PoliomyelitisPhase 2NCT04579510
Immunogenicity nOPV2 With and Without bOPV
A Phase 2 study testing Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) and Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Bangladesh.
Trial summary
This is an open-label randomized clinical trial that will compare immune responses among infants who receive either novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) alone, bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) alone, or co-administered nOPV2 and bOPV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 42 to 48 daysHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Poliomyelitis
- What is being tested?
- Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) and Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 795 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBangladesh
- Study dates
- 8 Feb 2021to 23 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 42 to 48 days
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Healthy infants 6 weeks of age (range: 42-48 days).
- Parents that consent for participation in the full length of the study.
- Parents that can understand and comply with planned study procedures.
- Infant has at least one sibling aged <10 years living in the same household that is eligible for participation in the study.
Who cannot join
- Parents and infants who are unable to participate in the full length of the study (e.g., plan to move away from the study area during the study period).
- A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder either in the infant or in an immediate family member.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of bleeding disorder that would contraindicate administration of bOPV or nOPV2 or collection of blood by venipuncture.
- Acute diarrhoea, infection or illness at the time of enrolment (6 weeks of age) that would require infant's admission to a hospital.
- Acute vomiting and intolerance to liquids within 24 hours before the enrolment visit (6 weeks of age).
- Evidence of a chronic medical condition identified by a study medical officer during physical exam.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Receipt of any polio vaccine (OPV or IPV) before enrolment based upon documentation or parental recall.
- Known allergy/sensitivity or reaction to polio vaccine, or its contents.
- Infants from multiple births. Infants from multiple births will be excluded because the infant(s) who is/are not enrolled would likely receive OPV through routine immunization and transmit vaccine poliovirus to the enrolled infant. Even if all births from a multiple birth could be enrolled in the study, we will exclude multiple births as discontinuation of one may lead to discontinuation of multiple participants.
- Infants from premature births (<37 weeks of gestation).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Immunogenicity of Novel Monovalent Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 2 (nOPV2) With and Without Bivalent OPV
This is an open-label randomized clinical trial that will compare immune responses among infants who receive either novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) alone, bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) alone, or co-administered nOPV2 and bOPV.
Read the detailed description
It is expected that nOPV2 would replace mOPV2 for responding to type 2 outbreaks. Outbreak response for cVDPV2 also offers the opportunity to close immunity gaps to polioviruses types 1 and 3. Furthermore, GPEI might have to respond to two poliovirus outbreaks in the same geography. For either scenario, it would be important to get data on the immunogenicity of co-administered nOPV2 and bOPV, compared to either vaccine given alone.
This clinical trial assesses and compares the immunogenicity of nOPV2 given with or without bOPV. Healthy infants 6 weeks of age will be enrolled in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and randomized to one of three study arms â " Arm A: nOPV2 only, Arm B: nOPV2 and bOPV, or Arm C: bOPV only. Infants will be followed-up until 18 weeks of age through clinic and household visits. Blood specimens will be collected to test for immunological response. Stool specimens will be collected from infant vaccine recipients and one sibling household contact each to assess viral recombinants and nOPV2 household transmission.
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Being tested
- Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)
- Keywords
- oral poliovirus vaccine, immunization, antibodies, poliovirus vaccines
- Medical subject headings
- Poliomyelitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2)Biological
nOPV2 candidate 1 (S2/cre5/S15domV/rec1/hifi3) is a live-attenuated serotype-2 poliovirus that was derived from a modified Sabin type-2 infectious cDNA clone and propagated in Vero cells. To improve genetic stability, nucleotide sequence modifications were made in the major determinant for attenuation in the Sabin 5'-untranslated region. Additionally, two modifications in the polymerase 3D were made to further improve stability of the attenuation, and a key replication element from the 2C coding region was relocated to the 5'-untranslated region to inhibit recombination.
Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)Biological
The live types 1 \& 3 oral polio vaccine (bOPV) is a bivalent vaccine containing suspension of types 1 \& 3 attenuated Polio viruses (Sabin strains).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| nOPV2 only | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive nOPV2 at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age Receives: Biological: Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) |
| nOPV2 and bOPV | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive both nOPV2 and bOPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age Receives: Biological: Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2); Biological: Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) |
| bOPV only | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive bOPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age Receives: Biological: Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vaccine response
Dichotomous (yes/no) variable defined as participants who are either seronegative (<1:8 titers) at baseline who become seropositive (≥1:8) after vaccination (seroconversion) or participants who demonstrate a four-fold rise in titers after vaccination between two specimens, e.g. a change from 1:8 to 1:32, after adjusting for expected decay in maternal antibodies. Antibody titers at 6 weeks of age will be the starting point for the expected decline in maternal antibodies, assuming at half-life of 28 days.
Measured: Measured four weeks after administration of study vaccine(s).
Secondary outcomes (3)
Reciprocal antibody titers
Variable of the observed reciprocal antibody titer results.
Measured: Measured four weeks after administration of study vaccine(s).
Household transmission of nOPV2
Detection of type 2 OPV in stool of household contact
Measured: 1, 2, and 4 weeks after first vaccination with nOPV2
Viral recombinants
Detection and characterization of viral recombinants
Measured: 2 and 4 weeks after first vaccination with study vaccine(s)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2020
- Study start8 Feb 2021
- Primary completion23 Dec 2021
- Study completion23 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PoliomyelitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 795 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amanda Wilkinson, PhD, Principal investigator, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionKhalequ Zaman, MBBS, PhD, Principal investigator, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04579510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20060
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Aggregated data will be added to the registration with publication. In accordance with the protocol, icddr,b investigators will have access to participant data with identifiers. External investigators will have access to deidentified participant data. Deidentified data may be shared with national and international vaccine manufacturers and regulatory authorities upon request.
Publications
Wilkinson AL, Zaman K, Hoque M, Estivariz CF, Burns CC, Konopka-Anstadt JL, Mainou BA, Kovacs SD, An Q, Lickness JS, Yunus M, Snider CJ, Zhang Y, Coffee E, Abid T, Wassilak SGF, Pallansch MA, Oberste MS, Vertefeuille JF, Anand A. Immunogenicity of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 administered concomitantly with bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;23(9):1062-1071. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00139-1. Epub 2023 May 10.
PubMed 37178706
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunogenicity of Novel Monovalent Oral Poliovirus Vaccine Type 2 (nOPV2) With and Without Bivalent OPV
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04579510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20060
- Conditions
- Poliomyelitis
- Keywords
- oral poliovirus vaccine, immunization, antibodies, poliovirus vaccines
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 795 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
- Study start
- 8 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is an open-label randomized clinical trial that will compare immune responses among infants who receive either novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) alone, bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) alone, or co-administered nOPV2 and bOPV.
Detailed description
It is expected that nOPV2 would replace mOPV2 for responding to type 2 outbreaks. Outbreak response for cVDPV2 also offers the opportunity to close immunity gaps to polioviruses types 1 and 3. Furthermore, GPEI might have to respond to two poliovirus outbreaks in the same geography. For either scenario, it would be important to get data on the immunogenicity of co-administered nOPV2 and bOPV, compared to either vaccine given alone.
This clinical trial assesses and compares the immunogenicity of nOPV2 given with or without bOPV. Healthy infants 6 weeks of age will be enrolled in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and randomized to one of three study arms â " Arm A: nOPV2 only, Arm B: nOPV2 and bOPV, or Arm C: bOPV only. Infants will be followed-up until 18 weeks of age through clinic and household visits. Blood specimens will be collected to test for immunological response. Stool specimens will be collected from infant vaccine recipients and one sibling household contact each to assess viral recombinants and nOPV2 household transmission.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| nOPV2 only | Active comparator | Biological: Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2)Participants in this arm will receive nOPV2 at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age |
| nOPV2 and bOPV | Active comparator | Biological: Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2), Biological: Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)Participants in this arm will receive both nOPV2 and bOPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age |
| bOPV only | Active comparator | Biological: Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)Participants in this arm will receive bOPV at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 42 to 48 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthy infants 6 weeks of age (range: 42-48 days).
- Parents that consent for participation in the full length of the study.
- Parents that can understand and comply with planned study procedures.
- Infant has at least one sibling aged <10 years living in the same household that is eligible for participation in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Parents and infants who are unable to participate in the full length of the study (e.g., plan to move away from the study area during the study period).
- A diagnosis or suspicion of immunodeficiency disorder either in the infant or in an immediate family member.
- A diagnosis or suspicion of bleeding disorder that would contraindicate administration of bOPV or nOPV2 or collection of blood by venipuncture.
- Acute diarrhoea, infection or illness at the time of enrolment (6 weeks of age) that would require infant's admission to a hospital.
- Acute vomiting and intolerance to liquids within 24 hours before the enrolment visit (6 weeks of age).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2)nOPV2 candidate 1 (S2/cre5/S15domV/rec1/hifi3) is a live-attenuated serotype-2 poliovirus that was derived from a modified Sabin type-2 infectious cDNA clone and propagated in Vero cells. To improve genetic stability, nucleotide sequence modifications were made in the major determinant for attenuation in the Sabin 5'-untranslated region. Additionally, two modifications in the polymerase 3D were made to further improve stability of the attenuation, and a key replication element from the 2C coding region was relocated to the 5'-untranslated region to inhibit recombination. | Biological | nOPV2 and bOPV, nOPV2 only |
| Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV)The live types 1 \& 3 oral polio vaccine (bOPV) is a bivalent vaccine containing suspension of types 1 \& 3 attenuated Polio viruses (Sabin strains). | Biological | bOPV only, nOPV2 and bOPV |
Primary outcome
Vaccine response
Time frame: Measured four weeks after administration of study vaccine(s).
Dichotomous (yes/no) variable defined as participants who are either seronegative (<1:8 titers) at baseline who become seropositive (≥1:8) after vaccination (seroconversion) or participants who demonstrate a four-fold rise in titers after vaccination between two specimens, e.g. a change from 1:8 to 1:32, after adjusting for expected decay in maternal antibodies. Antibody titers at 6 weeks of age will be the starting point for the expected decline in maternal antibodies, assuming at half-life of 28 days.
3 secondary outcomes
Reciprocal antibody titers
Time frame: Measured four weeks after administration of study vaccine(s).
Household transmission of nOPV2
Time frame: 1, 2, and 4 weeks after first vaccination with nOPV2
Viral recombinants
Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks after first vaccination with study vaccine(s)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37178706Wilkinson AL, Zaman K, Hoque M, Estivariz CF, Burns CC, Konopka-Anstadt JL, Mainou BA, Kovacs SD, An Q, Lickness JS, Yunus M, Snider CJ, Zhang Y, Coffee E, Abid T, Wassilak SGF, Pallansch MA, Oberste MS, Vertefeuille JF, Anand A. Immunogenicity of novel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 administered concomitantly with bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;23(9):1062-1071. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00139-1. Epub 2023 May 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Aggregated data will be added to the registration with publication. In accordance with the protocol, icddr,b investigators will have access to participant data with identifiers. External investigators will have access to deidentified participant data. Deidentified data may be shared with national and international vaccine manufacturers and regulatory authorities upon request.
Related trials for Poliomyelitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of the Diphtheria, Tetanus, Acellular Component Pertussis and Sabin Inactivated Poliomyelitis Vaccine Adsorbed
Diphtheria, Pertussis
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Poliomyelitis Vaccine (rPV) in Comparison With IPOL Vaccine in Healthy Adults
Polio Immunity
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Virtual Walking on Chronic Pain and Psychological Distress for Individuals With Severe Mobility Impairment
Severe Mobility Impairment, Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Mucosal Intestinal Immunity to Poliovirus Type-2 of nOPV2 at Birth Dose in Healthy IPV Vaccinated Infants
Poliomyelitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Phase II/III Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Safety and Lot-to-lot Consistency of LBVD, a Fully Liquid Hexavalent Diphtheria-tetanus-whole Cell Pertussis-hepatitis B-poliovirus-Haemophilus Influenzae Type b Conjugate (DTwP-HepB-IPV-Hib) Vaccine, in Healthy Infants as Primary Series
Diphtheria, Tetanus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amanda Wilkinson, PhD principal investigator
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Khalequ Zaman, MBBS, PhD principal investigator
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Novel monovalent oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) and Bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) in people with Poliomyelitis, run by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at 1 site in Bangladesh.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Bangladesh. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vaccine response (time frame: Measured four weeks after administration of study vaccine(s).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04579510, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.