Covid19STORM-HCWNCT04567836
Screening of Health-care Workers in an University Hospital for SARS-CoV-2
An observational study of Covid19, run by University of Milano Bicocca at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This is an observational prospective study. The aim is to assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Covid-19) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Covid19
- What is being tested?
- Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 9 Jul 2020to 18 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of: 1. Hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (principals of Monza and Desio) who, in the presence of symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection or asymptomatic but positive on the surveillance check list, carried out nasopharyngeal swabs and tested positive. The surveillance provided by the Occupational Medicine service of the ASST of Monza involves the execution of a double negative nasopharyngeal swab before readmission to work. This cohort of operators (over 250 at ASST of Monza) will be offered the possibility of performing the serological test on a voluntary basis; 2. Asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (garrisons of Monza and Desio) as indicated by the DG Welfare of the Lombardy region.
Who may be able to join
- Hospital staff on active duty;
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years;
Who cannot join
- Failure to consent to serological screening or failure to consent to study participation (there are two different consent)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Screening of Health-care Workers in an University Hospital: an Observational Prospective Study on the Screening of Hospital Workers for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
This is an observational prospective study. The aim is to assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Covid-19) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk.
Read the detailed description
The study protocol provides for a collection of basic data relating to all hospital workers who voluntarily underwent the test (age, sex, type of occupation - doctor / nurse / socio-health / administrative operator; attendance in Covid-19 wards department), IgG outcome (quantitative level) and swab outcome (negative, weakly positive, positive).
The cohort of hospital workers constitutes a population of particular relevance for the development of appropriate strategies for the surveillance of hospital risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection (relationship to the type of job, clinical evolution) and the available data are very limited.
The asymptomatic staff cohort constitutes the ideal population context to contribute to knowledge of aspects of the spread of the virus.
The limitations of current serological tests are well known, which do not allow to distinguish the acute phase of the infection and therefore the persistence of contagiousness. Similarly, the genomic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are not known in asymptomatic but swab positive subjects compared to the virus isolated from symptomatic patients.
In the cohort of operators who tested positive for nasopharyngeal swab (both symptomatic and asymptomatic), the availability of serological tests will allow to evaluate the antibody response over time in relation to the clinical evolution of the infection, and the persistence of a protective titer over time.
Methods and study design
- The cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators. The cohort will be evaluated as a prospective epidemiological study;
- The cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis. From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test on the same day and are negative for the serological test. Considering the positive percentage of 5.5% in the serological survey (from the first epidemiological data reported at the ASST of Monza), the positive screening cohort and the control cohort of about 480 are estimated at about 160.
- The serological test that will be used is the one required by the indication of the Circular G1.2020.00117959 of 22 April 2020. It is a test with the CLIA method designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS virus "spike" protein -CoV-2, selected for its ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses. The product has been designed to meet the need to identify in the population those who have already been infected with the virus, whose diagnosis has not been made through the execution of a swab and a molecular diagnostic test.
- The questionnaire will be administered to all operators.
Data anonymization Health worker will be identified with an 8-digit code followed by the letters OS and the year of collection (e.g. 00000001 OS / 2020); in biological sampling the laboratory will identify the patient with the same code and that will be the linkage code between the database and the bio-bank because it is unique for each worker at the ASST in Monza.
Biological studies
The fields of research in the biological field that the protocol aims to pursue are listed below:
- Characterizing the SARS-CoV-2 genome in relation to the characteristics of the hospital workers from which the virus is extracted and sequenced is relevant for knowing the functional mechanisms of the virus in relation to the host - both for clinical and diagnostic purposes, as well as for predict virus mutations and related clinical response in view of a second SARS-CoV-2 epidemic;
- Evaluate the relevance of tests with greater sensitivity and specificity in the population negative for the throat swab but positive for the serological investigation;
- Study of biomolecular markers of COVID-19 infection with the aim of identifying the basis of the different susceptibility in relation to age, sex and the presence of co-morbidities;
- Evaluate metabolic biochemical markers of resistance to viral infection in a subgroup of hospital workers with positive swab and in a subgroup with positive antibody test but negative swab to be evaluated at the first available sample and after at least 3 months to allow 27 hydroxycholesterol to return at the concentration prior to infection.
Statistic analysis Central tendency and dispersion measures will be used for descriptive analyzes. The percentage of positive subjects (serological and / swab) will be calculated as the number of positive subjects on the total number of participating subjects. The percentage of immune subjects will be calculated as the number of subjects with IgG immunoglobulins out of the total number of participants.These percentages will also be calculated for age and sex groups and for each characteristic considered relevant.
The logistic regression model will be used to identify demographic / social variables of predisposition to positivity.
- Conditions
- Covid19
- Being tested
- Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity
- Keywords
- sars-covid-2, coronavirus infection, coronavirus
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Investigation of the prevalence of test positivityOther
The study consists of an investigation by means of a prospective observational study with the aim of assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) ti covid-19 in relation to the duties and related occupational risk.
It is used CLIA method test designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus "spike" protein, selected for their ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses .
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The asymptomatic medical staff cohort | The cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis.
From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test that were analyzed on the same day and were negative for the serological test. Receives: Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity | |
| The symptomatic medical staff cohort | The cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators. Receives: Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of test positivity
Desciption of the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Correlation of the positive result of the test with the manifestations of the signs
Description of the positive result of the test (swab or serological examination) with the manifestations of the signs / symptoms collected in the previous months from the attached form in the cohort of positive cases and related negative controls.
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Development of COVID
Description of the outcome of positive serological and swab test operators in terms of development of COVID-related symptomatology
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Secondary outcomes (8)
Analysis of genomic sequences of the virus
to correlate the virus genomic sequence of asymptomatic but positive serological and swab operators with the available data of the SARS-CoV-2 virus sequences.
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the test relevance
Evaluate the relevance of tests with greater sensitivity and specificity in the population negative for the throat swab but positive for the serological investigation;
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of predictive biomolecular markers
Evaluation biomolecular markers that are predictive of susceptibility to infection and predictive of symptomatic infection
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The trend over time of the antibody response in subjects positive
Evaluate the trend over time of the antibody response in subjects positive to the serological test and to the swab (both symptomatic and asymptomatic).
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The frequency of re-infection
Evaluate the frequency of re-infection (symptomatology compatible with COVID and positive swab) in operators who tested positive for serological and swab tests.
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the mode of transmission relatively anamnestic data
Evaluate the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting anamnestic data.
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The relation between mode of transmission and the available clinical documentation
Assess the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting the available clinical documentation
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the mode of transmission for the use of barriers
Evaluate the mode of transmission between relatives by collecting the barriers used in the home: none, mask and spacing, voluntary isolation.
Measured: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2020
- Study start9 Jul 2020
- Primary completion18 Sep 2020
- Study completion18 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Covid19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Milano Bicocca
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04567836
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STORM-HCW
- Acronym
- STORM-HCW
- Status last verified
- Apr 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
PubMed 32091533Hunter E, Price DA, Murphy E, Schim van der Loeff I, Baker KF, Lendrem D, Lendrem C, Schmid ML, Pareja-Cebrian L, Welch A, Payne BAI, Duncan CJA. First experience of COVID-19 screening of health-care workers in England. Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):e77-e78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30970-3. Epub 2020 Apr 22. No abstract available.
PubMed 32333843Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259. No abstract available.
PubMed 32374370Civra A, Colzani M, Cagno V, Francese R, Leoni V, Aldini G, Lembo D, Poli G. Modulation of cell proteome by 25-hydroxycholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol: A link between cholesterol metabolism and antiviral defense. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Mar;149:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.08.031. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
PubMed 31525455
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Screening of Health-care Workers in an University Hospital: an Observational Prospective Study on the Screening of Hospital Workers for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04567836
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STORM-HCW / STORM-HCW
- Conditions
- Covid19
- Keywords
- sars-covid-2, coronavirus infection, coronavirus
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Milano BicoccaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an observational prospective study. The aim is to assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) to Coronavirus Disease-2019 (Covid-19) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk.
Detailed description
The study protocol provides for a collection of basic data relating to all hospital workers who voluntarily underwent the test (age, sex, type of occupation - doctor / nurse / socio-health / administrative operator; attendance in Covid-19 wards department), IgG outcome (quantitative level) and swab outcome (negative, weakly positive, positive).
The cohort of hospital workers constitutes a population of particular relevance for the development of appropriate strategies for the surveillance of hospital risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection (relationship to the type of job, clinical evolution) and the available data are very limited.
The asymptomatic staff cohort constitutes the ideal population context to contribute to knowledge of aspects of the spread of the virus.
The limitations of current serological tests are well known, which do not allow to distinguish the acute phase of the infection and therefore the persistence of contagiousness. Similarly, the genomic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus are not known in asymptomatic but swab positive subjects compared to the virus isolated from symptomatic patients.
In the cohort of operators who tested positive for nasopharyngeal swab (both symptomatic and asymptomatic), the availability of serological tests will allow to evaluate the antibody response over time in relation to the clinical evolution of the infection, and the persistence of a protective titer over time.
Methods and study design
- The cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators. The cohort will be evaluated as a prospective epidemiological study;
- The cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis. From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test on the same day and are negative for the serological test. Considering the positive percentage of 5.5% in the serological survey (from the first epidemiological data reported at the ASST of Monza), the positive screening cohort and the control cohort of about 480 are estimated at about 160.
- The serological test that will be used is the one required by the indication of the Circular G1.2020.00117959 of 22 April 2020. It is a test with the CLIA method designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS virus "spike" protein -CoV-2, selected for its ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses. The product has been designed to meet the need to identify in the population those who have already been infected with the virus, whose diagnosis has not been made through the execution of a swab and a molecular diagnostic test.
- The questionnaire will be administered to all operators.
Data anonymization Health worker will be identified with an 8-digit code followed by the letters OS and the year of collection (e.g. 00000001 OS / 2020); in biological sampling the laboratory will identify the patient with the same code and that will be the linkage code between the database and the bio-bank because it is unique for each worker at the ASST in Monza.
Biological studies
The fields of research in the biological field that the protocol aims to pursue are listed below:
- Characterizing the SARS-CoV-2 genome in relation to the characteristics of the hospital workers from which the virus is extracted and sequenced is relevant for knowing the functional mechanisms of the virus in relation to the host - both for clinical and diagnostic purposes, as well as for predict virus mutations and related clinical response in view of a second SARS-CoV-2 epidemic;
- Evaluate the relevance of tests with greater sensitivity and specificity in the population negative for the throat swab but positive for the serological investigation;
- Study of biomolecular markers of COVID-19 infection with the aim of identifying the basis of the different susceptibility in relation to age, sex and the presence of co-morbidities;
- Evaluate metabolic biochemical markers of resistance to viral infection in a subgroup of hospital workers with positive swab and in a subgroup with positive antibody test but negative swab to be evaluated at the first available sample and after at least 3 months to allow 27 hydroxycholesterol to return at the concentration prior to infection.
Statistic analysis Central tendency and dispersion measures will be used for descriptive analyzes. The percentage of positive subjects (serological and / swab) will be calculated as the number of positive subjects on the total number of participating subjects. The percentage of immune subjects will be calculated as the number of subjects with IgG immunoglobulins out of the total number of participants.These percentages will also be calculated for age and sex groups and for each characteristic considered relevant.
The logistic regression model will be used to identify demographic / social variables of predisposition to positivity.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The asymptomatic medical staff cohort | – | Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivityThe cohort of asymptomatic / paucisymptomatic operators will include the cohort of operators who will test positive in the serological analysis. From the entire population of hospital workers (over 3000), three controls will be identified for each operator who tested positive for the serological test that were analyzed on the same day and were negative for the serological test. |
| The symptomatic medical staff cohort | – | Other: Investigation of the prevalence of test positivityThe cohort of symptomatic hospital workers who tested positive for the swab includes 250 operators. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of: 1. Hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (principals of Monza and Desio) who, in the presence of symptoms suggestive of SARS-CoV-2 infection or asymptomatic but positive on the surveillance check list, carried out nasopharyngeal swabs and tested positive. The surveillance provided by the Occupational Medicine service of the ASST of Monza involves the execution of a double negative nasopharyngeal swab before readmission to work. This cohort of operators (over 250 at ASST of Monza) will be offered the possibility of performing the serological test on a voluntary basis; 2. Asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic hospital workers employed by the ASST of Monza (garrisons of Monza and Desio) as indicated by the DG Welfare of the Lombardy region.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Hospital staff on active duty;
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years;
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Failure to consent to serological screening or failure to consent to study participation (there are two different consent)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Investigation of the prevalence of test positivityThe study consists of an investigation by means of a prospective observational study with the aim of assess the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) ti covid-19 in relation to the duties and related occupational risk. It is used CLIA method test designed to recognize IgG antibodies directed against the S1 and S2 domains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus "spike" protein, selected for their ability to provide specificity for SARS-CoV-2 compared to other Coronaviruses . | Other | The asymptomatic medical staff cohort, The symptomatic medical staff cohort |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of test positivity
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Desciption of the prevalence of test positivity (swab or serological examination) in relation to the duties and related occupational risk
Correlation of the positive result of the test with the manifestations of the signs
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Description of the positive result of the test (swab or serological examination) with the manifestations of the signs / symptoms collected in the previous months from the attached form in the cohort of positive cases and related negative controls.
Development of COVID
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Description of the outcome of positive serological and swab test operators in terms of development of COVID-related symptomatology
8 secondary outcomes
Analysis of genomic sequences of the virus
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the test relevance
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of predictive biomolecular markers
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The trend over time of the antibody response in subjects positive
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The frequency of re-infection
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the mode of transmission relatively anamnestic data
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
The relation between mode of transmission and the available clinical documentation
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Evaluation of the mode of transmission for the use of barriers
Time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 32091533Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32333843Hunter E, Price DA, Murphy E, Schim van der Loeff I, Baker KF, Lendrem D, Lendrem C, Schmid ML, Pareja-Cebrian L, Welch A, Payne BAI, Duncan CJA. First experience of COVID-19 screening of health-care workers in England. Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):e77-e78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30970-3. Epub 2020 Apr 22. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32374370Sethuraman N, Jeremiah SS, Ryo A. Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2249-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8259. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 31525455Civra A, Colzani M, Cagno V, Francese R, Leoni V, Aldini G, Lembo D, Poli G. Modulation of cell proteome by 25-hydroxycholesterol and 27-hydroxycholesterol: A link between cholesterol metabolism and antiviral defense. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020 Mar;149:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.08.031. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Covid19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Covid19, run by University of Milano Bicocca at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of test positivity (time frame: Until the end of the study (approximately 6 months).). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04567836, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2022.