DepressionNCT04631900
Spiritual Intervention for Persons With Depression
A study testing Christianity approach as framework for spiritual intervention in people with Depression, run by City University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Mental health is an integral part of health and depression has become a common and serious mental disorder. The research study aims to explore the effectiveness of spiritual intervention in persons with depression. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression
- What is being tested?
- Christianity approach as framework for spiritual intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 27 Nov 2021to 28 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Hong Kong Chinese residents who can communicate in Cantonese;
- Religious or non-religious but have no objection to Christian faith rituals;
- Screening by PHQ-9 with score of 5-14 out of 27; and
- Willing to give informed consent and comply with the trial protocol.
Who cannot join
- Receiving any form of psychotherapy in the past 3 months;
- Significant cognitive impairment that is difficult to follow instructions;
- Lifetime history of psychosis that make the person unable to understand and follow instructions;
- Strong suicidal risk as rated by PHQ-9 item on suicide (score equal or more than 2), those with severe depression and strong suicidal ideas will be referred to seek professional help; and
- Adjustment of medication (antidepressant) within the past 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of a Community-oriented Spiritual Intervention Programme in Persons With Depression: a Randomized Wait-list Control Trial
Mental health is an integral part of health and depression has become a common and serious mental disorder. The research study aims to explore the effectiveness of spiritual intervention in persons with depression.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to develop a community-oriented spiritual intervention programme that focuses on connectedness and to explore its effectiveness in persons with depression.
Objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of this spiritual intervention on reducing depressive symptoms.
- To evaluate the effect of spiritual intervention on enhancing hope, meaning in life, self-esteem, and social support.
- To examine the moderatioon effect of demographic variables on the intervention effect in reducing the depressive and anxiety symptoms, and ennhancing hope, meaning in life, self-esteem, and social support.
- To examine participant's perspectives on the healing mechanisms of the intervention.
The study is conducted as a randomized-controlled trial using a wait-list control group for comparison. The wait-list control group will receive the intervention after the completion of the post-questionnaire.
The intervention is an 8 session weekly programme. Each weekly session is around 2 hours in length and the content is as below:
- Spirituality, mental health and depression
- Connectedness
- Forgiving and freedom
- Suffering and transcendence
- Hope
- Gratitude
- Relapse prevention and spiritual growth
- Wrap-up and celebration
- Conditions
- Depression
- Being tested
- Christianity approach as framework for spiritual intervention
- Keywords
- Spiritual intervention, Depression, Christian, Connectedness, randomized wait-list, community
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Christianity approach as framework for spiritual interventionBehavioural
Intervention includes use of Bible verses, prayer, hymns singing, sharing and caring for others (mutual support) within the group. Through these activities, participants have opportunities to re-build and further develop their connectedness to themselves, to others, to their living, their environment, and to larger meaning and purpose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Spiritual Intervention Programme | Experimental | The intervention is a 8 weeks' programme. The Christianity approach as the framework for spiritual intervention includes use of Bible verses, prayer, hymns singing, sharing and caring for others (mutual support) within the group.
Through these activities, participants have opportunities to re-build and further develop their connectedness to themselves, to others, to their living, their environment, and to larger meaning and purpose. Receives: Behavioral: Christianity approach as framework for spiritual intervention |
| Wait-list Control group | No intervention | Participants recruited in the waitlist control will be initially tested to generate pre-test scores and will then tested six weeks later which is equivalent to the timespan between the pre-test and post-test for the experimental spiritual programme. In between these two testing sessions, the waitlist control group will not receive any type of spiritual intervention. For ethical reasons, following the second testing session, the participants in the waitlist group will be given the opportunity to participant in the spiritual intervention programme. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in depression measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) is a self-reported questionnaire designed for use in primary care. It is a structured questionnaire that enquires after the nine symptom- based criteria for diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV depression. Score can range from 0-27. Sum scores of 0-4 indicate none or minimal depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 moderate depressive symptoms, and 15-27 severe depressive symptoms. It has been found to have good sensitivity and specificity (Kroenke et al., 2001). The Cronbach's alpha was reported to be 0.86 - 0.89 (Smarr \& Keefer, 2011).
Measured: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Change in anxiety measured with General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)
The General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006) is an easy-to-use 7 items self-administered patient questionnaire used to screen the severity measure of generalized anxiety disorder with good psychometric property. Score can range from 0-21. Sum scores of 0-5 indicates mild anxiety, 6-10 moderate anxiety, 11-15 moderately severe anxiety, and 16-21 severe anxiety. The Chinese version was tested to be a reliable and efficient instrument. (Wang Li, Lukai, Rongjing, Dayi, \& Sheng, 2014).
Measured: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in hope measured with State Hope Scale (SHS)
The State Hope Scale (SHS) ( Snyder et al., 1996) is a 6 items self-reported instrument for measuring the extent of hope individuals held toward ongoing events in their lives. It is an 8-point Likert scale, with 1 (definitely false) to 8 (definitely true), with odd-number items measuring pathway thinking and even number items measuring agency thinking. Scores can range from 6 to 48, with higher scores representing higher hope levels.. C. R. Snyder et al. (1996) reported that SHS was a reliable and valid measure of state hope, with factor analyses confirming the two factors of agency and pathways. The internal consistency values ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 for both the agency and pathways subscale, and all adaptations and translations of the scale are reported to retain the high internal consistency (Brooks \& Hirsch, 2017). The Chinese version is available (Mak, Ng, \& Wong, 2011).
Measured: The data will be collected in both experimental and wait-list control groups at three points: at baseline (T0), week 8 (T1) and week 20 (T2).
Change in meaning and purpose in life measured with Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ)
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ) (Steger, Frazier, Oishi, \& Kaler, 2006) is a 10 items questionnaire. It measures 2 subscales of the presence of meaning in life and the search for meaning in life. It is a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (absolutely true) to 7 (absolutely untrue). 5 items are for presence of meaning and 5 for search for meaning. Items are summed yielding a range from 5 to 35 for each subscale with higher scores indicates a strong presence of/search for meaning in one's life. It has been translated into over two dozen languages. The Chinese version of the questionnaire has the same factor structure as the original version of MLQ among the caregivers in Hong Kong (Chan, 2014).
Measured: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Change in self-esteem measured with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 1965) is a widely used instrument (10 items) around the world for measuring self-esteem with a 4 point Likert scale ranging from ranging from 4 (strong agree) to 1 (strong disagree). Reverse scoring (4= strongly disagree to 1= strongly agree are used for five negatively worded items: 2, 5, 6, 8 and 9. The total score ranges from 10 to 40 with higher scores indicates higher self-esteem. The internal reliability and factor structure of the scale is psychometrically sound across many languages and cultures (Schmitt \& Allik, 2005).
Measured: At baseline (T0), post at week 6 (T1) and follow-up at week 18 (T2).
Change in perceived social support measured with Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, \& Farley, 1988) is one of the most extensively used instruments to assess social support. It is a 12 items self -administered measure of social support with 3 subscales of family, friends, and significant others. It is a 7 point Likert scale ranging from 1(very strongly disagree ) to 7 (very strongly agree). The mean scores for significant other subscale is the sum across items 1, 2, 5 \& 10, then divided by 4; the mean scores for family subscale is the sum across items 3,4, 8, \& 11, then divided by 4; the mean scores of friends subscale is the sum across items 6, 7, 9, \&b 12, then divided by 4. The mean score of the total scale is the sum across all 12 items, then divided by 12. The mean score range from 1 (lowest) to 7 (highest). The Chinese version of MSPSS has good internal consistency reliability with composite reliability values of more than 0.7 (Y. Wang, Wan, Huang, Huang, \& Kong, 2017).
Measured: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2020
- Study start27 Nov 2021
- Primary completion28 Mar 2023
- Study completion28 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- City University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, LEUNG Lai Fun Judy, City University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Judy LF LEUNG, PhD(c), Principal investigator, City University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04631900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- judyll2222
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) from completed clinical trials should be responsibly shared to support efficient clinical research, generate new knowledge and bring benefit to patients. The result can be disseminated via seminars, conference presentations, and various media.
Publications
Chan WC. Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire among Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. Health Soc Work. 2014 Aug;39(3):135-43. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlu025.
PubMed 25095626Brooks, B. D., & Hirsch, J. K. (2017). State Hope Scale. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-4). TN: Springer International Publishing.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PubMed 11556941Li, W., Lukai, Rongjing, D., Dayi, H., & Sheng, L. (2014). GW25-e4488 The value of Chinese version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to screen anxiety and depression in cardiovascular outpatients. JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology), 64(16), C222-C222. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1038
Mak WW, Ng IS, Wong CC. Resilience: enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. J Couns Psychol. 2011 Oct;58(4):610-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025195.
PubMed 21895357Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Schmitt DP, Allik J. Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):623-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623.
PubMed 16287423Smarr KL, Keefer AL. Measures of depression and depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S454-66. doi: 10.1002/acr.20556. No abstract available.
PubMed 22588766Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL. Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321.
PubMed 8636885Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PubMed 16717171Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
Wang Y, Wan Q, Huang Z, Huang L, Kong F. Psychometric Properties of Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Chinese Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 21;8:2020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02020. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29209254Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of a Community-oriented Spiritual Intervention Programme in Persons With Depression: a Randomized Wait-list Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04631900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- judyll2222
- Conditions
- Depression
- Keywords
- Spiritual intervention, Depression, Christian, Connectedness, randomized wait-list, community
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- City University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mental health is an integral part of health and depression has become a common and serious mental disorder. The research study aims to explore the effectiveness of spiritual intervention in persons with depression.
Detailed description
This study aims to develop a community-oriented spiritual intervention programme that focuses on connectedness and to explore its effectiveness in persons with depression.
Objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of this spiritual intervention on reducing depressive symptoms.
- To evaluate the effect of spiritual intervention on enhancing hope, meaning in life, self-esteem, and social support.
- To examine the moderatioon effect of demographic variables on the intervention effect in reducing the depressive and anxiety symptoms, and ennhancing hope, meaning in life, self-esteem, and social support.
- To examine participant's perspectives on the healing mechanisms of the intervention.
The study is conducted as a randomized-controlled trial using a wait-list control group for comparison. The wait-list control group will receive the intervention after the completion of the post-questionnaire.
The intervention is an 8 session weekly programme. Each weekly session is around 2 hours in length and the content is as below:
- Spirituality, mental health and depression
- Connectedness
- Forgiving and freedom
- Suffering and transcendence
- Hope
- Gratitude
- Relapse prevention and spiritual growth
- Wrap-up and celebration
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Spiritual Intervention Programme | Experimental | Behavioral: Christianity approach as framework for spiritual interventionThe intervention is a 8 weeks' programme. The Christianity approach as the framework for spiritual intervention includes use of Bible verses, prayer, hymns singing, sharing and caring for others (mutual support) within the group. Through these activities, participants have opportunities to re-build and further develop their connectedness to themselves, to others, to their living, their environment, and to larger meaning and purpose. |
| Wait-list Control group | No intervention | –Participants recruited in the waitlist control will be initially tested to generate pre-test scores and will then tested six weeks later which is equivalent to the timespan between the pre-test and post-test for the experimental spiritual programme. In between these two testing sessions, the waitlist control group will not receive any type of spiritual intervention. For ethical reasons, following the second testing session, the participants in the waitlist group will be given the opportunity to participant in the spiritual intervention programme. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hong Kong Chinese residents who can communicate in Cantonese;
- Religious or non-religious but have no objection to Christian faith rituals;
- Screening by PHQ-9 with score of 5-14 out of 27; and
- Willing to give informed consent and comply with the trial protocol.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Receiving any form of psychotherapy in the past 3 months;
- Significant cognitive impairment that is difficult to follow instructions;
- Lifetime history of psychosis that make the person unable to understand and follow instructions;
- Strong suicidal risk as rated by PHQ-9 item on suicide (score equal or more than 2), those with severe depression and strong suicidal ideas will be referred to seek professional help; and
- Adjustment of medication (antidepressant) within the past 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Christianity approach as framework for spiritual interventionIntervention includes use of Bible verses, prayer, hymns singing, sharing and caring for others (mutual support) within the group. Through these activities, participants have opportunities to re-build and further develop their connectedness to themselves, to others, to their living, their environment, and to larger meaning and purpose. | Behavioural | Spiritual Intervention Programme |
Primary outcome
Change in depression measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (Kroenke, Spitzer, \& Williams, 2001) is a self-reported questionnaire designed for use in primary care. It is a structured questionnaire that enquires after the nine symptom- based criteria for diagnostic criteria in the DSM-IV depression. Score can range from 0-27. Sum scores of 0-4 indicate none or minimal depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 moderate depressive symptoms, and 15-27 severe depressive symptoms. It has been found to have good sensitivity and specificity (Kroenke et al., 2001). The Cronbach's alpha was reported to be 0.86 - 0.89 (Smarr \& Keefer, 2011).
Change in anxiety measured with General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
The General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, \& Löwe, 2006) is an easy-to-use 7 items self-administered patient questionnaire used to screen the severity measure of generalized anxiety disorder with good psychometric property. Score can range from 0-21. Sum scores of 0-5 indicates mild anxiety, 6-10 moderate anxiety, 11-15 moderately severe anxiety, and 16-21 severe anxiety. The Chinese version was tested to be a reliable and efficient instrument. (Wang Li, Lukai, Rongjing, Dayi, \& Sheng, 2014).
4 secondary outcomes
Change in hope measured with State Hope Scale (SHS)
Time frame: The data will be collected in both experimental and wait-list control groups at three points: at baseline (T0), week 8 (T1) and week 20 (T2).
Change in meaning and purpose in life measured with Meaning in Life Questionnaire (MLQ)
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Change in self-esteem measured with Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 6 (T1) and follow-up at week 18 (T2).
Change in perceived social support measured with Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25095626Chan WC. Factor structure of the Chinese version of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire among Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. Health Soc Work. 2014 Aug;39(3):135-43. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlu025.
- BackgroundBrooks, B. D., & Hirsch, J. K. (2017). State Hope Scale. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-4). TN: Springer International Publishing.
- Background: PubMed 11556941Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
- BackgroundLi, W., Lukai, Rongjing, D., Dayi, H., & Sheng, L. (2014). GW25-e4488 The value of Chinese version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to screen anxiety and depression in cardiovascular outpatients. JACC (Journal of the American College of Cardiology), 64(16), C222-C222. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1038
- Background: PubMed 21895357Mak WW, Ng IS, Wong CC. Resilience: enhancing well-being through the positive cognitive triad. J Couns Psychol. 2011 Oct;58(4):610-7. doi: 10.1037/a0025195.
- BackgroundRosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
- Background: PubMed 16287423Schmitt DP, Allik J. Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):623-42. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623.
- Background: PubMed 22588766Smarr KL, Keefer AL. Measures of depression and depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S454-66. doi: 10.1002/acr.20556. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8636885Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL. Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Feb;70(2):321-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.2.321.
- Background: PubMed 16717171Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
- BackgroundSteger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The Meaning in Life Questionnaire: Assessing the Presence of and Search for Meaning in Life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
- Background: PubMed 29209254Wang Y, Wan Q, Huang Z, Huang L, Kong F. Psychometric Properties of Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in Chinese Parents of Children with Cerebral Palsy. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 21;8:2020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02020. eCollection 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) from completed clinical trials should be responsibly shared to support efficient clinical research, generate new knowledge and bring benefit to patients. The result can be disseminated via seminars, conference presentations, and various media.
Related trials for Depression
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of Wearable Core Body Temperature-Based Circadian Rhythm Digital Biomarkers
Mood Disorders, Major Depressive Diorder
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective Study of Anxiety, Depression, and Bipolar Disorder in People
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Vortioxetine in Japanese Pediatric Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Anticipated Patient and Caregiver Burden
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
A Study of Brief Behavioral Activation for the Treatment of Depression in Older Adult Cancer Survivors
Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Judy LF LEUNG, PhD(c) principal investigator
City University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Christianity approach as framework for spiritual intervention in people with Depression, run by City University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in depression measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score (time frame: At baseline (T0), post at week 8 (T1) and follow-up at week 20 (T2).). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04631900, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2024.