AzTrials
AzTrials

Neck SyndromeNCT04603716

Concentric Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique on Upper Cross Syndrome

A study testing Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique and Concentric muscle energy technique in people with Neck Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project was a Randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of eccentric and concentric muscle energy techniques on patients with upper cross syndrome so that we can have best treatment option for patients with upper cross syndrome, duration was of 6months,convenient sampling was done, subject following… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 40 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Neck Syndrome
What is being tested?
Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique and Concentric muscle energy technique
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
30 Dec 2019to 30 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 40 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 6 month chronic neck pain
  • upper cross syndrome:
  • Clinical picture (Postural Changes):
  • Forward head posture
  • Increased cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis
  • Elevated and protracted shoulders (Rounded shoulders)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • A hunched upper back
  • Rotation or abduction and winging of the scapula
  • Test: Janda test: Patient supine tries to elevate the head from the couch. Normally the lordosis will disappear and the chin will touch the sternum. Otherwise pathological picture shows that the head is lifted with the very tense neck muscles

Who cannot join

  • Patients having any serious trauma on neck i.e. whiplash injury
  • Spinal fracture
  • Cervicogenic headache
  • History of systemic disease RA, SLE, TUMOR
  • psychiatric disorder
  • Any Red flag

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Mansoora hospital, Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effects of Concentric Versus Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Muscle Length and Function in Upper Cross Syndrome

This project was a Randomized control trial conducted to check the effects of eccentric and concentric muscle energy techniques on patients with upper cross syndrome so that we can have best treatment option for patients with upper cross syndrome, duration was of 6months,convenient sampling was done, subject following eligibility criteria from Mansoura hospital female physiotherapy department, Lahore were randomly allocated in two groups via lottery method, baseline assessment was done, Group A participants were given conservative treatment along with eccentric muscle energy technique and Group B participants were given conservative treatment along with concentric muscle energy technique than on 1st,3rdand 6th week post intervention assessment was done via neck disability index, Numeric rating scale, inches tape method,3 sessions per week were given, data was analyzed by using SPSS version 26.

Read the detailed description

In Upper cross syndrome upper trapezius, pectoralis major, and levator scapulae become tight and rhomboids , serratus anterior, middle and lower trapezius, and deep neck flexors, including scalene becomes weak. The postural muscles have tendency to become tight while the phasic muscles have tendency to become weak and inhibited. Thus typical pattern of altered posture and muscular imbalance occurs whenever dysfunction of muscle start. mainly muscular imbalance between weak and tonic muscles leads toward this upper cross syndrome. Soft tissue and cervical spine disorders are found out to be the major contributor in neck pain but when postural abnormality becomes the reason behind neck ache than this is categorized as Upper cross syndrome due to this imbalance in muscles our body has to suffer from severe consequences.rounded shoulder posture is a result of protracted girdle of shoulder due to muscular imbalances between agonist and antagonist muscles resulting in extreme pain and exaggerated cervical curvature.Imbalanced stress on cervical vertebrae is responsible in creating extra pull on neck and head similarly change in normal posture is responsible in overloading, weakening or tightening of cervical area. Characteristics of patient presenting with UCS will have forward head posture, kyphosis ,hunch of thoracic spine (rounded shoulder),winged scapulae, protracted and elevated shoulder and reduced thoracic spine mobility. UCS with the passage of time can detoriate persons physical fitness and health ,it is not only responsible for changes in posture of upper back i.e hypokyphosis over time, but it is also responsible for inducing respiratory problems including asthma. It also cause neck back shoulder and chest wall pain, this pain can be caused by muscular imbalance leading to overuse and fatigue of muscle because of movement dysfunction of back and neck.when muscles become fatigued they start generating more amount of inflammatory chemicals resulting in becoming more sore and increased spasticity. With the passage of time biomechanical and postural changing will induce osteoarthritis in upper thoracic and lower cervical spine in early ages. Functional Shoulder impingement syndrome is also considered to be another complication of Upper cross syndrome. Therefore it is necessary to correctly diagnose and treat this condition before its complication starts worsening.

Conditions
Neck Syndrome
Being tested
Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique, Concentric muscle energy technique
Keywords
upper cross syndrome,, MET,, NDI,, NPRS
Medical subject headings
Oculocerebral hypopigmentation syndrome type Preus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eccentric Muscle Energy TechniqueOther

    Conventional Treatment given to both groups (Hot pack for 15 minutes, Mobilization, AROM Exercises 10 sets x 3days in a week)

    Reciprocal inhibition of target muscle (i.e. levator scapulae ,pectoralis major, upper trapezius) causing relaxation, patient force is minimal towards maximal therapist force, 5-7 repetition for 2-4seconds 3 days in a week up to 6 weeks.

    Muscle is taken from shortened to lengthened position.

  • Concentric muscle energy techniqueOther

    Group B: Concentric Muscle Energy Technique: (Autogenic inhibition of target muscle (i.e. levator scapulae ,pectoralis major, upper trapezius) patient force is greater than therapist force, 5-7repitition for 3-4seconds)Muscle is taken from lengthened to shortened position.

    On eligible participants baseline assessment was done,3 session were given 3days per week, post intervention assessment was taken at 1st 3rd and 6th week

Study groups in NCT04603716
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Eccentric Muscle Energy TechniqueExperimentalconventional physical therapy Along with eccentric muscle energy technique
Receives: Other: Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique
concentric muscle energy techniqueExperimentalConventional physical therapy along with concentric muscle energy technique
Receives: Other: Concentric muscle energy technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Neck disability index

    10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain related disability. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. 10 item score from 0-5.maximum score is 50.

    • 0 to 4(0-8%)=no disability
    • 5 to14(19-28%)=mild
    • 15 to24(30-48%)=moderate
    • 25 to 34 (50-64%)=severe
    • Above 34(70-80%)=complete. 10-item questionnaire that measures a patient's self-reported neck pain related disability. A higher NDI score means the greater a patient's perceived disability due to neck pain. 10 item score from 0-5.maximum score is 50.
    • 0 to 4(0-8%)=no disability
    • 5 to14(19-28%)=mild
    • 15 to24(30-48%)=moderate
    • 25 to 34 (50-64%)=severe
    • Above 34(70-80%)=complete

    Measured: 6th Week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. NPRS

    Changes from base Line Numeric Pain rating scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain

    Measured: 6th Week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Oct 2020
  2. Study start30 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04603716
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/RCRS/20/1010 Sadia Khalid
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
19 Oct 2020
Last updated
27 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Joshi S, Srivastava N. To Compare the Effectiveness of Active Release Technique and Conventional Physical Therapy in the Management of Upper Cross Syndrome. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. 2018;12(4).

  • Rivera CE. Core and Lumbopelvic Stabilization in Runners. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2016 Feb;27(1):319-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.09.003.

    PubMed 26616187
  • Rajalaxmi V, Paul J, Nithya M, Lekha SC, Likitha B. Effectiveness of three dimensional approach of schroth method and yoga on pulmonary function test and posture in upper crossed syndrome with neck Pain-A double blinded study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(5):1835-9.

  • Izzo R, Popolizio T, D'Aprile P, Muto M. Spinal pain. Eur J Radiol. 2015 May;84(5):746-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

    PubMed 25824642
  • Yoo K-T, Lee H-S. Effects of therapeutic exercise on posture, pain and asymmetric muscle activity in a patient with forward head posture: Case report. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2016;11(1):71-82.

  • Rajalaxmi V, Ranjani V, Paul J, Subramanian S, Cyrus BE, Pavithralochani V. Efficacy of Neck Stabilization and Postural Correction Exercise on Pain, Posture, Disability, Respiratory Dysfuntions and Mental Status in Desk Job Workers-A Randomised Controlled Double Blinded Study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;12(5):2333-8.

  • Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Feb;90(2):284-99. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008.

    PubMed 25659245
  • Mujawar JC, Sagar JH. Prevalence of Upper Cross Syndrome in Laundry Workers. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;23(1):54-56. doi: 10.4103/ijoem.IJOEM_169_18.

    PubMed 31040591
  • Tiefel K. The Efficacy of Treatment for Upper Crossed Syndrome and the Involvement of Chiropractic. 2012.

  • Shahzad AN, Shakil-ur-Rehman S, Rafique N. Effectiveness of eccentric and concentric muscle energy techniques on hamstring length in healthy population. Rawal Medical Journal. 2019;44(2):350-2.

  • Osama M, Tassadaq N, Malik RJ. Effect of muscle energy techniques and facet joint mobilization on spinal curvature in patients with mechanical neck pain: A pilot study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Feb;70(2):344-347. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.14189.

    PubMed 32063632
  • Osama M, Shakil Ur Rehman S. Effects of static stretching as compared to autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques in the management of mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):786-790. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.9596.

    PubMed 32400728
  • Rana AA, Ahmad A, Gillani SA, Idrees MQ, Awan I. Effects of conventional physical therapy with and without muscle energy techniques for treatment of Upper Cross Syndrome. Rawal Medical Journal. 2020;45(1):127-32.

  • Phadke A, Bedekar N, Shyam A, Sancheti P. Effect of muscle energy technique and static stretching on pain and functional disability in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2016 Apr 14;35:5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2015.12.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.

    PubMed 30931028
  • Reese NB, Bandy WD. Joint range of motion and muscle length testing-E-book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Eccentric Muscle Energy Technique and Concentric muscle energy technique in people with Neck Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Neck disability index (time frame: 6th Week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04603716, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in