Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationADVENTNCT04612244
The FARAPULSE ADVENT PIVOTAL Trial PFA System vs SOC Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System and RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation in people with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 34 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, adaptive, multi-center, randomized safety and effectiveness pivotal study comparing the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System with standard of care ablation with force-sensing RF catheters and cryoballoon catheters indicated for the treatment of PAF. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System and RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 706 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 15 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any one of the following exclusion criteria:
- 1. AF that is any of the following:
- <!-- -->
- Persistent (both early and longstanding) by diagnosis or continuous duration > 7 days
- Requires four (4) or more direct-current cardioversions in the preceding 12 months
- Secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, alcohol or other reversible / non-cardiac causes
Show all 78Show fewer
- 2. Any of the following atrial conditions:
- Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm (by MRI, CT or TTE)
- Any prior atrial endocardial or epicardial ablation procedure, other than right sided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation or for right sided SVT
- Any prior atrial surgery
- Intra-atrial septal patch or interatrial shunt
- Atrial myxoma
- Current LA thrombus
- LA appendage closure, device or occlusion, past or anticipated
- Any PV abnormality, stenosis or stenting (common and middle PVs are admissible)
- 3. At any time, one (1) or more of the following cardiovascular procedures, implants or conditions:
- Sustained ventricular tachycardia or any ventricular fibrillation
- Hemodynamically significant valvular disease:
- Valvular disease that is symptomatic
- Valvular disease causing or exacerbating congestive heart failure
- Aortic stenosis: if already characterized, valve area < 1.5cm or gradient > 20 mm Hg
- Mitral stenosis: if already characterized, valve area < 1.5cm or gradient > 5 mm Hg
- Aortic or mitral regurgitation associated with abnormal LV function or hemodynamic measurements
- Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- Any prosthetic heart valve, ring or repair including balloon aortic valvuloplasty
- Pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices
- Any inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, known inability to obtain vascular access or other contraindication to femoral access
- History of rheumatic fever
- History of congenital heart disease with any residual anatomic or conduction abnormality
- 4. Any of the following procedures, implants or conditions:
- At baseline:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%
- Symptomatic hypotension
- Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP > 160 mmHg or DBP > 95 mmHg on two BP measurements at baseline assessment)
- Symptomatic resting bradycardia
- Implantable loop recorder or insertable cardiac monitor,
- Within the 3 months preceding the Consent Date:
- Myocardial infarction
- Unstable angina
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Heart failure hospitalization
- Treatment with amiodarone
- Pericarditis or symptomatic pericardial effusion
- Gastrointestinal bleeding
- Within the 6 months preceding the Consent Date:
- Heart surgery
- Stroke, TIA or intracranial bleeding
- Any thromboembolic event
- Carotid stenting or endarterectomy
- 5. Diagnosed disorder of blood clotting or bleeding diathesis
- 6. Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systemic anticoagulation
- 7. Patient who is not on anticoagulation therapy for at least 3 weeks prior to the ablation procedure
- 8. Contraindication to both CT and MRI
- 9. Sensitivity to contrast media not controllable by premedication
- 10. Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating, not using medical birth control or who are planning to become pregnant during the anticipated study period
- 11. Medical conditions that would prevent participation in the study, interfere with assessment or therapy, significantly raise the risk of study participation, or modify outcome data or its interpretation, including but not limited to:
- Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40.0
- Solid organ or hematologic transplant, or currently being evaluated for an organ transplant
- Severe lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, or any lung disease involving abnormal blood gases or requiring supplemental oxygen
- Renal insufficiency with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or any history of renal dialysis or renal transplant
- Active malignancy or history of treated malignancy within 24 months of enrollment (other than cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma)
- Clinically significant gastrointestinal problems involving the esophagus or stomach including severe or erosive esophagitis, uncontrolled gastric reflux, gastroparesis, esophageal candidiasis or active gastroduodenal ulceration
- Active systemic infection
- COVID-19 disease
- Current confirmed, active COVID-19 disease
- Current positive test for SARS-CoV-2
- Confirmed COVID-19 disease not clinically resolved at least 3 months prior to the Consent Date.
- Other uncontrolled medical conditions that may modify device effect or increase risk, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HgbA1c > 8.0% if test result already obtained) or active alcohol abuse
- Sleep apnea and:
- An apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15, or
- An AHI of ≥ 5 and ≤14 with documented symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness, impaired cognition, mood disorders or insomnia, or documented hypertension, ischemic heart disease or history of stroke, unless compliant with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment.
- Predicted life expectancy less than one (1) year
- 12. Clinically significant psychological condition that in the Investigator's opinion would prohibit the subject's ability to meet the protocol requirements
- 13. Current or anticipated enrollment in any other randomized, interventional or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-regulated clinical study (data collection for registries or retrospective studies is permitted)
- 14. Employees / family members of:
- FARAPULSE or any of its affiliates or contractors
- The Investigator, sub-Investigators, or their medical office or practice, or healthcare organizations at which study procedures may be performed
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 1 country.
34 sites in 1 country
United States34 sites
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
St Davids_Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Austin, Texas, 78705
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Grandview Medical Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35243
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
St Luke's Regional Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83712
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Trident Medical Center
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Doylestown Hospital
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Hackensack University Medical Center/Hackensack Meridian Health
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla
La Jolla, California, 92037
Catholic Medical Center
Manchester, New Hampshire, 03102
Saint Thomas Heart at Baptist Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, 37205
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
NYU Langone Health_Heart Rhythm Center
New York, New York, 10016
Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Northwell Health- Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, 10075
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Northwest, Washington, 20010
Nebraska Methodist Health system, Inc
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Banner University Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Providence St Vincent Medical Center, Heart and Vascular Clinical Trials
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Virginia Commonwealth University Health System
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
California Pacific Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94109
University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
San Francisco, California, 94143
HonorHealth Scottsdale Shea
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Swedish Medical Center Heart & Vascular Research
Seattle, Washington, 98122
UPMC Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute Inc.
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17105
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Randomized Pivotal Trial of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Compared With Standard of Care Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
This is a prospective, adaptive, multi-center, randomized safety and effectiveness pivotal study comparing the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System with standard of care ablation with force-sensing RF catheters and cryoballoon catheters indicated for the treatment of PAF.
- Conditions
- Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System, RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation SystemDevice
Ablation using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System
RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon AblationDevice
Contact Force Enabled RF and Cryoballoon ablation catheters indicated for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System |
| Force Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoballoon Ablation | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite Safety Endpoint;Proportion of MITT Subjects With One or More of the Specified Device or Procedure Related SAEs
Proportion of Intent to Treat subjects with one or more of the specified device or procedure related SAEs
Measured: 7 days and 12 Months
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Treatment Success: The primary effectiveness endpoint is Treatment Success in MITT Subjects, defined as:
- Acute Procedural Success AND
- Chronic Success, defined as freedom from:
- At the Index / Rescheduled Index Procedure: Use of a non-randomized treatment modality for PVI
- After the Blanking Period:
- Occurrence of any Detectable AF, AFL or AT (excluding CTI-dependent flutter confirmed by EP study) ii. Any cardioversion for AF, AFL or AT (excluding for CTI-dependent flutter) iii. Use of any Type I or Type III antiarrhythmic medication for the treatment of AF, AFL or AT
- At any time:
- Re-ablation for AF, AFL or AT (other than for CTI-dependent flutter) ii. Use of amiodarone, except intra-procedurally to control an arrhythmia Endpoint status will be assessed through the Month 12 Assessment (Day 360 ± 30).
Measured: 12-Months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in PV Cross-sectional Area
Mean change in aggregate PV Cross-Sectional area (cm^2) from baseline to Day 90
Measured: 3 months
Primary Effectiveness Treatment Success Tested for Superiority
The secondary effectiveness endpoint is the same as the primary effectiveness endpoint but will be tested for superiority rather than non-inferiority. The proportion of Pulsed Field Subjects with Treatment Success will be assessed for superiority to the proportion of Thermal Subjects with Treatment Success.
Measured: 12 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Nov 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion15 May 2023
- Study completion15 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Scientific CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 706 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vivek Reddy, MD, Principal investigator, Mt. Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04612244
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS0934
- Acronym
- ADVENT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gerstenfeld EP, Mansour M, Whang W, Venkateswaran R, Harding JD, Ellis CR, Ellenbogen KA, Osorio J, DeLurgio DB, Daccarett M, Mangrum M, McElderry T, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Schneider CW, Sutton BS, Reddy VY. Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field vs Thermal Ablation for Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of ADVENT. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;10(7 Pt 2):1634-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 16.
PubMed 38869507Reddy VY, Mansour M, Calkins H, d'Avila A, Chinitz L, Woods C, Gupta SK, Kim J, Eldadah ZA, Pickett RA, Winterfield J, Su WW, Waks JW, Schneider CW, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Sutton BS, Gerstenfeld EP; ADVENT Investigators. Pulsed Field vs Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmia Burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 2;84(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 18.
PubMed 38864538Patel C, Gerstenfeld EP, Gupta SK, Winterfield J, Woods C, Natale A, Schneider CW, Achyutha AB, Holland SK, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Lehmann JW, Mansour M, Reddy VY. Comparison of cerebral safety after atrial fibrillation using pulsed field and thermal ablation: Results of the neurological assessment subgroup in the ADVENT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Nov;21(11):2103-2109. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 31.
PubMed 38823667Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA, Patel C, Mountantonakis SE, Gibson DN, Harding JD, Ellis CR, Ellenbogen KA, DeLurgio DB, Osorio J, Achyutha AB, Schneider CW, Mugglin AS, Albrecht EM, Stein KM, Lehmann JW, Mansour M; ADVENT Investigators. Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 2;389(18):1660-1671. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307291. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
PubMed 37634148
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Randomized Pivotal Trial of the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System Compared With Standard of Care Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04612244
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADVENT / CS0934
- Conditions
- Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 706 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Scientific CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Nov 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, adaptive, multi-center, randomized safety and effectiveness pivotal study comparing the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System with standard of care ablation with force-sensing RF catheters and cryoballoon catheters indicated for the treatment of PAF.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System | Experimental | Device: FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System |
| Force Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoballoon Ablation | Active comparator | Device: RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (78 listed)
- Patients will be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any one of the following exclusion criteria:
- <!-- -->
- Left atrial anteroposterior diameter ≥ 5.5 cm (by MRI, CT or TTE)
- Any prior atrial endocardial or epicardial ablation procedure, other than right sided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation or for right sided SVT
- Any prior atrial surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation SystemAblation using the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System | Device | FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System |
| RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon AblationContact Force Enabled RF and Cryoballoon ablation catheters indicated for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Device | Force Sensing Radiofrequency Ablation and Cryoballoon Ablation |
Primary outcome
Composite Safety Endpoint;Proportion of MITT Subjects With One or More of the Specified Device or Procedure Related SAEs
Time frame: 7 days and 12 Months
Proportion of Intent to Treat subjects with one or more of the specified device or procedure related SAEs
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time frame: 12-Months
Treatment Success: The primary effectiveness endpoint is Treatment Success in MITT Subjects, defined as: 1. Acute Procedural Success AND 2. Chronic Success, defined as freedom from: 1. At the Index / Rescheduled Index Procedure: Use of a non-randomized treatment modality for PVI 2. After the Blanking Period: i. Occurrence of any Detectable AF, AFL or AT (excluding CTI-dependent flutter confirmed by EP study) ii. Any cardioversion for AF, AFL or AT (excluding for CTI-dependent flutter) iii. Use of any Type I or Type III antiarrhythmic medication for the treatment of AF, AFL or AT c. At any time: i. Re-ablation for AF, AFL or AT (other than for CTI-dependent flutter) ii. Use of amiodarone, except intra-procedurally to control an arrhythmia Endpoint status will be assessed through the Month 12 Assessment (Day 360 ± 30).
2 secondary outcomes
Change in PV Cross-sectional Area
Time frame: 3 months
Primary Effectiveness Treatment Success Tested for Superiority
Time frame: 12 Months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38869507Gerstenfeld EP, Mansour M, Whang W, Venkateswaran R, Harding JD, Ellis CR, Ellenbogen KA, Osorio J, DeLurgio DB, Daccarett M, Mangrum M, McElderry T, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Schneider CW, Sutton BS, Reddy VY. Autonomic Effects of Pulsed Field vs Thermal Ablation for Treating Atrial Fibrillation: Subanalysis of ADVENT. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Jul;10(7 Pt 2):1634-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38864538Reddy VY, Mansour M, Calkins H, d'Avila A, Chinitz L, Woods C, Gupta SK, Kim J, Eldadah ZA, Pickett RA, Winterfield J, Su WW, Waks JW, Schneider CW, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Sutton BS, Gerstenfeld EP; ADVENT Investigators. Pulsed Field vs Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmia Burden. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jul 2;84(1):61-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.001. Epub 2024 May 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38823667Patel C, Gerstenfeld EP, Gupta SK, Winterfield J, Woods C, Natale A, Schneider CW, Achyutha AB, Holland SK, Richards E, Albrecht EM, Lehmann JW, Mansour M, Reddy VY. Comparison of cerebral safety after atrial fibrillation using pulsed field and thermal ablation: Results of the neurological assessment subgroup in the ADVENT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2024 Nov;21(11):2103-2109. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37634148Reddy VY, Gerstenfeld EP, Natale A, Whang W, Cuoco FA, Patel C, Mountantonakis SE, Gibson DN, Harding JD, Ellis CR, Ellenbogen KA, DeLurgio DB, Osorio J, Achyutha AB, Schneider CW, Mugglin AS, Albrecht EM, Stein KM, Lehmann JW, Mansour M; ADVENT Investigators. Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 2;389(18):1660-1671. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307291. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
- Publication of ADVENT results (PubMed)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Active, not recruitingObservational study
THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH®SF Catheters With Ablation Index Study
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Navigation and Imaging System
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruiting
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Repeat Ablation Strategies With Durably Isolated Pulmonary Veins
Ablation Techniques, Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Active, not recruiting
VOLT CE Mark Study
Atrial Arrhythmia, Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vivek Reddy, MD principal investigator
Mt. Sinai
34 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System and RadioFrequency and Cryoballoon Ablation in people with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, run by Boston Scientific Corporation at 34 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 78 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite Safety Endpoint;Proportion of MITT Subjects With One or More of the Specified Device or Procedure Related SAEs (time frame: 7 days and 12 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04612244, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.