Neoplasms MalignantNCT04600206
Existential Distress in Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers
An observational study of Neoplasms Malignant and Carcinoma, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 5 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Despite the potential for alleviation of existential distress through psychosocial interventions, existential concerns and their impact on health care outcomes of patients and caregivers have not yet been systematically studied. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neoplasms Malignant, Carcinoma, Palliative Care
- What is being tested?
- Self-report questionnaires
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 800 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 23 Oct 2020to 8 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * Patients across all phases of advanced disease from diagnosis to terminal stages who are treated in outpatient and inpatient treatment facilities of the University Cancer Center Hamburg and affiliated clinics * Caregivers whose relatives are diagnosed with advanced cancer
Who may be able to join
- 18 years and older
- UICC stage IV solid tumor or UICC stage III lung or ovarian tumor
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Severe cognitive
- Severe physical impairment
- Insufficient German to give informed consent and complete self-report questionnaires
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Germany5 sites
LungenClinic Grosshansdorf
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 22927
Center for Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany, 20246
Albertinen Krankenhaus
Hamburg, Germany, 22457
Gynecological Outpatient Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Specialized Outpatient Clinic for Autoimmune Liver Disease and for Liver and Bile Duct Tumors, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
About this study
Official title: Existential Distress in Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers: a Longitudinal Cohort Study
Despite the potential for alleviation of existential distress through psychosocial interventions, existential concerns and their impact on health care outcomes of patients and caregivers have not yet been systematically studied. The aim of this longitudinal cohort study is to investigate the frequency, longitudinal trajectory and predictive impact of existential distress on patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes. Further, it aims to determine the need for and utilization of psychosocial support in patients and caregivers with regard to existential concerns.
Read the detailed description
Due to medical progress and an aging population, the number of patients and caregivers who face the profound existential challenges of advanced incurable cancer is constantly growing. Clinically significant existential distress may result from a fear of suffering and perceived lack of control, fear and uncertainty about the end of life, feelings of burdensomeness or insufficiency, grief about missed opportunities, and profound loneliness. Such distress may have a unique and independent contribution to health care outcomes at the end of life. Despite an increasing interest in existential and palliative care interventions that discuss such issues openly, a lack of systematic quantitative data on existential distress and specific support needs hampers clinicians to consequently detect and address existential needs. This longitudinal study aims to 1) systematically investigate the frequency, longitudinal trajectory and predictive impact of existential distress on patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes and 2) determine patients' and caregivers' specific need for and utilization of psychosocial support with respect to existential concerns.
Adult patients diagnosed with advanced cancer and caregivers will be consecutively recruited from outpatient and inpatient treatment facilities of the Univer-sity Cancer Center Hamburg and affiliated clinics. Existential distress, end-of-life outcomes, and mental disorders in 1,000 participants (500 patients, 500 care-givers) will be assessed using self-report questionnaires at five points of assessment over a period of 12 months and diagnostic interviews (at baseline, after six months). To determine the prevalence of existential distress, mental disorders and palliative care outcomes descriptive statistics will be calculated. Descriptive analyses will also be used to examine the need for and utilization of psychosocial support. To investigate the predictive impact of existential distress and patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes multiple linear and logistic regression will be conducted. To analyze longitudinal trajectory of existential distress growth mixture models will be used.
Shaping a clear and systematic knowledge about frequent and persistent existential concerns that are most relevant to the risk for unfavorable end-of-life outcomes, results will significantly contribute to the recognition and manage-ment of existential distress and provide a valuable basis for the development of targeted interventions.
- Conditions
- Neoplasms Malignant, Carcinoma, Palliative Care
- Being tested
- Self-report questionnaires
- Keywords
- Advanced cancer, Caregivers, Death anxiety, Demoralization, Existential distress, Longitudinal studies, Mental disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Necrophobia, Mental Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Self-report questionnairesOther
In this longitudinal cohort study, patients and caregivers will not receive an intervention. In addition to the outcomes named in the section "Outcome Measures" patients and caregivers will complete self-report questionnaires for
Existential distress (Demoralization Scale-II, Death and Dying Distress Scale, Depressive Experiences Questionnaire, Revised Loss Orientation and Life Engagement in Advanced Cancer Scale, Sense of Dignity Item, Patient Dignity Inventory, Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory, Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire)
Need for and utilization of psychosocial support
Resources (Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Questionnaire on the Defiant Power of the Human Spirit) and
Control variables (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, PHQ-9 and GAD-7)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | Adult patients across all phases of advanced disease (UICC stage IV solid tumor or stage III lung or ovarian tumor) from diagnosis to terminal stages Receives: Other: Self-report questionnaires | |
| Caregivers | Adult informal caregivers of patients who are diagnosed with stage IV solid tumors or stage III lung or ovarian tumors Receives: Other: Self-report questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Aggressiveness of care
Will be assessed for patients according to the criteria by Earle et al., 2003: receipt of chemotherapy in the last two weeks of life, emergency hospital admissions or intensive-care treatment during the last month of life. Will be obtained from medical chart reviews for deceased patients.
Measured: 4 weeks prior to death
Prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019).
Measured: 6-months follow-up
Prevalence of adjustment disorder
Will be assessed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) for patients and caregivers using the Adjustment Disorder Module of the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, (Perkonigg et al., 2018).
Measured: 6-months follow-up
Prevalence of substance use disorders
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019).
Will only be assessed for patients and caregivers who were recruited at location no.4 (Specialized Outpatient Clinic for Autoimmune Liver Disease and for Liver and Bile Duct Tumors, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf).
Measured: 6-months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (5)
Desire for hastened death
Will be assessed for patients using the short form of the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death (SAHD-A, Kolva et al., 2017). Items are scored with either being true (1) or false (0). The total score is the number of endorsed items, ranging from 0 to 6, with high scores indicating high levels of desire for hastened death.
Measured: 6- and 12-months-follow-up
Suicidal ideation
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS, Kliem \& Brähler, 2015). Items are scored from 0 to 2 (e.g., 0 = I have a moderate to strong wish to live, 1 = I have a weak wish to live, 2 = I have no wish to live). The sum score ranges from 0 to 38 for the total scale, with higher scores indicating stronger suicidal tendencies.
Measured: 6- and 12-months-follow-up
Coping and Demoralization
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Structured Interview for Psychological Adjustment and Demoralisation (Bobevski \& Kissane, 2019). Participants may answer most of the questions with yes or no.
Measured: 6-months follow-up
Complicated grief
Will be assessed for caregivers after the patient's death using the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG; Lumbeck et al., 2012). Items are scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The sum score ranges from 0 to 76, with scores ≥ 25 indicating experiences of complicated grief.
Measured: 3 months post-death
Quality of dying and death
Will be assessed from the caregivers' perspective using a shot version of the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD, Mah et al., 2020). Caregivers indicate how they would rate each experience for the patient on a scale from 0 (terrible experience) to 10 (almost perfect experience). The total score ranges between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating a better quality of the dying experience.
Measured: 3 months post-death
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2020
- Study start23 Oct 2020
- Primary completion8 Dec 2024
- Study completion8 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neoplasms MalignantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sigrun Vehling, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04600206
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DKH70113404
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Walbaum C, Philipp R, Bokemeyer C, Harter M, Junghans J, Koch U, Oechsle K, Schilling G, Vehling S. Death Anxiety in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.027. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
PubMed 39182590Philipp R, Kalender A, Harter M, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K, Koch U, Vehling S. Existential distress in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: study protocol of a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e046351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046351.
PubMed 33895716
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Existential Distress in Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Caregivers: a Longitudinal Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04600206
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DKH70113404
- Conditions
- Neoplasms Malignant, Carcinoma, Palliative Care
- Keywords
- Advanced cancer, Caregivers, Death anxiety, Demoralization, Existential distress, Longitudinal studies, Mental disorders
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 800 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite the potential for alleviation of existential distress through psychosocial interventions, existential concerns and their impact on health care outcomes of patients and caregivers have not yet been systematically studied. The aim of this longitudinal cohort study is to investigate the frequency, longitudinal trajectory and predictive impact of existential distress on patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes. Further, it aims to determine the need for and utilization of psychosocial support in patients and caregivers with regard to existential concerns.
Detailed description
Due to medical progress and an aging population, the number of patients and caregivers who face the profound existential challenges of advanced incurable cancer is constantly growing. Clinically significant existential distress may result from a fear of suffering and perceived lack of control, fear and uncertainty about the end of life, feelings of burdensomeness or insufficiency, grief about missed opportunities, and profound loneliness. Such distress may have a unique and independent contribution to health care outcomes at the end of life. Despite an increasing interest in existential and palliative care interventions that discuss such issues openly, a lack of systematic quantitative data on existential distress and specific support needs hampers clinicians to consequently detect and address existential needs. This longitudinal study aims to 1) systematically investigate the frequency, longitudinal trajectory and predictive impact of existential distress on patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes and 2) determine patients' and caregivers' specific need for and utilization of psychosocial support with respect to existential concerns.
Adult patients diagnosed with advanced cancer and caregivers will be consecutively recruited from outpatient and inpatient treatment facilities of the Univer-sity Cancer Center Hamburg and affiliated clinics. Existential distress, end-of-life outcomes, and mental disorders in 1,000 participants (500 patients, 500 care-givers) will be assessed using self-report questionnaires at five points of assessment over a period of 12 months and diagnostic interviews (at baseline, after six months). To determine the prevalence of existential distress, mental disorders and palliative care outcomes descriptive statistics will be calculated. Descriptive analyses will also be used to examine the need for and utilization of psychosocial support. To investigate the predictive impact of existential distress and patient- and caregiver-relevant end-of-life outcomes multiple linear and logistic regression will be conducted. To analyze longitudinal trajectory of existential distress growth mixture models will be used.
Shaping a clear and systematic knowledge about frequent and persistent existential concerns that are most relevant to the risk for unfavorable end-of-life outcomes, results will significantly contribute to the recognition and manage-ment of existential distress and provide a valuable basis for the development of targeted interventions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | – | Other: Self-report questionnairesAdult patients across all phases of advanced disease (UICC stage IV solid tumor or stage III lung or ovarian tumor) from diagnosis to terminal stages |
| Caregivers | – | Other: Self-report questionnairesAdult informal caregivers of patients who are diagnosed with stage IV solid tumors or stage III lung or ovarian tumors |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * Patients across all phases of advanced disease from diagnosis to terminal stages who are treated in outpatient and inpatient treatment facilities of the University Cancer Center Hamburg and affiliated clinics * Caregivers whose relatives are diagnosed with advanced cancer
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years and older
- UICC stage IV solid tumor or UICC stage III lung or ovarian tumor
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Severe cognitive
- Severe physical impairment
- Insufficient German to give informed consent and complete self-report questionnaires
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Self-report questionnairesIn this longitudinal cohort study, patients and caregivers will not receive an intervention. In addition to the outcomes named in the section "Outcome Measures" patients and caregivers will complete self-report questionnaires for Existential distress (Demoralization Scale-II, Death and Dying Distress Scale, Depressive Experiences Questionnaire, Revised Loss Orientation and Life Engagement in Advanced Cancer Scale, Sense of Dignity Item, Patient Dignity Inventory, Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory, Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire) Need for and utilization of psychosocial support Resources (Sources of Meaning and Meaning in Life Questionnaire, Questionnaire on the Defiant Power of the Human Spirit) and Control variables (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale, PHQ-9 and GAD-7) | Other | Caregivers, Patients |
Primary outcome
Aggressiveness of care
Time frame: 4 weeks prior to death
Will be assessed for patients according to the criteria by Earle et al., 2003: receipt of chemotherapy in the last two weeks of life, emergency hospital admissions or intensive-care treatment during the last month of life. Will be obtained from medical chart reviews for deceased patients.
Prevalence of affective and anxiety disorders
Time frame: 6-months follow-up
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019).
Prevalence of adjustment disorder
Time frame: 6-months follow-up
Will be assessed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) for patients and caregivers using the Adjustment Disorder Module of the CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview, (Perkonigg et al., 2018).
Prevalence of substance use disorders
Time frame: 6-months follow-up
Will be assessed for patients and caregivers using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-5, Beesdo-Baum et al., 2019). Will only be assessed for patients and caregivers who were recruited at location no.4 (Specialized Outpatient Clinic for Autoimmune Liver Disease and for Liver and Bile Duct Tumors, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf).
5 secondary outcomes
Desire for hastened death
Time frame: 6- and 12-months-follow-up
Suicidal ideation
Time frame: 6- and 12-months-follow-up
Coping and Demoralization
Time frame: 6-months follow-up
Complicated grief
Time frame: 3 months post-death
Quality of dying and death
Time frame: 3 months post-death
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39182590Walbaum C, Philipp R, Bokemeyer C, Harter M, Junghans J, Koch U, Oechsle K, Schilling G, Vehling S. Death Anxiety in Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Dec;68(6):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.08.027. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33895716Philipp R, Kalender A, Harter M, Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K, Koch U, Vehling S. Existential distress in patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: study protocol of a longitudinal cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e046351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046351.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neoplasms Malignant
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sigrun Vehling, PhD principal investigator
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Neoplasms Malignant and Carcinoma, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 5 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Aggressiveness of care (time frame: 4 weeks prior to death). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04600206, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025.