AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis CPhase 4NCT04620226

UHN Inpatient Hepatitis C & B Screening

A Phase 4 study testing Quality Improvement in people with Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B, run by Jordan Feld at 2 sites in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Currently, there is a lack of literature on programs evaluating rapid screening methods to traditional venipuncture methods for sample collection during screening for viral hepatitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B
What is being tested?
Quality Improvement
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,920 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
1 Feb 2024to Jul 2025
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 years or older at time of consent
  • Patients admitted to GIMIUs at TGH or TWH

Who cannot join

  • Patients whose end of life is expected to be less than 6 months
  • Patients who are unable or decline to provide informed consent
  • Patients with confirmed, active COVID-19 infections
  • Patients with immediate life-threatening conditions where screening for chronic HCV and HBV infection may delay urgent care

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Toronto General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4

    Bethany Barber

    Recruiting
  • Toronto Western Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8

    Bethany Barber

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Screening for Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B in Inpatients: A Toronto Viral Hepatitis Care Network (VIRCAN) Collaboration

Currently, there is a lack of literature on programs evaluating rapid screening methods to traditional venipuncture methods for sample collection during screening for viral hepatitis. Due to the relatively low diagnosis and linkage to care rate, screening programs that provide same day results for viral hepatitis infection may improve both diagnosis and enable providers to engage patients shortly after diagnosis. This stands in contrast to the multi-visit, weeks long process that normally accompanies serum testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). A few American studies have examined the implementation of HCV inpatient screening programs; however, they are focused specifically on high-risk patient populations, the barriers to accessing care experienced by study participants are not relevant to the Canadian healthcare system context, and do not use rapid testing. Furthermore, there are few, if any, data on HBV inpatient screening programs and the diagnosis rate remains low. This project will provide key data on a rapid inpatient screening and linkage to care strategy as well as the prevalence of these viruses across different age bands within the population. Finally, the study will help determine whether rapid inpatient screening is a feasible and acceptable approach for screening and linkage to care.

Being tested
Quality Improvement
Keywords
Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, Screening, Inpatient, Hospital
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Quality ImprovementOther

    Rapid Point-of-Care testing will provide participants with a HCV antibody and RNA result within 2 hours. If the participant is HCV RNA+, they will receive an inpatient consultation from a liver specialist prior to discharge. We hypothesize that this model will minimize losses in the continuum-of-care and improve linkages to care.

Study groups in NCT04620226
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional Serum TestingNo interventionParticipants will be screened by conventional HCV antibody (anti-HCV) serology and if screen positive, a second sample will be collected and tested for HCV RNA using a standard commercial assay.
Rapid Point-of-Care TestingExperimentalParticipants will be screened using the OraQuick® Rapid Anti-HCV Point-of-Care Test (OraSure) and if screen positive, an additional whole blood sample will be collected and tested for HCV RNA using Xpert® HCV RNA (Cepheid) point-of-care testing and confirmed using a standard commercial assay.
Receives: Other: Quality Improvement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of HCV antibody positive participants who complete an HCV RNA PCR.

    To determine the proportion of HCV antibody positive participants who complete HCV RNA PCR in each arm. Participants will be contacted at 90 days and 1 year post-enrolment to self-report progress.

    Measured: 2 year

  2. Number of HCV RNA positive participants who attend their first hepatology appointment.

    To determine the proportion of HCV RNA positive participants successfully linked to care from each arm. Participants will be contacted at 90 days and 1 year post-enrolment to self-report.

    Measured: 2 year

  3. Number of HCV RNA positive participants who achieve a Sustained Virological Response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after treatment completion.

    To determine the proportion of HCV RNA positive participants who successfully achieved a sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after treatment completion. Participants will be contacted at 90 days and 1 year post-enrolment to self-report.

    Measured: 2 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Number of chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis B infection in the general internal medicine inpatient units.

    Proportion of screened participants who are positive and chronically infected in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Number of patients willing to participate in hepatitis C and hepatitis B screening in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    To determine acceptability of implementing hepatitis C and hepatitis B screening in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Percentage of physicians, residents, and nurses who believe that hepatitis C and hepatitis B screening can be incorporated into the general internal medicine inpatient units' workflow.

    To determine the effect of hepatitis C and hepatitis B screening on hospital staff workflow in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Proportion of Cepheid Xpert® HCV Viral Load test results matching test results from the standard commercial assay for HCV RNA PCR.

    To determine whether results of the Cepheid Xpert® HCV Viral Load assay are valid when compared to the standard commercial assay for HCV RNA PCR.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Retrospective rates of HCV testing, HCV antibody positive results, and HCV RNA positive results in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    To determine the historical rate of HCV screening and chronic HCV infection in general internal medicine inpatient units.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,920 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04620226
Sponsor's protocol ID
UHN Inpatient HCV & HBV Screen
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
1 Oct 2020
Last updated
8 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Quality Improvement in people with Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B, run by Jordan Feld at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Bethany Barber, RN (4163404800 ext. 6569, Bethany.Barber@uhn.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of HCV antibody positive participants who complete an HCV RNA PCR. (time frame: 2 year). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in