AzTrials
AzTrials

Rotator Cuff InjuriesPhase 4NCT04594408

Tranexamic Acid to Improve Arthroscopic Visualization in Shoulder Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrine, Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine and Tranexamic Acid in people with Rotator Cuff Injuries and Rotator Cuff Tears, run by Panam Clinic at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization. Primary Objectives 1. Determine that patients given intravenous tranexamic acid improves surgeon-rated visualization compared to placebo. 2. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Epinephrine, Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine and Tranexamic Acid
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 1 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to read and understand patient consent form and give informed consent
  • Rotator cuff pathology or impingement that have clinical indications for shoulder arthroscopy surgery (either rotator cuff repair or subacromial decompression

Who cannot join

  • Have an active thromboembolic event
  • Allergies or hypersensitivies to TXA or any of the ingredients
  • Have a seizure disorder
  • On hormonal contraceptives
  • Pregnant
  • History of venous thromboembolism in the previous 12 months, or requiring lifelong anticoagulation related to previous VTE. VTE is defined as a cerebrovascular event (stroke, transient ischemic attack, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism or with a history of hypercoagulable disorders (i.e. Factor V Lieden, antiphospholipid antibody)
  • Acquired disturbances of colour vision
  • Hematuria with renal cause

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Pan Am Clinic

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3E4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: The Use of Tranexamic Acid in Irrigation Fluid to Improve Arthroscopic Visualization in Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous TXA is a safe alternative to epinephrine in improving arthroscopic shoulder visualization.

Primary Objectives

  1. Determine that patients given intravenous tranexamic acid improves surgeon-rated visualization compared to placebo.
  2. Determine that intravenous tranexamic acid is a safe alternative to epinephrine mixed irrigation fluid to improve arthroscopic shoulder visualization
Read the detailed description

In the last twenty years, the use of arthroscopy to surgically manage shoulder pathologies has expanded in its indications. The interplay between increased indications, surgeon experience, and improvements in equipment have all propelled arthroscopic shoulder surgery to preferred treatment in managing instability, rotator cuff, and impingement pathology. Obtaining adequate visual clarity is paramount to performing the procedures safely, efficiently, and effectively.

A variety of methods have been employed to improve visualization. This includes tighter control of blood pressure, regional anesthetic, pressure controlled irrigation system, sealed cannulas, electrocautery devices, and injecting epinephrine into irrigation fluid. The use of epinephrine in irrigation fluid has been studied in literature. The results of a few randomized controlled trials demonstrate that the vasoconstrictive properties of epinephrine decrease blood flow and consequently, improves surgeon visualization. However, there has been reports of ventricular tachycardia, lethal arrhythmias, and epinephrine induced pulmonary edema in literature that suggests that the addition of epinephrine in irrigation fluid may have caused these adverse events. Therefore, it is important to examine other alternatives, such as TXA, that can decrease bleeding and improve visualization without potential detrimental effects.

This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirements.

Being tested
Epinephrine, Tranexamic acid, Epinephrine and Tranexamic Acid
Medical subject headings
Rotator Cuff Injuries, Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EpinephrineDrug

    Also called Epi

    1 mL of 1:1000 mixed into irrigation bag.

  • Tranexamic acidDrug

    Also called TXA

    1 g IV x 1 dose to be administered intraoperatively.

  • Epinephrine and Tranexamic AcidDrug

    Also called TXA, Epi

    1 mL of 1:1000 epinephrine mixed into irrigation bag, and 1 g tranexamic acid x 1 dose to be administered intraoperatively.

Study groups in NCT04594408
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No epinephrine or TXANo interventionNo intervention given.
Epinephrine in irrigation fluidActive comparatorEpinephrine intervention used.
Receives: Drug: Epinephrine
Intravenous TXAExperimentalTranexamic acid intervention used.
Receives: Drug: Tranexamic acid
Epinephrine and TXAExperimentalEpinephrine and tranexamic acid intervention used.
Receives: Drug: Epinephrine and Tranexamic Acid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visualization Quality Scale

    Surgeons are asked every 15 minutes to report on the quality of visualization based on a 4-point scale. Minimum value is 0, maximum value is 3 with the higher value reflecting improved visualization

    Measured: Intra-operative

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Patient Log Book for Pain and Medications

    Patients are sent home from surgery with a log book to track the level of pain they are experiencing as well as the medications that they take.

    Measured: Day of surgery - post-operative day 14

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
128 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04594408
Sponsor's protocol ID
PA2018-001
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
13 Oct 2020
Last updated
2 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Jensen KH, Werther K, Stryger V, Schultz K, Falkenberg B. Arthroscopic shoulder surgery with epinephrine saline irrigation. Arthroscopy. 2001 Jul;17(6):578-81. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.23590.

    PubMed 11447543
  • Morrison DS, Schaefer RK, Friedman RL. The relationship between subacromial space pressure, blood pressure, and visual clarity during arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy. 1995 Oct;11(5):557-60. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90131-0.

    PubMed 8534296
  • Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Weisleder L. Fluid pump systems for arthroscopy: a comparison of pressure control versus pressure and flow control. Arthroscopy. 1995 Oct;11(5):591-5. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90137-x.

    PubMed 8534302
  • Avery DM 3rd, Gibson BW, Carolan GF. Surgeon-rated visualization in shoulder arthroscopy: a randomized blinded controlled trial comparing irrigation fluid with and without epinephrine. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

    PubMed 25442659
  • van Montfoort DO, van Kampen PM, Huijsmans PE. Epinephrine Diluted Saline-Irrigation Fluid in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Significant Improvement of Clarity of Visual Field and Shortening of Total Operation Time. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2016 Mar;32(3):436-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.027.

    PubMed 26524933
  • Mazzocca AD, Meneghini RM, Chhablani R, Badrinath SK, Cole BJ, Bush-Joseph CA. Epinephrine-induced pulmonary edema during arthroscopic knee surgery. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):913-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00023. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12728044
  • Cho SH, Yi JW, Kwack YH, Park SW, Kim MK, Rhee YG. Ventricular tachycardia during arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a report of two cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Mar;130(3):353-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0820-1. Epub 2009 Jan 29.

    PubMed 19184069
  • Karns JL. Epinephrine-induced potentially lethal arrhythmia during arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a case report. AANA J. 1999 Oct;67(5):419-21.

    PubMed 10876433
  • McCormack PL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in the treatment of hyperfibrinolysis. Drugs. 2012 Mar 26;72(5):585-617. doi: 10.2165/11209070-000000000-00000.

    PubMed 22397329
  • Johansson T, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty saves blood and money: a randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005 Jun;76(3):314-9.

    PubMed 16156456
  • Benoni G, Fredin H. Fibrinolytic inhibition with tranexamic acid reduces blood loss and blood transfusion after knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study of 86 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 May;78(3):434-40.

    PubMed 8636182
  • Yang ZG, Chen WP, Wu LD. Effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 3;94(13):1153-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00873.

    PubMed 22623147
  • Zhou XD, Tao LJ, Li J, Wu LD. Do we really need tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of nineteen randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Jul;133(7):1017-27. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1761-2. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

    PubMed 23615973
  • Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, Nargol A, Blenkinsopp J, Mason JM. Tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Dec;93(12):1577-85. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B12.26989.

    PubMed 22161917
  • Huang F, Wu D, Ma G, Yin Z, Wang Q. The use of tranexamic acid to reduce blood loss and transfusion in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2014 Jan;186(1):318-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.020. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

    PubMed 24075404

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Epinephrine, Tranexamic acid and Epinephrine and Tranexamic Acid in people with Rotator Cuff Injuries and Rotator Cuff Tears, run by Panam Clinic at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visualization Quality Scale (time frame: Intra-operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04594408, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in