Heart DiseasesNCT04583371
The Use of Pulmonary Hyperinflation With the Mechanical Ventilator in Cardiac Patients
A study testing MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATION in people with Heart Diseases, run by Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to reduce work and reverse or prevent fatigue of the respiratory muscles, decrease oxygen consumption and maintain gas exchange. In addition to the benefits given to patients undergoing MV, there is a high risk of accumulating bronchial secretions, related to pathology and / or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Diseases
- What is being tested?
- MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATION
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2020to 1 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Interned in the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), Intensive Care Center (ICU) and Emergency.
- Using invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours.
- Hemodynamically stable (MAP 60-120 mmHg).
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
- Individuals with pneumothorax and undrained hemothorax.
- Subcutaneous emphysema.
- Patients with peak pressure> 40 cmH2O.
- Patients diagnosed with neurological disease within 72 hours.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Instituto de Cardiologia
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90040371
Marcela Olixewski, Bacharel, 55 51 998078004, marcelapolixewski@hotmail.com
Daiane Pereira, Bacharel, 55 51 999187736, daianesilvpereira@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Effect of the Use of Pulmonary Hyperinflation With Mechanical Ventilator Plus Aspiration Versus Isolated Tracheal Aspiration in Bronchial Hygiene in Patients With Heart Disease
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to reduce work and reverse or prevent fatigue of the respiratory muscles, decrease oxygen consumption and maintain gas exchange. In addition to the benefits given to patients undergoing MV, there is a high risk of accumulating bronchial secretions, related to pathology and / or therapeutic intervention. Pulmonary hyperinflation is widespread in patients in intensive care centers (ICUs) as a bronchial hygiene therapy, being used in 40% of 64 Australian ICUs as demonstrated by Dennis et al., Through contact with physical therapists. Mechanical hyperinflation associated with tracheal aspiration is able to increase the amount of secretion aspirated when compared to isolated aspiration in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. To assess whether the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver with the mechanical ventilator, compared to isolated tracheal aspiration, increases the removal of secretions. To evaluate whether the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator is hemodynamically stable through the collection in two moments of the variables of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RF) that will be analyzed from the postoperative unit's multiparametric monitor.
Evaluate the change in respiratory mechanics through collection in two moments after the mechanical hyperinflation technique through dynamic compliance (Cdyn), tidal air volume (VAC), peak pressure (Ppico). The population will consist of patients from the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), from the Institute of Cardiology, of both sexes, over 18 years old, mechanically ventilated and the sample consisting of 50 individuals. These will be submitted to the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator. Randomized crossover clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to reduce work and reverse or prevent fatigue of the respiratory muscles, decrease oxygen consumption and maintain gas exchange. In addition to the benefits given to patients undergoing MV, there is a high risk of accumulating bronchial secretions, related to pathology and / or therapeutic intervention. Pulmonary hyperinflation is widespread in patients in intensive care centers (ICUs) as a bronchial hygiene therapy, being used in 40% of 64 Australian ICUs as demonstrated by Dennis et al., Through contact with physical therapists. Mechanical hyperinflation associated with tracheal aspiration is able to increase the amount of secretion aspirated when compared to isolated aspiration in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
To evaluate whether the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator is hemodynamically stable through the collection in two moments of the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RF) variables that will be analyzed from the postoperative unit's multiparametric monitor.
Evaluate the change in respiratory mechanics through collection in two moments after the mechanical hyperinflation technique through dynamic compliance (Cdyn), tidal air volume (VAC), peak pressure (Ppico). The population will consist of patients from the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), unit intensive care (UCI) and emergency room, from the Institute of Cardiology, of both sexes, over 18 years old, mechanically ventilated more than 48 hours and the sample consisting of 50 individuals. These will be submitted to the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator.
This is a randomized crossover clinical trial in which the individuals selected for the study will be randomized to receive isolated tracheal aspiration (Control Group) and pulmonary hyperinflation through the mechanical ventilator associated with tracheal aspiration (Intervention Group). Randomization will be performed through the randomization.com website by a 1: 1 crossed block, allocating the patient to one of the groups and, after 24 hours, another technique will be performed. In addition, a control aspiration will be performed 2 hours before both techniques.
For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique35.
In the control group, patients will be ventilated for 1 minute with 100% inspired oxygen (FiO2), followed by three aspirations for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds.
In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume for each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the supine position, the head elevated to 30º in assisted pressure-controlled ventilation mode, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and, in assisted ventilation mode. controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, observing the Ppeak that cannot exceed 40 cmH2O and the drive pressure that cannot exceed 15 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then a new aspiration will be performed. in the same way as the control group. The hemodynamics data will be taken from the multiparametric monitor of the hospitalization units (philips) and the respiratory mechanics data will be collected from the mechanical ventilator screen (Servo S; Drager; Newport), before and after the techniques. The volume of secretion will be stored in the collection flask (Water Seal 120 ml) and weighed using a high precision scale, discounting the weight of the collection flask.
The Informed Consent Form (ICF) will be signed by the responsible family member, containing information and explanations about the present study and the researcher will be available to explain doubts and questions at the time and afterwards through the telephone present at the ICF. All procedures will be performed under the supervision of the physiotherapist at the hospital. It is understood that this research may offer a minimal risk to volunteers, according to resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, since they may have some discomfort and / or their hemodynamic situation altered by the application of the aforementioned physical therapy technique. As a counterpart, in case the predicted risk occurs, the subjects will receive all the necessary care from the researcher, together with the unit's physiotherapist and medical team, if necessary. The benefits to the subjects refer to the possibility of improving their respiratory function and bronchial hygiene.
- Conditions
- Heart Diseases
- Being tested
- MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATION
- Keywords
- PHYSIOTHERAPY, Mechanical Ventilation
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATIONOther
For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique. In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume of each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the same way as baseline aspiration, in assisted-controlled pressure ventilation, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and, in ventilatory mode. -controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, observing the peak that cannot exceed 40 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then three aspirations will be performed for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GROUP CONTROL | No intervention | For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique. In the control group, patients will be ventilated for 1 minute with 100% inspired oxygen (FiO2), followed by three aspirations for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds. |
| INTERVENTION GROUP | Active comparator | For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique.
In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume of each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the supine position, the headboard elevated to 30º in assisted pressure-controlled ventilatory mode, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and in assisted ventilation mode. -controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, with Ppeak not exceeding 40 cmH2O and drive pressure not exceeding 15 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then a new aspiration in the same way as the control group. Receives: Other: MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATION |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
amount of secretion
ml
Measured: 15 minutes after the technique.
Secondary outcomes (10)
heart rate
bpm
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
respiratory rate
bpm
Measured: Immediately before and after and during the technique.
mean arterial pressure systolic and dyastolic blood pressure
mmhg
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
peripheral saturation
SpO2 %
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
static compliance
ml/cmH2O
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
dynamic compliance
ml/cmH2O
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
current air volume
ml
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
peak pressure
cmH2O
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
plateau pressure
cmH2O
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
drive pressure
cmH2O
Measured: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2020
- Primary completion30 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- This is a randomized crossover clinical trial in which the individuals selected for the study will be randomized to receive isolated tracheal aspiration (Control Group) and pulmonary hyperinflation through the mechanical ventilator associated with tracheal aspiration (Intervention Group). Randomization will be performed through the randomization.com website by a 1: 1 crossed block, allocating the patient to one of the groups and, after 24 hours, another technique will be performed. In addition, a control aspiration will be performed 2 hours before both techniques.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bruna Eibel, Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul
- Investigators
- Bruna Eibel, Dr, Principal investigator, Instituto de Cardiologia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04583371
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HPMVSASP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Carvalho CR, Toufen C Jr, Franca SA. [Mechanical ventilation: principles, graphic analysis and ventilatory modalities]. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33 Suppl 2S:S54-70. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132007000800002. No abstract available. Portuguese.
PubMed 18026665Franca EE, Ferrari F, Fernandes P, Cavalcanti R, Duarte A, Martinez BP, Aquim EE, Damasceno MC. Physical therapy in critically ill adult patients: recommendations from the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Physical Therapy. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012 Mar;24(1):6-22. English, Portuguese.
PubMed 23917708Dennis DM, Jacob WJ, Samuel FD. A survey of the use of ventilator hyperinflation in Australian tertiary intensive care units. Crit Care Resusc. 2010 Dec;12(4):262-8.
PubMed 21143087Lemes DA, Zin WA, Guimaraes FS. Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(4):249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70004-2.
PubMed 19929767Naue Wda S, Forgiarini Junior LA, Dias AS, Vieira SR. Chest compression with a higher level of pressure support ventilation: effects on secretion removal, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics in patients on mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):55-60. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132014000100008.
PubMed 24626270Favretto DO, Silveira RC, Canini SR, Garbin LM, Martins FT, Dalri MC. Endotracheal suction in intubated critically ill adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692012000500023. English, Portuguese, Spanish.
PubMed 23174846
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of the Use of Pulmonary Hyperinflation With Mechanical Ventilator Plus Aspiration Versus Isolated Tracheal Aspiration in Bronchial Hygiene in Patients With Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04583371
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HPMVSASP
- Conditions
- Heart Diseases
- Keywords
- PHYSIOTHERAPY, Mechanical Ventilation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do SulUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to reduce work and reverse or prevent fatigue of the respiratory muscles, decrease oxygen consumption and maintain gas exchange. In addition to the benefits given to patients undergoing MV, there is a high risk of accumulating bronchial secretions, related to pathology and / or therapeutic intervention. Pulmonary hyperinflation is widespread in patients in intensive care centers (ICUs) as a bronchial hygiene therapy, being used in 40% of 64 Australian ICUs as demonstrated by Dennis et al., Through contact with physical therapists. Mechanical hyperinflation associated with tracheal aspiration is able to increase the amount of secretion aspirated when compared to isolated aspiration in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. To assess whether the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver with the mechanical ventilator, compared to isolated tracheal aspiration, increases the removal of secretions. To evaluate whether the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator is hemodynamically stable through the collection in two moments of the variables of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RF) that will be analyzed from the postoperative unit's multiparametric monitor.
Evaluate the change in respiratory mechanics through collection in two moments after the mechanical hyperinflation technique through dynamic compliance (Cdyn), tidal air volume (VAC), peak pressure (Ppico). The population will consist of patients from the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), from the Institute of Cardiology, of both sexes, over 18 years old, mechanically ventilated and the sample consisting of 50 individuals. These will be submitted to the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator. Randomized crossover clinical trial.
Detailed description
Mechanical ventilation (MV) is used to reduce work and reverse or prevent fatigue of the respiratory muscles, decrease oxygen consumption and maintain gas exchange. In addition to the benefits given to patients undergoing MV, there is a high risk of accumulating bronchial secretions, related to pathology and / or therapeutic intervention. Pulmonary hyperinflation is widespread in patients in intensive care centers (ICUs) as a bronchial hygiene therapy, being used in 40% of 64 Australian ICUs as demonstrated by Dennis et al., Through contact with physical therapists. Mechanical hyperinflation associated with tracheal aspiration is able to increase the amount of secretion aspirated when compared to isolated aspiration in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.
To evaluate whether the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator is hemodynamically stable through the collection in two moments of the heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral saturation (SpO2), respiratory rate (RF) variables that will be analyzed from the postoperative unit's multiparametric monitor.
Evaluate the change in respiratory mechanics through collection in two moments after the mechanical hyperinflation technique through dynamic compliance (Cdyn), tidal air volume (VAC), peak pressure (Ppico). The population will consist of patients from the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), unit intensive care (UCI) and emergency room, from the Institute of Cardiology, of both sexes, over 18 years old, mechanically ventilated more than 48 hours and the sample consisting of 50 individuals. These will be submitted to the use of the pulmonary hyperinflation maneuver in the mechanical ventilator.
This is a randomized crossover clinical trial in which the individuals selected for the study will be randomized to receive isolated tracheal aspiration (Control Group) and pulmonary hyperinflation through the mechanical ventilator associated with tracheal aspiration (Intervention Group). Randomization will be performed through the randomization.com website by a 1: 1 crossed block, allocating the patient to one of the groups and, after 24 hours, another technique will be performed. In addition, a control aspiration will be performed 2 hours before both techniques.
For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique35.
In the control group, patients will be ventilated for 1 minute with 100% inspired oxygen (FiO2), followed by three aspirations for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds.
In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume for each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the supine position, the head elevated to 30º in assisted pressure-controlled ventilation mode, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and, in assisted ventilation mode. controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, observing the Ppeak that cannot exceed 40 cmH2O and the drive pressure that cannot exceed 15 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then a new aspiration will be performed. in the same way as the control group. The hemodynamics data will be taken from the multiparametric monitor of the hospitalization units (philips) and the respiratory mechanics data will be collected from the mechanical ventilator screen (Servo S; Drager; Newport), before and after the techniques. The volume of secretion will be stored in the collection flask (Water Seal 120 ml) and weighed using a high precision scale, discounting the weight of the collection flask.
The Informed Consent Form (ICF) will be signed by the responsible family member, containing information and explanations about the present study and the researcher will be available to explain doubts and questions at the time and afterwards through the telephone present at the ICF. All procedures will be performed under the supervision of the physiotherapist at the hospital. It is understood that this research may offer a minimal risk to volunteers, according to resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, since they may have some discomfort and / or their hemodynamic situation altered by the application of the aforementioned physical therapy technique. As a counterpart, in case the predicted risk occurs, the subjects will receive all the necessary care from the researcher, together with the unit's physiotherapist and medical team, if necessary. The benefits to the subjects refer to the possibility of improving their respiratory function and bronchial hygiene.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This is a randomized crossover clinical trial in which the individuals selected for the study will be randomized to receive isolated tracheal aspiration (Control Group) and pulmonary hyperinflation through the mechanical ventilator associated with tracheal aspiration (Intervention Group). Randomization will be performed through the randomization.com website by a 1: 1 crossed block, allocating the patient to one of the groups and, after 24 hours, another technique will be performed. In addition, a control aspiration will be performed 2 hours before both techniques.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GROUP CONTROL | No intervention | –For basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique. In the control group, patients will be ventilated for 1 minute with 100% inspired oxygen (FiO2), followed by three aspirations for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds. |
| INTERVENTION GROUP | Active comparator | Other: MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATIONFor basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique. In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume of each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the supine position, the headboard elevated to 30º in assisted pressure-controlled ventilatory mode, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and in assisted ventilation mode. -controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, with Ppeak not exceeding 40 cmH2O and drive pressure not exceeding 15 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then a new aspiration in the same way as the control group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Interned in the Post-Operative Unit (UPO), Intensive Care Center (ICU) and Emergency.
- Using invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours.
- Hemodynamically stable (MAP 60-120 mmHg).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
- Individuals with pneumothorax and undrained hemothorax.
- Subcutaneous emphysema.
- Patients with peak pressure> 40 cmH2O.
- Patients diagnosed with neurological disease within 72 hours.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATIONFor basal aspiration, the patient will be placed in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, will be submitted to a single aspiration with a size 12 probe (Mark Med), with a vacuum adjusted to -40cmH2O of pressure, with basic asepsis care being maintained for performing the technique. In the participants of the intervention group, the calculation of the ideal tidal volume of each patient will be performed, after which they will be positioned in the same way as baseline aspiration, in assisted-controlled pressure ventilation, increasing 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure and, in ventilatory mode. -controlled by volume, we will increase 50% of the tidal volume for a period of 10 minutes, observing the peak that cannot exceed 40 cmH2O in both ventilation modes, and then three aspirations will be performed for 15 seconds and with an interval of 30 seconds. | Other | INTERVENTION GROUP |
Primary outcome
amount of secretion
Time frame: 15 minutes after the technique.
ml
10 secondary outcomes
heart rate
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
respiratory rate
Time frame: Immediately before and after and during the technique.
mean arterial pressure systolic and dyastolic blood pressure
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
peripheral saturation
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
static compliance
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
dynamic compliance
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
current air volume
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
peak pressure
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
plateau pressure
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
drive pressure
Time frame: Immediately before and after ande during the technique.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 18026665Carvalho CR, Toufen C Jr, Franca SA. [Mechanical ventilation: principles, graphic analysis and ventilatory modalities]. J Bras Pneumol. 2007;33 Suppl 2S:S54-70. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132007000800002. No abstract available. Portuguese.
- Results publication: PubMed 23917708Franca EE, Ferrari F, Fernandes P, Cavalcanti R, Duarte A, Martinez BP, Aquim EE, Damasceno MC. Physical therapy in critically ill adult patients: recommendations from the Brazilian Association of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Physical Therapy. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012 Mar;24(1):6-22. English, Portuguese.
- Results publication: PubMed 21143087Dennis DM, Jacob WJ, Samuel FD. A survey of the use of ventilator hyperinflation in Australian tertiary intensive care units. Crit Care Resusc. 2010 Dec;12(4):262-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 19929767Lemes DA, Zin WA, Guimaraes FS. Hyperinflation using pressure support ventilation improves secretion clearance and respiratory mechanics in ventilated patients with pulmonary infection: a randomised crossover trial. Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(4):249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70004-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 24626270Naue Wda S, Forgiarini Junior LA, Dias AS, Vieira SR. Chest compression with a higher level of pressure support ventilation: effects on secretion removal, hemodynamics, and respiratory mechanics in patients on mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):55-60. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37132014000100008.
- Results publication: PubMed 23174846Favretto DO, Silveira RC, Canini SR, Garbin LM, Martins FT, Dalri MC. Endotracheal suction in intubated critically ill adult patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012 Sep-Oct;20(5):997-1007. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692012000500023. English, Portuguese, Spanish.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bruna Eibel, Dr principal investigator
Instituto de Cardiologia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MECHANICAL PULMONARY HYPERINFLUATION in people with Heart Diseases, run by Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marcela Olixewski, Bacharel (55 51998078004, marcelapolixewski@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
amount of secretion (time frame: 15 minutes after the technique.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04583371, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2020.