Neuromyelitis OpticaPhase 2NCT04614454
High Frequency Impulse Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in NMOSD
A Phase 2 study testing High Frequency Impulse Therapy in people with Neuromyelitis Optica, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine whether self-administered, at-home use of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulating device is an effective, acceptable and feasible method of relief from neuropathic pain among patients with Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuromyelitis Optica
- What is being tested?
- High Frequency Impulse Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jun 2021to 15 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women 18 years of age or older diagnosed with NMOSD per the 2015 NMOSD criteria
- Patients must be positive for the aquaporin-4 antibody in serum.
- Presence of persistent neuropathic pain (>3 months) rated at a level of 4 or higher on the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale
- Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Patients must be on a stable medication regimen that may include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment
- Pain must be localized to a spinal cord lesion
- Patient understands the study regimen, its requirements, risks, and discomforts, and is able and willing to sign an informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Patients who are cognitively or mentally incompetent
- Any of the following: pregnant women, nursing women, women of childbearing potential or their sexual partners who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception (condoms, diaphragm, birth control pills, injections, intrauterine device [IUD], surgical sterilization, subcutaneous implants, abstinence, etc.).
- Use of an investigational agent for pain control concurrently or within the past 30 days
- History of an allergic reaction or previous intolerance to transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation or to latex
- Patients with implantable drug delivery systems, e.g. Medtronic Synchromed.
- Patients with heart stents or metal implants such as pacemakers, automatic defibrillators, cochlear implants, aneurysm clips, vena cava clips and skull plates (Metal implants for orthopedic repair, e.g. pins, clips, plates, cages, joint replacements are allowed)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients with a known history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease within the past six months
- Prior celiac plexus block, or other neurolytic pain control treatment, within 1 month
- Other identified causes of painful parasthesias existing prior to chemotherapy (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, B12 deficiency, AIDS, monoclonal gammopathy, diabetes, heavy metal poisoning amyloidosis, syphilis, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, inherited neuropathy, etc.) that might be responsible for the patient's current neuropathic symptoms
- Skin conditions such as open sores that would prevent proper application of the electrodes
- Patients with an ongoing concomitant central neurologic disorder or history of epilepsy, brain damage, or symptomatic brain metastases
- Other medical or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the investigators might compromise the objectives of the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
The aim of this study is to determine whether self-administered, at-home use of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulating device is an effective, acceptable and feasible method of relief from neuropathic pain among patients with Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).
Read the detailed description
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic relapsing autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that preferentially targets the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to paralysis, blindness and death. NMOSD is a rare disease that affects approximately 4,000-8,000 (8,000 - 15,000) people in the United States, disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females, and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000. Pain is a severely disabling component of the disease with up to 91% of patients reporting central neuropathic pain (CNP) characterized by agonizing burning, shooting or tingling sensation in the face, arms, torso and legs. NMOSD lesions in the spinal cord are characteristically long and destructive, and pain is more prevalent in NMOSD than in most other neurological diseases. Research on the impact of persistent pain on quality of life (QoL) in NMOSD has found that those patients with CNP experience more depression, less enjoyment of life, and more difficulty with ambulation. Currently, there is no standard of care for CNP treatment and off-label use of medications typically used for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are often insufficient. NMOSD is a devastating disease and there remains a high unmet need for effective treatment of CNP.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying intervention that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of ascending (sensory) fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays.
Recently the investigators completed a sham controlled trial using a TENS unit called Scrambler in NMOSD patients showing a meaningful reduction in neuropathic pain compared to controls. The Scrambler device must be operated in an office by a professional technician, thereby limiting its usefulness to the wider NMOSD population. The home TENS device is similar to the Scrambler unit in that it provides non-invasive transcutaneous electrical impulses to reduce pain. It is a small, wearable device that utilizes both high and low frequencies to create a nerve-block effect based on the same gating theory. Because the TENS device for this study is programmable remotely, a controlled trial can be conducted while keeping the patient blinded to the trial arm.
For patients with NMOSD and other conditions that cause pain originating in the central nervous system, non-obtrusive, non-pharmacological devices might prove a viable alternative to pain medications. Pharmaceutical treatments for pain such as opioids have led to addiction and life-style changes with unacceptable side effects. Cost and side effects are concerns with other pharmacologic therapies for pain. In addition, in efforts to control pain, many patients are prescribed multiple medications, and then have to cope with the complexities and hazards of polypharmacy. Most importantly, none of the pharmaceutical treatments for pain in NMOSD have been proven effective in a trial.
If it can be shown among a significant patient cohort that a safe and effective at-home nonpharmacological pain therapy is available for patients with NMOSD, it would be life altering for a great many - not only those with NMOSD, but also with related neuroimmune disorders and other conditions with central neuropathic pain.
The goal of this project is to provide an effective, non-invasive treatment for neuropathic pain in NMOSD that can be safely employed at home. Many NMOSD patients have such chronic pain and/or disability that frequent visits to the clinic for therapy is difficult, if not impossible, in the best of times. Secondly, safe at-home treatments that offer continuous relief of pain (and potentially other co-occurring symptoms) can improve quality of life immensely during this, and likely future times of social distancing, when leaving home is dangerous, especially for a population on lifelong immune suppressants. Also, an at-home therapeutic option will save both time and money for patients.
- Conditions
- Neuromyelitis Optica
- Being tested
- High Frequency Impulse Therapy, High Frequency Impulse Therapy - Sham
- Medical subject headings
- Neuromyelitis Optica
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
High Frequency Impulse TherapyDevice
Also called Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
The home TENS unit device is an at-home transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit in that it provides non-invasive transcutaneous electrical impulses to reduce pain. It is a small, wearable device that utilizes both high and low frequencies to create a nerve-block effect based on the same gating theory.
High Frequency Impulse Therapy - ShamDevice
Also called Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation - Sham
This device looks like the experimental device but does not provide the electrical current.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | Devices will be programmed by our study coordinator to provide a sham signal or the experimental signal. The location of the TENS electrodes will be determined by the location of the pain with the goal of placing the unit at the top of the dermatological level corresponding to the pain. The study coordinator will assist each subject to place the device appropriately. Treatment will be administered for 1 hour per day for 4 weeks. Receives: Device: High Frequency Impulse Therapy |
| Sham arm | Sham comparator | The sham unit looks identical to the experimental unit. There may be a sensation experienced by subjects with the sham device but it does not deliver an electric current as the experimental units. The study coordinator will assist each subject to place the device appropriately. Treatment will be administered for 1 hour per day for 4 weeks. Receives: Device: High Frequency Impulse Therapy - Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pain Score on the Numerical Rating Score (NRS)
The NRS scale is an 11 point scale (0-10) with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst pain to determine the pain level. The result posted here is difference between the NRS at baseline and the NRS at 4 weeks.
Measured: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Secondary outcomes (3)
"Worst" Pain Score on the NRS Scale
The NRS scale is an 11 point scale (0-10) with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst pain to determine the pain level. The result posted here is difference between the worst NRS at baseline and the worst NRS at 4 weeks.
Measured: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Withdrawal From Trial
The number of patients who withdraw because of poor compliance.
Measured: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Quality of Life Survey
SF36 quality of life questionnaire summary score. The SF-36 scale range is from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health and lower scores indicating poorer health across all eight domains measured by the survey; essentially, a score of 0 represents the worst possible health and 100 represents the best possible health.
Measured: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2020
- Study start7 Jun 2021
- Primary completion13 Apr 2022
- Study completion15 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuromyelitis OpticaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment daily for 4 consecutive weeks versus sham, followed by an open-label phase for additional 4 consecutive weeks.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael, Levy M.D.,Ph.D., Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Michael Levy, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04614454
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020P003301
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Vishnevetsky A, Romanow G, Levy M. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for the relief of neuropathic pain in NMOSD: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024 Dec 5;10(4):20552173241301018. doi: 10.1177/20552173241301018. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
PubMed 39651334
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- High Frequency Impulse Therapy for Neuropathic Pain in NMOSD
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04614454
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020P003301
- Conditions
- Neuromyelitis Optica
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Apr 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine whether self-administered, at-home use of a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulating device is an effective, acceptable and feasible method of relief from neuropathic pain among patients with Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).
Detailed description
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a chronic relapsing autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that preferentially targets the optic nerves and spinal cord, leading to paralysis, blindness and death. NMOSD is a rare disease that affects approximately 4,000-8,000 (8,000 - 15,000) people in the United States, disproportionately affects non-Caucasians and females, and has a worldwide prevalence estimated to be 0.52 to 4.4/100,000. Pain is a severely disabling component of the disease with up to 91% of patients reporting central neuropathic pain (CNP) characterized by agonizing burning, shooting or tingling sensation in the face, arms, torso and legs. NMOSD lesions in the spinal cord are characteristically long and destructive, and pain is more prevalent in NMOSD than in most other neurological diseases. Research on the impact of persistent pain on quality of life (QoL) in NMOSD has found that those patients with CNP experience more depression, less enjoyment of life, and more difficulty with ambulation. Currently, there is no standard of care for CNP treatment and off-label use of medications typically used for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are often insufficient. NMOSD is a devastating disease and there remains a high unmet need for effective treatment of CNP.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) therapy is a non-invasive pain modifying intervention that utilizes transcutaneous electrical stimulation of ascending (sensory) fibers with the intent of re-organizing maladaptive signaling pathways. This neuromodulatory therapy has been investigated for treatment of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain in several conditions including chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia and post-surgical neuropathic pain with promising results. Patients report sustained relief after undergoing daily treatment sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays.
Recently the investigators completed a sham controlled trial using a TENS unit called Scrambler in NMOSD patients showing a meaningful reduction in neuropathic pain compared to controls. The Scrambler device must be operated in an office by a professional technician, thereby limiting its usefulness to the wider NMOSD population. The home TENS device is similar to the Scrambler unit in that it provides non-invasive transcutaneous electrical impulses to reduce pain. It is a small, wearable device that utilizes both high and low frequencies to create a nerve-block effect based on the same gating theory. Because the TENS device for this study is programmable remotely, a controlled trial can be conducted while keeping the patient blinded to the trial arm.
For patients with NMOSD and other conditions that cause pain originating in the central nervous system, non-obtrusive, non-pharmacological devices might prove a viable alternative to pain medications. Pharmaceutical treatments for pain such as opioids have led to addiction and life-style changes with unacceptable side effects. Cost and side effects are concerns with other pharmacologic therapies for pain. In addition, in efforts to control pain, many patients are prescribed multiple medications, and then have to cope with the complexities and hazards of polypharmacy. Most importantly, none of the pharmaceutical treatments for pain in NMOSD have been proven effective in a trial.
If it can be shown among a significant patient cohort that a safe and effective at-home nonpharmacological pain therapy is available for patients with NMOSD, it would be life altering for a great many - not only those with NMOSD, but also with related neuroimmune disorders and other conditions with central neuropathic pain.
The goal of this project is to provide an effective, non-invasive treatment for neuropathic pain in NMOSD that can be safely employed at home. Many NMOSD patients have such chronic pain and/or disability that frequent visits to the clinic for therapy is difficult, if not impossible, in the best of times. Secondly, safe at-home treatments that offer continuous relief of pain (and potentially other co-occurring symptoms) can improve quality of life immensely during this, and likely future times of social distancing, when leaving home is dangerous, especially for a population on lifelong immune suppressants. Also, an at-home therapeutic option will save both time and money for patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive treatment daily for 4 consecutive weeks versus sham, followed by an open-label phase for additional 4 consecutive weeks.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental arm | Experimental | Device: High Frequency Impulse TherapyDevices will be programmed by our study coordinator to provide a sham signal or the experimental signal. The location of the TENS electrodes will be determined by the location of the pain with the goal of placing the unit at the top of the dermatological level corresponding to the pain. The study coordinator will assist each subject to place the device appropriately. Treatment will be administered for 1 hour per day for 4 weeks. |
| Sham arm | Sham comparator | Device: High Frequency Impulse Therapy - ShamThe sham unit looks identical to the experimental unit. There may be a sensation experienced by subjects with the sham device but it does not deliver an electric current as the experimental units. The study coordinator will assist each subject to place the device appropriately. Treatment will be administered for 1 hour per day for 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Men and women 18 years of age or older diagnosed with NMOSD per the 2015 NMOSD criteria
- Patients must be positive for the aquaporin-4 antibody in serum.
- Presence of persistent neuropathic pain (>3 months) rated at a level of 4 or higher on the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale
- Patients must be stable in their disease, such that they have had no spinal cord relapses within 6 months prior to enrollment
- Patients must be on a stable medication regimen that may include anti-epileptic, antidepressant, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, with no adjustments to the regimen within 30 days of enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients who are cognitively or mentally incompetent
- Any of the following: pregnant women, nursing women, women of childbearing potential or their sexual partners who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception (condoms, diaphragm, birth control pills, injections, intrauterine device [IUD], surgical sterilization, subcutaneous implants, abstinence, etc.).
- Use of an investigational agent for pain control concurrently or within the past 30 days
- History of an allergic reaction or previous intolerance to transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation or to latex
- Patients with implantable drug delivery systems, e.g. Medtronic Synchromed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| High Frequency Impulse TherapyAlso: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationThe home TENS unit device is an at-home transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit in that it provides non-invasive transcutaneous electrical impulses to reduce pain. It is a small, wearable device that utilizes both high and low frequencies to create a nerve-block effect based on the same gating theory. | Device | Experimental arm |
| High Frequency Impulse Therapy - ShamAlso: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation - ShamThis device looks like the experimental device but does not provide the electrical current. | Device | Sham arm |
Primary outcome
Change in Pain Score on the Numerical Rating Score (NRS)
Time frame: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
The NRS scale is an 11 point scale (0-10) with 0 as no pain and 10 as worst pain to determine the pain level. The result posted here is difference between the NRS at baseline and the NRS at 4 weeks.
3 secondary outcomes
"Worst" Pain Score on the NRS Scale
Time frame: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Withdrawal From Trial
Time frame: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Quality of Life Survey
Time frame: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39651334Vishnevetsky A, Romanow G, Levy M. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device for the relief of neuropathic pain in NMOSD: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024 Dec 5;10(4):20552173241301018. doi: 10.1177/20552173241301018. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neuromyelitis Optica
Not yet recruiting
Neurogenetics and Multi-omics of Neuroinflammatory Diseases in Multiplex Families to Improve Patients Health
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
Recruiting
Impact of a Structured Wellness Behavioral Intervention on Quality of Life in NMOSD
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
RecruitingObservational study
Observational Safety Study in Women With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Exposed to UPLIZNA® During Pregnancy
Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder, Pregnancy Related
RecruitingPhase 2
Efgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis
Optic Neuritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Biobank For MS And Other Demyelinating Diseases
Multiple Sclerosis, Transverse Myelitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Levy, MD, PhD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing High Frequency Impulse Therapy in people with Neuromyelitis Optica, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pain Score on the Numerical Rating Score (NRS) (time frame: 4 weeks from baseline to completion of the experimental phase.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04614454, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2025.