AzTrials
AzTrials

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyNCT04630912

ACT for People With Dementia Experiencing Psychological Distress

A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in people with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dementia, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: People with dementia have a high prevalence of psychological distress but are under-served with evidence-based psychological interventions. To promote choice and improve clinical outcomes, there is a necessity to test different psychological intervention options for this population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Dementia
What is being tested?
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
6 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
20 Jan 2021to 22 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants were included in the study if they had:
  • A clinical diagnosis of dementia (any type)
  • A clinically significant level of psychological distress (a score of ≥8 on the GAD-7 and ≥10 on the PHQ-9).
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Participants were included in the study if they:
  • Cared for someone with a clinical diagnosis of dementia (any type)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Were paid or unpaid and regularly supported them with activities of daily living
  • Aged 18+ (no maximum age limit)
  • Able to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Participants were excluded if they:
  • Were already receiving psychotherapy
  • Had insufficient English or language abilities to engage in therapy
  • Were unable to consent to and/or engage in therapy
  • Participants were excluded if they:
  • Had insufficient English or language abilities to support the person with dementia or engage in study/Change Interviews
  • Were unable to consent to and/or engage in study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Community Mental Health Team for Older People

    Newark, Nottinghamshire

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for People With Dementia Experiencing Psychological Distress: a Hermeneutic Single Case Efficacy Design (HSCED) Series

Introduction: People with dementia have a high prevalence of psychological distress but are under-served with evidence-based psychological interventions. To promote choice and improve clinical outcomes, there is a necessity to test different psychological intervention options for this population. Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and acceptability of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for people with dementia, considering carer-supported, remote delivery and necessary therapy adaptations. Methods: A hermeneutic single case efficacy design (HSCED) series was used to analyse therapy process and change for three clients with dementia and psychological distress. Quantitative and qualitative data was collated ('rich case records') and analysed by three independent psychotherapy experts ('judges') who determined the outcome for each client. Results: Over the course of therapy, it was concluded that one client with dementia made positive changes, specifically reliable reductions in psychological distress, which were largely attributable to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). Two clients remained unchanged. Discussion/Conclusion: Where change was achieved, the ACT-specific processes of values, committed action and acceptance, in combination with non-specific therapy factors including a strong client-carer relationship, existing client interests and individualised therapy adaptations, were facilitative of change. Hence, ACT may be feasible and effective by helping carers to better meet the needs of their loved ones with dementia. Future research to optimise ACT delivery in this population may be beneficial. Furthermore, the assessment of carer factors (e.g., their psychological flexibility, the client-carer relationship) may strengthen the evidence-base for systemic ACT-use.

Being tested
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Keywords
Dementia, Psychological distress, Psychological therapy, ACT, Acceptability, HSCED
Medical subject headings
Dementia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acceptance and Commitment TherapyOther

    There is no specific protocol for ACT with dementia, therefore a published ACT protocol, 'Better Living with Illness' (Brassington et al., 2016), will be used flexibly to guide the intervention.

Study groups in NCT04630912
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acceptance and Commitment TherapyExperimental12 weekly, 90 minute ACT sessions with person with dementia (with a review at week 6)
Receives: Other: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in anxiety

    Generalised anxiety disorder questionnaire (GAD-7), scored 0-21, where higher scores indicate a greater severity of anxiety.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks

  2. Change in depression

    Patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), scored 0-27, where higher scores indicate a greater severity of depression.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in psychological flexibility

    Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance \& Commitment Therapy (CompACT-SF), scored 0-48, where higher scores indicate increased psychological flexibility.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks

  2. Change in wellbeing

    Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWS), scored 7-35, where higher scores indicate higher mental wellbeing.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks

  3. Change in client problems

    Personal questionnaire (PQ), where higher scores indicate greater severity of problems.

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks

  4. Change in therapeutic alliance

    Session rating scale (SRS), does not involve numerical values but asks clients to mark on a line nearest to the description that best fits their experience (marks further towards the right indicate better therapeutic alliance).

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2020
  2. Study start20 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion14 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion22 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Hermeneutic single case efficacy design (HSCED) series
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
6 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04630912
Sponsor's protocol ID
20064
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
2 Nov 2020
Last updated
19 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The study data was written up as part of the student Doctoral Thesis and will be submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Trent Doctorate in Clinical Psychology (DClinPsy) in February 2022. Participants chose a pseudonym for themselves to be used in publications (e.g. electronic documents, written notes and transcripts) to prevent identification and references to personal information (e.g. other people's names, locations) were altered.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in people with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dementia, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in anxiety (time frame: Through study completion, up to 24 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in