Covid19Phase 3CORONAVITNCT04579640
Trial of Vitamin D to Reduce Risk and Severity of COVID-19 and Other Acute Respiratory Infections
A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin D in people with Covid19 and Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
CORONAVIT is an open-label, phase 3, randomised clinical trial testing whether implementation of a test-and-treat approach to correction of sub-optimal vitamin D status results in reduced risk and/or severity of COVID-19 and other acute respiratory infections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Covid19, Acute Respiratory Tract Infection
- What is being tested?
- Vitamin D
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 6,200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 27 Oct 2020to 28 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- UK resident
- Age ≥16 years
- Gives informed consent to participate
Who cannot join
- taking digoxin, alfacalcidol, calcitriol, dihydrotachysterol or paricalcitol
- known diagnosis of sarcoidosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, renal stones or renal failure requiring dialysis
- known allergy to any ingredient in the study capsules (vitamin D, olive oil, caramel, gelatine or glycerol)
- pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Queen Mary University of London
London, County (optional), E1 2AB
About this study
Official title: Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation to Reduce Risk and Severity of COVID-19 and Other Acute Respiratory Infections in the UK Population
CORONAVIT is an open-label, phase 3, randomised clinical trial testing whether implementation of a test-and-treat approach to correction of sub-optimal vitamin D status results in reduced risk and/or severity of COVID-19 and other acute respiratory infections.
- Conditions
- Covid19, Acute Respiratory Tract Infection
- Being tested
- Vitamin D
- Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vitamin DDietary supplement
Capsules containing 800 IU (20 micrograms) or 3,200 IU (80 micrograms) cholecalciferol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Standard of care (national recommendation of 400 IU/day vitamin D) |
| Intervention: Lower-dose vitamin D | Experimental | Offer of a daily dose of 800 IU (20 micrograms) cholecalciferol to individuals with 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <75 nmol/L Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
| Intervention: Higher-dose vitamin D | Experimental | Offer of a daily dose of 3200 IU (80 micrograms) cholecalciferol to individuals with 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <75 nmol/L Receives: Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of participants experiencing at least one doctor-diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed acute respiratory infection of any cause.
Measured: Over 6 months
Secondary outcomes (22)
Proportion of participants developing PCR- or antigen test-positive COVID-19
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who are prescribed one or more courses of antibiotic treatment for acute respiratory infection
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants with asthma who experience one or more exacerbations of asthma requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or requiring hospital treatment
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants with COPD who experience one or more exacerbations of COPD requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, and/or requiring hospital treatment
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who have had PCR-, antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Mean MRC dyspnoea score at the end of the study in people who have had PCR-, antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: 6 months
Mean FACIT Fatigue Scale score at the end of the study in people with antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: 6 months
Mean COVID-19 Recovery Questionnaire score at the end of the study in people who have had antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of participants who experience one or more acute respiratory infections requiring hospitalisation
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who experience COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants hospitalised for COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of any cause during participation in the trial
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of acute respiratory infection during participation in the trial
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of COVID-19 during participation in the trial
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Mean end-study 25(OH)D concentration (sub-set of participants having end-study tests of vitamin D status)
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing known hypercalcaemia
Secondary safety outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing a probable or definite adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation
Secondary safety outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing a serious adverse event of any cause
Secondary safety outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Median titre of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants with antigen-specific T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (sub-set of participants)
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Frequency of antigen-specific T cells reacting to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants (sub-set of participants)
Secondary efficacy outcome
Measured: Over 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2020
- Study start27 Oct 2020
- Primary completion17 Jun 2021
- Study completion28 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Covid19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 6,200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust, Pharma Nord, Fischer Family Trust, The AIM Foundation, Synergy Biologics Ltd, Cytoplan Ltd
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04579640
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 289515
- Acronym
- CORONAVIT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified IPD will be shared with other researchers subject to terms of Data Transfer Agreement and IRB approval
Publications
Jolliffe DA, Holt H, Greenig M, Talaei M, Perdek N, Pfeffer P, Vivaldi G, Maltby S, Symons J, Barlow NL, Normandale A, Garcha R, Richter AG, Faustini SE, Orton C, Ford D, Lyons RA, Davies GA, Kee F, Griffiths CJ, Norrie J, Sheikh A, Shaheen SO, Relton C, Martineau AR. Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). BMJ. 2022 Sep 7;378:e071230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230.
PubMed 36215226
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 3 Randomised Controlled Trial of Vitamin D Supplementation to Reduce Risk and Severity of COVID-19 and Other Acute Respiratory Infections in the UK Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04579640
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CORONAVIT / 289515
- Conditions
- Covid19, Acute Respiratory Tract Infection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6,200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barts & The London NHS Trust, Pharma Nord, Fischer Family Trust, The AIM Foundation, Synergy Biologics Ltd, Cytoplan Ltd
- Study start
- 27 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CORONAVIT is an open-label, phase 3, randomised clinical trial testing whether implementation of a test-and-treat approach to correction of sub-optimal vitamin D status results in reduced risk and/or severity of COVID-19 and other acute respiratory infections.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Standard of care (national recommendation of 400 IU/day vitamin D) |
| Intervention: Lower-dose vitamin D | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DOffer of a daily dose of 800 IU (20 micrograms) cholecalciferol to individuals with 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <75 nmol/L |
| Intervention: Higher-dose vitamin D | Experimental | Dietary Supplement: Vitamin DOffer of a daily dose of 3200 IU (80 micrograms) cholecalciferol to individuals with 25-hydroxyvitamin D level <75 nmol/L |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- UK resident
- Age ≥16 years
- Gives informed consent to participate
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- taking digoxin, alfacalcidol, calcitriol, dihydrotachysterol or paricalcitol
- known diagnosis of sarcoidosis, primary hyperparathyroidism, renal stones or renal failure requiring dialysis
- known allergy to any ingredient in the study capsules (vitamin D, olive oil, caramel, gelatine or glycerol)
- pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vitamin DCapsules containing 800 IU (20 micrograms) or 3,200 IU (80 micrograms) cholecalciferol | Dietary supplement | Intervention: Higher-dose vitamin D, Intervention: Lower-dose vitamin D |
Primary outcome
Proportion of participants experiencing at least one doctor-diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed acute respiratory infection of any cause.
Time frame: Over 6 months
22 secondary outcomes
Proportion of participants developing PCR- or antigen test-positive COVID-19
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who are prescribed one or more courses of antibiotic treatment for acute respiratory infection
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants with asthma who experience one or more exacerbations of asthma requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or requiring hospital treatment
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants with COPD who experience one or more exacerbations of COPD requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, and/or requiring hospital treatment
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who have had PCR-, antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Time frame: Over 6 months
Mean MRC dyspnoea score at the end of the study in people who have had PCR-, antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Time frame: 6 months
Mean FACIT Fatigue Scale score at the end of the study in people with antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Time frame: 6 months
Mean COVID-19 Recovery Questionnaire score at the end of the study in people who have had antigen test- or antibody test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who report symptoms of COVID-19 lasting more than 4 weeks after onset
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of participants who experience one or more acute respiratory infections requiring hospitalisation
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants who experience COVID-19 requiring hospitalisation
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants hospitalised for COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of any cause during participation in the trial
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of acute respiratory infection during participation in the trial
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants dying of COVID-19 during participation in the trial
Time frame: Over 6 months
Mean end-study 25(OH)D concentration (sub-set of participants having end-study tests of vitamin D status)
Time frame: 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing known hypercalcaemia
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing a probable or definite adverse reaction to vitamin D supplementation
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of participants experiencing a serious adverse event of any cause
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants with antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
Time frame: Over 6 months
Median titre of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants
Time frame: Over 6 months
Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants with antigen-specific T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (sub-set of participants)
Time frame: Over 6 months
Frequency of antigen-specific T cells reacting to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated participants (sub-set of participants)
Time frame: Over 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36215226Jolliffe DA, Holt H, Greenig M, Talaei M, Perdek N, Pfeffer P, Vivaldi G, Maltby S, Symons J, Barlow NL, Normandale A, Garcha R, Richter AG, Faustini SE, Orton C, Ford D, Lyons RA, Davies GA, Kee F, Griffiths CJ, Norrie J, Sheikh A, Shaheen SO, Relton C, Martineau AR. Effect of a test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation on risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection and covid-19: phase 3 randomised controlled trial (CORONAVIT). BMJ. 2022 Sep 7;378:e071230. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071230.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified IPD will be shared with other researchers subject to terms of Data Transfer Agreement and IRB approval
Related trials for Covid19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Active, not recruiting
Intervention to Address Disparate Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Pandemic on Latinx and African Newcomers
Mental Health Issue, Mental Health Disorder
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Vitamin D in people with Covid19 and Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of participants experiencing at least one doctor-diagnosed or laboratory-confirmed acute respiratory infection of any cause. (time frame: Over 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04579640, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2022.