AzTrials
AzTrials

IgG4 Related DiseasePhase 2NCT04602598

Zanubrutinib in Patients With IgG4-Related Disease

A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib 80 MG in people with IgG4 Related Disease, run by Matthew C. Baker at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in treating patients with IgG4-related disease Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
IgG4 Related Disease
What is being tested?
Zanubrutinib 80 MG
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Aug 2022to 3 Apr 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women aged 18 to 85, inclusive, at the time of initial screening
  • Have histopathologically confirmed IgG4-RD in the submandibular gland and/or the lacrimal gland confirmed by international consensus pathology criteria
  • Presence of a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate with 10 IgG4+ plasma cells per high-power field and/or an IgG4+/IgG+ plasma cell ratio of 40%
  • All women must test negative for pregnancy and agree to use a reliable method of birth control
  • No current treatment with immunosuppressive medications other than prednisone 40mg daily (or other glucocorticoid equivalent) with stable dosing for 28 days

Who cannot join

  • Unstable prescribed dose of glucocorticoids within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Any treatment with a synthetic DMARD including but not limited to hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Any treatment with a cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drug including but not limited to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, cyclosporine, sirolimus, or tacrolimus within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Any treatment with a BTK inhibitor within 6 months before baseline
  • Any treatment with a JAK inhibitor within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Use of biologic agents including infliximab, abatacept, or tocilizumab within 56 days prior to baseline
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Use of a B cell depleting therapy (such as rituximab) within 12 months prior to baseline
  • A history of, or current, inflammatory or autoimmune disease (that could affect the interpretation of safety or efficacy outcomes) other than IgG4-related disease
  • Evidence of active tuberculosis, HIV, or hepatitis B or C infection
  • History of cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical dysplasia or carcinoma in situ (cured >1 year), prostate cancer (cured >5 years), or colon cancer (cured >5 years)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Stanford University

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase II, Single-Site, Open-Label Study of Zanubrutinib in Patients With IgG4-Related Disease

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in treating patients with IgG4-related disease

Read the detailed description

This will be a single-site, open-label study in symptomatic patients with IgG4-related disease affecting the submandibular and/or lacrimal glands. All patients will receive zanubrutinib orally at a dose of 80mg BID for 24 weeks.

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that zanubrutinib treatment reduces reduces the volume of the submandibular and/or lacrimal glands on PET/MRI at week 24 compared to baseline.

Being tested
Zanubrutinib 80 MG
Medical subject headings
Immunoglobulin G4-Related Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Zanubrutinib 80 MGDrug

    Zanubrutinib 80 MG for 24 weeks

Study groups in NCT04602598
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ZanubrutinibExperimentalZanubrutinib orally at a dose of 80mg BID for 24 weeks
Receives: Drug: Zanubrutinib 80 MG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Volume of the Submandibular Glands on PET-MRI

    To demonstrate that zanubrutinib treatment reduces the volume of the submandibular glands on PET-MRI at week 24 compared to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

  2. Volume of the Lacrimal Glands on PET-MRI

    To demonstrate that zanubrutinib treatment reduces the volume of the lacrimal glands on PET-MRI at Week 24 compared to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (34)
  1. FDG Avidity (SUVmax) of the Submandibular Glands on PET

    Effect of zanubrutinib on change in FDG avidity (SUVmax) of the submandibular glands on PET at Weeks 12 and 24 compared to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  2. FDG Avidity (SUVmax) of the Lacrimal Glands on PET

    Effect of zanubrutinib on change in FDG avidity (SUVmax) of the lacrimal glands on PET at Week 24 compared to Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  3. Change in Total Metabolic Lesion Volume (tMLV) of Lacrimal Glands, Submandibular Glands, Parotid Glands, and Lymph Notes on PET

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  4. Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) of Submandibular and/or Lacrimal Glands on PET

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  5. Change in Submandibular Glands on MRI

    Change in parenchymal architecture scored 0 to 4 and sialography scored 0 to 4 where 0 is normal, healthy gland and 4 is worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  6. Change in Parotid Glands on MRI

    Change in parenchymal architecture scored 0 to 4 and sialography scored 0 to 4, where 0 is normal, healthy gland and 4 is worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  7. Change in Lacrimal Glands on MRI

    Change in parenchymal architecture scored 0 to 4, where 0 is normal, healthy gland and 4 is worse outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  8. Change in the Volume of the Parotid Glands on PET/MRI

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  9. Change in the Volume of the Submandibular Glands on PET/MRI

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  10. Change in the Volume of the Lacrimal Glands on PET/MRI

    Measured: Baseline, and Week 12

  11. Change in Serum IgG4 Level

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  12. Change in Plasmablast Count

    Change in percentage of CD19+ B cells in blood

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  13. Change in Absolute Regulatory B Cell Count

    Percentage of regulatory B cells in the blood, assessed using flow cytometry.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  14. Change in the IgG4-RD Responder Index

    The IgG4-RD Responder Index detects change in disease activity and identifies improvements/worsening in the same or different organ systems. It encompasses more than 25 organs/sites and records the following for each organ/site: (i) activity trend (through a 0-3 [normal/resolved - worsening] organ/site score); (ii) presence of symptoms due to active disease; (iii) need for urgent care; (iv) presence of damage; and (v) presence of symptoms due to damage. The final activity score at each visit is obtained by summing all organ/site scores (i) and by doubling items needing urgent care (iii). The IgG4-RD Responder Index Total Activity Score ranges from 0 to a maximum of 162. Higher scores represent greater (i.e. worse) disease activity. A score of 0 represents no disease activity other than residual fibrosis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  15. Proportion of Patients With no Disease Flares

    Number and percentage of patients who did not have an IgG4-RD flare

    Measured: Week 12 to Week 24

  16. Change in Total Salivary Grey Scale Ultrasound Score (TUS)

    Each parotid and submandibular gland scored from 0 to 3 with a higher score indicating worse disease, total summed scores across all four glands will be assessed for change (overall score range: 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating worse disease)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  17. Change in Highest Score Among the Salivary Glands for the Grey Scale Ultrasound Score (HSUS)

    Each parotid and submandibular gland (n=4) scored from 0 to 3 with a higher score indicating worse disease, highest score will be assessed for change (overall score range: 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating worse disease)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  18. Change in Glandular Inflammation Total Ultrasound Score (iTUS)

    Each parotid and submandibular gland (n=4) scored from 0 to 3 with a higher score indicating worse disease, total summed scores across all four glands will be assessed for change (overall score range: 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating worse disease)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  19. Change in Highest Score Among the Salivary Glands for the Glandular Inflammation Ultrasound Score (iHSUS)

    Each parotid and submandibular gland (n=4) scored from 0 to 3 with a higher score indicating worse disease, highest score will be assessed for change (overall score range: 0 to 12, with a higher score indicating worse disease)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  20. Change in Physician Global Assessment of Disease

    Symptoms rated on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  21. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Disease

    Symptoms rated on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  22. Change in VAS for Ocular Symptoms - Dryness

    Symptoms rated on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to worse disease state.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  23. Change in VAS for Dryness Symptoms

    Symptoms rated on a 100 mm VAS. Score range: 0 to 100, higher scores correspond to more dryness. Participants were asked to assess their dryness, taking into account all areas, including ocular and salivary symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24

  24. Change in FACIT-F Fatigue Score

    Total score range: 0-52, lower scores correspond with more fatigue. FACIT = Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  25. Change in RAND Short Form-36

    The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  26. Change in C3 Lab

    Complement component 3 (C3) level in blood

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  27. Change in C4 Lab

    Complement component 4 (C4) level in blood

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  28. Change in Total IgG Lab

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  29. Change in IgE Lab

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  30. Change in IgG1 Lab

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  31. Change in ESR Lab

    Change in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  32. Change in CRP Lab

    Change in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24

  33. Incidence of Safety Parameters Including Adverse Events

    Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 32

  34. Incidence of Safety Parameters Including Abnormal Laboratory Results

    Number of participants with any grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent laboratory abnormality

    Measured: Baseline to Week 32

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Aug 2022
  3. Primary completion11 Feb 2025
  4. Study completion3 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Open-label study in symptomatic subjects with histopathologically confirmed IgG4-related disease affecting the submandibular and/or lacrimal glands. Ten subjects will be included in the study. All eligible subjects will receive zanubrutinib 80mg BID over a period of 24 weeks and will be followed up for an additional 8 weeks after the last dose.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04602598
Sponsor's protocol ID
58497
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
20 Oct 2020
Last updated
1 Apr 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib 80 MG in people with IgG4 Related Disease, run by Matthew C. Baker at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Apr 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Volume of the Submandibular Glands on PET-MRI (time frame: Baseline and Week 24). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in