NewbornNCT04625010
The Effectiveness of Two Different Methods Applied During Heel Blood Collection on Pain Level of Healthy Term Newborns
A study testing Swaddling and Maternal holding in people with Newborn and Pain, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study was planned to evaluate the effect of two different non-pharmacologic pain relief methods (swaddling and maternal holding) on healthy term newborn's pain levels during heel stick. Study hypotheses are; Hypothesis 1. Swaddling is effective at relieving pain due to heel stick procedures in newborns. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 4 daysHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Newborn, Pain, Maternal; Procedure
- What is being tested?
- Swaddling and Maternal holding
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 105 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2016to 30 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 4 days
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- full term neonates (38-42 weeks of gestation)
- underwent heel stick blood drawing for routine metabolic screening,
- aged 2 to 4 days
- passed the hearing screening
Who cannot join
- Congenital anomalies
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study was planned to evaluate the effect of two different non-pharmacologic pain relief methods (swaddling and maternal holding) on healthy term newborn's pain levels during heel stick.
Study hypotheses are; Hypothesis 1. Swaddling is effective at relieving pain due to heel stick procedures in newborns. Hypothesis 2. Maternal holding is effective at relieving pain due to heel stick in newborns. Hypothesis 3. Maternal holding is more effective than swaddling at relieving pain due to heel stick in newborns.
Read the detailed description
This study was conducted in the baby's nursery of Bandirma State Hospital, Turkey between March and June 2016. It was designed as a prospective randomized clinical trial that evaluated and experimentally determined the effects of swaddling and maternal holding during heel stick on pain levels in healthy term neonates.
The study comprised all newborns who came to the baby's nursery for a heel stick procedure for routine metabolic screening; the study sample consisted of 105 healthy newborns who matched the case selection criteria and underwent heel stick. The inclusion criteria were as follows: full term neonates (38-42 weeks of gestation) who underwent heel stick blood drawing for routine metabolic screening, were aged 2 to 4 days, and had passed the hearing screening. Babies with congenital anomalies were excluded from the study.
In the power analysis conducted using heel stick literature1,4,9, the sample size required for 80% reliability and α=0.05 was 35 in each group; the total was 105. Neonates were randomized into three groups and 35 babies were evaluated in each group (swaddling [n=35], maternal holding [n=35], control [n=35]) (Figure 1). Numbers from 1-105 were randomly distributed by a computer program to the three groups with no number repetition to determine which child would be allocated to which group.
The study data were obtained using an information form and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).
Information Form: This form contained questions about the sociodemographic characteristics of the neonate and family. It consisted of 20 questions in total comprising personal characteristics information of the families, and sex, delivery method (vaginal or cesarean), gestational age, birth weight, postnatal age (hours after birth) of the neonate and period of procedures.
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale: NIPS was developed by Lawrence et al. (1993)21 to evaluate behavioral and physiologic pain responses of preterm and term infants. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Akdovan (1999)22. In the present study, NIPS was used to evaluate the interventional (procedural) pain level of newborns. The scale consists of five behavioral (facial expressions, crying, wakefulness, arm and leg movements) and a physiologic (breathing) signs; 0-2 points are given to the crying indicator, 0-1 points are given to other indicators, and the total score is between 0 and 7. High scores indicate that the severity of pain is excessive.
Data collection All blood sampling was performed in a quiet nursery room between 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM, 1-2 hours after breastfeeding, the normal time when infants undergo heel stick for routine blood collection for metabolic screening. Blood collection was performed in a standardized manner by the same nurse who has a minimum of 5 years' experience in the performance heel stick and had no conflict of interest. A pediatrician made the clinical decision for heel stick.
Before the procedure, the newborns were kept in a quiet room far away from the cries of other babies. The infants' diapers were changed before procedure. For the heel stick procedure, the antiseptic solution (70% alcohol), heel stick method, heel region for sampling (the outer right side of the ball), needle (21-G needle), and environmental factors such as heat, light, and noise were all standardized. The whole procedure was video-recorded until three minutes after the procedure.
At the beginning of the study, the parents of the newborns were informed about the aim and content of the research, and parental approval was obtained. Neonatal and family demographics were collected using self-report information forms, which included medical history, mother's gestational age, neonatal age, sex, birth weight, duration of sampling, total crying time, processing time, and the time from the start of the first cry to the first crying during the process.
All blood sampling in the study was performed for clinical purposes, such as newborn metabolic screening tests, which were taken on the second to third days following birth. The standard protocol for blood sampling involved swabbing the heel with a small gauze pad with disinfectant, lancing the heel, and then gently squeezing the heel intermittently until the amount of blood required for clinical use was collected.
All procedures performed in the experimental and control groups were video recorded by the researcher from the beginning of the procedure. After the procedure the newborns' pain levels and crying duration were evaluated using the video recordings. Assessment of pain was conducted independently by the investigator and the nurse using NIPS. At the same time, the newborns' total procedural crying time, the duration of the procedure, and the first calming time were recorded. The total crying time of the newborns was measured from the start of crying due to heel stick to the complete cessation of crying. The time of the procedure was measured from the beginning to the end of the heel stick procedure. The calming time was measured from the time of the first cry to the first calming time.
The SPSS (version 19) program was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, rate, min., max.) were used when study data were evaluated. The one-way Anova test was used in the comparison of data of the three groups with normal distribution. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the comparison of data of the three groups with non-normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify the group that caused the difference. Pearson's Chi-square test and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparison of qualitative data. Significance was considered as p<0.05.
- Conditions
- Newborn, Pain, Maternal; Procedure, Needle Stick
- Being tested
- Swaddling, Maternal holding
- Keywords
- Newborn, Pain management, Swaddling, Maternal holding, Heel stick
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Needlestick Injuries, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SwaddlingOther
Also called Group 2
Swaddling is a wrapping procedure in which a baby's arms and legs are comfortable, sometimes only the arms are wrapped inside, and two ends of fabric are crossed on the chest of the baby, generally with thin cotton and soft fabric or a blanket. In the swaddling group, neonates were placed in the supine position on a blanket. In compliance with the newborn anatomic posture, the legs were wrapped in the flexion and abduction position. The arms of the neonates were placed close to their torso with both hands, without restraining limb movements. Swaddling was carried out 1 minute before the heel stich procedure and continued 3 minutes after the procedure. The neonate remained on the examination table during the swaddling procedure. Swaddling was applied not too loose or too tight during the procedure.
Maternal holdingOther
Also called Group 3
Neonates in this group were held in their mothers' lap while their mothers were seated reclining on a comfortable chair. Neonates remained clothed in their mothers' lap during the heel stick procedure, and no breastfeeding was administered during the procedure. Holding was continued for a minimum of 3 minutes during and after the procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 2 (Swaddling group) | Experimental | Swaddling group: Swaddling is a wrapping procedure in which a baby's arms and legs are comfortable, sometimes only the arms are wrapped inside, and two ends of fabric are crossed on the chest of the baby, generally with thin cotton and soft fabric or a blanket. In the swaddling group, neonates were placed in the supine position on a blanket. In compliance with the newborn anatomic posture, the legs were wrapped in the flexion and abduction position. The arms of the neonates were placed close to their torso with both hands, without restraining limb movements. Swaddling was carried out 1 minute before the heel stich procedure and continued 3 minutes after the procedure. The neonate remained on the examination table during the swaddling procedure. Swaddling was applied not too loose or too tight during the procedure. Receives: Other: Swaddling |
| Group 3 (Maternal Holding group) | Experimental | Maternal holding group: Neonates in this group were held in their mothers' lap while their mothers were seated reclining on a comfortable chair. Neonates remained clothed in their mothers' lap during the heel stick procedure, and no breastfeeding was administered during the procedure. Holding was continued for a minimum of 3 minutes during and after the procedure. Receives: Other: Maternal holding |
| Group 1 | No intervention | In the control group, the heel stick procedures were conducted using the standard method and the neonates received no interventions during the procedures. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale)
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale: NIPS was developed by Lawrence et al. (1993)21 to evaluate behavioral and physiologic pain responses of preterm and term infants. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Akdovan (1999)22. In the present study, NIPS was used to evaluate the interventional (procedural) pain level of newborns. The scale consists of five behavioral (facial expressions, crying, wakefulness, arm and leg movements) and a physiologic (breathing) signs; 0-2 points are given to the crying indicator, 0-1 points are given to other indicators, and the total score is between 0 and 7. High scores indicate that the severity of pain is excessive.
Measured: Pain levels of the newborns evaluated during the procedures
Secondary outcomes (2)
Total criying time
The total crying time of the newborns was measured from the start of crying due to heel stick to the complete cessation of crying.
Measured: The time of the procedure was measured from the beginning to the end of the heel stick procedure.
The time to first calming
The calming time was measured from the time of the first cry to the first calming time.
Measured: Procedure (The calming time was measured from the time of the first cry to the first calming time.)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Nov 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2016
- Primary completion1 Jun 2016
- Study completion30 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NewbornStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sevil Inal, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Investigators
- Leyla Erdim, Dr, Principal investigator, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04625010
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IstanbullUC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: I did not find It appropriate to share it.
Publications
Gradin M, Eriksson M, Holmqvist G, Holstein A, Schollin J. Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream. Pediatrics. 2002 Dec;110(6):1053-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.1053.
PubMed 12456899Obeidat HM, Shuriquie MA. Effect of Breast-Feeding and Maternal Holding in Relieving Painful Responses in Full-Term Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):248-54. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000121.
PubMed 26218818Okan F, Ozdil A, Bulbul A, Yapici Z, Nuhoglu A. Analgesic effects of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in procedural pain in healthy term neonates. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2010;30(2):119-28. doi: 10.1179/146532810X12703902516121.
PubMed 20522298Harrison D, Reszel J, Bueno M, Sampson M, Shah VS, Taddio A, Larocque C, Turner L. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 28;10(10):CD011248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011248.pub2.
PubMed 27792244Karakoc A, Turker F. Effects of white noise and holding on pain perception in newborns. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Dec;15(4):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
PubMed 24559599Morrow C, Hidinger A, Wilkinson-Faulk D. Reducing neonatal pain during routine heel lance procedures. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):346-54; quiz 354-6. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181f4fc53.
PubMed 20926970Cong X. Heel stick test for obtaining blood samples in neonates: both swaddling and heel warming may help, but heel warming appears to provide greater pain reduction. Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Oct;18(4):118. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-102048. Epub 2015 Apr 16. No abstract available.
PubMed 25883132
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of Two Different Methods Applied During Heel Blood Collection on Pain Level of Healthy Term Newborns
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04625010
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IstanbullUC
- Conditions
- Newborn, Pain, Maternal; Procedure, Needle Stick
- Keywords
- Newborn, Pain management, Swaddling, Maternal holding, Heel stick
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 105 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University - CerrahpasaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study was planned to evaluate the effect of two different non-pharmacologic pain relief methods (swaddling and maternal holding) on healthy term newborn's pain levels during heel stick.
Study hypotheses are; Hypothesis 1. Swaddling is effective at relieving pain due to heel stick procedures in newborns. Hypothesis 2. Maternal holding is effective at relieving pain due to heel stick in newborns. Hypothesis 3. Maternal holding is more effective than swaddling at relieving pain due to heel stick in newborns.
Detailed description
This study was conducted in the baby's nursery of Bandirma State Hospital, Turkey between March and June 2016. It was designed as a prospective randomized clinical trial that evaluated and experimentally determined the effects of swaddling and maternal holding during heel stick on pain levels in healthy term neonates.
The study comprised all newborns who came to the baby's nursery for a heel stick procedure for routine metabolic screening; the study sample consisted of 105 healthy newborns who matched the case selection criteria and underwent heel stick. The inclusion criteria were as follows: full term neonates (38-42 weeks of gestation) who underwent heel stick blood drawing for routine metabolic screening, were aged 2 to 4 days, and had passed the hearing screening. Babies with congenital anomalies were excluded from the study.
In the power analysis conducted using heel stick literature1,4,9, the sample size required for 80% reliability and α=0.05 was 35 in each group; the total was 105. Neonates were randomized into three groups and 35 babies were evaluated in each group (swaddling [n=35], maternal holding [n=35], control [n=35]) (Figure 1). Numbers from 1-105 were randomly distributed by a computer program to the three groups with no number repetition to determine which child would be allocated to which group.
The study data were obtained using an information form and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).
Information Form: This form contained questions about the sociodemographic characteristics of the neonate and family. It consisted of 20 questions in total comprising personal characteristics information of the families, and sex, delivery method (vaginal or cesarean), gestational age, birth weight, postnatal age (hours after birth) of the neonate and period of procedures.
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale: NIPS was developed by Lawrence et al. (1993)21 to evaluate behavioral and physiologic pain responses of preterm and term infants. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Akdovan (1999)22. In the present study, NIPS was used to evaluate the interventional (procedural) pain level of newborns. The scale consists of five behavioral (facial expressions, crying, wakefulness, arm and leg movements) and a physiologic (breathing) signs; 0-2 points are given to the crying indicator, 0-1 points are given to other indicators, and the total score is between 0 and 7. High scores indicate that the severity of pain is excessive.
Data collection All blood sampling was performed in a quiet nursery room between 09:00 AM and 11:00 AM, 1-2 hours after breastfeeding, the normal time when infants undergo heel stick for routine blood collection for metabolic screening. Blood collection was performed in a standardized manner by the same nurse who has a minimum of 5 years' experience in the performance heel stick and had no conflict of interest. A pediatrician made the clinical decision for heel stick.
Before the procedure, the newborns were kept in a quiet room far away from the cries of other babies. The infants' diapers were changed before procedure. For the heel stick procedure, the antiseptic solution (70% alcohol), heel stick method, heel region for sampling (the outer right side of the ball), needle (21-G needle), and environmental factors such as heat, light, and noise were all standardized. The whole procedure was video-recorded until three minutes after the procedure.
At the beginning of the study, the parents of the newborns were informed about the aim and content of the research, and parental approval was obtained. Neonatal and family demographics were collected using self-report information forms, which included medical history, mother's gestational age, neonatal age, sex, birth weight, duration of sampling, total crying time, processing time, and the time from the start of the first cry to the first crying during the process.
All blood sampling in the study was performed for clinical purposes, such as newborn metabolic screening tests, which were taken on the second to third days following birth. The standard protocol for blood sampling involved swabbing the heel with a small gauze pad with disinfectant, lancing the heel, and then gently squeezing the heel intermittently until the amount of blood required for clinical use was collected.
All procedures performed in the experimental and control groups were video recorded by the researcher from the beginning of the procedure. After the procedure the newborns' pain levels and crying duration were evaluated using the video recordings. Assessment of pain was conducted independently by the investigator and the nurse using NIPS. At the same time, the newborns' total procedural crying time, the duration of the procedure, and the first calming time were recorded. The total crying time of the newborns was measured from the start of crying due to heel stick to the complete cessation of crying. The time of the procedure was measured from the beginning to the end of the heel stick procedure. The calming time was measured from the time of the first cry to the first calming time.
The SPSS (version 19) program was used for statistical analysis. Descriptive statistical methods (mean, standard deviation, median, frequency, rate, min., max.) were used when study data were evaluated. The one-way Anova test was used in the comparison of data of the three groups with normal distribution. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the comparison of data of the three groups with non-normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to identify the group that caused the difference. Pearson's Chi-square test and the Fisher-Freeman-Halton test were used for the comparison of qualitative data. Significance was considered as p<0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Prospective, randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 2 (Swaddling group) | Experimental | Other: SwaddlingSwaddling group: Swaddling is a wrapping procedure in which a baby's arms and legs are comfortable, sometimes only the arms are wrapped inside, and two ends of fabric are crossed on the chest of the baby, generally with thin cotton and soft fabric or a blanket. In the swaddling group, neonates were placed in the supine position on a blanket. In compliance with the newborn anatomic posture, the legs were wrapped in the flexion and abduction position. The arms of the neonates were placed close to their torso with both hands, without restraining limb movements. Swaddling was carried out 1 minute before the heel stich procedure and continued 3 minutes after the procedure. The neonate remained on the examination table during the swaddling procedure. Swaddling was applied not too loose or too tight during the procedure. |
| Group 3 (Maternal Holding group) | Experimental | Other: Maternal holdingMaternal holding group: Neonates in this group were held in their mothers' lap while their mothers were seated reclining on a comfortable chair. Neonates remained clothed in their mothers' lap during the heel stick procedure, and no breastfeeding was administered during the procedure. Holding was continued for a minimum of 3 minutes during and after the procedure. |
| Group 1 | No intervention | –In the control group, the heel stick procedures were conducted using the standard method and the neonates received no interventions during the procedures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 4 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- full term neonates (38-42 weeks of gestation)
- underwent heel stick blood drawing for routine metabolic screening,
- aged 2 to 4 days
- passed the hearing screening
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Congenital anomalies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SwaddlingAlso: Group 2Swaddling is a wrapping procedure in which a baby's arms and legs are comfortable, sometimes only the arms are wrapped inside, and two ends of fabric are crossed on the chest of the baby, generally with thin cotton and soft fabric or a blanket. In the swaddling group, neonates were placed in the supine position on a blanket. In compliance with the newborn anatomic posture, the legs were wrapped in the flexion and abduction position. The arms of the neonates were placed close to their torso with both hands, without restraining limb movements. Swaddling was carried out 1 minute before the heel stich procedure and continued 3 minutes after the procedure. The neonate remained on the examination table during the swaddling procedure. Swaddling was applied not too loose or too tight during the procedure. | Other | Group 2 (Swaddling group) |
| Maternal holdingAlso: Group 3Neonates in this group were held in their mothers' lap while their mothers were seated reclining on a comfortable chair. Neonates remained clothed in their mothers' lap during the heel stick procedure, and no breastfeeding was administered during the procedure. Holding was continued for a minimum of 3 minutes during and after the procedure. | Other | Group 3 (Maternal Holding group) |
Primary outcome
NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale)
Time frame: Pain levels of the newborns evaluated during the procedures
Neonatal Infant Pain Scale: NIPS was developed by Lawrence et al. (1993)21 to evaluate behavioral and physiologic pain responses of preterm and term infants. The scale was adapted to Turkish by Akdovan (1999)22. In the present study, NIPS was used to evaluate the interventional (procedural) pain level of newborns. The scale consists of five behavioral (facial expressions, crying, wakefulness, arm and leg movements) and a physiologic (breathing) signs; 0-2 points are given to the crying indicator, 0-1 points are given to other indicators, and the total score is between 0 and 7. High scores indicate that the severity of pain is excessive.
2 secondary outcomes
Total criying time
Time frame: The time of the procedure was measured from the beginning to the end of the heel stick procedure.
The time to first calming
Time frame: Procedure (The calming time was measured from the time of the first cry to the first calming time.)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 12456899Gradin M, Eriksson M, Holmqvist G, Holstein A, Schollin J. Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream. Pediatrics. 2002 Dec;110(6):1053-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.6.1053.
- Results publication: PubMed 26218818Obeidat HM, Shuriquie MA. Effect of Breast-Feeding and Maternal Holding in Relieving Painful Responses in Full-Term Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Jul-Sep;29(3):248-54. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000121.
- Results publication: PubMed 20522298Okan F, Ozdil A, Bulbul A, Yapici Z, Nuhoglu A. Analgesic effects of skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding in procedural pain in healthy term neonates. Ann Trop Paediatr. 2010;30(2):119-28. doi: 10.1179/146532810X12703902516121.
- Results publication: PubMed 27792244Harrison D, Reszel J, Bueno M, Sampson M, Shah VS, Taddio A, Larocque C, Turner L. Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 28;10(10):CD011248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011248.pub2.
- Results publication: PubMed 24559599Karakoc A, Turker F. Effects of white noise and holding on pain perception in newborns. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Dec;15(4):864-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 20926970Morrow C, Hidinger A, Wilkinson-Faulk D. Reducing neonatal pain during routine heel lance procedures. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):346-54; quiz 354-6. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e3181f4fc53.
- Results publication: PubMed 25883132Cong X. Heel stick test for obtaining blood samples in neonates: both swaddling and heel warming may help, but heel warming appears to provide greater pain reduction. Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Oct;18(4):118. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-102048. Epub 2015 Apr 16. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. I did not find It appropriate to share it.
Related trials for Newborn
RecruitingPhase 1
Imatinib to Increase RUNX1 Activity in Participants With Germline RUNX1 Deficiency
Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome, Familial Platelet Disorder With Predisposition to Myeloid Malignancies
Not yet recruiting
Executive Function Play Opportunities for Children With Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome, Trisomy 21
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
4SCAR-T Therapy Targeting GD2, PSMA and CD276 for Treating Neuroblastoma
Neuroblastoma
RecruitingObservational study
Southeast Asian Brugada Syndrome Cohort
Brugada Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leyla Erdim, Dr principal investigator
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Swaddling and Maternal holding in people with Newborn and Pain, run by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
NIPS (Neonatal Infant Pain Scale) (time frame: Pain levels of the newborns evaluated during the procedures). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04625010, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2020.