AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 2NCT04566445

HORIZON: A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of GT005

A Phase 2 study testing GT005 in people with Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Gyroscope Therapeutics Limited at 62 sites in 7 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single subretinal injection in subjects with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration
What is being tested?
GT005
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
255 participants
Where
62 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
28 Sep 2020to 10 Jun 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able and willing to give written informed consent
  • Age ≥55 years
  • a. In Stage 1: Have a clinical diagnosis of GA secondary to AMD in the study eye, as determined by the Investigator, and a diagnosis of AMD in the contralateral eye; b. In Stage 2: Have a clinical diagnosis of GA secondary to AMD in the study eye, as determined by the Investigator, that is non-foveal, as determined by the central reading centre, or has a CFI rare variant genotype and meets inclusion criteria 3a, and a diagnosis of AMD in the contralateral eye (except if monocular)
  • GA lesion(s) within an acceptable size on FAF, in the study eye
  • The GA lesion in the study eye must reside completely within the FAF image
  • Up to 25% of the enrolled study population are permitted to have CNV in the fellow eye
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Have a BCVA of ≥24 letters (6/95 or 20/320 Snellen acuity equivalent), using ETDRS charts, in the study eye
  • a. In Stage 1: Meet one of the pre-specified AMD genetic subgroup criteria; b. In Stage 2: Genotyping is not required for study eligibility
  • Able to attend all study visits and complete the study procedures
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to randomisation (not required for postmenopausal women) or provide documentation of being surgically sterilised

Who cannot join

  • a. In Stage 1: Carriers of excluded genetic variants; b. In Stage 2: Subjects are excluded if they have a clinical diagnosis of Stargardt Disease or other retinal dystrophies
  • Have a history, or evidence, of CNV in the study eye
  • Presence of moderate/severe or worse non-proliferative, diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
  • Have history of vitrectomy, sub-macular surgery, or macular photocoagulation in the study eye
  • History of intraocular surgery in the study eye within 12 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Have clinically significant cataract that may require surgery during the study period in the study eye
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Presence of moderate to severe glaucomatous optic neuropathy, uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP), despite use of two or more topical agents; or a history of glaucoma-filtering or valve surgery
  • Axial myopia of greater than -8 diopters in the study eye
  • Have received any investigational product for the treatment of GA within the past 6 months or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer), other than nutritional supplements such as the age-related eye disease study (AREDS) formula
  • Have received a gene or cell therapy at any time.
  • Have a contraindication to the protocol specified corticosteroid regimen
  • Are unwilling to use two forms of contraception (one of which being a barrier method) for 90 days post-dosing, if relevant
  • Active malignancy within the past 12 months, except for appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, or prostate cancer with a stable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 12 months
  • Have any other significant ocular or non-ocular medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the subject at risk or may influence the results of the study

Trial locations and contacts

62 sites in 7 countries.

62 sites in 7 countries

United States45 sites
  • Southeast Retina Center

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

  • Austin Research Center for Retina, PLLC

    Austin, Texas, 78705

  • The Retina Care Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21209

  • Retina Consultants of Houston-TMC

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Ophthalamic Consultants of Boston (OCB)

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Illinois Retina Associates

    Chicago, Illinois, 60657

  • Cincinnati Eye Institute

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Retina Foundation of the Southwest

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Texas Retina Associates (Dallas)

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Rand Eye Institute

    Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33064

  • Southwest Retina Research Center

    Durango, Colorado, 81303

  • Duke Eye Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

  • Erie Retinal Surgery ,INC

    Erie, Pennsylvania, 16507

  • Oregon Retina

    Eugene, Oregon, 97401

  • Retina Consultants of Orange County

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • VitreoRetinal Associates, P.A.

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • Charles Retina Institute

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Retina Associates of Michigan

    Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439

  • Midwest Eye Institute Northside

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290

  • Southeastern Retina Associates, PC

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37922

  • University Retina Macula Associates PC

    Lemont, Illinois, 60452

  • Georgia Retina PC

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates

    Mountain View, California, 94040

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Byers Eye Institute at Stanford

    Palo Alto, California, 94303

  • Mid Atlantic Retina - Wills Eye Hospital

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • Retinal Research Institute (retina consultants of AZ)

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85053

  • Casey Eye Institute - OHSU

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Retina Consultants of San Diego

    Poway, California, 92064

  • Sierra Eye Associates

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • Retina Associates of Western New York

    Rochester, New York, 14620

  • Associated Retinal Consultants PC

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073

  • University of California (UC) Davis Medical Group Eye Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • Rocky Mountain Retina Consultants

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84107

  • Retinal Consultants of San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78240

  • Department of Ophthalmology UW Medicine

    Seattle, Washington, 98104-2499

  • Retina Associates, LLC

    Shawnee Mission, Kansas, 66204

  • Retina Center Northwest

    Silverdale, Washington, 98383

  • Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33711

  • Retina Consultants of Houston

    The Woodlands, Texas, 77384

  • Palmetto Retina Center

    West Columbia, South Carolina, 29169

  • Wolfe Eye Clinic

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

Other trials in United States

Germany4 sites
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

  • Internationale Innovative Ophthalmochirurgie

    Düsseldorf, 40549

  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck

    Lübeck, 23562

  • Universitaetsklinikum Tuebingen

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Moorfields Eye Hospital - NHS Foundation Trust

    London, EC1V 2PD

  • Retina Clinic London

    London, W1G 7LB

  • John Radcliffe Hospital

    Oxford, OX3 9DU

  • Sunderland Eye Infirmary

    Sunderland, SR2 9HP

Other trials in United Kingdom

France3 sites
  • CHU Dijon - Hopital Mitterrand

    Dijon, 21000

  • Centre Paradis Monticelli

    Marseille, 13008

  • CHU de Nantes - Hôtel-Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

Other trials in France

Spain3 sites
  • Instituto de microcirugía ocular

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Clinica Baviera

    Madrid, 28046

  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra - Pamplona

    Pamplona, 31008

Other trials in Spain

Australia2 sites
  • The University of Melbourne - The Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA)

    Melbourne E., Victoria, 3002

  • Sydney Hospital and Sydney Eye Hospital

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2000

Other trials in Australia

Poland1 site
  • Oftalmika Spolka z ograniczona odpowiedzialnoscia

    Bydgoszcz, 85-631

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: HORIZON: A Phase II, Open-label, Outcomes-assessor Masked, Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of GT005 Administered as a Single Subretinal Injection in Subjects With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single subretinal injection in subjects with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase II, open-label, outcomes-assessor masked, multicenter, randomized, controlled study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single-time subretinal injection in subjects with Geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to Age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Approximately 250 subjects, across Stage 1 and Stage 2, were planned to be randomized to one of two doses of GT005 or the untreated control group.

Subjects entered the study had genotyping and serum Complement factor I (CFI) levels assessed either through participation in a previous Gyroscope sponsored study, or a Sponsor-approved laboratory during the HORIZON screening period. If both eyes are eligible; the eye with the worse visual acuity will be selected as the study eye. If subjects failed to meet the eligibility criteria for this study, they were classified as screen failures and could be considered for entry into another Novartis/Gyroscope sponsored study.

After providing the informed consent, subjects underwent ophthalmic and clinical assessments to determined eligibility for inclusion in the study.

Upon confirmation of eligibility, subjects were randomized to one of two dose groups (medium dose [5E10 vg] or high dose [2E11 vg]). Within each dose group, subjects were allocated to GT005, or untreated control based on a 2:1 ratio. The overall study population (N=approximately 250) aimed to include approximately 60% of subjects with foveal GA and 40% of subjects with non-foveal GA (extrafoveal lesions). The study eye was identified for all subjects.

Enrolment for HORIZON were composed of two stages. Stage 1 enrolled subjects with foveal or non-foveal GA until 180 subjects were randomized. Stage 2 enrolled subjects with nonfoveal GA. Subjects with a CFI rare variant associated with normal or low serum CFI were also allowed to be enrolled in Stage 2, irrespective of GA foveal involvement.

Subjects were stratified by GA lesion size on Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) (≤10 mm2 or >10 mm2) and AMD genotype subgroup. Randomization of study eyes in the GA lesion size upper stratum of >10 mm2 to 17.5 mm2 was capped at 20% of total subjects randomized in Stage 1 and Stage 2, respectively. In Stage 2, once enrolment capping at 20% based on upper GA lesion size was reached, eyes that fulfilled the cap criteria were no longer eligible, unless the subject had a CFI rare variant genotype (minor allele frequency ≤1%) previously associated with normal or low serum CFI or had an unreported CFI rare variant genotype (Group 1 and 5). A permuted-block method was used to obtain an approximately 2:1 ratio between GT005 and the untreated control groups for each dose group within each stratum.

Following randomization, the Investigator was informed of the subject's allocated treatment (GT005 or the untreated control group) and the study eye selected. To minimize bias during imaging grading, all imaging endpoint assessments and grading were performed at a Central reading centre (CRC). All imaging efficacy assessments were performed in a masked fashion. The Sponsor, subjects, investigators, and study personnel performing clinical assessments remained masked to the dose received for those allocated to GT005.

For each subject, the study comprised of a screening period lasting up to 8 weeks (or up to 12 weeks if agreed by the Sponsor Medical Monitor) followed by a 96-week study period. All subjects were assessed for the occurrence of AEs at each visit and underwent functional assessments, retinal imaging, and biological sampling as per the schedule of assessments.

This study was conducted in compliance with Independent ethics committees (IECs) / Institutional review boards (IRBs), informed consent regulations, the Declaration of Helsinki, International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11, Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures, and FDA, Guidance for Industry: Computerised Systems Used in Clinical Trials.

On 24-Aug-2023, the decision was taken to terminate the study and the GT005 program. The decision was aligned with the recommendation of an independent Data monitoring committee (DMC), which concluded that futility criteria had been met for the HORIZON study (GT005-03) and the overall benefit-risk ratio did not support continuation of the current development program as planned. All GT005- treated subjects, who were willing to be transferred into the long-term safety follow-up study were enrolled in the ORACLE (CPPY988A12203B) study.

Being tested
GT005
Keywords
Dry age-related macular degeneration, Geographic atrophy, Retinal disease, Eye disease, Retinal degeneration, Macular atrophy
Medical subject headings
Geographic Atrophy, Retinal Diseases, Eye Diseases, Retinal Degeneration, Anetoderma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GT005Drug

    GT005 is a recombinant, non-replicating AAV2 expressing human complement factor I (CFI). GT005 was administered as a single time subretinal injection into the study eye of subjects allocated to one of the two GT005 doses.

Study groups in NCT04566445
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GT005 Medium dose [5E10 vg]ExperimentalGT005 Medium dose [5E10 vg]
Receives: Drug: GT005
GT005 High dose [2E11 vg]ExperimentalGT005 High dose [2E11 vg]
Receives: Drug: GT005
Untreated controlNo interventionUntreated control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)

    GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. The Change From Baseline at Week 96 in Geographic Atrophy (GA)

    GA area as measured by fundus autofluorescence (FAF)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 96

  2. Summary of Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

    A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

    Measured: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

  3. Ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects by Primary System Organ Class and Preferred Term for the Study Eye

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

    A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

    System organ classes are sorted alphabetically, and preferred terms are sorted by decreasing overall frequency within system organ class.

    Measured: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

  4. Non-ocular AEs Occurring in ≥2% of Subjects

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence (e.g. any unfavorable and unintended sign [including abnormal laboratory findings], symptom or disease) in a subject or clinical investigation subject.

    A TEAE is defined as any AE that develops after randomization or any AE already present that worsens following randomization. The primary summaries of AEs are based on TEAEs.

    Measured: Adverse events are reported from randomization to the end of study, at Week 96, up to a maximum timeframe of approximately 96 weeks.

  5. Change in GA Morphology From Baseline to Week 96 on Multimodal Imaging - Number of Participants With Increase in Fundus Autofluorescence

    Change in retinal morphology on multimodal imaging.

    For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits at Week 5.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 5, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

  6. Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score From Baseline Through Week 96 Via the Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) Chart

    BCVA was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

    Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

    For the untreated control group, there were no protocol-specified visits for Weeks 1, 5 and 8.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 5, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

  7. Change in Low Luminance Difference (LLD) Letter Count From Baseline at Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96, Via Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy (ETDRS) Chart

    LLD was assessed using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing charts.

    The test was to be performed after BCVA testing, prior to pupil dilation, and distance refraction was to be carried out before Low Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) was measured.

    LLVA was to be measured by placing a 2.0-log-unit neutral density filter over the front of each eye and having the subject read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart. The LLD was calculated as the difference between BCVA and LLVA.

    Initially, letters were to be read at a distance of 4 metres from the chart. If <20 letters were read at 4 metres, testing at 1 metre should have been performed. LLD was to be reported as number of letters read correctly by the subject.

    Min and max possible scores are 0-100 respectively. A higher score represents better visual functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

  8. Reading Performance, Measured as the MRS (Words Per Minute), as Assessed by Minnesota Low-vision Reading Test (MNRead) Chart: Summary Statistics for Change From Baseline by Visit for the Study Eye

    The maximum reading speed (MRS) represents the highest reading speed an individual can achieve when print size is not a limiting factor. Essentially, it measures how quickly a person can read text when the print is large enough to be easily readable.

    A higher count represents better visual functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

  9. Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Functional Reading Independence (FRI) Index

    The FRI index is a patient-reported outcome measure developed specifically for use in GA patients. The FRI index evaluates the level of independence subjects have in performing everyday activities that require reading, such as writing a cheque or reading a prescription.

    Scores derived from the index range from 1 (unable to do) to 4 (total independence).

    A higher score represents better visual functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

  10. Change From Baseline at Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite Score

    The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) measures the influence of visual disability and visual symptoms on general health domains.

    The NEI VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better visual functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. A composite score is derived based on the average of the 11 subscales.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 36, 48, 72 and 96

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Sep 2020
  2. Study start28 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion10 Jun 2024
  4. Study completion10 Jun 2024

Why it stopped: Terminated for interim analysis demonstrating futility (trial highly unlikely to meet efficacy outcome). The trial is not ending early because of medical problems or concerns.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a Phase II, open-label, outcomes-assessor masked, multicentre, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two doses of GT005 administered as a single subretinal injection in subjects with GA secondary to AMD.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
255 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04566445
Sponsor's protocol ID
GT005-03
Other IDs
CPPY988A12201, 2020-002431-30
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
9 Sep 2020
Last updated
28 Jan 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Tzoumas N, Riding G, Williams MA, Steel DH. Complement inhibitors for age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 14;6(6):CD009300. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009300.pub3.

    PubMed 37314061

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GT005 in people with Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Gyroscope Therapeutics Limited at 62 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 62 sites in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Spain and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Geographic Atrophy (GA) (time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04566445, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in