AzTrials
AzTrials

Healthy PopulationNCT04582994

The Role of Beta Oscillation in Mental Time Travel

An observational study of Healthy Population, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The project aims to study the neural basis of Mental Time Travel (MTT), i.e. the ability to travel back and forth in time. It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 33 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy Population
What is being tested?
Beta tACS and Alfa tACS
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Feb 2019to 26 Mar 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 33 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Two groups of healthy partcipants. Age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group

Who may be able to join

  • age between 20-30 for the first group and age between 60-80 for the second group

Who cannot join

  • • generalized cognitive impairment (score lower than 24 at the Mini Mental State Examination)
  • psychiatric disorders
  • additional neurological disorders
  • abusive use of alcohol or illicit drugs
  • Personal or familiar history of epileptic fits

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Center for study and reaserch in Cognitive Neuroscience

    Cesena, ITA, 47521

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: The Role of Beta Oscillation in Mental Time Travel: a tACS Study in Healthy Subjects

The project aims to study the neural basis of Mental Time Travel (MTT), i.e. the ability to travel back and forth in time. It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, the present project investigates the hypothesis that MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, cause previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a difference between these two populations in the capacity to travel mentally in time.

Read the detailed description

A characteristic of human conscious experience is the ability to mentally project oneself to a new time location, either in the past or in the future, i.e. the so-called Mental Time Travel (MTT). The aim of the present project is to study the neural basis of MTT.

It has been proposed that the self-projection in time is similar to the self-projection in space, emphasizing the role of spatial navigation in MTT. Indeed, the posterior parietal cortex, a key region for visual imagery in space-related tasks, and the temporo-parietal junction, a key region for mental projection, are both recruited by self-projection in time and space. However, the specific neural computation of the two processes remains unclear. One way to address this is by investigating the brain oscillations that may modulate MTT. One plausible candidate for MTT processing are beta oscillations because of their role in the production and perception of short temporal intervals, as opposed to alpha oscillations which correlate with illusory changes in self location in space. Thus, we hypothesize that the MTT may rely on posterior parietal cortex's beta oscillations to self-project in time. Moreover, because previous studies showed a different performance in time processing between young and elderly health population, we want to investigate also if there is a differences between these two populations in the MTT.

To assess the MTT we developed a new task in which participants see stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection', they indicate if it is likely or unlikely that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago; in the 'Future projection' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. We use transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to test within subjects the role of target (Beta) and control oscillations (Alpha), in addition to a control non-stimulation condition (Sham). To rule out that tACS may simply affect age perception, participants are also asked to report the age of each stimulus face (Age Estimation task). Moreover, to investigate if there is any correlation between the MTT and the perception of short temporal interval, participants perform a time reproduction task before the brain stimulation and the MTT task. In the Time Reproduction task, a blue square is presented with a variable duration (encoding phase). Immediately after the encoding phase, a red square of the same size and position is presented. Subjects press a response button when they considered that the same of the previously studied time interval has elapsed.

A pilot study from 11 participants shows that beta-tACS corresponds to a shift in the psychometric curve towards a younger age in the 'Past condition', and towards an older age in the 'Future condition'. Thus, participants indicated a younger face as more likely to have lived an event 10 years ago and an older face as more likely to live an event 10 years in the future. This suggests that beta-tACS leads to an under-estimation of time relative to sham and alpha-tACS. Crucially, there were no significant differences in estimating the veridical ages of the stimulus faces. Thus, beta oscillation may modulate self-projection in time, since these data are consistent with an under-estimation of time.

If confirmed, results will allow us to specify that self-projection in time relies on the posterior parietal regions and beta oscillations. Moreover, if supported by our future experiments involving space processing, this result may also shed a new light on the distinction between self-projection in space, which is known to rely on alpha, and self-projection in time that relies on beta. Overall, these data may point to the fact that beta oscillations are critical for processing long durations, in addition to their well-known role in supporting short durations. This may be because beta oscillation may serve as a memory standard to which different durations are compared.

Being tested
Beta tACS, Alfa tACS, Sham
Keywords
Time Perception; Mental Time Travel; tACS; Brain Stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Beta tACSBehavioural

    participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Beta frequencies (22 Hz)

  • Alfa tACSBehavioural

    participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while tACS stimulation is delivered at Alfa frequencies (10 Hz)

  • ShamBehavioural

    participants perform the Mental Time Travel task (duration 20 minutes), while Sham tACS stimulation is delivered

Study groups in NCT04582994
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Young participants30 young participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below: 1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz) 2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz) 3. Day 3. Sham tACS
Receives: Behavioral: Beta tACS; Behavioral: Alfa tACS; Behavioral: Sham
Old participants30 old participants will perform the Mental Time Travel task while tACS stimulation is delivered at three different frequencies on the posterior parietal cortex. Interventions are administered in three different sessions in a pseudo-randomized order as described below: 1. Day 1. Beta tACS (22Hz) 2. Day 2. Alpha tACS (10 Hz) 3. Day 3. Sham tACS
Receives: Behavioral: Beta tACS; Behavioral: Alfa tACS; Behavioral: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Mental Time Travel Task.

    Participants see 420 stimulus faces of different ages, one at a time. Each face is presented with a short phrase describing a particular life event, commonly happening in middle age. Participants perform a 2-alternative forced choice: in the 'Past Projection condition', they indicate if it is "likely" or "unlikely" that the stimulus person has lived the life event 10 years ago, in the 'Future projection condition' that the stimulus person will live the event 10 years in the future. A psychometric curve will be computed on the proportions of Likely responses, both in the "Future-projection" and in the "Past-projection" condition. We will assess the change in performance between Alpha , Beta and Sham tACS stimulation. Beta-Alpha and Sham tACS stimulation will be delivered in a randomized order in three different days.

    Measured: at day 1, day 2 and day 3

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time Reproduction Task

    In the Time Reproduction task, a blue square is presented with a variable duration (encoding phase) around a standard interval of 2000 ms (1600, 1800, 2000, 2200 and 2400 ms). Immediately after the encoding phase, a red square of the same size and position was presented. Subjects had to press a response button when they considered that the same (reproduction task) of the previously studied time interval had elapsed.

    Measured: at day 1

  2. Change in Age Estimation task

    Faces stimuli are presented one at time. Participants are asked to guess the age of the persons depicted on the screen. This is a control task to rule out the possibility that Brain stimulation may simply affect age perception. Thus we will assess the change in performance between the different sessions of tACS stimulation (at day 1, 2 and 3)

    Measured: at day 1, day 2, day 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2021
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04582994
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC 1199
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
4 Oct 2020
Last updated
29 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Anelli F, Avanzi S, Arzy S, Mancuso M, Frassinetti F. Effects of spatial attention on mental time travel in patients with neglect. Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PubMed 29482017
  • Arzy S, Collette S, Ionta S, Fornari E, Blanke O. Subjective mental time: the functional architecture of projecting the self to past and future. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Nov;30(10):2009-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06974.x. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

    PubMed 19912333
  • Wiener M, Parikh A, Krakow A, Coslett HB. An Intrinsic Role of Beta Oscillations in Memory for Time Estimation. Sci Rep. 2018 May 22;8(1):7992. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26385-6.

    PubMed 29789611
  • Lenggenhager B, Halje P, Blanke O. Alpha band oscillations correlate with illusory self-location induced by virtual reality. Eur J Neurosci. 2011 May;33(10):1935-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07647.x. Epub 2011 Mar 13.

    PubMed 21395867
  • D'Angelo M, Frassinetti F, Cappelletti M. The Role of Beta Oscillations in Mental Time Travel. Psychol Sci. 2023 Apr;34(4):490-500. doi: 10.1177/09567976221147259. Epub 2023 Feb 16.

    PubMed 37067986

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Healthy Population, run by Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Mental Time Travel Task. (time frame: at day 1, day 2 and day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04582994, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in