AzTrials
AzTrials

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationNCT04580576

Gender Differences in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

An observational study of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gender medicine considers the way in which gender, male or female, affects the development and impact of diseases and the response to therapies. It can be said that it is a new transversal dimension of medicine, which evaluates the gender differences in the physiology, pathophysiology and clinic of many diseases and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 months to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
What is being tested?
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2000to 1 Oct 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 months to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Population of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged between 4 months and 17 years
  • Diagnosis of oncohaematological disease subjected to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation from January 2000 to October 2018
  • Consent acquired for the processing of data for research purposes

Who cannot join

None listed.

About this study

Official title: Pilot Study on Gender Differences in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Outcomes in the Pediatric Population

Gender medicine considers the way in which gender, male or female, affects the development and impact of diseases and the response to therapies. It can be said that it is a new transversal dimension of medicine, which evaluates the gender differences in the physiology, pathophysiology and clinic of many diseases and thus sets itself the goal of reaching optimal therapeutic decisions both in men and women based on proven scientific evidence.

Although knowledge of gender medicine has increased significantly in recent years, a gender approach has not been much developed in pediatrics. In the field of bone marrow transplants, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is known to be the most effective consolidation therapy in some high-risk hematology malignancies such as acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia, and represents one of the potential treatment for patients suffering from solid tumors and genetic hematological, metabolic diseases and primary immunodeficiencies. Huge progress has been made in high resolution donor typing, choice of conditioning regimens, manipulation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and prevention of serious infections in recent years, which have significantly improved the survival rate of patients undergoing to this procedure.

Read more

International literature regarding the response and outcomes from hematopoietic cell transplantation in a gender perspective is completely absent, for these reasons this pilot study was born from the need to understand from a broader perspective and in order to better understand how the gender may or not influence the outcome of transplantation in pediatric patients.

This retrospective analysis of the data will concern all patients who underwent allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplant. The data will be collected from clinical records and from Regional electronic databases. All data will be collected anonymously and an identification code will be assigned to each case.

Being tested
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Keywords
gender, pediatrics, hematopoietic cell transplantation
Medical subject headings
Coitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantationProcedure or surgery

    Allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplant

Study groups in NCT04580576
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Female groupPediatric female patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Receives: Procedure: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Male groupPediatric male patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Receives: Procedure: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Gender-related difference in overall 12-month toxicity

    Differences in toxicity (hepatic, renal, pulmonary, gastrointestinal) in males and females recipients

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Gender difference in overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival comparison from males and females recipients

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  2. Gender difference in post-transplant primary disease recurrence

    Incidence of post-transplant leukemic relapse in males and females recipients

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  3. Gender difference in the frequency of transplant-related toxicity at 12 months

    Frequency of post-transplant liver, kidney, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, cardiac toxicity

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  4. Gender difference in infectious complications

    Number of episodes of sepsis / fungal infections / viral reactivations after HSCT

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  5. Gender difference in the frequency of adverse events due to pre-transplant conditioning regimen

    Number of chemo- radiotherapy-related adverse events. Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  6. Gender difference in severity of adverse events due to pre-transplant conditioning regimen

    Severity of chemo- radiotherapy-related adverse events. Toxicity wil be graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  7. Gender difference in timing of hematological engraftment

    Engraftment defined as the engraftment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) on the first day of 3 consecutive days with PMN number greater than 500 / ml3 and engraftment of platelets defined as number of platelets> 20,000 / ml3 in the absence of platelet transfusion in the previous 5 days.

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  8. Gender difference in frequency of primary graft failure

    Engraftment defined as the engraftment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) on the first day of 3 consecutive days with PMN number greater than 500 / ml3 and engraftment of platelets defined as number of platelets> 20,000 / ml3 in the absence of platelet transfusion in the previous 5 days.

    Primary graft failure is defined as no evidence of engraftment or hematological recovery of donor cells, within the first month after transplant, without evidence of disease relapse.

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

  9. Gender difference in frequency of secondary graft failure

    Engraftment defined as the engraftment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) on the first day of 3 consecutive days with PMN number greater than 500 / ml3 and engraftment of platelets defined as number of platelets> 20,000 / ml3 in the absence of platelet transfusion in the previous 5 days.

    Secondary graft failure refers to the loss of a previously functioning graft, resulting in cytopenia involving at least two blood cell lineages.

    Measured: 12 months after transplant

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2000
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04580576
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC 25/2019
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
2 Oct 2020
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, run by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Gender-related difference in overall 12-month toxicity (time frame: 12 months after transplant). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in