Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT04568330
Prevention of Hand-foot Skin Reaction
A study testing best support care, moisture cream and 10% urea-based cream in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
Trial summary
Sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-dependent side effect in patients with advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The appropriate prophylactic dose of urea-based cream and comparison of its effectiveness with other creams remain unclear. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 54 to 91 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- best support care, moisture cream and 10% urea-based cream
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 129 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 21 Mar 2014to 11 Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 54 to 91 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HCC by proof of pathology
- Presence of tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein or the first-order branches of the portal vein with minimal ascetics or with no ascetics by abdominal CT scan
- Child-Pugh liver function class A
- Planning to receive oral sorafenib 400 mg twice per day
- Age of 20 or more years old
- Able to communication in Chinese, Taiwanese or Hakka
Who cannot join
- Encephalopathy, psychosis, cognition impairment, blindness or hearing impairment
- Allergic history to urea
- Present ulceration, blisters, infective problems on the palms or soles
- Previous surgery, systematic chemotherapy or frequent radial ablation
About this study
Official title: Re-validating Prophylactic Efficacy of Urea-based Cream on Sorafenib-induced Hand-foot Skin Reaction in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-dependent side effect in patients with advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The appropriate prophylactic dose of urea-based cream and comparison of its effectiveness with other creams remain unclear. The aim of this study was re-validating the prophylactic HFSR incidence density and cutaneous wetness of 10% urea-based cream on sorafenib-induced HFSR in patients with advanced HCC.
Read the detailed description
Methods
Patients
This study population consisted of patients with (1) HCC by proof of pathology, (2) presence of tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein or the first-order branches of the portal vein with minimal ascetics or with no ascetics by abdominal CT scan, (3) Child-Pugh liver function class A, (4) planning to receive oral sorafenib 400 mg twice per day, (5) age of 20 or more years old, and (6) able to communication in Chinese, Taiwanese or Hakka. Patients with (1) encephalopathy, psychosis, cognition impairment, blindness or hearing impairment, (2) allergic history to urea, (3) present ulceration, blisters, infective problems on the palms or soles, or (4) previous surgery, systematic chemotherapy or frequent radial ablation were excluded.
Research procedure
This is a randomized double-blind experiment study. Sample size was estimated by the G. power software version 3.1, which was set with logistic regression, odds ratio: 3.8, and power: 0.80. The estimated sample size should be 125 at least. This study, there was recruited 129 patients (43 patients in each groups). All eligible patients were recruited from Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 1st and December 31th, 2014. They were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to treat with best supportive care plus moisturizing cream (A group), BSC plus 10% urea-based cream (B group) and BSC alone (group C which is comparison group),by method of EXCEL random sampling. A case manager recruited the eligible patients who also conducted informed consent and patient education. A research employee had responsibilities to record patients' demographic data, provide non-label cream and check previous container of the cream that should be exhausted. A medical oncologist or a nurse had responsibilities to assess patients' severity of HFSR and cutaneous wetness. The assessment was done on 3 days before starting sorafenib treatment and each 7 days after the starting, total 9 times. Creams were provided after the assessment. When patients developed HFSR, they will be referred to receive the most appropriate management.
Interventions
Interventions for group C (comparison group) who received BSC alone were (1) informed of potential presentations of HFSR, (2) asked for wearing waterproof gloves before execute household or work with water, (3) provided the method of contacting with healthcare specialists for confirming early diagnosis of HFSR, and (4) asked for self-report when they occurred symptoms of HFSR. The A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream received the interventions as the comparison group, was given the moisturizing cream (dimethicone, fragrance free, Aveeno, United States) for 9 times and was instructed how to use the cream. The education of usage included (1) using the cream twice a day from 3 days before starting sorafenib and each week post starting sorafenib, (2) scooping out nut-sized cream with a unique spoon each time, (3) gently applied the cream evenly on symmetrical palms below wrists and symmetrical soles below ankles each time, (4) wore unique cotton gloves immediately after the appalment of cream for 30 minutes each time. A B group with BCS plus 10% urea-based cream had the similar interventions as the A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream except being given the cream container with different component (10% urea; Sipharr, Taiwan). The outlook of the containers with the two kinds of cream was the same. All the cream looks white and grey.
Outcomes and assessment
Data of con founders and two end-points, incidence density of HFSR and cutaneous wetness, were collected. The con-founders included gender, age, numbers of chronic illnesses, numbers of metastatic regions as well as levels of white count, hemoglobin, bleeding time, liver enzymes, albumin and electrolyte.
The grades of HFSR were assessed by NCI-CTCAE version 4, which was developed by Dueck et al. This is an available psychometric patient-reported instrument. Body water with 33% or less meant dry skin, 34% to 37% meant mild dry skin, 38% to 42% meant general status, 43% to 46/% was mild moisty skin and 47% or more presented moisty skin. When using the scanner, examiners had to confirm whether it tied to fix on the skin.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Institution Review Board of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (2013-13-009B). Informed consent was obtained from all patients by a case manager on 3 days before starting sorafenib. Patients were explained the study protocol and were educated self-care skills by the case manager. All of them were well aware that their rights will be protected, the risk of participation will be limited to the lowest and most suitable management will be arranged when they developed sorafenib-induced HFSR.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- best support care, moisture cream, 10% urea-based cream
- Keywords
- hand-foot skin reaction, side effect of sorafenib, symptom related to target therapy, efficacy of urea-based cream, symptom management
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
best support careOther
Best support care
moisture creamOther
BSC plus moisture cream
10% urea-based creamOther
BSC plus 10% urea-based cream.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Best support care (BSC) | Other | Interventions for comparison group (group C) who received BSC alone were (1) informed of potential presentations of HFSR, (2) asked for wearing waterproof gloves before execute household or work with water, (3) provided the method of contacting with healthcare specialists for confirming early diagnosis of HFSR, and (4) asked for self-report when they occurred symptoms of HFSR. Receives: Other: best support care |
| BSC plus moisture cream | Experimental | The A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream received the interventions as the comparison group, was given the moisturizing cream (dimethicone, fragrance free, Aveeno, United States) for 9 times and was instructed how to use the cream. The education of usage included (1) using the cream twice a day from 3 days before starting sorafenib and each week post starting sorafenib, (2) scooping out nut-sized cream with a unique spoon each time, (3) gently applied the cream evenly on symmetrical palms below wrists and symmetrical soles below ankles each time, (4) wore unique cotton gloves immediately after the appalment of cream for 30 minutes each time. Receives: Other: moisture cream |
| 10% urea-based cream | Active comparator | The B group with BCS plus 10% urea-based cream had the similar interventions as the A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream except being given the cream container with different component (10% urea; Sipharr, Taiwan). The outlook of the containers with the two kinds of cream was the same. All the cream looks white and grey. Receives: Other: 10% urea-based cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Scale
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0
Measured: three days before taking Sorafenib
Secondary outcomes (1)
Scale
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Measured: 1 week after taking Sorafenib
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2020
- Study start21 Mar 2014
- Primary completion11 Nov 2015
- Study completion11 Dec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jiin Ger, MD, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04568330
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013-11-009
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
PubMed 19095497Benson AB 3rd, Abrams TA, Ben-Josef E, Bloomston PM, Botha JF, Clary BM, Covey A, Curley SA, D'Angelica MI, Davila R, Ensminger WD, Gibbs JF, Laheru D, Malafa MP, Marrero J, Meranze SG, Mulvihill SJ, Park JO, Posey JA, Sachdev J, Salem R, Sigurdson ER, Sofocleous C, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Goff LW, Yen Y, Zhu AX. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Apr;7(4):350-91. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0027. No abstract available.
PubMed 19406039Kao PH, Cen JS, Chung WH. Cutaneous adverse events of targeted anticancer therapy: a review of common clinical manifestations and management. J Cancer Res Pract. 2015; 2(4): 271-284.
Wood LS, Lemont H, Jatoi A. Practical considerations in the management of hand-foot skin reaction caused by multikinase inhibitors. Commun Oncol .2010; 7: 23-39
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
PubMed 30207593European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. No abstract available.
PubMed 29628281Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, Schwartz M, Porta C, Zeuzem S, Bolondi L, Greten TF, Galle PR, Seitz JF, Borbath I, Haussinger D, Giannaris T, Shan M, Moscovici M, Voliotis D, Bruix J; SHARP Investigators Study Group. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359(4):378-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857.
PubMed 18650514Cubero DIG, Abdalla BMZ, Schoueri J, Lopes FI, Turke KC, Guzman J, Del Giglio A, Filho CDSM, Salzano V, Fabra DG. Cutaneous side effects of molecularly targeted therapies for the treatment of solid tumors. Drugs Context. 2018 Jul 17;7:212516. doi: 10.7573/dic.212516. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30038659Lipworth AD, Robert C, Zhu AX. Hand-foot syndrome (hand-foot skin reaction, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia): focus on sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncology. 2009;77(5):257-71. doi: 10.1159/000258880. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
PubMed 19923864Massey PR, Okman JS, Wilkerson J, Cowen EW. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) have distinct cutaneous toxicity profiles: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2520-9. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
PubMed 25471178Chang WT, Lu SN, Rau KM, Huang CS, Lee KT. Increased cumulative doses and appearance of hand-foot skin reaction prolonged progression free survival in sorafenib-treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;34(7):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
PubMed 30063012Macdonald JB, Macdonald B, Golitz LE, LoRusso P, Sekulic A. Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies: Part I: Inhibitors of the cellular membrane. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Feb;72(2):203-18; quiz 219-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.032.
PubMed 25592338Manchen E, Robert C, Porta C. Management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced hand-foot skin reaction: viewpoints from the medical oncologist, dermatologist, and oncology nurse. J Support Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.suponc.2010.12.007.
PubMed 21465734Ren Z, Zhu K, Kang H, Lu M, Qu Z, Lu L, Song T, Zhou W, Wang H, Yang W, Wang X, Yang Y, Shi L, Bai Y, Guo X, Ye SL. Randomized controlled trial of the prophylactic effect of urea-based cream on sorafenib-associated hand-foot skin reactions in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):894-900. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9651. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
PubMed 25667293Negri FV, Porta C. Urea-Based Cream to Prevent Sorafenib-Induced Hand-and-Foot Skin Reaction: Which Evidence? J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3219-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.6417. Epub 2015 Jul 27. No abstract available.
PubMed 26215963
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Re-validating Prophylactic Efficacy of Urea-based Cream on Sorafenib-induced Hand-foot Skin Reaction in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04568330
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2013-11-009
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- hand-foot skin reaction, side effect of sorafenib, symptom related to target therapy, efficacy of urea-based cream, symptom management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 129 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanOther government
- Study start
- 21 Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sorafenib-induced hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a dose-dependent side effect in patients with advance hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The appropriate prophylactic dose of urea-based cream and comparison of its effectiveness with other creams remain unclear. The aim of this study was re-validating the prophylactic HFSR incidence density and cutaneous wetness of 10% urea-based cream on sorafenib-induced HFSR in patients with advanced HCC.
Detailed description
Methods
Patients
This study population consisted of patients with (1) HCC by proof of pathology, (2) presence of tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein or the first-order branches of the portal vein with minimal ascetics or with no ascetics by abdominal CT scan, (3) Child-Pugh liver function class A, (4) planning to receive oral sorafenib 400 mg twice per day, (5) age of 20 or more years old, and (6) able to communication in Chinese, Taiwanese or Hakka. Patients with (1) encephalopathy, psychosis, cognition impairment, blindness or hearing impairment, (2) allergic history to urea, (3) present ulceration, blisters, infective problems on the palms or soles, or (4) previous surgery, systematic chemotherapy or frequent radial ablation were excluded.
Research procedure
This is a randomized double-blind experiment study. Sample size was estimated by the G. power software version 3.1, which was set with logistic regression, odds ratio: 3.8, and power: 0.80. The estimated sample size should be 125 at least. This study, there was recruited 129 patients (43 patients in each groups). All eligible patients were recruited from Taipei Veterans General Hospital between January 1st and December 31th, 2014. They were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to treat with best supportive care plus moisturizing cream (A group), BSC plus 10% urea-based cream (B group) and BSC alone (group C which is comparison group),by method of EXCEL random sampling. A case manager recruited the eligible patients who also conducted informed consent and patient education. A research employee had responsibilities to record patients' demographic data, provide non-label cream and check previous container of the cream that should be exhausted. A medical oncologist or a nurse had responsibilities to assess patients' severity of HFSR and cutaneous wetness. The assessment was done on 3 days before starting sorafenib treatment and each 7 days after the starting, total 9 times. Creams were provided after the assessment. When patients developed HFSR, they will be referred to receive the most appropriate management.
Interventions
Interventions for group C (comparison group) who received BSC alone were (1) informed of potential presentations of HFSR, (2) asked for wearing waterproof gloves before execute household or work with water, (3) provided the method of contacting with healthcare specialists for confirming early diagnosis of HFSR, and (4) asked for self-report when they occurred symptoms of HFSR. The A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream received the interventions as the comparison group, was given the moisturizing cream (dimethicone, fragrance free, Aveeno, United States) for 9 times and was instructed how to use the cream. The education of usage included (1) using the cream twice a day from 3 days before starting sorafenib and each week post starting sorafenib, (2) scooping out nut-sized cream with a unique spoon each time, (3) gently applied the cream evenly on symmetrical palms below wrists and symmetrical soles below ankles each time, (4) wore unique cotton gloves immediately after the appalment of cream for 30 minutes each time. A B group with BCS plus 10% urea-based cream had the similar interventions as the A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream except being given the cream container with different component (10% urea; Sipharr, Taiwan). The outlook of the containers with the two kinds of cream was the same. All the cream looks white and grey.
Outcomes and assessment
Data of con founders and two end-points, incidence density of HFSR and cutaneous wetness, were collected. The con-founders included gender, age, numbers of chronic illnesses, numbers of metastatic regions as well as levels of white count, hemoglobin, bleeding time, liver enzymes, albumin and electrolyte.
The grades of HFSR were assessed by NCI-CTCAE version 4, which was developed by Dueck et al. This is an available psychometric patient-reported instrument. Body water with 33% or less meant dry skin, 34% to 37% meant mild dry skin, 38% to 42% meant general status, 43% to 46/% was mild moisty skin and 47% or more presented moisty skin. When using the scanner, examiners had to confirm whether it tied to fix on the skin.
Ethical considerations
This study was approved by the Institution Review Board of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital (2013-13-009B). Informed consent was obtained from all patients by a case manager on 3 days before starting sorafenib. Patients were explained the study protocol and were educated self-care skills by the case manager. All of them were well aware that their rights will be protected, the risk of participation will be limited to the lowest and most suitable management will be arranged when they developed sorafenib-induced HFSR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Best support care (BSC) | Other | Other: best support careInterventions for comparison group (group C) who received BSC alone were (1) informed of potential presentations of HFSR, (2) asked for wearing waterproof gloves before execute household or work with water, (3) provided the method of contacting with healthcare specialists for confirming early diagnosis of HFSR, and (4) asked for self-report when they occurred symptoms of HFSR. |
| BSC plus moisture cream | Experimental | Other: moisture creamThe A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream received the interventions as the comparison group, was given the moisturizing cream (dimethicone, fragrance free, Aveeno, United States) for 9 times and was instructed how to use the cream. The education of usage included (1) using the cream twice a day from 3 days before starting sorafenib and each week post starting sorafenib, (2) scooping out nut-sized cream with a unique spoon each time, (3) gently applied the cream evenly on symmetrical palms below wrists and symmetrical soles below ankles each time, (4) wore unique cotton gloves immediately after the appalment of cream for 30 minutes each time. |
| 10% urea-based cream | Active comparator | Other: 10% urea-based creamThe B group with BCS plus 10% urea-based cream had the similar interventions as the A group with BCS plus moisturizing cream except being given the cream container with different component (10% urea; Sipharr, Taiwan). The outlook of the containers with the two kinds of cream was the same. All the cream looks white and grey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 54 to 91 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- HCC by proof of pathology
- Presence of tumor thrombus in the main trunk of the portal vein or the first-order branches of the portal vein with minimal ascetics or with no ascetics by abdominal CT scan
- Child-Pugh liver function class A
- Planning to receive oral sorafenib 400 mg twice per day
- Age of 20 or more years old
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Encephalopathy, psychosis, cognition impairment, blindness or hearing impairment
- Allergic history to urea
- Present ulceration, blisters, infective problems on the palms or soles
- Previous surgery, systematic chemotherapy or frequent radial ablation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| best support careBest support care | Other | Best support care (BSC) |
| moisture creamBSC plus moisture cream | Other | BSC plus moisture cream |
| 10% urea-based creamBSC plus 10% urea-based cream. | Other | 10% urea-based cream |
Primary outcome
Scale
Time frame: three days before taking Sorafenib
National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0
1 secondary outcome
Scale
Time frame: 1 week after taking Sorafenib
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Sep 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19095497Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z, Tsao CJ, Qin S, Kim JS, Luo R, Feng J, Ye S, Yang TS, Xu J, Sun Y, Liang H, Liu J, Wang J, Tak WY, Pan H, Burock K, Zou J, Voliotis D, Guan Z. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jan;10(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 19406039Benson AB 3rd, Abrams TA, Ben-Josef E, Bloomston PM, Botha JF, Clary BM, Covey A, Curley SA, D'Angelica MI, Davila R, Ensminger WD, Gibbs JF, Laheru D, Malafa MP, Marrero J, Meranze SG, Mulvihill SJ, Park JO, Posey JA, Sachdev J, Salem R, Sigurdson ER, Sofocleous C, Vauthey JN, Venook AP, Goff LW, Yen Y, Zhu AX. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009 Apr;7(4):350-91. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0027. No abstract available.
- BackgroundKao PH, Cen JS, Chung WH. Cutaneous adverse events of targeted anticancer therapy: a review of common clinical manifestations and management. J Cancer Res Pract. 2015; 2(4): 271-284.
- BackgroundWood LS, Lemont H, Jatoi A. Practical considerations in the management of hand-foot skin reaction caused by multikinase inhibitors. Commun Oncol .2010; 7: 23-39
- Results publication: PubMed 30207593Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
- Results publication: PubMed 29628281European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018 Jul;69(1):182-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Apr 5. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 18650514Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, Schwartz M, Porta C, Zeuzem S, Bolondi L, Greten TF, Galle PR, Seitz JF, Borbath I, Haussinger D, Giannaris T, Shan M, Moscovici M, Voliotis D, Bruix J; SHARP Investigators Study Group. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 24;359(4):378-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708857.
- Results publication: PubMed 30038659Cubero DIG, Abdalla BMZ, Schoueri J, Lopes FI, Turke KC, Guzman J, Del Giglio A, Filho CDSM, Salzano V, Fabra DG. Cutaneous side effects of molecularly targeted therapies for the treatment of solid tumors. Drugs Context. 2018 Jul 17;7:212516. doi: 10.7573/dic.212516. eCollection 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 19923864Lipworth AD, Robert C, Zhu AX. Hand-foot syndrome (hand-foot skin reaction, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia): focus on sorafenib and sunitinib. Oncology. 2009;77(5):257-71. doi: 10.1159/000258880. Epub 2009 Nov 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 25471178Massey PR, Okman JS, Wilkerson J, Cowen EW. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) have distinct cutaneous toxicity profiles: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jun;23(6):1827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2520-9. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 30063012Chang WT, Lu SN, Rau KM, Huang CS, Lee KT. Increased cumulative doses and appearance of hand-foot skin reaction prolonged progression free survival in sorafenib-treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jul;34(7):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 25592338Macdonald JB, Macdonald B, Golitz LE, LoRusso P, Sekulic A. Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies: Part I: Inhibitors of the cellular membrane. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Feb;72(2):203-18; quiz 219-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.07.032.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing best support care, moisture cream and 10% urea-based cream in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Scale (time frame: three days before taking Sorafenib). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04568330, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2020.