Neck PainNCT04605510
Acute Effect of Passive Joint Mobilization in Non-Specific Neck Pain
A study testing Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization in people with Neck Pain, run by Mücahit ÖZTOP at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aim of present study is investigating the acute effects of passive joint mobilization on pain perception and range of motion. Study protocol includes passive joint mobilization application to study group with neck pain and blood sample collection of study and healthy control group. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 53 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 23 May 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- For Intervention Group;
- Having neck pain lasting more than 30 days and being diagnosed with non-specific neck pain
- Having obtained 14/50 points and above in Neck Disability Index
- Expressing neck pain at least 34/100 points and above on a Visual Analog Scale
- Being 20-45 years old and female
- For Healthy Control Group;
- Healthy volunteers without a chronic illness and musculoskeletal pain
Who cannot join
- Congenital anomalies
- Previously diagnosed orthopedic diseases related to the spine
- Pregnancy and having just given birth
- Within the last 3 months; use of corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, or immunosuppressants
- Liver or kidney failure
- Acute or chronic infections (including HIV)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Serious pathologies (such as cancer, spondylolisthesis, rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis)
- Symptoms of cervical spinal stenosis (such as incoordination of hands, arms and legs, bowel and bladder incontinence)
- Radix compression (such as sensory changes, muscle weakness or decreased reflexes)
- Whiplash or a history of cervical surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Pamukkale University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
Denizli, 20000
About this study
Official title: Acute Effect of Passive Joint Mobilization on Joint Motion And Pain Perception in Non-Specific Neck Pain
Aim of present study is investigating the acute effects of passive joint mobilization on pain perception and range of motion. Study protocol includes passive joint mobilization application to study group with neck pain and blood sample collection of study and healthy control group.
Read the detailed description
Our purpose of planning this study is to examine the acute effect of passive joint mobilization application on pain perception and range of motion in women with non-specific neck pain.
The hypotheses we will test for this purpose;
H1- Passive joint mobilization application increases the range of motion of the cervical joint in women with non-specific neck pain.
H2- Passive joint mobilization application increases the pressure pain threshold in women with non-specific neck pain.
H3- Passive joint mobilization increases serum Orexin A and Neurotensin levels in women with non-specific neck pain.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization
- Keywords
- non-specific neck pain, passive joint mobilization, blood markers, neck range of motion
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Passive Cervical Joint MobilizationOther
Also called Maitland Mobilization
It will be applied to the cervical spine, whose dysfunction is detected as a result of the evaluation. The participant will be in the prone position and Grade 3 Central Posterior-Anterior (CPA) passive joint mobilization with Maitland method will be applied for 3 sets, 30 seconds, to the segment to be treated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | 24 female participants with non-specific neck pain included in the mobilization group will undergo detailed manual cervical examination. In the evaluation, the most painful segment with dysfunction will be selected and mobilization application and algometric measurements will be performed on this segment. Grade 3 Central Posterior-Anterior (CPA) passive joint mobilization with Maitland method will be applied in 3 sets, 30 seconds, to the segment with the detected dysfunction. Receives: Other: Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization |
| Healthy Control Group | No intervention | Healthy volunteer participants included in the control group will only be applied an evaluation protocol and blood samples will be taken without any application. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cervical Range of Motion
Cervical Range of Motion will be assessed by Baselşne Bubble Inclinometer as degree of flexion-extension, rotation and lateral flexion and will be recorded.
Measured: Cervical Range of Motion assessment will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Pain Pressure Threshold
Pressure Pain Threshold will be measured with the JTech Commander Algometer at the level of the right and left zygapophyseal joint of the dysfunctional cervical segment detected during physical examination. During the evaluation, the participants will be asked to lie in a prone position. By placing the probe of the algometer vertically on the skin, the pressure applied will be gradually increased and the participant will be asked to report at the first moment of pain. The measurement will be made once and the result will be recorded in kilograms.
Measured: Pain Pressure Threshold assessment will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Neuropeptide Measurement
Neuropeptide Measurement will be performed as a result of evaluating the blood samples taken from the participants with the appropriate ELISA kits. Orexin A and Neurotensin levels are planned to be evaluated with Human Orexin A (Competitive EIA) ELISA Kit and Human NTS / NT / Neurotensin (Competitive EIA) ELISA Kit which are specific for these neuropeptides.
Measured: Blood Sample Collection for Neuropeptide Measurement will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pain Intensity Measurement
Pain intensity will be evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale. The Visual Analogue Scale is a horizontal scale in the range of 0-100 mm, where 0 is the lowest pain and 100 the highest pain. The patient will be asked to mark the pain felt in the neck area on this line and the point marked will be measured with a ruler and recorded in mm.
Measured: Pain Intensity Measurement will take maximum of 1 minute.
Neck Disability
Neck Disability will be measured by Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a frequently used scale to evaluate the level of disability due to neck pain. It consists of 10 items and 6 options under each item. Options are scored between 0-5 points. An increasing score indicates a higher level of disability. The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 50. 14 points are used as cut-off points for the minimal level of disability.
Measured: Neck Disability measurement will take maximum of 1 minute.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion20 Jul 2021
- Study completion23 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study includes two groups. Intervention group including women with non-specific neck pain will applied cervical passive joint mobilization and assessment protocol. Control group including healthy women without pain will applied only assessment protocol.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mücahit ÖZTOP
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pamukkale University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Mücahit ÖZTOP, Pamukkale University
- Investigators
- Nesrin YAĞCI, Professor, Study director, Pamukkale University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04605510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 60116787-020/46072
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 25 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Plaza-Manzano G, Molina-Ortega F, Lomas-Vega R, Martinez-Amat A, Achalandabaso A, Hita-Contreras F. Changes in biochemical markers of pain perception and stress response after spinal manipulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;44(4):231-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4996. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
PubMed 24450367Molina-Ortega F, Lomas-Vega R, Hita-Contreras F, Plaza Manzano G, Achalandabaso A, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Martinez-Amat A. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on nitric oxide, substance P and pain perception. Man Ther. 2014 Oct;19(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
PubMed 24674816Lohman EB, Pacheco GR, Gharibvand L, Daher N, Devore K, Bains G, AlAmeri M, Berk LS. The immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation on pain and biochemical markers in females with acute non-specific mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):186-196. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1553696. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
PubMed 30935335Maitland GD. Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation. Seventh Ed. (Hengeveld E, Banks K, eds.). Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2013. https://www.elsevier.com/books/maitlands-vertebral-manipulation/hengeveld/978-0-7020-4066-5.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Effect of Passive Joint Mobilization on Joint Motion And Pain Perception in Non-Specific Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04605510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 60116787-020/46072
- Conditions
- Neck Pain
- Keywords
- non-specific neck pain, passive joint mobilization, blood markers, neck range of motion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 53 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mücahit ÖZTOPUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pamukkale University
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of present study is investigating the acute effects of passive joint mobilization on pain perception and range of motion. Study protocol includes passive joint mobilization application to study group with neck pain and blood sample collection of study and healthy control group.
Detailed description
Our purpose of planning this study is to examine the acute effect of passive joint mobilization application on pain perception and range of motion in women with non-specific neck pain.
The hypotheses we will test for this purpose;
H1- Passive joint mobilization application increases the range of motion of the cervical joint in women with non-specific neck pain.
H2- Passive joint mobilization application increases the pressure pain threshold in women with non-specific neck pain.
H3- Passive joint mobilization increases serum Orexin A and Neurotensin levels in women with non-specific neck pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study includes two groups. Intervention group including women with non-specific neck pain will applied cervical passive joint mobilization and assessment protocol. Control group including healthy women without pain will applied only assessment protocol.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization24 female participants with non-specific neck pain included in the mobilization group will undergo detailed manual cervical examination. In the evaluation, the most painful segment with dysfunction will be selected and mobilization application and algometric measurements will be performed on this segment. Grade 3 Central Posterior-Anterior (CPA) passive joint mobilization with Maitland method will be applied in 3 sets, 30 seconds, to the segment with the detected dysfunction. |
| Healthy Control Group | No intervention | –Healthy volunteer participants included in the control group will only be applied an evaluation protocol and blood samples will be taken without any application. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- For Intervention Group;
- Having neck pain lasting more than 30 days and being diagnosed with non-specific neck pain
- Having obtained 14/50 points and above in Neck Disability Index
- Expressing neck pain at least 34/100 points and above on a Visual Analog Scale
- Being 20-45 years old and female
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Congenital anomalies
- Previously diagnosed orthopedic diseases related to the spine
- Pregnancy and having just given birth
- Within the last 3 months; use of corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, or immunosuppressants
- Liver or kidney failure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Passive Cervical Joint MobilizationAlso: Maitland MobilizationIt will be applied to the cervical spine, whose dysfunction is detected as a result of the evaluation. The participant will be in the prone position and Grade 3 Central Posterior-Anterior (CPA) passive joint mobilization with Maitland method will be applied for 3 sets, 30 seconds, to the segment to be treated. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Cervical Range of Motion
Time frame: Cervical Range of Motion assessment will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Cervical Range of Motion will be assessed by Baselşne Bubble Inclinometer as degree of flexion-extension, rotation and lateral flexion and will be recorded.
Pain Pressure Threshold
Time frame: Pain Pressure Threshold assessment will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Pressure Pain Threshold will be measured with the JTech Commander Algometer at the level of the right and left zygapophyseal joint of the dysfunctional cervical segment detected during physical examination. During the evaluation, the participants will be asked to lie in a prone position. By placing the probe of the algometer vertically on the skin, the pressure applied will be gradually increased and the participant will be asked to report at the first moment of pain. The measurement will be made once and the result will be recorded in kilograms.
Neuropeptide Measurement
Time frame: Blood Sample Collection for Neuropeptide Measurement will take maximum of 5 minutes.
Neuropeptide Measurement will be performed as a result of evaluating the blood samples taken from the participants with the appropriate ELISA kits. Orexin A and Neurotensin levels are planned to be evaluated with Human Orexin A (Competitive EIA) ELISA Kit and Human NTS / NT / Neurotensin (Competitive EIA) ELISA Kit which are specific for these neuropeptides.
2 secondary outcomes
Pain Intensity Measurement
Time frame: Pain Intensity Measurement will take maximum of 1 minute.
Neck Disability
Time frame: Neck Disability measurement will take maximum of 1 minute.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2022.
- Background: PubMed 24450367Plaza-Manzano G, Molina-Ortega F, Lomas-Vega R, Martinez-Amat A, Achalandabaso A, Hita-Contreras F. Changes in biochemical markers of pain perception and stress response after spinal manipulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;44(4):231-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4996. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 24674816Molina-Ortega F, Lomas-Vega R, Hita-Contreras F, Plaza Manzano G, Achalandabaso A, Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Martinez-Amat A. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on nitric oxide, substance P and pain perception. Man Ther. 2014 Oct;19(5):411-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 30935335Lohman EB, Pacheco GR, Gharibvand L, Daher N, Devore K, Bains G, AlAmeri M, Berk LS. The immediate effects of cervical spine manipulation on pain and biochemical markers in females with acute non-specific mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2019 Sep;27(4):186-196. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1553696. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
- BackgroundMaitland GD. Maitland's Vertebral Manipulation. Seventh Ed. (Hengeveld E, Banks K, eds.). Edinburgh; New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2013. https://www.elsevier.com/books/maitlands-vertebral-manipulation/hengeveld/978-0-7020-4066-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nesrin YAĞCI, Professor study director
Pamukkale University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Passive Cervical Joint Mobilization in people with Neck Pain, run by Mücahit ÖZTOP at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cervical Range of Motion (time frame: Cervical Range of Motion assessment will take maximum of 5 minutes.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04605510, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.