AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental HealthNCT04608578

Evaluation of a Serious Game Aimed at Improving Mental Health in Youth.

A study testing Silver in people with Mental Health, run by University Ghent at 14 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a serious game aimed at improving mental health in teenagers aged 12-16 years old. This will test the effectiveness by studying the effect on emotion regulation strategies, coping strategies, the presence of cognitive errors and suicidal ideation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mental Health
What is being tested?
Silver
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,000 participants
Where
14 sitesBelgium
Study dates
26 Oct 2020to 15 Mar 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Dutch speaking
  • having access to a smartphone or tablet

Who cannot join

  • not being part of the selected classes in the participating schools

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 1 country.

14 sites in 1 country

Belgium14 sites
  • De!Kunsthumaniora

    Antwerp

  • KA Beveren

    Beveren

  • VTI Brugge

    Bruges

  • GO! Atheneum Denderleeuw

    Denderleeuw

  • Kunsthumaniora Sint-Lucas

    Ghent

  • Humaniora Kindsheid Jesu

    Hasselt

  • Middenschool Kindsheid Jesu

    Hasselt

  • GO! Atheneum Heist

    Heist-op-den-Berg

  • RHIZO Hotelschool

    Kortrijk

  • RHIZO Lyceum OLV Vlaanderen

    Kortrijk

  • GO! Campus Redingenhof Leuven

    Leuven

  • GO! Atheneum Ninove

    Ninove

  • De Burgerschool

    Roeselare

  • PITO Stabroek

    Stabroek

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a serious game aimed at improving mental health in teenagers aged 12-16 years old. This will test the effectiveness by studying the effect on emotion regulation strategies, coping strategies, the presence of cognitive errors and suicidal ideation. Participants will also be asked to evaluate the game. The study is a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in secondary schools in Flanders.

Conditions
Mental Health
Being tested
Silver
Keywords
Suicide Prevention, Universal Suicide Prevention, Serious Game
Medical subject headings
Psychological Well-Being, Suicide Prevention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SilverBehavioural

    A serious game to improve mental health in youth

Study groups in NCT04608578
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalThe intervention group gain access to the game after filling in the baseline online questionnaire. The participants are asked to play at least two characters in the game. They have two weeks to play the game.
Receives: Behavioral: Silver
Control groupNo interventionWaitlist control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Dutch version of the Questionnaire for the assessment of emotion regulation in children and adolescents (FEEL-KJ)

    A 90-item self-report instrument measuring seven adaptive, five maladaptive, and three external emotion (sadness, anger, and anxiety) regulation strategies. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = almost never to 5 = almost always. The score on the adaptive (ranging from 42-210), maladaptive (ranging from 30-150) and external (ranging from 18-90) subscales are considered. The higher the score on a subscale, the greater the disposition to cope with negative emotions in a certain way.

    Measured: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Children's Coping Strategies Checklist -Revision 1 (CCSC-R1)

    3 subscales on cognitive coping strategies (i.e., optimism, control, and seeking understanding) are used. Each subscale has 4 items and all items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = never to 4 = most of the time. For each subscale the minimum total score is 4 and the maximum score 16. The higher the mean score on the subscale, the more often the cognitive coping strategy is used.

    Measured: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)

  2. Children's Negative Cognitive Error Questionnaire-Revised (CNCEQ-R)

    The scale assess cognitive Errors and has 5 subscales and 16 items in total. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = not at all like I would think to 5 = almost exactly like I would think. Total scores range from 16-80. Higher scores reflect more distorted cognitive processes.

    Measured: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)

  3. 2 subscales of the EMO-check kids

    Two subscales of the EMO-Check kids are used i.e., Emotional clearness and Understanding emotions. They measure strategies to cope with emotions on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 = not at all to 4 = (almost) always. The score on a subscale ranges from 0 to 12. Higher score indicate more use a certain emotion regulation strategy.

    Measured: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)

  4. Children's Depression Inventory, version 2 (CDI-2)

    A 28-item self-report scale measuring depressive symptoms experienced over the previous 2 weeks. Items are score on a scale from 0 to 2. Total scores range from 0 to 56. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptomatology.

    Measured: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Oct 2020
  2. Study start26 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
3,000 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04608578
Sponsor's protocol ID
BC - 07288
Status last verified
Dec 2021
First submitted
24 Oct 2020
Last updated
10 Dec 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Silver in people with Mental Health, run by University Ghent at 14 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Dutch version of the Questionnaire for the assessment of emotion regulation in children and adolescents (FEEL-KJ) (time frame: Baseline and posttest (after 2 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in