Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedNOHARMNCT04570371
Non-pharmacological Pain Management After Surgery
A study testing Conversation Guide + Clinical Support in people with Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, run by Mayo Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test the impact of a bundled NOHARM Conversation Guide with clinical decision support intervention embedded within an Electronic Health Record (EHR) on pain and function 3 months following surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
- What is being tested?
- Conversation Guide + Clinical Support
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 81,938 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2020to 2 May 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients 18 years of age and older.
- Must be undergoing qualifying surgeries at participating sites.
- Patients under 18 years of age.
Who cannot join
- Patients under 18 years of age.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
About this study
Official title: Non-Pharmacological Options in Postoperative Hospital-based and Rehabilitation Pain Management: The NOHARM Trial
The purpose of this study is to test the impact of a bundled NOHARM Conversation Guide with clinical decision support intervention embedded within an Electronic Health Record (EHR) on pain and function 3 months following surgery.
- Conditions
- Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
- Being tested
- Conversation Guide + Clinical Support
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conversation Guide + Clinical SupportBehavioural
The intervention is a bundled intervention (conversation guide + clinician decision support tools) which promotes the solicitation and use of patient preferences for post-surgical, non-pharmacological pain management strategies.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Per a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial design, all patients within whole surgical practices will be randomized to implementation tranches in which the intervention will be implemented per the study schedule. Receives: Behavioral: Conversation Guide + Clinical Support |
| Control Arm | No intervention | Per a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial design, all patients within whole surgical practices will be randomized to implementation tranches. The control arm consists of all patients receiving surgery in implementation tranches in which the intervention has not been implemented yet (per the study schedule). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PROMIS-CAT Pain
Change in patient reported pain; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 1-,2-, and 3-Months Post-Surgery
PROMIS-CAT Physical Function
Change in patient reported Physical Function; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Measured: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 1-,2-, and 3-Months Post-Surgery
PROMIS-CAT Anxiety
Change in patient reported Anxiety; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 3-Months Post-Surgery
Use of Non-Pharmacological Pain Control Modalities
Number of participants using Non-Pharmacological Pain Control Modalities
Measured: 3 Months Post-Surgery
Opioid Use
Binary variables indicating presence or absence of opioid administration and prescription during the hospital encounter associated with the index surgery and during the post-discharge follow-up period.
Measured: 3-Months Post-Surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Sep 2020
- Study start16 Oct 2020
- Primary completion2 May 2024
- Study completion2 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 81,938 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andrea Cheville, Mayo Clinic
- Investigators
- Andrea L Cheville, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04570371
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-004839
- Other IDs
- UG3AG067593
- Acronym
- NOHARM
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cheville AL, Herrin J, Minteer S, Grzegorczyk V, Tilburt J; Mayo Clinic NOHARM Research Team. Integrating Nonpharmacological Options Into Perioperative Pain Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Sep 1;9(9):e2635900. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.35900.
PubMed 42789267Redmond S; Mayo Clinic NOHARM Research Team; Tilburt J, Cheville A. Non-pharmacological Options in Postoperative Hospital-Based and Rehabilitation Pain Management (NOHARM): Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial. Pain Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1037-1053. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00393-x. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
PubMed 35657564
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Non-Pharmacological Options in Postoperative Hospital-based and Rehabilitation Pain Management: The NOHARM Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04570371
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NOHARM / 20-004839
- Conditions
- Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 81,938 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Nov 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test the impact of a bundled NOHARM Conversation Guide with clinical decision support intervention embedded within an Electronic Health Record (EHR) on pain and function 3 months following surgery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a stepped wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Conversation Guide + Clinical SupportPer a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial design, all patients within whole surgical practices will be randomized to implementation tranches in which the intervention will be implemented per the study schedule. |
| Control Arm | No intervention | –Per a stepped-wedge cluster randomized pragmatic clinical trial design, all patients within whole surgical practices will be randomized to implementation tranches. The control arm consists of all patients receiving surgery in implementation tranches in which the intervention has not been implemented yet (per the study schedule). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All patients 18 years of age and older.
- Must be undergoing qualifying surgeries at participating sites.
- Patients under 18 years of age.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients under 18 years of age.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conversation Guide + Clinical SupportThe intervention is a bundled intervention (conversation guide + clinician decision support tools) which promotes the solicitation and use of patient preferences for post-surgical, non-pharmacological pain management strategies. | Behavioural | Intervention |
Primary outcome
PROMIS-CAT Pain
Time frame: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 1-,2-, and 3-Months Post-Surgery
Change in patient reported pain; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
PROMIS-CAT Physical Function
Time frame: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 1-,2-, and 3-Months Post-Surgery
Change in patient reported Physical Function; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
PROMIS-CAT Anxiety
Time frame: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 3-Months Post-Surgery
Change in patient reported Anxiety; measured on scale of 1-100. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Use of Non-Pharmacological Pain Control Modalities
Time frame: 3 Months Post-Surgery
Number of participants using Non-Pharmacological Pain Control Modalities
Opioid Use
Time frame: 3-Months Post-Surgery
Binary variables indicating presence or absence of opioid administration and prescription during the hospital encounter associated with the index surgery and during the post-discharge follow-up period.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Nov 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42789267Cheville AL, Herrin J, Minteer S, Grzegorczyk V, Tilburt J; Mayo Clinic NOHARM Research Team. Integrating Nonpharmacological Options Into Perioperative Pain Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2026 Sep 1;9(9):e2635900. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.35900.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35657564Redmond S; Mayo Clinic NOHARM Research Team; Tilburt J, Cheville A. Non-pharmacological Options in Postoperative Hospital-Based and Rehabilitation Pain Management (NOHARM): Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial. Pain Ther. 2022 Sep;11(3):1037-1053. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00393-x. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Recruiting
Improving Surgical Communication for Patients in Wisconsin
Surgeons, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Continuous Connected Patient Care (CCPC), a Pilot Testing a Novel Device for Continuous Vitals Monitoring - Department of Anesthesia at PHC
Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
RecruitingPhase 4
A Clinical Trial on the Use of Lidocaine Infusion During Surgery for Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures and Its Impact on Total Perioperative Opioid Requirements
Fracture Arm, Fracture Closed of Lower End of Forearm, Unspecified
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Cyclobenzaprine for Postoperative Pain in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Unspecified
Recruiting
Preoperative Fasting vs. Not Fasting in Critically Ill Patients
Critical Illness, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea L Cheville principal investigator
Mayo Clinic
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conversation Guide + Clinical Support in people with Surgical Procedure, Unspecified, run by Mayo Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PROMIS-CAT Pain (time frame: Baseline (before hospital discharge), 1-,2-, and 3-Months Post-Surgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04570371, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2025.