Heart Failure,CongestiveNCT04572425
Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Advanced Heart Failure
A study testing Guided imagery and Virtual reality in people with Heart Failure,Congestive and Acute Pain, run by Medstar Health Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the impact of virtual reality therapy on mitigating heart failure pain in hospitalized patients with heart failure and compare this impact to that of 2-dimensional guided imagery distraction therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure,Congestive, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Guided imagery and Virtual reality
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 94 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to 30 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- hospitalized at study institution
- primary diagnosis of ACC/AHA Stage C or D heart failure
- reports pain on 0-10 Likert scale at least 4/10 or greater
Who cannot join
- participant already uses virtual reality for personal use
- intractable nausea/vomiting
- history of motion sickness
- history of seizures or epilepsy
- have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset
- currently enrolled in a palliative care or pain management study
- on contact isolation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study to Evaluate Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Advanced Heart Failure
The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the impact of virtual reality therapy on mitigating heart failure pain in hospitalized patients with heart failure and compare this impact to that of 2-dimensional guided imagery distraction therapy.
Read the detailed description
Through ongoing collaborative work between the MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Advanced Heart Failure clinical team at our hospital and the MedStar Washington Hospital Center Palliative Care team, the research team identifies hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (ACC/AHA stage C or D). Subjects will be considered for enrollment in this study if able to provide consent, at least 18 years old, and report moderate-severe pain (at least 4 out of 10 where pain is rated on a Likert scale between zero and 10) in the previous 24 hours. Subjects will be excluded if they already use VR for personal use, have intractable nausea/vomiting, history of motion sickness, history of seizures or epilepsy, have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset, are currently enrolled in a palliative care or pain management study, and/or are on contact isolation. Institutional review board approval will be sought and informed consent will be conducted before enrolling every patient.
After consenting to participate, in addition to usual pharmacologic pain management, 128 patients should be randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive either one 10-minute VR session, or one 10-minute 2-dimensional guided-imagery session.
VR sessions will be administered using the Facebook (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA) Oculus GO VR. The VR software that will be used is the Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) application. The guided-imagery session depicts a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery. Patients will watch the guided imagery video on a portable tablet for 10 minutes, the same duration as the VR intervention.
Subjects in both arms will continue to receive standard pharmacologic pain management.
Because of the nature of the compared interventions, subjects and researchers cannot be blinded to intervention. Our primary outcome measure will determine the impact of distraction therapy (either VR therapy or 2-dimensional guided imagery) on self-reported pain experience. Self-reported pain experience remains the standard for clinical pain research. Secondary outcomes will measure impact of each distraction therapy on general distress level, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management.
Following consent and randomization, subjects will complete surveys on electronic tablets to provide baseline data on pain scores, general distress, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management. Pain will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF, modified to assess symptoms in the last 24 hours) that includes a 0-10 Likert scale for self-reported pain as well as information about pain location, quality, and interference of pain on daily living. General distress will be measured using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (a Likert scale measuring from No Distress to Extreme Distress, where "distress" is defined by the patient; we will not include the tool's associated Problem List due to overlap with other survey questions and attempt to avoid survey fatigue). General quality of life will be measured using the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness-Therapy in Palliative Care 14-item (FACIT-Pal 14) scale that measures non-pain symptoms and general well-being.
After completion of baseline surveys, subjects will be administered either VR therapy for 10 minutes or 2-dimensional guided imagery for 10 minutes. For both arms, a member of the research team will educate the patient on the technology and assure comfort with use, remaining outside the room but nearby during the actual 10 minutes.
Following the distraction therapy, subjects will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, and Distress Thermometer (Aim 1). Both groups will also be surveyed regarding acceptance of and satisfaction with the distraction therapy intervention itself and its thematic content (Aim 2). Patients randomized to VR therapy will be surveyed regarding level of immersion of the VR experience. In order to evaluate any residual effects of the distraction therapy, enrollees will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, Distress Thermometer, and pain management satisfaction questions on the following day.
Our study will reach 80% power to detect a difference of 1 unit in the pain score measure between the 2 groups using a two-sample t-test with equal variance at a two-sided alpha=0.05 and assuming a within-group standard deviation of 2 for each group. Sample size calculations were conducted in PASS.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure,Congestive, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Guided imagery, Virtual reality
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guided imageryOther
10 minutes of guided imagery experience delivered on tablet
Virtual realityOther
10 minutes of virtual reality experience delivered by Facebook Oculus Go VR device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Guided imagery | Active comparator | 10 minutes of guided imagery (using Apple iPad and headphones, subject watches 10 minute video of a guided-imagery session depicting a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery) Receives: Other: Guided imagery |
| Virtual reality | Experimental | 10 minutes of virtual reality (using study-administered Facebook Oculus Go VR headset with headphones, subject engages with VR application Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) that features a forest environment with voice narration that can be played in a seated or fixed position. Receives: Other: Virtual reality |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self reported pain score
Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Measured: Immediately after assigned intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
Quality of life score
Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness-Therapy in Palliative Care 14-item scale (FACIT Pal 14 scale) -- subject replies to 14 questions about quality of life issues with responses in 5-point Likert scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much), total score range 0-56
Measured: Immediately after assigned intervention
Self reported distress
National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer -- subject rates distress at that point in time on Likert scale 0-10 (0 = no distress; 10 = worst distress)
Measured: Immediately after assigned intervention
Ease of intervention ("How easy was this technology for you to use?") -- this single question designed for this study
Single best answer to this question: subjects choose between "easy," "normal," or "difficult"
Measured: Immediately after assigned intervention
Acceptability of intervention ("Would you use this intervention again?") -- this single question designed for this study
Single best answer: subjects choose between two choices, "Yes" or "No"
Measured: Immediately after assigned intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completion29 Mar 2020
- Study completion30 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart Failure,CongestiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medstar Health Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hunter Groninger, MD, Principal investigator, Medstar Health Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04572425
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-076
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 3 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Stewart D, Mete M, Groninger H. Virtual reality for pain management in patients with heart failure: Study rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Oct 12;16:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100470. eCollection 2019 Dec.
PubMed 31650079Groninger H, Stewart D, Fisher JM, Tefera E, Cowgill J, Mete M. Virtual reality for pain management in advanced heart failure: A randomized controlled study. Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):2008-2016. doi: 10.1177/02692163211041273. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
PubMed 34431398
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study to Evaluate Virtual Reality for Pain Management in Advanced Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04572425
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-076
- Conditions
- Heart Failure,Congestive, Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 94 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medstar Health Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research project is to evaluate the impact of virtual reality therapy on mitigating heart failure pain in hospitalized patients with heart failure and compare this impact to that of 2-dimensional guided imagery distraction therapy.
Detailed description
Through ongoing collaborative work between the MedStar Heart and Vascular Institute Advanced Heart Failure clinical team at our hospital and the MedStar Washington Hospital Center Palliative Care team, the research team identifies hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of heart failure (ACC/AHA stage C or D). Subjects will be considered for enrollment in this study if able to provide consent, at least 18 years old, and report moderate-severe pain (at least 4 out of 10 where pain is rated on a Likert scale between zero and 10) in the previous 24 hours. Subjects will be excluded if they already use VR for personal use, have intractable nausea/vomiting, history of motion sickness, history of seizures or epilepsy, have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset, are currently enrolled in a palliative care or pain management study, and/or are on contact isolation. Institutional review board approval will be sought and informed consent will be conducted before enrolling every patient.
After consenting to participate, in addition to usual pharmacologic pain management, 128 patients should be randomized with a 1:1 ratio to receive either one 10-minute VR session, or one 10-minute 2-dimensional guided-imagery session.
VR sessions will be administered using the Facebook (Facebook Inc., Menlo Park, CA) Oculus GO VR. The VR software that will be used is the Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) application. The guided-imagery session depicts a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery. Patients will watch the guided imagery video on a portable tablet for 10 minutes, the same duration as the VR intervention.
Subjects in both arms will continue to receive standard pharmacologic pain management.
Because of the nature of the compared interventions, subjects and researchers cannot be blinded to intervention. Our primary outcome measure will determine the impact of distraction therapy (either VR therapy or 2-dimensional guided imagery) on self-reported pain experience. Self-reported pain experience remains the standard for clinical pain research. Secondary outcomes will measure impact of each distraction therapy on general distress level, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management.
Following consent and randomization, subjects will complete surveys on electronic tablets to provide baseline data on pain scores, general distress, general quality of life, and satisfaction with pain management. Pain will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF, modified to assess symptoms in the last 24 hours) that includes a 0-10 Likert scale for self-reported pain as well as information about pain location, quality, and interference of pain on daily living. General distress will be measured using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (a Likert scale measuring from No Distress to Extreme Distress, where "distress" is defined by the patient; we will not include the tool's associated Problem List due to overlap with other survey questions and attempt to avoid survey fatigue). General quality of life will be measured using the Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness-Therapy in Palliative Care 14-item (FACIT-Pal 14) scale that measures non-pain symptoms and general well-being.
After completion of baseline surveys, subjects will be administered either VR therapy for 10 minutes or 2-dimensional guided imagery for 10 minutes. For both arms, a member of the research team will educate the patient on the technology and assure comfort with use, remaining outside the room but nearby during the actual 10 minutes.
Following the distraction therapy, subjects will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, and Distress Thermometer (Aim 1). Both groups will also be surveyed regarding acceptance of and satisfaction with the distraction therapy intervention itself and its thematic content (Aim 2). Patients randomized to VR therapy will be surveyed regarding level of immersion of the VR experience. In order to evaluate any residual effects of the distraction therapy, enrollees will be re-surveyed BPI-SF, FACIT-Pal 14, Distress Thermometer, and pain management satisfaction questions on the following day.
Our study will reach 80% power to detect a difference of 1 unit in the pain score measure between the 2 groups using a two-sample t-test with equal variance at a two-sided alpha=0.05 and assuming a within-group standard deviation of 2 for each group. Sample size calculations were conducted in PASS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Guided imagery | Active comparator | Other: Guided imagery10 minutes of guided imagery (using Apple iPad and headphones, subject watches 10 minute video of a guided-imagery session depicting a peaceful walk through a forest with instrumental background music and 2-dimensional imagery) |
| Virtual reality | Experimental | Other: Virtual reality10 minutes of virtual reality (using study-administered Facebook Oculus Go VR headset with headphones, subject engages with VR application Forest of Serenity (Holosphere VR®, Birmingham, UK) that features a forest environment with voice narration that can be played in a seated or fixed position. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- hospitalized at study institution
- primary diagnosis of ACC/AHA Stage C or D heart failure
- reports pain on 0-10 Likert scale at least 4/10 or greater
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- participant already uses virtual reality for personal use
- intractable nausea/vomiting
- history of motion sickness
- history of seizures or epilepsy
- have cranial structure abnormalities that prevent use of VR headset
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guided imagery10 minutes of guided imagery experience delivered on tablet | Other | Guided imagery |
| Virtual reality10 minutes of virtual reality experience delivered by Facebook Oculus Go VR device | Other | Virtual reality |
Primary outcome
Self reported pain score
Time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Likert scale 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
4 secondary outcomes
Quality of life score
Time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Self reported distress
Time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Ease of intervention ("How easy was this technology for you to use?") -- this single question designed for this study
Time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Acceptability of intervention ("Would you use this intervention again?") -- this single question designed for this study
Time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 31650079Stewart D, Mete M, Groninger H. Virtual reality for pain management in patients with heart failure: Study rationale and design. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Oct 12;16:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100470. eCollection 2019 Dec.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34431398Groninger H, Stewart D, Fisher JM, Tefera E, Cowgill J, Mete M. Virtual reality for pain management in advanced heart failure: A randomized controlled study. Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):2008-2016. doi: 10.1177/02692163211041273. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure,Congestive
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Vericiguat in Pediatric Participants With Heart Failure Due to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (MK-1242-036)
Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
RecruitingPhase 1/2
HS235 Study in Overweight and Obese Participants With Combined Pre and Post-Capillary Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Pulmonary Hypertension, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting
Heart Failure Patient Management and Interventions Using Continuous Patient Monitoring Outside Hospitals and Real-world Data
Chronic Heart Failure, Heart Transplant Recipient
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Savagen (Sacubitril/Valsartan) in Malaysian HFrEF Patients
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hunter Groninger, MD principal investigator
Medstar Health Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Guided imagery and Virtual reality in people with Heart Failure,Congestive and Acute Pain, run by Medstar Health Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self reported pain score (time frame: Immediately after assigned intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04572425, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2020.