Language ImpairmentNCT04604821
Delivering EMT Via Telehealth to Children and Families
A study testing Enhanced Milieu Teaching and Parent Education in people with Language Impairment, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
In the U.S., approximately 12% of children under 36 months have language impairments, yet less than 2% receive early language intervention. Early language intervention is underutilized nationally, with pronounced service gaps in rural communities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 36 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Language Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced Milieu Teaching and Parent Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 36 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- (a) Child age between 18 and 36 months
- (b) developmental age of 9 months as measured on the Visual Reception Scale of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL; 1995)
- (c) language delay as measured by a score of at least 1.33 SD below the mean on the Preschool Language Sclaes-5th Edition (PLS-5; Zimmerman, Steiner, \& Evatt-Pond, 2011), and
- (d) hearing (with or without amplification) reported at 25dB HL or better confirmed by audiological testing, or medical record.
Who cannot join
- (a) primary diagnosis of any specific disability other than a language impairment including severe motor impairment
- (b) concomitant sensory impairments (e.g., hearing impairment, blindness), and
- (c) symptoms of autism spectrum disorder as measured by a result indicating "high risk" for autism (e.g., scores of 8 or higher) on the Modified Checklist for Autism In Toddlers-Revised with Follow-up (MCHAT-R/F Robins, Fein \& Barton, 2009).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Official title: Delivering Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EM-Teach) Via Telehealth to Children and Families in Rural Communities
In the U.S., approximately 12% of children under 36 months have language impairments, yet less than 2% receive early language intervention. Early language intervention is underutilized nationally, with pronounced service gaps in rural communities. This gap is a significant issue because children with language impairments are at increased risk for learning and reading disabilities that can persist into adulthood. Telehealth has the potential to mitigate service gaps by improving access to treatments, increasing the availability of clinicians with expertise in language intervention, and reducing healthcare costs. Telehealth can alleviate logistic and geographic barriers to treatment facing children with disabilities and their families in rural communities. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effects of telehealth interventions for children with language impairments under 36 months. Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore innovative telehealth interventions with potential to improve the quality and efficiency of language treatments. The investigators will conduct a feasibility trial (small randomized control trial) to evaluate a telehealth intervention for children with language impairments and their caregivers.
Read the detailed description
Aim 1: Explore stakeholders' preferences, experiences, and information needs regarding the delivery of language interventions via telehealth. Ethnographic interviews will be conducted with 16 stakeholders (n= 8 caregivers, 8 clinicians) to explore their preferences, experiences, and needs.
Aim 2: Determine the effect of telehealth Enhanced Milieu Teaching on caregiver language strategy use. Caregiver language strategy use will be compared between the intervention and control groups (n = 28 families, 14 intervention,14 control) during semi-structured caregiver-child interactions.
- Conditions
- Language Impairment
- Being tested
- Enhanced Milieu Teaching, Parent Education
- Keywords
- Language Impairment, Telehealth, Rural, Enhanced Milieu Teaching
- Medical subject headings
- Language Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced Milieu TeachingBehavioural
A behavioral language intervention that uses naturally occurring interactions to facilitate young children's language skills.
Parent EducationBehavioural
Parents receive information on child developmental milestones.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Milieu Teaching | Experimental | Child-caregiver dyads receive up to 24 speech-language therapy sessions (50minutes, 2x per week for 3 months) where parents are taught by the interventionist to use Enhanced Milieu Teaching Strategies. Children and their families may continue to participate community-based educational programs. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Milieu Teaching |
| Community Treatment as Usual | Other | Child-caregiver dyads may continue to participate in community-based educational programs. Researchers provide up to 4 educational sessions to caregivers (50 minutes, every 3 weeks). During educational sessions parents are taught developmental milestones from the CDC Learn the Signs Act Early Public Health Campaign. Receives: Behavioral: Parent Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Parent use of EMT Strategies during a parent child interaction.
A parent-child interaction is a brief, repeatable, play-based, observational measure of a child's communicative performance during a 10-minute play period with the parent who agreed to participate in as a research volunteer in the study. It measures the number and percentage of correct of matched turns, expansions, time delays, and milieu teaching episodes during this play period.
An increase in the Parent use of EMT strategies is a positive outcome.
Metric/ Measurement Unit: Number and percentage of turns parents used EMT Strategies (e.g. matched turns, expansions, time delays, and milieu teaching episodes) during a 10 minute play interaction.
Measured: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Productive Vocabulary on the Mac-Arthur Bates Communication Development Inventory (MCDI) score after 3-4 months of intervention
The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MCDI) is a parent report instrument which captures important information about children's developing abilities in early language, including vocabulary comprehension, production, gestures, and grammar.
An increase in the productive vocabulary represents a positive outcome.
Metric/ Measurement Unit: Number of words expressed on the MCDI. The range of this instrument is 0 - 396.
Measured: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Change in Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers- Early Communication Indicator (IGDI-ECI) score through 3-4 months of intervention
The ECI is a brief, repeatable, play-based, observational measure of a child's communicative performance during a 6-minute play period with a familiar adult. It measures the number of gestures, vocalizations, single words, and multiple word combinations during this play period.
An increase in the ECI presents a positive outcome.
Metric/ Measurement Unit: Frequency count of communication utterances expressed during the 6 minute play interaction. ECI scores are weighted such that each single-word utterance is given a weight of two (each tally is multiplied by two), and each multiple word utterance is given a weight of three (each tally is multiplied by three)
Measured: Once per month of intervention through study completion (3-4 months of intervention)
Change in Preschool-Language Scales - 5th edition (PLS-5)
PLS™-5 Preschool Language Scales Fifth Edition offers a comprehensive developmental language assessment with items that range from pre-verbal, interaction-based skills to emerging language to early literacy.
Increases on the PLS-5 represent a positive outcome.
Metric/ Measurement Unit: Total Standard Score Range = 50 - 150 (Mean = 100, SD = 15).
If we are unable to administer assessments to all participants in person due to public health impacts of COVID-19, we will report the raw scores because the PLS-5 is not standardized for telepractice administration. Raw scores range 0 - 132.
Measured: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Change in number of Different Words on Structured Language Sample
A language sample is a naturalistic adult-child interaction with a specific set of toys to evaluate a child's spontaneous expressive language ability.
Metric/ Measurement Unit: Change in frequency count of the number of different words spoken during a 20 minute language sample.
Measured: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Why it stopped: PI decided to pursue the same aims using a different methodology, specifically a single-case experimental design, also called N-of-1 Trial to answer research questions after consultation with research mentors and consultants.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Language ImpairmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oregon Health and Science UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Feasibility Study (Small Randomized Control Trial)
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emily Quinn, Oregon Health and Science University
- Investigators
- Emily D Quinn, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Oregon Health and Science University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04604821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00019997
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delivering Enhanced Milieu Teaching (EM-Teach) Via Telehealth to Children and Families in Rural Communities
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04604821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00019997
- Conditions
- Language Impairment
- Keywords
- Language Impairment, Telehealth, Rural, Enhanced Milieu Teaching
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: PI decided to pursue the same aims using a different methodology, specifically a single-case experimental design, also called N-of-1 Trial to answer research questions after consultation with research mentors and consultants.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon Health and Science UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the U.S., approximately 12% of children under 36 months have language impairments, yet less than 2% receive early language intervention. Early language intervention is underutilized nationally, with pronounced service gaps in rural communities. This gap is a significant issue because children with language impairments are at increased risk for learning and reading disabilities that can persist into adulthood. Telehealth has the potential to mitigate service gaps by improving access to treatments, increasing the availability of clinicians with expertise in language intervention, and reducing healthcare costs. Telehealth can alleviate logistic and geographic barriers to treatment facing children with disabilities and their families in rural communities. However, there is insufficient evidence on the effects of telehealth interventions for children with language impairments under 36 months. Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore innovative telehealth interventions with potential to improve the quality and efficiency of language treatments. The investigators will conduct a feasibility trial (small randomized control trial) to evaluate a telehealth intervention for children with language impairments and their caregivers.
Detailed description
Aim 1: Explore stakeholders' preferences, experiences, and information needs regarding the delivery of language interventions via telehealth. Ethnographic interviews will be conducted with 16 stakeholders (n= 8 caregivers, 8 clinicians) to explore their preferences, experiences, and needs.
Aim 2: Determine the effect of telehealth Enhanced Milieu Teaching on caregiver language strategy use. Caregiver language strategy use will be compared between the intervention and control groups (n = 28 families, 14 intervention,14 control) during semi-structured caregiver-child interactions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Feasibility Study (Small Randomized Control Trial)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Milieu Teaching | Experimental | Behavioral: Enhanced Milieu TeachingChild-caregiver dyads receive up to 24 speech-language therapy sessions (50minutes, 2x per week for 3 months) where parents are taught by the interventionist to use Enhanced Milieu Teaching Strategies. Children and their families may continue to participate community-based educational programs. |
| Community Treatment as Usual | Other | Behavioral: Parent EducationChild-caregiver dyads may continue to participate in community-based educational programs. Researchers provide up to 4 educational sessions to caregivers (50 minutes, every 3 weeks). During educational sessions parents are taught developmental milestones from the CDC Learn the Signs Act Early Public Health Campaign. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 36 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- (a) Child age between 18 and 36 months
- (b) developmental age of 9 months as measured on the Visual Reception Scale of the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL; 1995)
- (c) language delay as measured by a score of at least 1.33 SD below the mean on the Preschool Language Sclaes-5th Edition (PLS-5; Zimmerman, Steiner, \& Evatt-Pond, 2011), and
- (d) hearing (with or without amplification) reported at 25dB HL or better confirmed by audiological testing, or medical record.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- (a) primary diagnosis of any specific disability other than a language impairment including severe motor impairment
- (b) concomitant sensory impairments (e.g., hearing impairment, blindness), and
- (c) symptoms of autism spectrum disorder as measured by a result indicating "high risk" for autism (e.g., scores of 8 or higher) on the Modified Checklist for Autism In Toddlers-Revised with Follow-up (MCHAT-R/F Robins, Fein \& Barton, 2009).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Milieu TeachingA behavioral language intervention that uses naturally occurring interactions to facilitate young children's language skills. | Behavioural | Enhanced Milieu Teaching |
| Parent EducationParents receive information on child developmental milestones. | Behavioural | Community Treatment as Usual |
Primary outcome
Change in Parent use of EMT Strategies during a parent child interaction.
Time frame: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
A parent-child interaction is a brief, repeatable, play-based, observational measure of a child's communicative performance during a 10-minute play period with the parent who agreed to participate in as a research volunteer in the study. It measures the number and percentage of correct of matched turns, expansions, time delays, and milieu teaching episodes during this play period. An increase in the Parent use of EMT strategies is a positive outcome. Metric/ Measurement Unit: Number and percentage of turns parents used EMT Strategies (e.g. matched turns, expansions, time delays, and milieu teaching episodes) during a 10 minute play interaction.
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Productive Vocabulary on the Mac-Arthur Bates Communication Development Inventory (MCDI) score after 3-4 months of intervention
Time frame: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Change in Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers- Early Communication Indicator (IGDI-ECI) score through 3-4 months of intervention
Time frame: Once per month of intervention through study completion (3-4 months of intervention)
Change in Preschool-Language Scales - 5th edition (PLS-5)
Time frame: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Change in number of Different Words on Structured Language Sample
Time frame: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Language Impairment
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Enrolling by invitation
Brain Stimulation Paired With Structured Reading Instruction in Children With Dyslexia
Dyslexia, Reading Disability
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Recruiting
Personalization of Visual Characters and Text-to-Speech (TTS) to Support Learning in Students With Reading Difficulties
Developmental Dyslexia, Reading Problem
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Virtually Simulated Intervention for Patients Having Stuttering
Stuttering
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emily D Quinn, Ph.D principal investigator
Oregon Health and Science University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced Milieu Teaching and Parent Education in people with Language Impairment, run by Oregon Health and Science University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Parent use of EMT Strategies during a parent child interaction. (time frame: 1 pre-intervention assessment (start of study) and 1 post intervention assessment through study completion (3-4 months later).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2022.