AzTrials
AzTrials

Covid19STORM-HCWNCT04567836

Screening of Health-care Workers in an University Hospital for SARS-CoV-2

An observational study of Covid19, run by University of Milano Bicocca at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an observational prospective study. The aim is to assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Covid-19) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Covid19
What is being tested?
Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity
How many people
260 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
9 Jul 2020to 18 Sep 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consists of: 1. Hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (principals of Monza and Desio) who, in the presence of symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection or asymptomatic but positive on the surveillance check list, carried out nasopharyngeal swabs and tested positive. The surveillance provided by the Occupational Medicine service of the ASST of Monza involves the execution of a double negative nasopharyngeal swab before readmission to work. This cohort of operators (over 250 at ASST of Monza) will be offered the possibility of performing the serological test on a voluntary basis; 2. Asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (garrisons of Monza and Desio) as indicated by the DG Welfare of the Lombardy region.

Who may be able to join

  • Hospital staff on active duty;
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years;

Who cannot join

  • Failure to consent to serological screening or failure to consent to study participation (there are two different consent)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • ASST Monza-Ospedale San Gerardo

    Monza

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Screening of Health-care Workers in an University Hospital: an Observational Prospective Study on the Screening of Hospital Workers for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

This is an observational prospective study. The aim is to assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Covid-19) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk.

Read the detailed description

The study protocol provides for a collection of basic data relating to all hospital workers who voluntarily underwent the test (age, sex, type of occupation - doctor / nurse / socio-health / administrative operator; attendance in Covid-19 wards department), IgG outcome (quantitative level) and swab outcome (negative, weakly positive, positive).

The cohort of hospital workers constitutes a population of particular relevance for the development of appropriate strategies for the surveillance of hospital risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection (relationship to the type of job, clinical evolution) and the available data are very limited.

The asymptomatic staff cohort constitutes the ideal population context to contribute to knowledge of aspects of the spread of the virus.

The limitations of current serological tests are well known, which do not allow to distinguish the acute phase of the infection and therefore the persistence of contagiousness. Similarly, the genomic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are not known in asymptomatic but swab positive subjects compared to the virus isolated from symptomatic patients.

In the cohort of operators who tested positive for nasopharyngeal swab (both symptomatic and asymptomatic), the availability of serological tests will allow to evaluate the antibody response over time in relation to the clinical evolution of the infection, and the persistence of a protective titer over time.

Methods and study design

  1. The cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators. The cohort will be evaluated as a prospective epidemiological study;
  2. The cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis. From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test on the same day and are negative for the serological test. Considering the positive percentage of 5.5% in the serological survey (from the first epidemiological data reported at the ASST of Monza), the positive screening cohort and the control cohort of about 480 are estimated at about 160.
  3. The serological test that will be used is the one required by the indication of the Circular G1.2020.00117959 of 22 April 2020. It is a test with the CLIA method designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS virus "spike" protein -CoV-2, selected for its ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses. The product has been designed to meet the need to identify in the population those who have already been infected with the virus, whose diagnosis has not been made through the execution of a swab and a molecular diagnostic test.
  4. The questionnaire will be administered to all operators.

Data anonymization Health worker will be identified with an 8-digit code followed by the letters OS and the year of collection (e.g. 00000001 OS / 2020); in biological sampling the laboratory will identify the patient with the same code and that will be the linkage code between the database and the bio-bank because it is unique for each worker at the ASST in Monza.

Biological studies

The fields of research in the biological field that the protocol aims to pursue are listed below:

  1. Characterizing the SARS-CoV-2 genome in relation to the characteristics of the hospital workers from which the virus is extracted and sequenced is relevant for knowing the functional mechanisms of the virus in relation to the host - both for clinical and diagnostic purposes, as well as for predict virus mutations and related clinical response in view of a second SARS-CoV-2 epidemic;
  2. Evaluate the relevance of tests with greater sensitivity and specificity in the population negative for the throat swab but positive for the serological investigation;
  3. Study of biomolecular markers of COVID-19 infection with the aim of identifying the basis of the different susceptibility in relation to age, sex and the presence of co-morbidities;
  4. Evaluate metabolic biochemical markers of resistance to viral infection in a subgroup of hospital workers with positive swab and in a subgroup with positive antibody test but negative swab to be evaluated at the first available sample and after at least 3 months to allow 27 hydroxycholesterol to return at the concentration prior to infection.

Statistic analysis Central tendency and dispersion measures will be used for descriptive analyzes. The percentage of positive subjects (serological and / swab) will be calculated as the number of positive subjects on the total number of participating subjects. The percentage of immune subjects will be calculated as the number of subjects with IgG immunoglobulins out of the total number of participants.These percentages will also be calculated for age and sex groups and for each characteristic considered relevant.

The logistic regression model will be used to identify demographic / social variables of predisposition to positivity.

Conditions
Covid19
Being tested
Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity
Keywords
sars-covid-2, coronavirus infection, coronavirus
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Investigation of the prevalence of test positivityOther

    The study consists of an investigation by means of a prospective observational study with the aim of assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) ti covid-19 in relation to the duties and related occupational risk.

    It is used CLIA method test designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus "spike" protein, selected for their ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses .

Study groups in NCT04567836
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The asymptomatic medical staff cohortThe cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis. From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test that were analyzed on the same day and were negative for the serological test.
Receives: Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity
The symptomatic medical staff cohortThe cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators.
Receives: Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of test positivity

    Desciption of the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  2. Correlation of the positive result of the test with the manifestations of the signs

    Description of the positive result of the test (swab or serological examination) with the manifestations of the signs / symptoms collected in the previous months from the attached form in the cohort of positive cases and related negative controls.

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  3. Development of COVID

    Description of the outcome of positive serological and swab test operators in terms of development of COVID-related symptomatology

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Analysis of genomic sequences of the virus

    to correlate the virus genomic sequence of asymptomatic but positive serological and swab operators with the available data of the SARS-CoV-2 virus sequences.

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  2. Evaluation of the test relevance

    Evaluate the relevance of tests with greater sensitivity and specificity in the population negative for the throat swab but positive for the serological investigation;

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  3. Evaluation of predictive biomolecular markers

    Evaluation biomolecular markers that are predictive of susceptibility to infection and predictive of symptomatic infection

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  4. The trend over time of the antibody response in subjects positive

    Evaluate the trend over time of the antibody response in subjects positive to the serological test and to the swab (both symptomatic and asymptomatic).

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  5. The frequency of re-infection

    Evaluate the frequency of re-infection (symptomatology compatible with COVID and positive swab) in operators who tested positive for serological and swab tests.

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  6. Evaluation of the mode of transmission relatively anamnestic data

    Evaluate the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting anamnestic data.

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  7. The relation between mode of transmission and the available clinical documentation

    Assess the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting the available clinical documentation

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

  8. Evaluation of the mode of transmission for the use of barriers

    Evaluate the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting the barriers used in the home: none, mask and spacing, voluntary isolation.

    Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Sep 2020
  2. Study start9 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion18 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion18 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
260 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04567836
Sponsor's protocol ID
STORM-HCW
Acronym
STORM-HCW
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
22 Sep 2020
Last updated
29 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32091533
  • Hunter E, Price DA, Murphy E, Schim van der Loeff I, Baker KF, Lendrem D, Lendrem C, Schmid ML, Pareja-Cebrian L, Welch A, Payne BAI, Duncan CJA. First experience of COVID-19 screening of health-care workers in England. Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):e77-e78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30970-3. Epub 2020 Apr 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32333843
  • Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32374370
  • Civra A, Colzani M, Cagno V, Francese R, Leoni V, Aldini G, Lembo D, Poli G. Modulation of cell proteome by 25-hydroxycholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol: A link between cholesterol metabolism and antiviral defense. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Mar;149:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.08.031. Epub 2019 Sep 13.

    PubMed 31525455

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Covid19, run by University of Milano Bicocca at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of test positivity (time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04567836, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in