Fibrodyplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)Phase 3NCT04577820
Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Garetosmab in Japanese Adult Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)
A Phase 3 study testing garetosmab in people with Fibrodyplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) and Heterotopic Ossification (HO), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.
Trial summary
The primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of garetosmab in Japanese male and female adult patients with FOP. The primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of garetosmab on Heterotopic ossification (HO) in Japanese adult patients with FOP, as determined by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibrodyplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP), Heterotopic Ossification (HO)
- What is being tested?
- garetosmab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2021to 8 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of FOP (based on findings of congenital malformation of the great toes, episodic soft tissue swelling, and/or progressive HO)
- Confirmation of FOP diagnosis with documentation of any Type I activin A receptor (ACVR1) mutation
- FOP disease activity, as defined in the protocol, within 1 year of screening visit
- Willing and able to undergo PET and CT imaging procedures and other procedures as defined in this study
- Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires and diaries (assistance from caregivers is allowed)
Who cannot join
- Patient has significant concomitant illness or history of significant illness such as but not limited to cardiac, renal, rheumatologic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic, or lymphatic disease, that in the opinion of the study investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient by their participation in the study
- Previous history or diagnosis of cancer
- Severely impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (1 retest is allowed)
- Uncontrolled diabetes defined as hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) >9% at screening (1 retest allowed)
- History of severe respiratory compromise, as defined in protocol
- Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical study or a non-interventional study with radiographic measures or invasive procedures
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Garetosmab in Japanese Adult Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
The primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of garetosmab in Japanese male and female adult patients with FOP.
The primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of garetosmab on Heterotopic ossification (HO) in Japanese adult patients with FOP, as determined by the number of new heterotopic bone lesions identified by computed tomography (CT).
- Being tested
- garetosmab
- Medical subject headings
- Ossification, Heterotopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
garetosmabDrug
Also called REGN2477
Repeated doses administered intravenously (IV) every four weeks (Q4W)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| garetosmab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: garetosmab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs)
Measured: Through week 28
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 28
Secondary outcomes (39)
Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 28
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)
Measured: At week 28
Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Measured: At week 28
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 28
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Measured: At week 28
Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups
Measured: Baseline to week 28
Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups
Measured: Baseline to week 56
Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary
Measured: Baseline to week 28
Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary
Measured: Baseline to week 56
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 56
Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 56
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: At week 56
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Measured: At week 56
Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Measured: At week 56
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Measured: At week 56
Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Change in total lesion activity by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Change in total lesion activity by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in total lesion activity by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in total lesion activity by PET
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET
HO lesions defined as target and new lesions relative to baseline.
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET
Defined above
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT
Defined above
Measured: Baseline and week 28
Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT
Defined above
Measured: Baseline and week 56
Time-weighted average (standardized area under curve [AUC]) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily numeric rating scale (NRS)
The NRS is a categorical rating scale used by patients to rate their pain associated with FOP. Patients will be asked to rate their pain on a scale that ranges from "0" (no pain) to "10" (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline through week 28
Time-weighted average (standardized AUC) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily NRS
Measured: Baseline through week 56
Total dosage of glucocorticoids use
Measured: Through week 56
Incidence and severity of TEAEs
Measured: Through week 56
Concentration of total activin A in serum over time
Measured: Through week 56
Pharmacokinetic (Pk) Profile - concentrations of garetosmab in serum over time
Measured: Through week 56
Immunogenicity as measured by Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to garetosmab over time
Measured: Through week 28
Percent change from baseline in biomarkers of bone formation levels in serum
Measured: Through week 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2020
- Study start13 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Oct 2022 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Phase 2 Study R2477-FOP-1940 has been withdrawn and the next phase of the development program is being planned
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Fibrodyplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04577820
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R2477-FOP-1940
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All Individual Patient Data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Garetosmab in Japanese Adult Patients With Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04577820
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R2477-FOP-1940
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Phase 2 Study R2477-FOP-1940 has been withdrawn and the next phase of the development program is being planned
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Oct 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary safety objective of the study is to assess the safety and tolerability of garetosmab in Japanese male and female adult patients with FOP.
The primary efficacy objective of the study is to assess the effect of garetosmab on Heterotopic ossification (HO) in Japanese adult patients with FOP, as determined by the number of new heterotopic bone lesions identified by computed tomography (CT).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| garetosmab | Experimental | Drug: garetosmab |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of FOP (based on findings of congenital malformation of the great toes, episodic soft tissue swelling, and/or progressive HO)
- Confirmation of FOP diagnosis with documentation of any Type I activin A receptor (ACVR1) mutation
- FOP disease activity, as defined in the protocol, within 1 year of screening visit
- Willing and able to undergo PET and CT imaging procedures and other procedures as defined in this study
- Able to understand and complete study-related questionnaires and diaries (assistance from caregivers is allowed)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient has significant concomitant illness or history of significant illness such as but not limited to cardiac, renal, rheumatologic, neurologic, psychiatric, endocrine, metabolic, or lymphatic disease, that in the opinion of the study investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the patient by their participation in the study
- Previous history or diagnosis of cancer
- Severely impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (1 retest is allowed)
- Uncontrolled diabetes defined as hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) >9% at screening (1 retest allowed)
- History of severe respiratory compromise, as defined in protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| garetosmabAlso: REGN2477Repeated doses administered intravenously (IV) every four weeks (Q4W) | Drug | garetosmab |
Primary outcome
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs)
Time frame: Through week 28
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 28
39 secondary outcomes
Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 28
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by positron emission tomography (PET)
Time frame: At week 28
Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: At week 28
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 28
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: At week 28
Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups
Time frame: Baseline to week 28
Percent of patients with investigator-assessed flare-ups
Time frame: Baseline to week 56
Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary
Time frame: Baseline to week 28
Percent of patients with flare-ups assessed by patient e-diary
Time frame: Baseline to week 56
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 56
Total volume of new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 56
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: At week 56
Number of new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: At week 56
Total lesion activity in new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: At week 56
Percent of patients with new HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: At week 56
Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in mean maximum standard uptake volume (SUVmax) of individual active HO site(s) by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Change in total lesion activity by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Change in total lesion activity by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in total lesion activity by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in total lesion activity by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Percent change in the total volume of HO lesions as assessed by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Change in number of HO lesions as assessed by PET
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 28
Change in the number of HO lesions detectable by CT
Time frame: Baseline and week 56
Time-weighted average (standardized area under curve [AUC]) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily numeric rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: Baseline through week 28
Time-weighted average (standardized AUC) change in daily pain due to FOP, as measured using the daily NRS
Time frame: Baseline through week 56
Total dosage of glucocorticoids use
Time frame: Through week 56
Incidence and severity of TEAEs
Time frame: Through week 56
Concentration of total activin A in serum over time
Time frame: Through week 56
Pharmacokinetic (Pk) Profile - concentrations of garetosmab in serum over time
Time frame: Through week 56
Immunogenicity as measured by Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to garetosmab over time
Time frame: Through week 28
Percent change from baseline in biomarkers of bone formation levels in serum
Time frame: Through week 28
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All Individual Patient Data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing garetosmab in people with Fibrodyplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) and Heterotopic Ossification (HO), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) (time frame: Through week 28). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2021.