Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveORIONNCT04582799
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for Acute Decompensation of COPD
A study testing ECCO2R and NIV in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by University of Bologna.
Trial summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- ECCO2R and NIV
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 1 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients older than 18 and younger than 90 years
- Documented clinical history of COPD
- ICU admission for exacerbation of COPD requiring non-invasive ventilatory support After two hours of NIV at least two of the following criteria must be fulfilled
- arterial pH ≤ 7.25
- respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min
- use of accessory muscles or paradoxical abdominal movements
Show all 10Show fewer
- patient moribund
- severe liver insufficiency (Child-Pugh scores > 7) or fulminant hepatic failure
- diagnosed with acute or chronic neuromuscular disease
- required chronic mechanical ventilation prior to hospital admission
Who cannot join
- mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg despite infusion of fluids and vasoactive drugs
- ratio of arterial-to-inspired oxygen O2 fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 150 with FiO2 of less than 0.6 and PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O
- contraindications to anticoagulation (i.e. any of the following: platelet count <50,000/mm3; prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5; stroke or severe head trauma or intracranial arterio-venous malformation, or cerebral aneurysm, or central nervous system mass lesion within the previous 3 months; epidural catheter in place or expected to be positioned during the study; history of congenital bleeding diatheses; gastrointestinal bleeding within the 6 weeks prior to study entry; esophageal varices, chronic jaundice, cirrhosis, or chronic ascites; trauma);
- heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
- body weight >120 Kg;
- contraindication to continuation of active treatment;
Show all 9Show fewer
- failure to obtain consent
- catheter access to femoral vein or jugular vein impossible
- pneumothorax
About this study
Official title: Extra-Corporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal for Acute Decompensation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial (The ORION Study)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange. Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis.
Read more
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, showed that: (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care.
Read the detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.
The pathophysiological hallmarks of COPD patients include expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure. Under these circumstances, a prolonged expiratory time is the compensatory mechanism patients adopt to maintain a stable tidal breathing. COPD exacerbations result in higher respiratory rates and reduced expiratory time, leading to dynamic hyperinflation, elevated intrathoracic pressures, and excessive work of breathing. Alteration of the balance between (a) the decreased capacity of the respiratory muscles to generate pressure, and (b) the increased mechanical respiratory load due to expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure leads to CO2 retention. The consequent reduction of alveolar ventilation leads to a further worsening of CO2 retention and increased work of breathing. This vicious circle is the underlying mechanisms responsible of acute respiratory failure requiring admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ventilatory support.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange.
Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) have been used in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure since ECCO2R may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis. Although available studies are limited to case series, several ECCO2R devices have been developed and proposed for the clinical use in patients with COPD. These systems often represent modifications of renal replacement therapy circuits, and are characterized by:
- veno-venous by-pass systems
- extracorporeal blood flow of 0.3-0.5 litres/min
- 13 Fr bore catheters or a single co-axial catheter
- very low doses or no heparin
- minimal volumes for "priming"
This technological implementation of ECCO2-R is therefore closer to device for renal replacement therapy than full ECMO. CO2 is removed through a double-lumen catheter and constantly propelled, by a non-occlusive rotating pump, though an artificial membrane lung (a filter adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide) connected to a source of 100% O2 (flow 6-8 liters/min). These systems are able to reduce PaCO2 by 20-25%.
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, compared "NIV-plus-ECCO2R" and "NIV-only" in patients at risk of NIV failure, and showed that (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients. A recent systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ECCO2R in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure across 12 studies and showed that the majority of patients were either successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation or sustained on NIV, avoiding intubation. However, this high success rates, was associated with a high frequency of potentially severe complications.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication
Objectives:
The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care. Event free survival is defined as survival at day 28 free of any of the followings: (a) development of sepsis; (b) occurrence of a second episode of COPD exacerbation requiring or not mechanical ventilation; (c) occurrence of severe hypoxemia; (d) prolonged mechanical ventilation (e) death.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- ECCO2R, NIV
- Keywords
- COPD, ECCO2R
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ECCO2RDevice
Extracorporeal CO2 Removal
NIVDevice
Non-invasive ventilation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care (NIV) | Active comparator | Patients in the control group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation only. Receives: Device: NIV |
| Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R) | Experimental | Patients in the treatment group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation combined with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal. Receives: Device: ECCO2R; Device: NIV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined 28-day mortality or surrogate events
Incidence of death, prolonged mechanical ventilation, development of septic shock, development of severe hypoxemia, second episode of COPD exacerbation
Measured: 28 days after enrollment
Secondary outcomes (5)
Endotracheal intubation
Cumulative incidence of endotracheal intubation
Measured: 28 days after enrollment
Tracheostomy
Cumulative incidence of tracheostomy
Measured: 28 days after enrollment
Hospital length-of-stay
Duration of stay in the hospital
Measured: Whole hospital stay
ICU length-of-stay
Duration of stay in the intensive care unit
Measured: Whole ICU stay
90-day mortality
Incidence of death
Measured: 90 days after enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completion1 Aug 2024
- Study completion1 Aug 2024
Why it stopped: Lack of enrollment, termination of funding.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Bologna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Milan, University of Turin, Italy, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, V. Marco Ranieri, University of Bologna
- Investigators
- V. Marco Ranieri, M.D., Study chair, University of BolognaStefano Nava, M.D., Study chair, University of Bologna
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04582799
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ORION
- Acronym
- ORION
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 3 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tonetti T, Pisani L, Cavalli I, Vega ML, Maietti E, Filippini C, Nava S, Ranieri VM. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for treatment of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ORION): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05692-w.
PubMed 34666820
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Extra-Corporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal for Acute Decompensation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial (The ORION Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04582799
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ORION / ORION
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Keywords
- COPD, ECCO2R
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of enrollment, termination of funding.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BolognaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Milan, University of Turin, Italy, University of Roma La Sapienza
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange. Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis.
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, showed that: (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care.
Detailed description
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide, resulting in a social and economic burden that is substantial and increasing. Exacerbations affect the prognosis and quality of life of patients with COPD. Hospital mortality of patients admitted for a hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD is approximately 10% and the long-term outcome is poor. In addition, hypercapnic exacerbation of COPD have serious negative impacts on patient quality of life, lung function and costs. Thus, prompt treatment of exacerbations may impact the clinical progression of COPD by ameliorating quality of life and prognosis.
The pathophysiological hallmarks of COPD patients include expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure. Under these circumstances, a prolonged expiratory time is the compensatory mechanism patients adopt to maintain a stable tidal breathing. COPD exacerbations result in higher respiratory rates and reduced expiratory time, leading to dynamic hyperinflation, elevated intrathoracic pressures, and excessive work of breathing. Alteration of the balance between (a) the decreased capacity of the respiratory muscles to generate pressure, and (b) the increased mechanical respiratory load due to expiratory flow limitation and small airway closure leads to CO2 retention. The consequent reduction of alveolar ventilation leads to a further worsening of CO2 retention and increased work of breathing. This vicious circle is the underlying mechanisms responsible of acute respiratory failure requiring admission in the intensive care unit (ICU) for ventilatory support.
Standard of care for patients with COPD exacerbation that need ICU admission for management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and severe respiratory acidosis is non-invasive ventilation (NIV). When NIV fails (arterial pH remains < 7.30), invasive ventilation through endotracheal intubation is initiated to restore adequate gas-exchange.
Extracorporeal circuits designed to remove CO2 (ECCO2R) have been used in patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure since ECCO2R may enhance the efficacy of NIV to remove CO2 and avoid the worsening of respiratory acidosis. Although available studies are limited to case series, several ECCO2R devices have been developed and proposed for the clinical use in patients with COPD. These systems often represent modifications of renal replacement therapy circuits, and are characterized by:
- veno-venous by-pass systems
- extracorporeal blood flow of 0.3-0.5 litres/min
- 13 Fr bore catheters or a single co-axial catheter
- very low doses or no heparin
- minimal volumes for "priming"
This technological implementation of ECCO2-R is therefore closer to device for renal replacement therapy than full ECMO. CO2 is removed through a double-lumen catheter and constantly propelled, by a non-occlusive rotating pump, though an artificial membrane lung (a filter adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide) connected to a source of 100% O2 (flow 6-8 liters/min). These systems are able to reduce PaCO2 by 20-25%.
A recent matched cohort study with historical control, compared "NIV-plus-ECCO2R" and "NIV-only" in patients at risk of NIV failure, and showed that (a) the hazard of being intubated was three times higher in patients treated with "NIV-only" than in patients treated with "NIV-plus-ECCO2R"; (b) hospital mortality was significantly lower in "NIV plus ECCO2R" than in "NIV-only" [8% (95% CI 1.0-26.0%) vs. 33% (95% CI 18.0-57.5%), respectively]. However, ECCO2R-related complications were observed in almost half of the patients. A recent systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of ECCO2R in patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure across 12 studies and showed that the majority of patients were either successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation or sustained on NIV, avoiding intubation. However, this high success rates, was associated with a high frequency of potentially severe complications.
The consistency of the above discussed data, and the observation of the continuous increase use of ECCO2R despite the lack of solid evidence confirm that the equipoise regarding the use of ECCO2R may justify a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with respiratory acidosis refractory to NIV should be intubated and take the risks associated with invasive mechanical ventilation, or should be connected to ECCO2R to avoid intubation, but run the risk of the potentially serious ECCO2R-related complication
Objectives:
The main objective of this randomized multicenter clinical trial is to test the hypothesis that in patients with acute life-threatening exacerbation of COPD, use of ECCO2R could increase event-free survival as compared to standard of care. Event free survival is defined as survival at day 28 free of any of the followings: (a) development of sepsis; (b) occurrence of a second episode of COPD exacerbation requiring or not mechanical ventilation; (c) occurrence of severe hypoxemia; (d) prolonged mechanical ventilation (e) death.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care (NIV) | Active comparator | Device: NIVPatients in the control group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation only. |
| Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R) | Experimental | Device: ECCO2R, Device: NIVPatients in the treatment group will be treated with non-invasive ventilation combined with Extracorporeal CO2 Removal. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients older than 18 and younger than 90 years
- Documented clinical history of COPD
- ICU admission for exacerbation of COPD requiring non-invasive ventilatory support After two hours of NIV at least two of the following criteria must be fulfilled
- arterial pH ≤ 7.25
- respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg despite infusion of fluids and vasoactive drugs
- ratio of arterial-to-inspired oxygen O2 fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≤ 150 with FiO2 of less than 0.6 and PEEP of at least 5 cm H2O
- contraindications to anticoagulation (i.e. any of the following: platelet count <50,000/mm3; prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5; stroke or severe head trauma or intracranial arterio-venous malformation, or cerebral aneurysm, or central nervous system mass lesion within the previous 3 months; epidural catheter in place or expected to be positioned during the study; history of congenital bleeding diatheses; gastrointestinal bleeding within the 6 weeks prior to study entry; esophageal varices, chronic jaundice, cirrhosis, or chronic ascites; trauma);
- heparin-induced thrombocytopenia;
- body weight >120 Kg;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ECCO2RExtracorporeal CO2 Removal | Device | Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R) |
| NIVNon-invasive ventilation | Device | Extracorporeal CO2 Removal (NIV+ECCO2R), Standard of Care (NIV) |
Primary outcome
Combined 28-day mortality or surrogate events
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Incidence of death, prolonged mechanical ventilation, development of septic shock, development of severe hypoxemia, second episode of COPD exacerbation
5 secondary outcomes
Endotracheal intubation
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Tracheostomy
Time frame: 28 days after enrollment
Hospital length-of-stay
Time frame: Whole hospital stay
ICU length-of-stay
Time frame: Whole ICU stay
90-day mortality
Time frame: 90 days after enrollment
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34666820Tonetti T, Pisani L, Cavalli I, Vega ML, Maietti E, Filippini C, Nava S, Ranieri VM. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for treatment of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ORION): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 19;22(1):718. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05692-w.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
V. Marco Ranieri, M.D. study chair
University of Bologna
Stefano Nava, M.D. study chair
University of Bologna
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ECCO2R and NIV in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by University of Bologna.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined 28-day mortality or surrogate events (time frame: 28 days after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04582799, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2025.