Osteogenesis ImperfectaPhase 1/2BOOST2BNCT04623606
Boost to Brittle Bones - Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Brittle Bones
A Phase 1/2 study testing BOOST cells in people with Osteogenesis Imperfecta, run by Christian Medical College, Vellore, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
An exploratory, open label, multiple dose, phase I/II trial (n=15) evaluating safety and efficacy of intravenous and intraosseous infusion of allogeneic expanded fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the treatment of severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) compared with historical and untreated prospective controls. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 8 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
- What is being tested?
- BOOST cells
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 20 May 2019to Dec 2021
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 8 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
(i)Inclusion Criteria Treatment group
- Parent's/legal guardian's signed informed-consent form
- Clinical diagnosis of OI type III or IV AND
- Molecular diagnosis of OI (Glycine substitution in the collagen triple-helix encoding region of either the COL1A1 or COL1A2 gene)
- Age between 1 to 4 years
- BP treatment initiated before inclusion
- Parent/legal guardian over 18 years of age (ii)Inclusion Criteria Prospective Untreated Control Group and Historical Control Group:
- Parent's/legal guardian's signed informed-consent form
- Clinical and molecular diagnosis of OI (Glycine substitution in the collagen triple-helix encoding region of either the COL1A1 or COL1A2 gene)
- Age between 4 to 8 years
- Parent/legal guardian over 18 years of age (iii)Exclusion Criteria Treatment group Prospective and historical control group:
- Existence of other known disorder that might interfere with the treatment (such as severe malformations, congenital heart defect, hypoxic encephalopathy (l-lll), neurological problems, immune deficiencies, muscle diseases, syndromes) diagnosed by clinical examination
- Any contraindication for invasive procedures such as a moderate/severe bleeding tendency or contagious infections
- Abnormal karyotype or other confirmed genetic syndromes
- Oncologic disease
- Inability to comply with the trial protocol and evaluation and follow-up schedule
- Inability to understand the information and to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Christian Medical College
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004
Suhasini Ganesh, M.Pharm, 91-416-2285117, brittlebonekids@cmcvellore.ac.in
Suhasini Ganesh, M Pharm, 91-416-2285117, brittlebonekids@cmcvellore.ac.in
About this study
Official title: Exploratory, Open Label, Multiple Dose, Phase I/II Trial Evaluating Safety, Efficacy of Intravenous and Intraosseous Infusion of Allogeneic Fetal Mesenchymal Stem In Treatment of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta Compared With Historical and Untreated Prospective Controls
An exploratory, open label, multiple dose, phase I/II trial (n=15) evaluating safety and efficacy of intravenous and intraosseous infusion of allogeneic expanded fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the treatment of severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) compared with historical and untreated prospective controls.
- Conditions
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
- Being tested
- BOOST cells
- Keywords
- OI, Brittle bone disease, Hereditary bone fragility
- Medical subject headings
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BOOST cellsBiological
Four doses of expanded human 1st trimester fetal liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective Control (Untreated) and historical controls | No intervention | Subjects eligible for the trial but not willing/able to participate in any of the experimental arms Matched historical controls. Subjects will be identified in historical registries and data will be retrieved from OI database |
| Treatment | Experimental | Administration of four doses of BOOST cells with the first dose between 1-4 years of age and the three additional doses at +4, +8 and +12 months after the first dose. Each dose is 3x10^6 MSC/kg body weight. Receives: Biological: BOOST cells |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety and tolerability measured as seriousness, severity and frequency of treatment related adverse events (AEs)
The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability measured as seriousness, severity and frequency of treatment related adverse events (AEs)/Serious AE (SAE)/Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR)with specific focus on the following:
- Vital signs in conjunction with the MSC infusion
- Transfusion reactions (infusion toxicity, embolism, allergy, infections)
- Immune reaction towards the cells, donor-specific antibodies, graft rejection, Graft versus Host Disease, autoimmunity)
- Tumourigenicity
- Mortality/morbidity
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Secondary outcomes (16)
Number of fractures [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow-up ]
Number of fractures.
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Time (days) to first fracture after each stem cell administration. [ Time Frame: From each dose of stem cells to the time point of the first fracture.
Time (days) to first fracture after each stem cell administration. Number of fractures
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Change in bone-marrow density (g/cm2). [ Time Frame: From baseline to the primary follow-up (From baseline to 16 months follow up)
Change in bone-marrow density (g/cm2).
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Growth (cm). [ Time Frame: From baseline to16 months follow up]
Growth (cm) as assessed by clinician
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Weight (kg). [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up]
Growth (kg) as assessed by clinician.
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Change in clinical status of OI. [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up]
Change in clinical status of OI based on parameters defined under efficacy assessments described in protocol, as assessed by OI clinician.
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Calcium (mg %) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker P-Calcium (mg %)
Measured: From at baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Phosphate (mg %) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker P-Phosphate (mg %)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Albumin (g/dL)
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker P-Albumin (g/dL)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-ALP (IU/L) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker S-ALP (IU/L)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-CTx (mg %) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker S-CTx (mg %)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers fP-PTH (pg/mL)in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker fP-PTH (pg/mL)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers Vitamin D (nmol/L) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker Vitamin D (nmol/L)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers Bone specific S-ALP (μg/L) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker Bone specific S-ALP (μg/L)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-Osteocalcin (ng/mL) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker S-Osteocalcin (ng/mL)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers U-DPD/Krea and U-NTx/Krea (mg %) in blood samples.
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover marker U-DPD/Krea and U-NTx/Krea (mg %)
Measured: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Nov 2020
- Study start20 May 2019
- Primary completionNov 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Osteogenesis ImperfectaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Historical and Untreated prospective control and Treatment group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science and Technology, India, Vinnova, Karolinska Institutet
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vrisha Madhuri, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Investigators
- Vrisha Madhuri, MS Orth, Principal investigator, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04623606
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMCB2B0X
- Acronym
- BOOST2B
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 18 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 10 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploratory, Open Label, Multiple Dose, Phase I/II Trial Evaluating Safety, Efficacy of Intravenous and Intraosseous Infusion of Allogeneic Fetal Mesenchymal Stem In Treatment of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta Compared With Historical and Untreated Prospective Controls
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04623606
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BOOST2B / CMCB2B0X
- Conditions
- Osteogenesis Imperfecta
- Keywords
- OI, Brittle bone disease, Hereditary bone fragility
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Christian Medical College, Vellore, IndiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Science and Technology, India, Vinnova, Karolinska Institutet
- Study start
- 20 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An exploratory, open label, multiple dose, phase I/II trial (n=15) evaluating safety and efficacy of intravenous and intraosseous infusion of allogeneic expanded fetal mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for the treatment of severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) compared with historical and untreated prospective controls.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Historical and Untreated prospective control and Treatment group
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prospective Control (Untreated) and historical controls | No intervention | –Subjects eligible for the trial but not willing/able to participate in any of the experimental arms Matched historical controls. Subjects will be identified in historical registries and data will be retrieved from OI database |
| Treatment | Experimental | Biological: BOOST cellsAdministration of four doses of BOOST cells with the first dose between 1-4 years of age and the three additional doses at +4, +8 and +12 months after the first dose. Each dose is 3x10^6 MSC/kg body weight. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 8 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BOOST cellsFour doses of expanded human 1st trimester fetal liver-derived mesenchymal stem cells. | Biological | Treatment |
Primary outcome
Safety and tolerability measured as seriousness, severity and frequency of treatment related adverse events (AEs)
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability measured as seriousness, severity and frequency of treatment related adverse events (AEs)/Serious AE (SAE)/Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSAR)with specific focus on the following: 1. Vital signs in conjunction with the MSC infusion 2. Transfusion reactions (infusion toxicity, embolism, allergy, infections) 3. Immune reaction towards the cells, donor-specific antibodies, graft rejection, Graft versus Host Disease, autoimmunity) 4. Tumourigenicity 5. Mortality/morbidity
16 secondary outcomes
Number of fractures [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow-up ]
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Time (days) to first fracture after each stem cell administration. [ Time Frame: From each dose of stem cells to the time point of the first fracture.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Change in bone-marrow density (g/cm2). [ Time Frame: From baseline to the primary follow-up (From baseline to 16 months follow up)
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Growth (cm). [ Time Frame: From baseline to16 months follow up]
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Weight (kg). [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up]
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Change in clinical status of OI. [ Time Frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up]
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Calcium (mg %) in blood samples.
Time frame: From at baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Phosphate (mg %) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers P-Albumin (g/dL)
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-ALP (IU/L) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-CTx (mg %) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers fP-PTH (pg/mL)in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers Vitamin D (nmol/L) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers Bone specific S-ALP (μg/L) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers S-Osteocalcin (ng/mL) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Assessment of biochemical bone turnover by analysis of the markers U-DPD/Krea and U-NTx/Krea (mg %) in blood samples.
Time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Nov 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteogenesis Imperfecta
RecruitingPhase 2
Osteogenesis Imperfecta Trial of AGA2115 for ADUlts With COL1A1 and/or COL1A2 GeNetic Variations (IDUN)
Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Cardiopulmonary Outcomes in Osteogenesis Imperfecta: BBD7708
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
GRACE II (General Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Experience With AGN1 LOEP)
Osteoporosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Setrusumab vs Bisphosphonates in Pediatric Subjects With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Setrusumab vs Placebo for Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vrisha Madhuri, MS Orth principal investigator
Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing BOOST cells in people with Osteogenesis Imperfecta, run by Christian Medical College, Vellore, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vrisha Madhuri, MS Orth (91-416-2282172, madhuriwalter@cmcvellore.ac.in), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety and tolerability measured as seriousness, severity and frequency of treatment related adverse events (AEs) (time frame: From baseline to 16 months follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2020.