AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveORIONNCT04582799

Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for Acute Decompensation of COPD

A study testing ECCO2R and NIV in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by University of Bologna.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
ECCO2R and NIV
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Aug 2024to 1 Aug 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients older than 18 and younger than 90 years
  • Documented clinical history of COPD
  • ICU admission for exacerbation of COPD requiring non-invasive ventilatory support After two hours of NIV at least two of the following criteria must be fulfilled
  • arterial pH ≤ 7.25
  • respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min
  • use of accessory muscles or paradoxical abdominal movements
Show all 10Show fewer
  • patient moribund
  • severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh scores > 7) or fulminant hepatic failure
  • diagnosed with acute or chronic neuromuscular disease
  • required chronic mechanical ventilation prior to hospital admission

Who cannot join

  • mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg despite infusion of fluids and vasoactive drugs
  • ratio of arterial-to-inspired oxygen O2 fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 150 with FiO2 of less than 0.6 and PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O
  • contraindications to anticoagulation (i.e. any of the following: platelet count <50,000/mm3; prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5; stroke or severe head trauma or intracranial arterio-venous malformation, or cerebral aneurysm, or central nervous system mass lesion within the previous 3 months; epidural catheter in place or expected to be positioned during the study; history of congenital bleeding diatheses; gastrointestinal bleeding within the 6 weeks prior to study entry; esophageal varices, chronic jaundice, cirrhosis, or chronic ascites; trauma);
  • heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
  • body weight >120 Kg;
  • contraindication to continuation of active treatment;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • failure to obtain consent
  • catheter access to femoral vein or jugular vein impossible
  • pneumothorax

About this study

Official title: Extra-Corporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal for Acute Decompensation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial (The ORION Study)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.

Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange. Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis.

Read more

A recent matched cohort study with historical control, showed that: (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients.

The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care.

Read the detailed description

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.

The pathophysiological hallmarks of COPD patients include expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure. Under these circumstances, a prolonged expiratory time is the compensatory mechanism patients adopt to maintain a stable tidal breathing. COPD exacerbations result in higher respiratory rates and reduced expiratory time, leading to dynamic hyperinflation, elevated intrathoracic pressures, and excessive work of breathing. Alteration of the balance between (a) the decreased capacity of the respiratory muscles to generate pressure, and (b) the increased mechanical respiratory load due to expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure leads to CO2 retention. The consequent reduction of alveolar ventilation leads to a further worsening of CO2 retention and increased work of breathing. This vicious circle is the underlying mechanisms responsible of acute respiratory failure requiring admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ventilatory support.

Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange.

Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) have been used in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure since ECCO2R may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis. Although available studies are limited to case series, several ECCO2R devices have been developed and proposed for the clinical use in patients with COPD. These systems often represent modifications of renal replacement therapy circuits, and are characterized by:

  1. veno-venous by-pass systems
  2. extracorporeal blood flow of 0.3-0.5 litres/min
  3. 13 Fr bore catheters or a single co-axial catheter
  4. very low doses or no heparin
  5. minimal volumes for "priming"

This technological implementation of ECCO2-R is therefore closer to device for renal replacement therapy than full ECMO. CO2 is removed through a double-lumen catheter and constantly propelled, by a non-occlusive rotating pump, though an artificial membrane lung (a filter adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide) connected to a source of 100% O2 (flow 6-8 liters/min). These systems are able to reduce PaCO2 by 20-25%.

A recent matched cohort study with historical control, compared "NIV-plus-ECCO2R" and "NIV-only" in patients at risk of NIV failure, and showed that (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients. A recent systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ECCO2R in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure across 12 studies and showed that the majority of patients were either successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation or sustained on NIV, avoiding intubation. However, this high success rates, was associated with a high frequency of potentially severe complications.

The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication

Objectives:

The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care. Event free survival is defined as survival at day 28 free of any of the followings: (a) development of sepsis; (b) occurrence of a second episode of COPD exacerbation requiring or not mechanical ventilation; (c) occurrence of severe hypoxemia; (d) prolonged mechanical ventilation (e) death.

Being tested
ECCO2R, NIV
Keywords
COPD, ECCO2R
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ECCO2RDevice

    Extracorporeal CO2 Removal

  • NIVDevice

    Non-invasive ventilation

Study groups in NCT04582799
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care (NIV)Active comparatorPatients in the control group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation only.
Receives: Device: NIV
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R)ExperimentalPatients in the treatment group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation combined with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal.
Receives: Device: ECCO2R; Device: NIV

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Combined 28-day mortality or surrogate events

    Incidence of death, prolonged mechanical ventilation, development of septic shock, development of severe hypoxemia, second episode of COPD exacerbation

    Measured: 28 days after enrollment

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Endotracheal intubation

    Cumulative incidence of endotracheal intubation

    Measured: 28 days after enrollment

  2. Tracheostomy

    Cumulative incidence of tracheostomy

    Measured: 28 days after enrollment

  3. Hospital length-of-stay

    Duration of stay in the hospital

    Measured: Whole hospital stay

  4. ICU length-of-stay

    Duration of stay in the intensive care unit

    Measured: Whole ICU stay

  5. 90-day mortality

    Incidence of death

    Measured: 90 days after enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2024

Why it stopped: Lack of enrollment, termination of funding.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04582799
Sponsor's protocol ID
ORION
Acronym
ORION
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
3 Oct 2020
Last updated
1 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tonetti T, Pisani L, Cavalli I, Vega ML, Maietti E, Filippini C, Nava S, Ranieri VM. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for treatment of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ORION): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05692-w.

    PubMed 34666820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ECCO2R and NIV in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by University of Bologna.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Combined 28-day mortality or surrogate events (time frame: 28 days after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04582799, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in