AzTrials
AzTrials

Aspiration ProphylaxisNCT04609124

Effect of Intravenous Metochlopramide Prophylaxis on Gastric Volume

An observational study of Aspiration Prophylaxis, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gastric fluid volume and pH in patients undergoing cesarean section are essential considerations for general anesthesia (GA). Increased gastric volume and low pH of gastric contents could predispose the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 22 to 38 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aspiration Prophylaxis
What is being tested?
Abdominal ultrasound evaluation of antral area
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
111 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
24 Oct 2021to 30 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 22 to 38 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: pregnant females

Who may be able to join

  • pregnant women belonging to the age range between 22 to 38 years and who provided informed consent to participate.

Who cannot join

  • a neurological and psychological disorders
  • renal or hepatic diseases
  • chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases
  • refusal to consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Assiut University Hospitals

    Asyut, 71515

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: the Effect of Intravenous Metochlopramide Prophylaxis on Gastric Volume and Antral Cross Sectional Area in Patients Awaiting for Caesarean Section :a Randomized Double Blind Study.

Gastric fluid volume and pH in patients undergoing cesarean section are essential considerations for general anesthesia (GA). Increased gastric volume and low pH of gastric contents could predispose the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. The present study explored the research question "whether prophylaxis with intravenous metoclopramide significantly reduces gastric volume and antral cross-sectional area in patients awaiting cesarean section under GA

Read the detailed description

Since regional anaesthesia has largely replaced general anaesthesia, the risk of aspiration pneumonitis during caesarean sections has significantly decreased. Nevertheless, prophylaxis against gastric aspiration is still important in patients in whom regional anaesthesia is contraindicated or in whom general anaesthesia has to be administered (for example; during emergency caesarean delivery). The administration of intravenous anaesthetics reduces the level of consciousness of a patient that compromises the protective reflexes of the upper airways. Moreover, a high level of sedation also reduces the tone of the LES (lower oesophageal sphincter). Both these situations predispose the risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients awaiting surgical interventions in supine position under general anaesthesia.

The risk of aspiration increases in outpatients if the volume of the gastric contents increases beyond 25 ml and its pH falls below 2.5. However, the risk of aspiration significantly decreases in "fasted" outpatients. Since most patients awaiting elective surgery remains fasted, routine prophylaxis for preventing aspiration pneumonitis is not recommended anymore.

the administration of intravenous metoclopramide and cimetidine across patients (n=20) awaiting laparoscopic gynaecological surgery significantly increased the pH of the gastric contents in the intervention group compared to their control counterparts (6.1 versus 2.7, p<0.05). The mean aspirated volumes were also significantly lower in the intervention group compared to their age-matched controls (6.9ml versus 15.3ml, p<0.05). Hong (2006) further showed that the percentage of individuals with high-risk gastric volume (>25 ml) and low pH (<2.5) was higher in individuals who did not receive intravenous metoclopramide and cimetidine prior to surgery compared to their counterparts who received such interventions (20% versus 5%, p<0.05) .

Being tested
Abdominal ultrasound evaluation of antral area
Keywords
metoclopramide, cesarean section, ultrasound, gastric volume

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Abdominal ultrasound evaluation of antral areaDiagnostic test

    Also called Nausea and vomiting episodes

    ultrasound assessment of antral cross sectional area

Study groups in NCT04609124
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention group:Patients (n=35) fasting for 8 hours and received 10 mg metoclopramide intravenously diluted in 10 mL saline 0.9%.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Abdominal ultrasound evaluation of antral area
Control group:Patients (n=35) fasting for 8 hours and received intravenous 10 mL saline 0.9% as placebo
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Abdominal ultrasound evaluation of antral area

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. effect of S intravenous metoclopramide prophylaxis on gastric volume

    antral cross section will be measured using ultrasound machine before and after metoclopramide injection

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2020
  2. Study start24 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
111 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04609124
Sponsor's protocol ID
DASH1001
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
3 Sep 2020
Last updated
8 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: only the outcome of the study no personal identity will be revealed

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aspiration Prophylaxis, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

effect of S intravenous metoclopramide prophylaxis on gastric volume (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in