AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple Rib FracturesNCT04575272

Ultrasound-guided Deep Versus Superficial Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures

A study testing Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block in people with Multiple Rib Fractures and Pain, Acute, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present clinical study will be undertaken to evaluate the effect of Ultrasound-guided Deep versus Superficial continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
What is being tested?
Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
3 Aug 2021to 10 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients of either sex, having three or more unilateral fracture ribs and admitted to the trauma ICU, Rib fractures were confirmed by X-ray and CT scan reads.

Who cannot join

  • significant head injury and unconsciousness (GCS less than 14)
  • Patients with significant pain from other injuries
  • pathological obesity (body mass index ≥35)
  • history of drug allergy local anesthetics
  • local infection at the injection site
  • inability to obtain consent from patient or surrogate, and patient refusal

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Assiut University

    Asyut, 71515

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound-guided Deep Versus Superficial Continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures: Randomized Double-blind Clinical Trial

The present clinical study will be undertaken to evaluate the effect of Ultrasound-guided Deep versus Superficial continuous Serratus Anterior Plane Block for pain management in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Read the detailed description

Thoracic blunt trauma, especially when multiple rib fractures are associated, is challenging to manage and causes significant morbidity due to the severe pain implied.

Patients can present with respiratory compromise as their capacity to expand the thorax is limited by pain. As a result, they are at high risk to develop atelectasis and pneumonia.

the key goal of management is adequate analgesia and pulmonary volume expansion Various strategies to treat such pain have been utilized, including regional analgesia (intrapleural, intercostal paravertebral nerve blockade), and neuraxial analgesia (thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), intrathecal opioids).

The use of neuraxial analgesia in polytrauma is frequently limited by the need for aggressive venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis, and positioning of the patient for a neuraxial approach may be impossible.

There is a growing interest in exploring treatments that are less invasive than EA and can be performed on patients who have contraindications to neuraxial analgesia. Ultrasound-guided Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) block is a recent technique, first described by Blanco et al. in 2013, that provides analgesia for the thoracic wall by blocking the lateral branches of the intercostal nerves from T2 to L2. It is a safe, simple to perform block with no significant contraindications or side effects. he described 2 potential spaces, one superficial and another deep to serratus. The SAPB has been used effectively for the management of pain in the context of rib fractures, thoracoscopic surgery, thoracotomy, breast surgery, and post-mastectomy pain syndrome, few studies compared the two approaches, and the difference between them has not yet been studied in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Being tested
Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block
Keywords
serratus anterior plane block, multiple rib fractures
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane blockProcedure or surgery

    Local anesthetic infusion though a peripheral nerve catheter placed related to the serratus anterior muscle at the level of the 5th rib

Study groups in NCT04575272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Continuous Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block groupExperimentalat the level of the fifth rib in the mid-axillary line. After anaesthetizing the skin with 2 mL of lidocaine 2%, an 18-gauge Touhy needle was introduced in-plane, under direct visualization, to the plane immediately deep to the serratus anterior muscle. After negative aspiration, 35 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected. Afterwards, a 20-gauge peripheral nerve catheter will be threaded into the space. then bupivacaine 0.125% infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h by an Infusion Syringe Pump will be started.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block
Continuous Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block groupActive comparatorat the level of the fifth rib in the mid-axillary line. After anaesthetizing the skin with 2 mL of lidocaine 2%, an 18-gauge Touhy needle was introduced in-plane, under direct visualization, to the plane immediately superficial to the serratus anterior muscle. After negative aspiration, 35 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected. Afterwards, a 20-gauge peripheral nerve catheter will be threaded into the space. then bupivacaine 0.125% infusion at a rate of 5 ml/h by an Infusion Syringe Pump will be started.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in pain score

    patient report numerical rating scale (NRS) 0 to 10, with 0 being "no pain" and 10 being "the worst pain imaginable"

    Measured: before and after the block at "30 minutes", "2hours", "4hours", "6hours", "12hours", "24hours", "36hours", "48 hours" & "72hours"

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Change in inspiratory volumes (mL)

    Maximum inspiratory respiratory volume (measured in ml) recorded on single use of incentive spirometer device

    Measured: before and after block at "90 minutes" then every "12hours" for 3 days

  2. change in Serum beta-endorphin level

    We will use radioimmunoassays to measure plasma beta-endorphin level

    Measured: before procedure and at 24 hours post procedure

  3. Lung Ultrasound Score (LUSS)

    We will use a techniques based on the international evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound that recommended using a complete eight-zone lung ultrasound ,The worst ultrasound pattern observed in each zone was recorded and used to calculate the sum of the scores (total score = 24).

    Measured: before and after block at "90 minutes" then every "24 hours" for 3 days

  4. mean arterial blood pressure

    mean arterial blood pressure by non invaisive blood pressure monitoring

    Measured: before and after the block every "2hours" for 3 days

  5. heart rate

    heart rate by EKG monitor

    Measured: before and after the block every "2hours" for 3 days

  6. peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2)

    measured by Pulse oximetry

    Measured: before and after the block every "2hours" for 3 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2020
  2. Study start3 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04575272
Sponsor's protocol ID
Serratus Plane Block and MFRs
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
20 Sep 2020
Last updated
24 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • May L, Hillermann C, Patil S. Rib fracture management. BJA Educ. 2016 Jan 1;16(1):26-32.

  • Chien CY, Chen YH, Han ST, Blaney GN, Huang TS, Chen KF. The number of displaced rib fractures is more predictive for complications in chest trauma patients. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Feb 28;25(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0368-y.

    PubMed 28241883
  • Lotfipour S, Kaku SK, Vaca FE, Patel C, Anderson CL, Ahmed SS, Menchine MD. Factors associated with complications in older adults with isolated blunt chest trauma. West J Emerg Med. 2009 May;10(2):79-84.

    PubMed 19561823
  • Vasigh A, Jaafarpour M, Khajavikhan J, Khani A. The Effect of Gabapentin Plus Celecoxib on Pain and Associated Complications After Laminectomy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):UC04-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17923.7346. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

    PubMed 27134973
  • Khalil AE, Abdallah NM, Bashandy GM, Kaddah TA. Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracotomy Pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):152-158. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Aug 21.

    PubMed 27939192
  • Hernandez N, de Haan J, Clendeninn D, Meyer DE, Ghebremichael S, Artime C, Williams G, Eltzschig H, Sen S. Impact of serratus plane block on pain scores and incentive spirometry volumes after chest trauma. Local Reg Anesth. 2019 Aug 2;12:59-66. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S207791. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31447581
  • Okmen K, Okmen BM. The efficacy of serratus anterior plane block in analgesia for thoracotomy: a retrospective study. J Anesth. 2017 Aug;31(4):579-585. doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2364-9. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

    PubMed 28447227
  • Beard L, Hillermann C, Beard E, Millerchip S, Sachdeva R, Gao Smith F, Veenith T. Multicenter longitudinal cross-sectional study comparing effectiveness of serratus anterior plane, paravertebral and thoracic epidural for the analgesia of multiple rib fractures. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 May;45(5):351-356. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101119. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

    PubMed 32165553
  • Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013 Nov;68(11):1107-13. doi: 10.1111/anae.12344. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

    PubMed 23923989
  • Durant E, Dixon B, Luftig J, Mantuani D, Herring A. Ultrasound-guided serratus plane block for ED rib fracture pain control. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):197.e3-197.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Jul 19. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27595172
  • Piracha MM, Thorp SL, Puttanniah V, Gulati A. "A Tale of Two Planes": Deep Versus Superficial Serratus Plane Block for Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):259-262. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000555.

    PubMed 28079733
  • Zocca JA, Chen GH, Puttanniah VG, Hung JC, Gulati A. Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Plane Block for Treatment of Postmastectomy Pain Syndromes in Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Series. Pain Pract. 2017 Jan;17(1):141-146. doi: 10.1111/papr.12482. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

    PubMed 27587333
  • Bhoi D, Selvam V, Yadav P, Talawar P. Comparison of two different techniques of serratus anterior plane block: A clinical experience. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):251-253. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_294_16. No abstract available.

    PubMed 30104841
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

    PubMed 17695343
  • Volpicelli G, Mussa A, Garofalo G, Cardinale L, Casoli G, Perotto F, Fava C, Frascisco M. Bedside lung ultrasound in the assessment of alveolar-interstitial syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):689-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.02.013.

    PubMed 16984837

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound-guided continuous serratus anterior plane block in people with Multiple Rib Fractures and Pain, Acute, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in pain score (time frame: before and after the block at "30 minutes", "2hours", "4hours", "6hours", "12hours", "24hours", "36hours", "48 hours" & "72hours"). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04575272, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in