. STUDY DESIGN All patients between 18 and 25 years treated for fractures at Methodist Dallas Medical Center (MDMC) with an index admission vitamin D assessment will be enrolled. This study will consider any patients with an index admission occurring between February 2016 and February 2020. No changes to care or intervention will occur and this study will be conducted completely via chart review. The aim is to identify 100 subjects with a one-year follow-up appointment for their injury to determine the rate of nonunion and vitamin D levels. As patients receive vitamin D supplementation as standard of care if index values are low, impact will be assessed through relative deficiency and clinical outcomes. Data collected from subjects without need for supplementation may be used to generate a threshold. Patient demographics will be considered as practice suggests minority patients may be disproportionally affected. The plan to complete the data collection and analysis by February 2021.
Being tested
Vitamin D Assessment, Fracture
Keywords
fracture, fracture nonunion, vitamin D
Medical subject headings
Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Ununited

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin D AssessmentOther

    index admission vitamin D assessment

  • FractureOther

    rate of nonunion (i.e., failure of a fractured bone to heal)

Study groups in NCT04564625
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fracture and Vitamin D assessmentAll patients between 18 and 25 years treated for fractures at Methodist Dallas Medical Center (MDMC) with an index admission vitamin D assessment will be enrolled. This study will consider any patients with an index admission occurring between February 2016 and February 2020. No changes to care or intervention will occur and this study will be conducted completely via chart review. The aim is to identify 100 subjects with a one-year follow-up appointment for their injury to determine the rate of nonunion and vitamin D levels. As patients receive vitamin D supplementation as standard of care if index values are low, impact will be assessed through relative deficiency and clinical outcomes. Data collected from subjects without need for supplementation may be used to generate a threshold.
Receives: Other: Vitamin D Assessment; Other: Fracture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vitamin D levels at the time of the index injury through one year post-operative follow up.

    Vitamin D levels at the time of the index injury through one year post-operative follow up.

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Patient demographics

    age, sex, ethnicity

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  2. injury characteristics

    injury characteristics

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  3. rate of nonunion

    failure of a fractured bone to heal

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  4. admit information

    admit information

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  5. discharge disposition

    discharge disposition

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  6. payer type

    payer type

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

  7. mortality

    mortality

    Measured: February 2016 and February 2020

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2020
  2. Study start6 Mar 2020
  3. Primary completion26 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion26 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04564625
Sponsor's protocol ID
005.TRA.2020.D
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
21 Sep 2020
Last updated
19 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: This is a single center study and the data will not be shared with outside entities until it is de-identified in order to be presented at relevant conferences or published in a scientific journal

Publications

  • Horan MP, Williams K, Hughes D. The Role of Vitamin D in Pediatric Orthopedics. Orthop Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;50(2):181-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2018.10.002.

    PubMed 30850077
  • Ramirez N, Ortiz-Fullana JL, Arciniegas N, Fullana A, Valentin P, Orengo JC, Iriarte I, Carlo S. Vitamin D levels and fracture risk among Hispanic children. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Apr;29(3):531-536. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2315-7. Epub 2018 Oct 13.

    PubMed 30317468
  • McClean E, Archbold GP, Taggart HM. Do the COL1A1 and Taq 1 vitamin D receptor polymorphisms have a role in identifying individuals at risk of developing osteoporosis? Ulster Med J. 2003 May;72(1):26-33.

    PubMed 12868700
  • Lorentzon M, Lorentzon R, Nordstrom P. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism is associated with birth height, growth to adolescence, and adult stature in healthy caucasian men: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Apr;85(4):1666-70. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.4.6566.

    PubMed 10770213
  • Ensrud KE, Stone K, Cauley JA, White C, Zmuda JM, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Cummings SR. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and the risk of fractures in older women. For the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Oct;14(10):1637-45. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1637.

    PubMed 10491209

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Fracture and Fracture Nonunion, run by Methodist Health System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vitamin D levels at the time of the index injury through one year post-operative follow up. (time frame: February 2016 and February 2020). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04564625, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in