AzTrials
AzTrials

Airway Complication of AnesthesiaNCT04623645

Ultrasound Guided Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block Compared With Blind Block Technique

A study testing ultrasound technique in people with Airway Complication of Anesthesia, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound guided technique for block of internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve in surgical patient in comparison to blind anatomical technique. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Airway Complication of Anesthesia
What is being tested?
ultrasound technique
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Feb 2021to Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists ( ASA ) physical status I and II.
  • Age between 40-60 years.
  • Modified Mallampati class III-IV .

Who cannot join

  • Local pathology of the neck.
  • Bleeding diathesis.
  • Allergy to local anesthetic agent.
  • Intellectual impairment.
  • Psychiatric disease.
  • Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Alshaymaa Mortada Ali Eltohry, M.B.B.CH contact

+201006485550

alshaymaaali62@gmail.com

sanaa Mohamed El Fawal, professor contact

+201143504178

sana_y_fawal@yahoo.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Alshaymaa Mortada Ali Eltohry

    Alexandria, Please Select An Option, 21500

    Alshaymaa Mortada A Eltohry, 01006485550, alshaymaaali62@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Superior Laryngeal Nerve Block Compared With Blind Block Technique For Awake Fibre-optic Intubation In Suspected Difficult Intubation

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound guided technique for block of internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve in surgical patient in comparison to blind anatomical technique.

Read the detailed description

Airway anesthesia is pivotal for successful awake intubation provided either topically or by nerves blocks. Airway blocks are technically harder to perform with more complications possibilities. However, in experienced hands, they can be useful as they provide better intubating conditions.

Being tested
ultrasound technique
Keywords
Suspected Difficult Intubation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultrasound techniqueDevice

    evaluate the effect of ultrasound guided technique for block of internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve

Study groups in NCT04623645
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ultrasound groupExperimentalpatient using ultrasound technique.probe will be placed over submandibular area, the thyrohoid muscle and thyrohyoid membrane will be identified between greater horn fo hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage , 3 ml of lignocaine will be placed on space between thim and the procedure will repeated on contra lateral side.
Receives: Device: ultrasound technique
anatomical blind groupActive comparatorpatient using anatomical land mark technique, internal branch of superior laryngeal nerve will be blocked slightly anterior to greater horn of hyoid bone . by 3 ml lignocaine . the procdure will be repeated on contra lateral side .
Receives: Device: ultrasound technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. assessment the quality of airway anesthesia

    The Quality of Airway anesthesia will be graded as: 0 = no coughing or gagging in response to intubation, 1 = mild coughing or gagging that will not hinder intubation, 2 = moderate coughing or gagging that will interfere minimally with intubation,3 = severe coughing or gagging that make intubation difficult and 4 = very severe coughing or gagging that will require additional local anesthetic or change in technique to achieve successful intubation.

    Measured: Up to 2 years post baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2020
  2. Study startFeb 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionAug 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04623645
Sponsor's protocol ID
FMASU MS 19/ 2020
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
5 Nov 2020
Last updated
15 Jan 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Manikandan S, Neema PK, Rathod RC. Ultrasound-guided bilateral superior laryngeal nerve block to aid awake endotracheal intubation in a patient with cervical spine disease for emergency surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Sep;38(5):946-8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800523.

    PubMed 20865885
  • Ramkumar V. Preparation of the patient and the airway for awake intubation. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;55(5):442-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.89863.

    PubMed 22174458

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultrasound technique in people with Airway Complication of Anesthesia, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alshaymaa Mortada Ali Eltohry, M.B.B.CH (+201006485550, alshaymaaali62@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

assessment the quality of airway anesthesia (time frame: Up to 2 years post baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04623645, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in