Coronary Artery DiseaseNCT04575207
The Flash FFR Ⅱ Study
A study testing caFFR and FFR in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Stenosis, run by Peking University First Hospital at 13 sites in China.
Trial summary
The overall purpose of Flash FFR Ⅱ is to investigate whether coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR), compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire, has non-inferior clinical effect and cost benefit in guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Myocardial Ischaemia
- What is being tested?
- caFFR and FFR
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,132 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2021to Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General inclusion criteria:
- Age above 18 years old, no limit on the gender;
- Angiography is considered necessary and feasible by investigator, and PCI will be performed if necessary;
- Suspected coronary heart disease, stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris, non-culprit vascular assessment in participants with acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and non-culprit vascular assessment in patients with previous ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction;
- Participants voluntarily participate in this clinical trial and sign informed consent form.
- Coronary angiography inclusion criteria:
Show all 10Show fewer
- The presence of at least one stenosis and meets the following imaging findings:
- The degree of coronary artery stenosis≥50% and ≤90% by visual measurement;
- The reference diameter of the stenotic segment≥2.25 mm by visual measurement;
- The investigator visually observes the target vessel through angiographic images, and consider that PCI surgery is technically feasible.
Who cannot join
- General exclusion criteria:
- Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction within 6 days;
- Cardiogenic shock or left ventricular ejection fraction≤50%;
- eGFR < 30 mL/min (1.73 m2);
- Severe coagulation dysfunctions or bleeding disorders;
- Allergic to iodine contrast medium or contraindications for adenosine administration;
Show all 19Show fewer
- Severe aortic stenosis;
- Life expectancy less than 1 year;
- Pregnant women or women planning a recent pregnancy;
- Participation in any other clinical trials of devices or drugs (ongoing or within the past 1 month);
- The investigator believes that the particitant has other conditions that are not suitable for clinical trials.
- Coronary angiography exclusion criteria:
- TIMI flow in the target vessel<grade III ;
- Presence of myocardial bridge and systolic compression ≥50% in the target vessel;
- Presence of artificial bypass in the target vessel;
- Left main coronary artery or right coronary artery ostial lesions;
- Stent implantation in the target vessel within 3 months;
- Target vessel provides collateral support to chronically total occluded vessels;
- Presence of factors affecting angiographic analysis and stenosis visualization, including incomplete vessel opacification, or overlap with other coronary branches of extreme vessel foreshortening.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
China13 sites, 12 recruiting
- Recruiting
Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000
Hongxiu Liu, MD
Hongxiu Liu, MD
- Recruiting
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Yahui Lu, MD
Jian Liu, drjianliu@163.com
- Recruiting
Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital
Beijing, 100034
Yanjun Gong, MD, 8610-83575607, gongyanjun111@163.com
Yong Huo, MD
- Recruiting
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610000
Chen Li, MD, 69825160@qq.com
Chen Li, MD
- Completed
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510000
- Recruiting
The People's Hospital of Hebi
Hebi, Henan, 458000
Xueliang Gao, MD
Peng Liu, MD, nick-208@126.com
- Recruiting
QILU Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, 250012
Jianmin Yang, MD
Jianmin Yang, MD
- Recruiting
Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University
Kunming, Yunnan, 650021
Xinjin Zhang, MD, zxjgry2004@sina.com
Xinjin Zhang, MD
- Recruiting
Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330000
Hongmin Zhu, MD
Lang Hong, MD
- Recruiting
Zhongshan Hospital affiliated to Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032
Chenguang Li, MD, chenguang.li@zs-hospital.sh.cn
Junbo Ge, MD
- Recruiting
The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen hospital
Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000
Cong Chen, MD, 0086+1866496688, chenc6@hku-szh.org
Gaozhen Cao, MD, 0086+18307555105, caogz@hku-szh.org
- Recruiting
Xiamen Cardiovascular Hospital Xiamen University
Xiamen, Fujian, 361000
Suiji Li, MD
Yan Wang, MD
- Recruiting
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College
Xinxiang, Henan, 453100
Guoan Zhao, MD, guoanzhao@xxmu.edu.cn
Guoan Zhao, MD
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized, Noninferiority Clinical Trial of Coronary Angiography Fractional Flow Reserve (caFFR) Versus Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(Flash FFR Ⅱ )
The overall purpose of Flash FFR Ⅱ is to investigate whether coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR), compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire, has non-inferior clinical effect and cost benefit in guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis in terms of long-term clinical prognosis.
Read the detailed description
Flash FFR Ⅱ is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Eligible patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis will be included in the study and randomly assigned to either caFFR-guided group or FFR-guided group. Participant caFFR or FFR will be used to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy.
The rate of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) and the cost data will be collected during the long-term follow-up (2 years). MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be compared between the two groups.
A subgroup analysis is pre-set and included in the protocol, including age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, mean aortic pressure (resting state), acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular ejection fraction, lesion site, lesion stenosis severity, target vessel reference diameter, small vessel lesion, blood flow velocity, PCI mode, and so on.
The trial is equipped with a core laboratory. Some interesting sub-studies will be carried out, such as a comparison of laboratory and operator analysis results.
If the trial results show non-inferiority, it should be noted that caFFR can bring new benefits to both operators and patients as a new index of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity with the advantages of lower cost, less risk, faster time, and less use of resources.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Myocardial Ischaemia, Coronary Circulation, Stable Angina Pectoris, Unstable Angina Pectoris
- Being tested
- caFFR, FFR
- Keywords
- Flash, FFR, caFFR, coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischaemia, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Circulation
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Angina, Stable, Angina, Unstable, photopsia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
caFFRDiagnostic test
Also called Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve
caFFR is a new index of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity, based on angiographic images. Through two-dimensional analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of two coronary angiography image series with an angle-off > 30 degrees, combined with fluid mechanics, TIMI frame counting method, and optimized CFD algorithm, the pressure drop from coronary ostium to every point in the vessel can be obtained, and then the caFFR value of each point in the vessel can be computed. The cutoff value in this trial is caFFR ≤ 0.80 for myocardial ischemia.
FFRDiagnostic test
Also called Fractional Flow Reserve
FFR is a widely used, pressure-based functional assessment index of coronary stenoses obtained with an intracoronary pressure wire fitted with pressure sensors. The pressure wire passes through the stenosis and directly measures the pressure distal to the stenosis. FFR value can be obtained by combining the pressure at the coronary ostium and the distal pressure to the stenosis. The cutoff value in this trial is FFR ≤ 0.80 for myocardial ischemia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| caFFR-guided | Experimental | Participants who are randomly assigned to caFFR-guided group will receive the detection of Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (caFFR) Measurement System. The online caFFR value is used to guide the PCI strategy. If caFFR ≤ 0.80, PCI treatment will be performed in lesions and optimal medicine treatment will be performed when caFFR > 0.80. Receives: Diagnostic Test: caFFR |
| FFR-guided | Active comparator | Participants who are randomly assigned to FFR-guided group will receive the detection of pressure wire. The FFR value is used to guide the PCI strategy. If FFR ≤ 0.80, PCI treatment will be performed in lesions and optimal medicine treatment will be performed when FFR > 0.80. Receives: Diagnostic Test: FFR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MACE
A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (9)
MACE(excluding PCI-related MI)
A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (excluding PCI-related), and unplanned revascularization
Measured: 1 month, 1 year, 2 years
Death
Cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular, and undetermined death
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
MI
Target vessel related and non-target vessel related MI
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
The ischemia driven and non-ischemia driven TVR
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Any coronary artery revascularization
The ischemia driven and non-ischemia driven revascularization
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
Definite and probable stent thrombosis during acute, sub-acute, late, and very late phase
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Evaluation of health economics
Cost-utility analysis and computation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Measured: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year
Analysis of participant discomfort during the operation (none/mild/moderate/severe )
During the caFFR or FFR detection, the operator will ask the participant if there is discomfort (none/mild/moderate/severe ) and what kind of discomfort(such as palpitation, chest stuffy , nausea, dizziness, foreign body invasion ), and fill out a questionnaire after the operation.The discomfort of all participants caused by the use of drugs, intervention, etc. during the caFFR or FFR detection will be analyzed.
Measured: During the operation
The changes of PCI strategy depending on caFFR/FFR information
Before randomization,the operators will be asked to provide their planned treatment strategy based on the angiographic information alone.
After randomization and functional assessment,we will record how caFFR/FFR changed the treatment strategy.
Measured: During the operation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2020
- Study start12 Jan 2021
- Primary completionDec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,132 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University First Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Rainmed Ltd., Suzhou, China
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yong Huo, Peking University First Hospital
- Investigators
- Yong Huo, MD, Study chair, Peking University First Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04575207
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SZRMD2020001
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Li J, Gong Y, Wang W, Yang Q, Liu B, Lu Y, Xu Y, Huo Y, Yi T, Liu J, Li Y, Xu S, Zhao L, Ali ZA, Huo Y. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR. Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jun 1;116(7):1349-1356. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz289.
PubMed 31693092Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
PubMed 19144937De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
PubMed 22924638Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28317458Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28317438
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized, Noninferiority Clinical Trial of Coronary Angiography Fractional Flow Reserve (caFFR) Versus Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention(Flash FFR Ⅱ )
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04575207
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SZRMD2020001
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Myocardial Ischaemia, Coronary Circulation, Stable Angina Pectoris, Unstable Angina Pectoris
- Keywords
- Flash, FFR, caFFR, coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve, Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischaemia, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Circulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,132 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University First HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Rainmed Ltd., Suzhou, China
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overall purpose of Flash FFR Ⅱ is to investigate whether coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR), compared with fractional flow reserve (FFR) measured by a pressure wire, has non-inferior clinical effect and cost benefit in guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis in terms of long-term clinical prognosis.
Detailed description
Flash FFR Ⅱ is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, non-inferiority trial. Eligible patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis will be included in the study and randomly assigned to either caFFR-guided group or FFR-guided group. Participant caFFR or FFR will be used to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy.
The rate of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) and the cost data will be collected during the long-term follow-up (2 years). MACE is defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization. Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be compared between the two groups.
A subgroup analysis is pre-set and included in the protocol, including age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, mean aortic pressure (resting state), acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular ejection fraction, lesion site, lesion stenosis severity, target vessel reference diameter, small vessel lesion, blood flow velocity, PCI mode, and so on.
The trial is equipped with a core laboratory. Some interesting sub-studies will be carried out, such as a comparison of laboratory and operator analysis results.
If the trial results show non-inferiority, it should be noted that caFFR can bring new benefits to both operators and patients as a new index of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity with the advantages of lower cost, less risk, faster time, and less use of resources.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| caFFR-guided | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: caFFRParticipants who are randomly assigned to caFFR-guided group will receive the detection of Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (caFFR) Measurement System. The online caFFR value is used to guide the PCI strategy. If caFFR ≤ 0.80, PCI treatment will be performed in lesions and optimal medicine treatment will be performed when caFFR > 0.80. |
| FFR-guided | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: FFRParticipants who are randomly assigned to FFR-guided group will receive the detection of pressure wire. The FFR value is used to guide the PCI strategy. If FFR ≤ 0.80, PCI treatment will be performed in lesions and optimal medicine treatment will be performed when FFR > 0.80. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- General inclusion criteria:
- Coronary angiography inclusion criteria:
- The degree of coronary artery stenosis≥50% and ≤90% by visual measurement;
- The reference diameter of the stenotic segment≥2.25 mm by visual measurement;
- The investigator visually observes the target vessel through angiographic images, and consider that PCI surgery is technically feasible.
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- General exclusion criteria:
- Coronary angiography exclusion criteria:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| caFFRAlso: Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow ReservecaFFR is a new index of physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity, based on angiographic images. Through two-dimensional analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of two coronary angiography image series with an angle-off > 30 degrees, combined with fluid mechanics, TIMI frame counting method, and optimized CFD algorithm, the pressure drop from coronary ostium to every point in the vessel can be obtained, and then the caFFR value of each point in the vessel can be computed. The cutoff value in this trial is caFFR ≤ 0.80 for myocardial ischemia. | Diagnostic test | caFFR-guided |
| FFRAlso: Fractional Flow ReserveFFR is a widely used, pressure-based functional assessment index of coronary stenoses obtained with an intracoronary pressure wire fitted with pressure sensors. The pressure wire passes through the stenosis and directly measures the pressure distal to the stenosis. FFR value can be obtained by combining the pressure at the coronary ostium and the distal pressure to the stenosis. The cutoff value in this trial is FFR ≤ 0.80 for myocardial ischemia. | Diagnostic test | FFR-guided |
Primary outcome
MACE
Time frame: 1 year
A composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization
9 secondary outcomes
MACE(excluding PCI-related MI)
Time frame: 1 month, 1 year, 2 years
Death
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
MI
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Any coronary artery revascularization
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Definite or probable stent thrombosis
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years
Evaluation of health economics
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1 year
Analysis of participant discomfort during the operation (none/mild/moderate/severe )
Time frame: During the operation
The changes of PCI strategy depending on caFFR/FFR information
Time frame: During the operation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 31693092Li J, Gong Y, Wang W, Yang Q, Liu B, Lu Y, Xu Y, Huo Y, Yi T, Liu J, Li Y, Xu S, Zhao L, Ali ZA, Huo Y. Accuracy of computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to coronary angiography to derive fractional flow reserve: FLASH FFR. Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Jun 1;116(7):1349-1356. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz289.
- Background: PubMed 19144937Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
- Background: PubMed 22924638De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
- Background: PubMed 28317458Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 28317438Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Reducing Slow/No-Reflow With Prophylactic High-Dose Intracoronary Adenosine Protocol in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction The REFLOW AMI Trial
ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)
Active, not recruiting
Insulin Resistance and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Myocardial Ischemia and Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Coronary Microvascular Disease
Not yet recruiting
TRADENT Scoring Balloon Versus Non-scoring Balloon for Lesion Preparation in DCB-Based Coronary Intervention
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Initiation of Tafolecimab for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromeundergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chinese Population
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Non ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yong Huo, MD study chair
Peking University First Hospital
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing caFFR and FFR in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Stenosis, run by Peking University First Hospital at 13 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yanjun Gong, MD (8610-83575607, gongyanjun111@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MACE (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04575207, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2023.