AzTrials
AzTrials

Social Determinants of HealthNCT04630041

Social Needs Screenings in ED

A study testing 211 Referral in people with Social Determinants of Health, run by Andrea Wallace at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will determine whether existing Health Information Technology can be leveraged to 1) implement a universal, patient-centered social needs assessment and referral process during routine Emergency Department care; 2) understand whether linking social needs assessment, community based referral, and health… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Social Determinants of Health
What is being tested?
211 Referral
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
5,081 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2019to 1 Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • seen in the UHealth University hospital ED
  • ability to use touchpad technology
  • ability to communicate via telephone for 211 follow-up

Who cannot join

  • Non-English and non-Spanish speaking (English nor Spanish need not be the 1st language)
  • unable to communicate verbally
  • admitted to an inpatient unit or to a skilled nursing facility (vs discharged to a community-based setting where participants are responsible for their own self-care)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementation Barriers to Social Needs Screenings in Routine Emergency Care

This study will determine whether existing Health Information Technology can be leveraged to 1) implement a universal, patient-centered social needs assessment and referral process during routine Emergency Department care; 2) understand whether linking social needs assessment, community based referral, and health outcomes data may facilitate an understanding of population health; and 3) address the needs and wishes of patients and clinicians.

Hypothesis: Results of this study will provide much needed information to already overburdened hospital systems regarding whether systematically incorporating social needs information and referrals into emergency discharge processes allows for a better understanding of factors placing patients at risk for poor outcomes post-discharge, and whether doing so has potential for enhancing discharge support for a larger patient population seen in emergency departments.

Being tested
211 Referral
Keywords
Emergencies, Social needs
Medical subject headings
Emergencies

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 211 ReferralBehavioural

    Patients with one or more reported social need will be referred to 211 for community based services. 211 will reach out and contact patients for follow-up.

Study groups in NCT04630041
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Social Needs AssessmentExperimentalPatients in the Emergency Department will complete a social needs assessment screener that may refer them to 211 services
Receives: Behavioral: 211 Referral

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Health Utilization Outcome questionnaire

    The variable will be created by combining primary care utilization (yes/no), ED revisit (yes/no), and hospitalization (yes/no) within 60 days of original ED visit. Scores range from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate worse health utilization outcomes.

    Measured: 60 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2020
  2. Study start1 May 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
5,081 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04630041
Sponsor's protocol ID
00125877
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
11 Nov 2020
Last updated
16 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Wallace AS, Luther BL, Sisler SM, Wong B, Guo JW. Integrating social determinants of health screening and referral during routine emergency department care: evaluation of reach and implementation challenges. Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Oct 7;2(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00212-y.

    PubMed 34620248

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 211 Referral in people with Social Determinants of Health, run by Andrea Wallace at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Health Utilization Outcome questionnaire (time frame: 60 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04630041, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Nov 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in