Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNCT04597593
Association Between Genetic Variant Scores and DOACs (DARES2)
An observational study of Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions and Iatrogenic Disorder, run by Cipherome, Inc. at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
The study's objective is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's algorithm in predicting and preventing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) experienced by patients while on direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Iatrogenic Disorder
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 7 Oct 2020to 30 Dec 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients on rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban who experienced a serious adverse drug reaction and/or treatment failure and case-matched controls.
Who may be able to join
- Any adult patient 18 years and older, who experienced a serious adverse drug reaction while taking a DOAC and is able to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Failure to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Correlation Between Bleeding Complication and Treatment Failure of DOAC and Its Predictions Based on Cipherome's Pharmacogenomic Technology
The study's objective is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's algorithm in predicting and preventing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) experienced by patients while on direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs).
- Medical subject headings
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Iatrogenic Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ADR Group | ISTH bleeding scale Major Bleeding | |
| Control Group | No ADR, No Treatment Failure | |
| Treatment Failure Group | Recurrent MI, Ischemic stroke, Other thromboembolic disorders |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To determine the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's Drug Safety Score (DSS) in correlating with serious Adverse Drug Reactions associated with Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban).
The primary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS in predicting clinical outcomes of major bleeding per International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostatis (ISTH) criteria in subjects on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs). The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs. We will determine the DSS of all subjects who experienced major bleeding and compare it to the DSS of control subjects who did not experience bleeding.
Measured: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
Secondary outcomes (2)
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with serious ADRs compared to clinical tools (e.g., HAS BLED criteria).
The secondary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS predicting clinical outcomes compared to clinical tools such as the HAS-BLED scoring system. A subject with a HAS-BLED score of > 4 points will be considered moderate-high risk of bleeding and a HAS-BLED score of 4 or less will be considered low risk. A DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs. Both DSS (low and high risk subjects) and HAS-BLED scores (low and high risk subjects) will be compared to actual clinical outcomes to assess the predictive accuracy of each scoring system.
Measured: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with treatment failures while on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs)
The secondary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS in predicting treatment failures (e.g., recurrent MI, systemic embolism, or ischemic stroke) as compared to clinical outcomes while on DOACs. The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with preliminary studies demonstrating that scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs.
Measured: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2020
- Study start7 Oct 2020
- Primary completion29 Dec 2022
- Study completion30 Dec 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cipherome, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ilyoung Oh, MD, Principal investigator, SNUBH
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04597593
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C02-002 BD001
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Zareh M, Davis A, Henderson S. Reversal of warfarin-induced hemorrhage in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):386-92. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.3.2051.
PubMed 22224125Kirley K, Qato DM, Kornfield R, Stafford RS, Alexander GC. National trends in oral anticoagulant use in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967299. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
PubMed 22949490January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, Heidenreich PA, Murray KT, Shea JB, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28. No abstract available.
PubMed 30703431Bauer KA. Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:464-70. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.464.
PubMed 24319220Xian Y, Xu H, O'Brien EC, Shah S, Thomas L, Pencina MJ, Fonarow GC, Olson DM, Schwamm LH, Bhatt DL, Smith EE, Hannah D, Maisch L, Lytle BL, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF. Clinical Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke: Findings From the Patient-Centered Research Into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research (PROSPER) Study. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Oct 1;76(10):1192-1202. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2099.
PubMed 31329212Kanuri SH, Kreutz RP. Pharmacogenomics of Novel Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Newly Identified Genes and Genetic Variants. J Pers Med. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jpm9010007.
PubMed 30658513Sennesael AL, Larock AS, Douxfils J, Elens L, Stillemans G, Wiesen M, Taubert M, Dogne JM, Spinewine A, Mullier F. Rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients admitted for bleeding events: insights from a prospective study. Thromb J. 2018 Nov 12;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12959-018-0183-3. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30455596Ing Lorenzini K, Daali Y, Fontana P, Desmeules J, Samer C. Rivaroxaban-Induced Hemorrhage Associated with ABCB1 Genetic Defect. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 19;7:494. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00494. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 28066243Ueshima S, Hira D, Kimura Y, Fujii R, Tomitsuka C, Yamane T, Tabuchi Y, Ozawa T, Itoh H, Ohno S, Horie M, Terada T, Katsura T. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of apixaban in Japanese adult patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;84(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13561. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
PubMed 29457840Shi J, Wang X, Nguyen JH, Bleske BE, Liang Y, Liu L, Zhu HJ. Dabigatran etexilate activation is affected by the CES1 genetic polymorphism G143E (rs71647871) and gender. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 1;119:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
PubMed 27614009Dimatteo C, D'Andrea G, Vecchione G, Paoletti O, Cappucci F, Tiscia GL, Buono M, Grandone E, Testa S, Margaglione M. Pharmacogenetics of dabigatran etexilate interindividual variability. Thromb Res. 2016 Aug;144:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 May 26.
PubMed 27261537Sychev DA, Levanov AN, Shelekhova TV, Bochkov PO, Denisenko NP, Ryzhikova KA, Mirzaev KB, Grishina EA, Gavrilov MA, Ramenskaya GV, Kozlov AV, Bogoslovsky T. The impact of ABCB1 (rs1045642 and rs4148738) and CES1 (rs2244613) gene polymorphisms on dabigatran equilibrium peak concentration in patients after total knee arthroplasty. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2018 Jul 25;11:127-137. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S169277. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30100750Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0134. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
PubMed 20299623Schulman S, Kearon C; Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Apr;3(4):692-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01204.x.
PubMed 15842354Selak V, Kerr A, Poppe K, Wu B, Harwood M, Grey C, Jackson R, Wells S. Annual Risk of Major Bleeding Among Persons Without Cardiovascular Disease Not Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy. JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2507-2520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8194.
PubMed 29946729
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Correlation Between Bleeding Complication and Treatment Failure of DOAC and Its Predictions Based on Cipherome's Pharmacogenomic Technology
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04597593
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C02-002 BD001
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cipherome, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- Study start
- 7 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study's objective is to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's algorithm in predicting and preventing serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) experienced by patients while on direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ADR Group | – | –ISTH bleeding scale Major Bleeding |
| Control Group | – | –No ADR, No Treatment Failure |
| Treatment Failure Group | – | –Recurrent MI, Ischemic stroke, Other thromboembolic disorders |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients on rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban who experienced a serious adverse drug reaction and/or treatment failure and case-matched controls.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any adult patient 18 years and older, who experienced a serious adverse drug reaction while taking a DOAC and is able to provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Failure to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
To determine the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's Drug Safety Score (DSS) in correlating with serious Adverse Drug Reactions associated with Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban).
Time frame: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
The primary endpoint is to determine the accuracy of the DSS in predicting clinical outcomes of major bleeding per International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostatis (ISTH) criteria in subjects on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs). The DSS is calculated on a scale of 0 to 1, with scores below 0.3 correlated with a higher risk of ADRs and scores above 0.7 correlated with a lower risk of ADRs. We will determine the DSS of all subjects who experienced major bleeding and compare it to the DSS of control subjects who did not experience bleeding.
2 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with serious ADRs compared to clinical tools (e.g., HAS BLED criteria).
Time frame: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DSS in correlating with treatment failures while on Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs)
Time frame: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 22224125Zareh M, Davis A, Henderson S. Reversal of warfarin-induced hemorrhage in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;12(4):386-92. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2011.3.2051.
- Background: PubMed 22949490Kirley K, Qato DM, Kornfield R, Stafford RS, Alexander GC. National trends in oral anticoagulant use in the United States, 2007 to 2011. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):615-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967299. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 30703431January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, Heidenreich PA, Murray KT, Shea JB, Tracy CM, Yancy CW. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 9;74(1):104-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 28. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24319220Bauer KA. Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:464-70. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2013.1.464.
- Background: PubMed 31329212Xian Y, Xu H, O'Brien EC, Shah S, Thomas L, Pencina MJ, Fonarow GC, Olson DM, Schwamm LH, Bhatt DL, Smith EE, Hannah D, Maisch L, Lytle BL, Peterson ED, Hernandez AF. Clinical Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in Older Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke: Findings From the Patient-Centered Research Into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research (PROSPER) Study. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Oct 1;76(10):1192-1202. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2099.
- Background: PubMed 30658513Kanuri SH, Kreutz RP. Pharmacogenomics of Novel Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Newly Identified Genes and Genetic Variants. J Pers Med. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):7. doi: 10.3390/jpm9010007.
- Background: PubMed 30455596Sennesael AL, Larock AS, Douxfils J, Elens L, Stillemans G, Wiesen M, Taubert M, Dogne JM, Spinewine A, Mullier F. Rivaroxaban plasma levels in patients admitted for bleeding events: insights from a prospective study. Thromb J. 2018 Nov 12;16:28. doi: 10.1186/s12959-018-0183-3. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 28066243Ing Lorenzini K, Daali Y, Fontana P, Desmeules J, Samer C. Rivaroxaban-Induced Hemorrhage Associated with ABCB1 Genetic Defect. Front Pharmacol. 2016 Dec 19;7:494. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00494. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 29457840Ueshima S, Hira D, Kimura Y, Fujii R, Tomitsuka C, Yamane T, Tabuchi Y, Ozawa T, Itoh H, Ohno S, Horie M, Terada T, Katsura T. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics of apixaban in Japanese adult patients with atrial fibrillation. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;84(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13561. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 27614009Shi J, Wang X, Nguyen JH, Bleske BE, Liang Y, Liu L, Zhu HJ. Dabigatran etexilate activation is affected by the CES1 genetic polymorphism G143E (rs71647871) and gender. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016 Nov 1;119:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 27261537Dimatteo C, D'Andrea G, Vecchione G, Paoletti O, Cappucci F, Tiscia GL, Buono M, Grandone E, Testa S, Margaglione M. Pharmacogenetics of dabigatran etexilate interindividual variability. Thromb Res. 2016 Aug;144:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 May 26.
- Background: PubMed 30100750Sychev DA, Levanov AN, Shelekhova TV, Bochkov PO, Denisenko NP, Ryzhikova KA, Mirzaev KB, Grishina EA, Gavrilov MA, Ramenskaya GV, Kozlov AV, Bogoslovsky T. The impact of ABCB1 (rs1045642 and rs4148738) and CES1 (rs2244613) gene polymorphisms on dabigatran equilibrium peak concentration in patients after total knee arthroplasty. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2018 Jul 25;11:127-137. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S169277. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
RecruitingObservational study
Reduction of Adverse Drug Events and Readmissions
Pharmacogenomic Testing for Medication Management
RecruitingObservational study
Post-market Safety Study of LUMISIGHT
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real World Asparaginase Therapy Toxicity
Drug Toxicity
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Study of the Quality of Life of Patients Suffering From OTOTOXICITY Due to Chemotherapy Based on Platinum Salts Fitted With a Hearing Aid Compared to Those Not Fitted.
Cancer, Ototoxicity, Drug-Induced
Active, not recruiting
Imaging Versus Cardiac Biomarker Monitored HER2 Directed Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer
Cardiotoxicity, HER2-positive Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ilyoung Oh, MD principal investigator
SNUBH
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions and Iatrogenic Disorder, run by Cipherome, Inc. at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To determine the predictive accuracy of Cipherome's Drug Safety Score (DSS) in correlating with serious Adverse Drug Reactions associated with Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs) (rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban). (time frame: Within 1 year of DOAC therapy initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04597593, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2023.