AzTrials
AzTrials

Endometrial CancerSENNANNCT04577950

A Prospective Study Comparing Three Injection Sites to Detect Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer

A study testing Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancer in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common histologic type of uterine cancer. Endometrial cancer is the fifth most frequent cancer in women in Switzerland. The incidence rose up to 5.9% in 2015. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometrial Cancer
What is being tested?
Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancer
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
21 Jan 2021to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Informed Consent as documented by signature
  • Early endometrial cancers (of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA-IB), whatever histological grade and type
  • Primary surgical treatment with hysterectomy
  • No metastasis, no other cancers, no recurrency of cancers
  • No signs of lymph nodes metastasis on the preoperative workup (MRI +/- positron emission computed tomography)
  • No contraindication to laparoscopic procedures.
  • Women of > 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Known severe allergies (antecedents of Quincke oedema, anaphylactic shock,…) and a history of allergy to iodides
  • Contraindications to the injected products because of known hypersensitivity or allergy to ICG of blue dye
  • Antecedent of pelvic lymph nodes surgery
  • Previous lymphadenectomy or surgery that could change the uterine lymphatic drainage (conisation or myomectomy)
  • Other diagnosed cancer during treatment or care
  • Stage II and above (tumor invading cervix stroma) including those after a neo-adjuvant treatment
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Suspicion of lymph nodes metastasis at preoperative workup
  • Medical or uterine conservative treatment
  • Patient, who does not understand, speak or write in French
  • Drugs that can interfere with ICG : anti convulsants - bisulphite compounds - haloperidol - heroin - pethidine [meperidine] - methamizole - methadone - morphine - nitrofurantoin - opium alkaloids - phenobarbitone- phenylbutazone - cyclopropane - probenecid - rifamycin - sodium bisulphite (mostly combined with heparin)
  • Radioactive iodine uptake performed less than one week following the use of ICG.
  • Hypersensitivity to Nanocoll, to any of the excipients (Stannous chloride, dihydrate Glucose, anhydrous Poloxamer 238 Sodium phosphate, dibasic, anhydrous Sodium phytate, anhydrous) or to any of the components of the labelled radiopharmaceutical.
  • A history of hypersensitivity to products containing human albumin
  • Hypersensitivity to dyes made of triphenylmethane
  • Lymphostasis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Patrice Mathevet, MD- PhD contact

+41213146727 ext. +41

patrice.mathevet@chuv.ch

Switzerland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHUV department of gynecology

    Lausanne, 1011

    Patrice Mathevet, MD PhD, +41213146727, patrice.mathevet@chuv.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Prospective Phase 2 Study Comparing Three Injection Sites to Detect Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Lymphatic Drainages and Location of the Sentinel Lymph Nodes Depending on the Injection Site of the Tracer

Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common histologic type of uterine cancer. Endometrial cancer is the fifth most frequent cancer in women in Switzerland. The incidence rose up to 5.9% in 2015. This tumor affects mainly older women, at 63 years on average. The majority of women are diagnosed at an early stage. Seventy-five to 90% of the patients are alerted by abnormal uterine bleeding very quickly, which allows a quick management of care and a high survival rate.

Besides age, one of the main risk factor of developing an endometrial carcinoma is obesity. In fact, obese women have higher risk to have an endometrial cancer, but also at a younger age than the average and finally they have an increased risk of death due to this particular cancer. Although this cancer is linked to the co-morbidities that go with obesity like diabetes or hypertension.

Read more

The treatment of endometrial cancer in most women is surgery involving a total hysterectomy and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without a lymph node dissection. For patients with early stage endometrial cancer, there is a disagreement regarding lymph nodes dissection, because randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have shown no clear evidence on overall or recurrence-free survival and a higher incidence on early and late complications in relation with pelvic lymph node dissection. A systematic lymph node dissection consists of removing all the nodes within a nodal drainage basin. This dissection proves to be very difficult in obese patient and includes a risk to damage blood vessels or nerves. Moreover, lymph node dissection is associated with a higher morbidity, longer operating time, more frequent blood loss and finally symptomatic lymphedema and seroma.

That is why, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) seems to be a good alternative to lymph node dissection. The tumor's spread is assessed in lymph nodes with a reduced morbidity. In fact, lymphadenectomy and its dangerous complications, like lymphedema, could be avoided in the vast majority of cases. Indeed, a histological analysis of these sentinel lymph-nodes (SLNs) leads to ultrastadification: cancers are graded depending on the presence and the size of metastasis in lymph nodes. Adjuvant treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, can be suggested following these data and a better management of endometrial cancer is possible.

Read the detailed description

Worldwide, in 2012, 527'600 women were diagnosed with uterine cancer. It is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. In developing countries, it is the second most common, just behind cervical cancer. Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common histologic site and type of uterine cancer. Endometrial cancer is the fifth most frequent cancer in women in Switzerland. The incidence rose up to 5.9% in 2015. This tumor affects mainly older women, at 63 years on average. The majority of women are diagnosed at an early stage: confined to primary site for 67%, spread to regional organs and lymph nodes for 21% and with distant metastasis for 8%. Seventy-five to 90% of the patients are alerted by abnormal uterine bleeding very quickly, which allows a quick management of care and a high survival rate.

Besides age, one of the main risk factor of developing an endometrial carcinoma is obesity. In fact, obese women have higher risk to have an endometrial cancer, but also at a younger age than the average and finally they have an increased risk of death due to this particular cancer. Although the investigators are not sure of the reasons, it may be linked to the co-morbidities that go with obesity like diabetes or hypertension.

The treatment of endometrial cancer in most women is surgery involving a total hysterectomy and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without a lymph node dissection. For patients with early stage endometrial cancer, there is a disagreement among cancer centers regarding lymph nodes dissection, because randomized controlled trials and a meta-analysis have shown no clear evidence on overall or recurrence-free survival and a higher incidence on early and late complications in relation with pelvic lymph node dissection. A systematic lymph node dissection consists of removing all the nodes within a nodal drainage basin irrespective of size. The problem with that technique is that dissection proves to be very difficult in obese patient and includes a risk to damage blood vessels or nerves.Moreover, lymph node dissection is associated with a higher morbidity, longer operating time, more frequent blood loss and finally symptomatic lymphedema and seroma. Indeed, the risk of leg lymphedema due to a node dissection is often under-reported, with rates going from 5% to 38%.

That is why, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) seems to many authors to be a good alternative to lymph node dissection. The tumor's spread is assessed in lymph nodes with a reduced morbidity. In fact, lymphadenectomy and its dangerous complications, like lymphedema, could be avoided in the vast majority of cases. In cutaneous melanoma or in breast's cancer, this technique is already widely used throughout the world. A sentinel node is the first node involved in the movement of the tumor from the primary cancer to the lymph nodes. When tumor cells spread to lymphatic network, they arrive in the first place in that sentinel node. If it contains no metastasis, then nodes, on the lymph path below, will not be affected either.

Not only SLNB in endometrial cancer is associated with a reduction in morbidity compared to lymph node dissection, but with it, a personalized treatment can be developed. Indeed, a histological analysis of these sentinel lymph-nodes (SLNs) leads to ultrastadification: cancers are graded depending on the presence and the size of metastasis in lymph nodes. Adjuvant treatments, such as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, can be suggested following these data and a better management of endometrial cancer is possible. Now, when lymph-node status is still unknown, indication for adjuvant therapies are based on pathological features of surgical specimens of the tumor, exposing some patients to either overtreatment or undertreatment.

In fact, five-year disease free survival in stage I patients with positive SLNs is 54%, whereas survival with negative SLNs is up to 90%.Therefore, SLN is one of the most important prognostic factors in endometrial cancer.

Primary objective of SENNAN study: The study seeks primarily to compare the location of uterine SLNs depending on the injection sites of the tracers: whether in endometrium, in uterine isthmus or in the cervix.

Secondary objectives are:

  1. A comparison of the sensitivity of the tracers to detect SLNs
  2. A description of the incidence of adverse events
  3. An evaluation of additional time required to identify SLNs with or without lymph node dissection.
  4. A description of morbidity directly induced by the search of SLNs
  5. A calculation of negative predictive value of the different markers and their associations
  6. A correlation between the anatomical locations of the SLNs and ultrastadification of SLNs.
  7. An evaluation of the data of the lymphatic drainage, depending on tumor location in the uterus.
  8. An evaluation of the data of the lymphatic drainage, depending on histological grade of the tumor.
  9. An analysis of cases wherein change in the treatment have been made related to results of detection of SLNs.

Procedure:

The patients will have the day before the surgery an identification of the sentinel nodes with radiocolloid (Nanocoll®). The marker at a radioactivity of 80 MBq will be injected in four points in the cervix, 0.2 ml of 20 millibecquerel each. A CTscintigraphy will be performed three or four hours after the injection. The day of the surgery, the patients will undergo a general anaesthesia and then under general anaesthesia, the first step of the surgery will be to do the injection of the other two markers :

  • ICG® will be injected through hysteroscopic guidance apart of the tumoral lesions at 4 points of injections. The volume of injected ICG will be 0.5 ml at each injection at the concentration of 5 mg/ml. A total of 2 ml (10mg) of ICG will be used.
  • Patent blue® will be diluted with 2 ml of physiologic serum. Then it will be injected through the cervix along the uterus isthmus at the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock level. 2 ml will be injected on each side.

Then the patients will have a laparoscopic surgical approach with identification of the sentinel nodes in the pelvic and lower abdomen areas. After identification of all the sentinel nodes : blue and / or radioactive and / or fluorescent nodes, the patients will have a total hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy and salpingectomy. The surgical technique for this procedure is the same as the one usually performed for this kind of lesions.

The major benefit of looking for SLNs in endometrial cancer is that lymphadenectomy can be avoided for patients who have already comorbidities. Indeed, endometrial cancer is found in aged women and obese women are also more affected. Lymphadenectomy is a heavy procedure with a risk of lymphedema. That is why the technique of SLNs offers a good alternative with lesser surgical risks.

Being tested
Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancer
Keywords
Sentinel node, Endometrial carcinoma, Lymphatic drainage
Medical subject headings
Endometrial Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancerProcedure or surgery

    Nanocoll® is injected a day before surgery in the cervix at four points. A lymphoscintigraphy is performed 2 or 3 hours afterward. At the beginning of the surgery, the operative field already in place and before the beginning of laparoscopic, 2ml (10mg) of ICG, distributed in four points around the tumor, is injected under the endometrium intra-myometrial under endoscopic control. As ICG spreads slower than blue dye, ICG is always injected first. Then, Bleu Patenté® is injected at two sites in the uterine isthmus, opposite of the uterine arteries. The risk of false negative results, because a tracer migrated too quickly, is reduced when the injection takes place when patients are already anesthetized.

Study groups in NCT04577950
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm with procedure: identification of lymphatic drainage of the uterus following 3 sites injectionsExperimentalA radiocolloid (Nanocoll® marked with Technetium 99), a fluorochrome (ICG) and a blue dye (Bleu Patenté®) will be injected in submucosal tissue to see the differences in lymphatic drainage between three different injection sites. Indeed, ICG will be injected under the endometrium, whereas Nanocoll® will be injected in the cervix and Bleu Patenté® in the uterine isthmus, at the transition between the cervix and the uterine corpus.
Receives: Procedure: Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancer

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lymphatic route of endometrial cancer dissemination

    Comparing the per-operative anatomical locations of uterine SLNs depending on the 3 different injection sites of the tracers: whether in endometrium, in uterine isthmus or in the cervix.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Sensibility/sensitivity of the tracers

    A comparison of the sensibility/sensitivity of the tracers to detect SLNs

    Measured: 1 month

  2. Adverse events

    A description of the incidence of adverse events

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Additional time required to identify SLNs

    An evaluation of additional time required to identify SLNs with or without lymph node dissection.

    Measured: 1 month

  4. Morbidity directly induced by the search of SLNs

    A description of morbidity grades (following the NCI CTCAE classification) directly induced by the search of SLNs

    Measured: 1 month

  5. Negative predictive value of the different markers

    A calculation of negative predictive value of the different markers and their associations

    Measured: 1 month

  6. Correlation between the per-operative anatomical locations of the SLNs and ultrastadification of SLNs.

    A correlation between the per-operative anatomical locations of the SLNs and the results of ultrastadification of these SLNs.

    Measured: 1 month

  7. Comparison between the results of lymphatic drainage and location of the tumor.

    An evaluation of the anatomical location of the SLNs depending on uterine location of the tumor.

    The anatomical locations would be divided in 3 different sites: pelvic, para-aortic and parametrial.

    The location of the tumor would be divided in 3 sites: uterine horns, uterine fundus, uterine walls.

    Measured: 1 month

  8. Comparison between the results of lymphatic drainage and grade of the tumor.

    An evaluation of the anatomical location of the SLNs depending on grade of the tumor.

    The anatomical locations would be divided in 3 different sites: pelvic, para-aortic and parametrial.

    The location of the tumor would be divided in 3 grades: 1, 2 and 3

    Measured: 1 month

  9. Cases with change in treatment in relation with SLNs detection and histology.

    Description of cases wherein change in the treatment have been made related to results of different anatomical locations and pathological (including ultrastadification) results of SLNs.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2020
  2. Study start21 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completionSep 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
A prospective phase 2 study comparing three injection sites to detect sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial cancer.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04577950
Sponsor's protocol ID
SENNAN
Acronym
SENNAN
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
12 Sep 2020
Last updated
27 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All data will be accessed under request to the PI.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lymphatic drainage of endometrial cancer in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Patrice Mathevet, MD- PhD (+41213146727 ext. +41, patrice.mathevet@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lymphatic route of endometrial cancer dissemination (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in