Arthroplasty ComplicationsNCT04565093
Efficacy of iPACK After Unilateral TKA
A study testing iPACK and Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in people with Arthroplasty Complications and Pain, Joint, run by King Khalid University Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic procedure associated with severe postoperative pain which may limit patient rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Although various analgesic techniques have been proposed, there is currently no consensus on the optimal protocol to improve functional outcomes… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty Complications, Pain, Joint, Arthritis Knee
- What is being tested?
- iPACK and Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2020to 27 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score I-III
- Scheduled for elective unilateral TKA
- Age > 18 < 80 years
- BMI < 40 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score (ASA) IV
- Patient scheduled for revision of TKA
- Rheumatoid Arthritis patient
- Prior back surgery
- Patients on any anticoagulant
- Any other contra-indication for spinal anesthesia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Versus Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective Randomized Control Trial
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic procedure associated with severe postoperative pain which may limit patient rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Although various analgesic techniques have been proposed, there is currently no consensus on the optimal protocol to improve functional outcomes following TKA. The ideal analgesic regimen post TKA should enable adequate pain control, early mobilization and physical therapy, shorten hospital stay, reduce the risk of postoperative complications and improve patient satisfaction. Our hypothesis is iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee) peripheral nerves anesthetic block is superior to Periarticular local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)which is commonly given by the surgeons during the TKA in terms of pain relief and early mobilization.
Read the detailed description
Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons. Research has found that orthopedic surgeries are the most painful procedures.(1) Unrelieved pain post orthopedic surgery is a stressor that can cause altered physiologic changes and negative effects on every organ system of the body. Untreated pain can result in complex pathophysiology than the pain caused by the original injury or disease. This can have both detrimental physical and psychological consequences for patients, as well as a substantial economic impact due to increased costs of health care and lost productivity. (2) The anatomy of sensory supply to the knee joint is complex with contributions from both the lumbar and sacral plexuses. The anterior-medial compartmental innervation consists of branches from the femoral nerve, including the saphenous nerve, the medial femoral cutaneous nerve and the nerve to vastus medialis. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the nerves to vastus intermedius and lateralis innervate the knee anterolaterally. The posterior group consists of the popliteal nerve plexus that ramifies around the genicular vasculature in the popliteal fossa. The popliteal nerve plexus is derived from the tibial nerve and the posterior branch of the obturator nerve. The posterior group supplies intra-articular innervation to the menisci, the peri-meniscular joint capsule, the cruciate ligaments, the infra-patellar fat pad, and the posterior part of the fibrous knee capsule.(3) The medial para-patellar arthrotomy performed for total knee arthroplasty, through the anteromedial integument of the knee and the extra-articular medial retinacular complex, evokes pain mediated by the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve, the medial retinacular nerve (the terminal branch of the nerve to vastus medialis), and the anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve. This procedure will not affect the extra-articular nerve branches to the anterolateral portion of the knee from the common peroneal nerve, the nerves to vastus intermedius and lateralis, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The intra-articular excision evokes pain from structures innervated by the posterior group. (4) Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) is one of the most commonly used techniques that has been shown to significantly improve analgesia and reduce postoperative opioid consumption after TKA. However, FNB may lead to quadriceps muscle weakness, limiting ambulation and increasing the risk of falls, making physical rehabilitation results unsatisfactory.(5) Recently, there has been increased interest in the Adductor Canal Block (ACB) for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty. (6) The adductor canal is a pyramidal, musculoaponeurotic tunnel from the apex of the femoral triangle to the adductor hiatus, running between the vastus medialis muscle anterolaterally and the adductor longus and adductor Magnus muscles posteromedially. It is covered in its entire length by the vastoadductor membrane. The contents of the adductor canal include the superficial artery and vein, saphenous nerve, the nerve to vastus medialis, the posterior branch of the obturator nerve, and in some cases, the medial cutaneous nerve and the anterior branch of the obturator nerve. The advantage of this technique rests in the fact that it provides localized motor-sparing analgesia, with similar opioid consumption and side effects when compared with FNB.(7) However, ACB does not provide analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee, which can be moderate to severe after surgery. This pain may be ameliorated by the addition of the ultrasound-guided local anesthetic infiltration of the Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee (iPACK). (8) Although this technique seems to provide many advantages, it may present some limitations and risks like intravascular injection and injury due to the presence of the popliteal vessels near the target. Although the use of ultrasound guidance decreases this risk, significant bleeding and serious complications can still occur due to the inability to recognize and compress the source of bleeding. (4)
Methods: In this study we are going to recruit 169 participants to compare them in two groups. group-1 iPACK (n=85) will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) + iPACK and group 2 LIA (n=84) ACB+ periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA). All participants, care provider (nurses \& assistant anesthetists) and outcome assessors (physiotherapist) will be blinded to the group allocation. Only the anesthesiologist responsible for perioperative care performing the ACB and iPACK blocks will be aware of the randomization. All peripheral nerve blocks will be performed with complete aseptic technique and under ultrasound guidance. Periarticular LIA will be performed by the surgeon with the landmark technique base. This study will be conducted in six months' duration. All patients will consent for spinal anesthesia, ACB, and iPACK and they will be instructed how to report pain on a 10 cm long Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) postoperatively.
The primary outcome, severity of pain (NRS) will be evaluated in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The secondary outcome, time to mobilization along with pain score will be recorded in the ward after 2 hours of surgery then every 12 hours until the patient discharged home. Quadriceps muscle strength will be evaluated with the knee range of motion (ROM). A completely straight knee joint (extension) will measure 0° and a fully bent knee will have a flexion of at 130° degrees. The Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests to evaluate functional recovery after TKA. The TUG test measures the time it takes a patient to get up from a chair, walk 3 m, and return to the sitting position in the chair.
On arrival to operation room (OR), all eligible participants will have intravenous (IV) cannula in situ and monitors according to the Association of Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Under complete aseptic technique, spinal anesthesia will be performed with pencil point 25 Gauge (Whitacre) needle with heavy Bupivacaine 0.5% and Fentanyl 15 micrograms (mics) total 3 milliliters (ml). After spinal anesthesia, each participant will receive either ultrasound-guided ACB+iPACK or ACB+ periarticular LIA.
Description of peripheral nerve blocks technique:
Adductor Canal Block (ACB): The skin is disinfected and the transducer (SonoSite 8-14 MHz) is placed anteromedially, approximately at the junction between the middle and distal third of the thigh. The saphenous nerve is usually identified as anterior and lateral to the femoral artery. The needle (Pajunk Germany100 mm) will be inserted in-plane from lateral-to-medial orientation and advanced toward the femoral artery deep to the sartorius muscle. Once the needle tip is visualized anterior to the artery and after careful aspiration, 1-2 mL of local anesthetic will be injected to confirm the proper injection site. If injection of local anesthetic does not appear to result in its spread around the femoral artery, additional needle repositions and injections may be necessary. A total of 20 millilitres (ml) of Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected.
Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK):
The patient will be placed in a supine position with the lower extremity flexed at the knee and abducted at the hip. To begin scanning, the transducer will be placed on the lower third of the medial thigh to visualize the femur and the femoral vessels in cross-section. The transducer then will be slide caudally to observe the femoral artery as it dives into the popliteal fossa through the adductor hiatus to become the popliteal artery. At this point, the transducer will be moved posteriorly and inferiorly to visualize the space between the popliteal artery and the shaft of the femur just superior to the femoral condyles. The needle will be inserted, in a plane, from the anterior end of the transducer in a medial to the lateral trajectory, keeping the needle parallel to the acoustic shadow of the femur. With the needle tip resting 2 cm beyond the lateral border of the artery, 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected, after negative aspiration of blood, to infiltrate the tissue space in divided doses as the needle is withdrawn.
Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA):
A mixture of Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues.
Postoperatively all participants will be prescribed 1 gm Paracetamol oral every 6 hours + buprenorphine transdermal patch 5 mics ± celecoxib 200 mg every 12 hours ± oxycodone 10 mg every 12 hours ± pregabalin 75 mg every 12 hours for breakthrough pain.
Sample Size:
In King Khalid University Hospital, we are approximately doing annually 300 TKA cases. Assuming that and confidence level of 95%, margin of error 5% Raosoft® recommended sample size is 169.
Data Collection:
The data will be collected by the outcome assessors who will be unaware of group allocation and will record their findings in patient's file and on predesigned form. Patients demographic data, duration of surgery, tourniquet time, PACU stay, postoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pain score, knee range of motion (ROM), time-up-go (TUG), time to hospital discharge, patient and surgeon satisfaction and any complication will be recorded.
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
- Being tested
- iPACK, Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA)
- Keywords
- Knee arthroplasty, Pain control, iPACK, Local infiltration analgesia, Early rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Arthralgia, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iPACKProcedure or surgery
Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK):
This is basically ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block performed by the anesthesiologists at the posterior side of the knee to control pain after TKA.
Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA)Procedure or surgery
A mixture of Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues. This intervention is commonly performed by the operating orthopedic surgeon to control pain after TKA.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| iPACK | Experimental | In this group, participants will receive a peripheral nerve anesthetic block that is iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee) to cover posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This anesthetic block will be performed by assigned anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. Receives: Procedure: iPACK |
| Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) | Placebo comparator | In this group, participants will receive a mixture of bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) that will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues. This local anesthetic infiltration is commonly performed by the operating orthopedic surgeon during TKA for postoperative pain control. Receives: Procedure: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from preoperative pain score after TKA
The pain will assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS). From 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Knee range of motion (ROM)
The functional recovery of the knee joint after TKA will be evaluated by ROM.A completely straight knee joint (extension) will measure 0° and a fully bent knee will have a flexion of at 130° degrees
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Timed-up and go (TUG)
The functional recovery of the knee joint after TKA will be evaluated by TUG test. The TUG test is the time it takes a patient to get up from a chair, walk 3 m, and return to the sitting position in the chair
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2020
- Study start28 Sep 2020
- Primary completion24 Mar 2021
- Study completion27 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is conducted to evaluate posterior knee pain after unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) comparing iPACK (Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) under spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) to cover pain from anteromedial aspect of knee. 169 adult patients will be recruited in this study and will be divided into two groups; group-1 iPACK (n=85) will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) + iPACK and group 2 LIA (n=84) will receive ACB+ periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA). The primary outcome, severity of pain (NRS) will be evaluated in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The secondary outcome, time to mobilization (ROM and TUG tests) along with pain score will be recorded in the ward after 2 hours of surgery then every 12 hours until the patient discharged home.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Khalid University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Abdul Sattar Narejo, King Khalid University Hospital
- Investigators
- Abdul Sattar Narejo, FCPS, FCAI, Principal investigator, King Saud University College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04565093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB PROJECT NO. E-20-4819
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results
Publications
YaDeau JT, Cahill JB, Zawadsky MW, Sharrock NE, Bottner F, Morelli CM, Kahn RL, Sculco TP. The effects of femoral nerve blockade in conjunction with epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):891-895. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159150.79908.21.
PubMed 16116010Fine PG. Long-term consequences of chronic pain: mounting evidence for pain as a neurological disease and parallels with other chronic disease states. Pain Med. 2011 Jul;12(7):996-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01187.x.
PubMed 21752179Runge C, Borglum J, Jensen JM, Kobborg T, Pedersen A, Sandberg J, Mikkelsen LR, Vase M, Bendtsen TF. The Analgesic Effect of Obturator Nerve Block Added to a Femoral Triangle Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):445-51. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000406.
PubMed 27171822Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80.
PubMed 23788068Jiang X, Wang QQ, Wu CA, Tian W. Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):294-300. doi: 10.1111/os.12268.
PubMed 27627711Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
PubMed 25376972Thobhani S, Scalercio L, Elliott CE, Nossaman BD, Thomas LC, Yuratich D, Bland K, Osteen K, Patterson ME. Novel Regional Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty Promote Reduced Hospital Length of Stay: An Analysis of 106 Patients. Ochsner J. 2017 Fall;17(3):233-238.
PubMed 29026354
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Versus Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04565093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB PROJECT NO. E-20-4819
- Keywords
- Knee arthroplasty, Pain control, iPACK, Local infiltration analgesia, Early rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King Khalid University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic procedure associated with severe postoperative pain which may limit patient rehabilitation and hospital discharge. Although various analgesic techniques have been proposed, there is currently no consensus on the optimal protocol to improve functional outcomes following TKA. The ideal analgesic regimen post TKA should enable adequate pain control, early mobilization and physical therapy, shorten hospital stay, reduce the risk of postoperative complications and improve patient satisfaction. Our hypothesis is iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee) peripheral nerves anesthetic block is superior to Periarticular local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA)which is commonly given by the surgeons during the TKA in terms of pain relief and early mobilization.
Detailed description
Background: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent procedures performed by orthopedic surgeons. Research has found that orthopedic surgeries are the most painful procedures.(1) Unrelieved pain post orthopedic surgery is a stressor that can cause altered physiologic changes and negative effects on every organ system of the body. Untreated pain can result in complex pathophysiology than the pain caused by the original injury or disease. This can have both detrimental physical and psychological consequences for patients, as well as a substantial economic impact due to increased costs of health care and lost productivity. (2) The anatomy of sensory supply to the knee joint is complex with contributions from both the lumbar and sacral plexuses. The anterior-medial compartmental innervation consists of branches from the femoral nerve, including the saphenous nerve, the medial femoral cutaneous nerve and the nerve to vastus medialis. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, the common peroneal nerve, and the nerves to vastus intermedius and lateralis innervate the knee anterolaterally. The posterior group consists of the popliteal nerve plexus that ramifies around the genicular vasculature in the popliteal fossa. The popliteal nerve plexus is derived from the tibial nerve and the posterior branch of the obturator nerve. The posterior group supplies intra-articular innervation to the menisci, the peri-meniscular joint capsule, the cruciate ligaments, the infra-patellar fat pad, and the posterior part of the fibrous knee capsule.(3) The medial para-patellar arthrotomy performed for total knee arthroplasty, through the anteromedial integument of the knee and the extra-articular medial retinacular complex, evokes pain mediated by the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve, the medial retinacular nerve (the terminal branch of the nerve to vastus medialis), and the anterior branch of the medial femoral cutaneous nerve. This procedure will not affect the extra-articular nerve branches to the anterolateral portion of the knee from the common peroneal nerve, the nerves to vastus intermedius and lateralis, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. The intra-articular excision evokes pain from structures innervated by the posterior group. (4) Ultrasound-guided Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) is one of the most commonly used techniques that has been shown to significantly improve analgesia and reduce postoperative opioid consumption after TKA. However, FNB may lead to quadriceps muscle weakness, limiting ambulation and increasing the risk of falls, making physical rehabilitation results unsatisfactory.(5) Recently, there has been increased interest in the Adductor Canal Block (ACB) for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty. (6) The adductor canal is a pyramidal, musculoaponeurotic tunnel from the apex of the femoral triangle to the adductor hiatus, running between the vastus medialis muscle anterolaterally and the adductor longus and adductor Magnus muscles posteromedially. It is covered in its entire length by the vastoadductor membrane. The contents of the adductor canal include the superficial artery and vein, saphenous nerve, the nerve to vastus medialis, the posterior branch of the obturator nerve, and in some cases, the medial cutaneous nerve and the anterior branch of the obturator nerve. The advantage of this technique rests in the fact that it provides localized motor-sparing analgesia, with similar opioid consumption and side effects when compared with FNB.(7) However, ACB does not provide analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee, which can be moderate to severe after surgery. This pain may be ameliorated by the addition of the ultrasound-guided local anesthetic infiltration of the Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee (iPACK). (8) Although this technique seems to provide many advantages, it may present some limitations and risks like intravascular injection and injury due to the presence of the popliteal vessels near the target. Although the use of ultrasound guidance decreases this risk, significant bleeding and serious complications can still occur due to the inability to recognize and compress the source of bleeding. (4)
Methods: In this study we are going to recruit 169 participants to compare them in two groups. group-1 iPACK (n=85) will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) + iPACK and group 2 LIA (n=84) ACB+ periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA). All participants, care provider (nurses \& assistant anesthetists) and outcome assessors (physiotherapist) will be blinded to the group allocation. Only the anesthesiologist responsible for perioperative care performing the ACB and iPACK blocks will be aware of the randomization. All peripheral nerve blocks will be performed with complete aseptic technique and under ultrasound guidance. Periarticular LIA will be performed by the surgeon with the landmark technique base. This study will be conducted in six months' duration. All patients will consent for spinal anesthesia, ACB, and iPACK and they will be instructed how to report pain on a 10 cm long Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) postoperatively.
The primary outcome, severity of pain (NRS) will be evaluated in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The secondary outcome, time to mobilization along with pain score will be recorded in the ward after 2 hours of surgery then every 12 hours until the patient discharged home. Quadriceps muscle strength will be evaluated with the knee range of motion (ROM). A completely straight knee joint (extension) will measure 0° and a fully bent knee will have a flexion of at 130° degrees. The Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests to evaluate functional recovery after TKA. The TUG test measures the time it takes a patient to get up from a chair, walk 3 m, and return to the sitting position in the chair.
On arrival to operation room (OR), all eligible participants will have intravenous (IV) cannula in situ and monitors according to the Association of Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI). Under complete aseptic technique, spinal anesthesia will be performed with pencil point 25 Gauge (Whitacre) needle with heavy Bupivacaine 0.5% and Fentanyl 15 micrograms (mics) total 3 milliliters (ml). After spinal anesthesia, each participant will receive either ultrasound-guided ACB+iPACK or ACB+ periarticular LIA.
Description of peripheral nerve blocks technique:
Adductor Canal Block (ACB): The skin is disinfected and the transducer (SonoSite 8-14 MHz) is placed anteromedially, approximately at the junction between the middle and distal third of the thigh. The saphenous nerve is usually identified as anterior and lateral to the femoral artery. The needle (Pajunk Germany100 mm) will be inserted in-plane from lateral-to-medial orientation and advanced toward the femoral artery deep to the sartorius muscle. Once the needle tip is visualized anterior to the artery and after careful aspiration, 1-2 mL of local anesthetic will be injected to confirm the proper injection site. If injection of local anesthetic does not appear to result in its spread around the femoral artery, additional needle repositions and injections may be necessary. A total of 20 millilitres (ml) of Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected.
Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK):
The patient will be placed in a supine position with the lower extremity flexed at the knee and abducted at the hip. To begin scanning, the transducer will be placed on the lower third of the medial thigh to visualize the femur and the femoral vessels in cross-section. The transducer then will be slide caudally to observe the femoral artery as it dives into the popliteal fossa through the adductor hiatus to become the popliteal artery. At this point, the transducer will be moved posteriorly and inferiorly to visualize the space between the popliteal artery and the shaft of the femur just superior to the femoral condyles. The needle will be inserted, in a plane, from the anterior end of the transducer in a medial to the lateral trajectory, keeping the needle parallel to the acoustic shadow of the femur. With the needle tip resting 2 cm beyond the lateral border of the artery, 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected, after negative aspiration of blood, to infiltrate the tissue space in divided doses as the needle is withdrawn.
Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA):
A mixture of Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues.
Postoperatively all participants will be prescribed 1 gm Paracetamol oral every 6 hours + buprenorphine transdermal patch 5 mics ± celecoxib 200 mg every 12 hours ± oxycodone 10 mg every 12 hours ± pregabalin 75 mg every 12 hours for breakthrough pain.
Sample Size:
In King Khalid University Hospital, we are approximately doing annually 300 TKA cases. Assuming that and confidence level of 95%, margin of error 5% Raosoft® recommended sample size is 169.
Data Collection:
The data will be collected by the outcome assessors who will be unaware of group allocation and will record their findings in patient's file and on predesigned form. Patients demographic data, duration of surgery, tourniquet time, PACU stay, postoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure, pain score, knee range of motion (ROM), time-up-go (TUG), time to hospital discharge, patient and surgeon satisfaction and any complication will be recorded.
Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is conducted to evaluate posterior knee pain after unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) comparing iPACK (Interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee) and Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) under spinal anesthesia. All patients will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) to cover pain from anteromedial aspect of knee. 169 adult patients will be recruited in this study and will be divided into two groups; group-1 iPACK (n=85) will receive Adductor Canal Block (ACB) + iPACK and group 2 LIA (n=84) will receive ACB+ periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA). The primary outcome, severity of pain (NRS) will be evaluated in Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). The secondary outcome, time to mobilization (ROM and TUG tests) along with pain score will be recorded in the ward after 2 hours of surgery then every 12 hours until the patient discharged home.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| iPACK | Experimental | Procedure: iPACKIn this group, participants will receive a peripheral nerve anesthetic block that is iPACK (Interspace between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee) to cover posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This anesthetic block will be performed by assigned anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. |
| Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA)In this group, participants will receive a mixture of bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) that will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues. This local anesthetic infiltration is commonly performed by the operating orthopedic surgeon during TKA for postoperative pain control. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score I-III
- Scheduled for elective unilateral TKA
- Age > 18 < 80 years
- BMI < 40 kg/m2
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status score (ASA) IV
- Patient scheduled for revision of TKA
- Rheumatoid Arthritis patient
- Prior back surgery
- Patients on any anticoagulant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iPACKInterspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK): This is basically ultrasound guided peripheral nerve block performed by the anesthesiologists at the posterior side of the knee to control pain after TKA. | Procedure or surgery | iPACK |
| Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA)A mixture of Bupivacaine 0.25% 20 ml + epinephrine 100 mics ± lornoxicam 8 mg ± morphine 10 mg ± tranexamic acid 1 gm in 40 ml normal saline (NS) will be injected into the posterior capsule and the medial and lateral ligaments just before implantation: after insertion of the implants and into the capsule and retinacular tissues. The remaining solution (approximately 20 mL) will be used to infiltrate the muscle and subcutaneous tissues. This intervention is commonly performed by the operating orthopedic surgeon to control pain after TKA. | Procedure or surgery | Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) |
Primary outcome
Change from preoperative pain score after TKA
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
The pain will assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS). From 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable
2 secondary outcomes
Knee range of motion (ROM)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Timed-up and go (TUG)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 16116010YaDeau JT, Cahill JB, Zawadsky MW, Sharrock NE, Bottner F, Morelli CM, Kahn RL, Sculco TP. The effects of femoral nerve blockade in conjunction with epidural analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):891-895. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000159150.79908.21.
- Results publication: PubMed 21752179Fine PG. Long-term consequences of chronic pain: mounting evidence for pain as a neurological disease and parallels with other chronic disease states. Pain Med. 2011 Jul;12(7):996-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01187.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 27171822Runge C, Borglum J, Jensen JM, Kobborg T, Pedersen A, Sandberg J, Mikkelsen LR, Vase M, Bendtsen TF. The Analgesic Effect of Obturator Nerve Block Added to a Femoral Triangle Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):445-51. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000406.
- Results publication: PubMed 23788068Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80.
- Results publication: PubMed 27627711Jiang X, Wang QQ, Wu CA, Tian W. Analgesic Efficacy of Adductor Canal Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Orthop Surg. 2016 Aug;8(3):294-300. doi: 10.1111/os.12268.
- Results publication: PubMed 25376972Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
- Results publication: PubMed 29026354Thobhani S, Scalercio L, Elliott CE, Nossaman BD, Thomas LC, Yuratich D, Bland K, Osteen K, Patterson ME. Novel Regional Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty Promote Reduced Hospital Length of Stay: An Analysis of 106 Patients. Ochsner J. 2017 Fall;17(3):233-238.
- King Khalid University HospitalLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results
Related trials for Arthroplasty Complications
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Wound Surgical, Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and Quadro-Iliac Plane Block in Elective Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty
Postoperative Pain, Hip Arthroplasty, Total
Recruiting
Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Post-knee Arthroplasty Chronic Pain.
Chronic Post-surgical Pain, Chronic Post Operative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdul Sattar Narejo, FCPS, FCAI principal investigator
King Saud University College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iPACK and Periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) in people with Arthroplasty Complications and Pain, Joint, run by King Khalid University Hospital at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from preoperative pain score after TKA (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04565093, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2021.