AzTrials
AzTrials

Diet QualityNCT04632212

Understanding Food Choices

A study testing Explicit Tax, Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets) and Ordering in people with Diet Quality, run by Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to build and optimize a multi-component intervention that improves diet quality. The investigators will evaluate the effects of evidence-based public health interventions on consumers' diet quality via a web-based grocery store "NUSMart" and then… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Diet Quality
What is being tested?
Explicit Tax, Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets) and Ordering
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
756 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
2 Dec 2020to 14 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Singapore Resident
  • Age 21 and above
  • Must be the primary weekly grocery shopper in their household

Who cannot join

  • Non-Singapore resident
  • Less than 21 years old
  • Non-primary grocery shopper in their household

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • Duke-NUS Medical School

    Singapore, 169857

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Multiphase Optimal Strategy To Improve Diet Quality-MOSTDQ (Aim 1)

This study aims to use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to build and optimize a multi-component intervention that improves diet quality. The investigators will evaluate the effects of evidence-based public health interventions on consumers' diet quality via a web-based grocery store "NUSMart" and then identify a multi-component intervention that includes only those interventions meaningfully affecting diet quality.

Read the detailed description

The important role that diet plays in health and disease is well established. Excessive intake of energy, saturated fat and sodium increase the risk of heart disease, diabetes and certain cancers. As a result, interventions aimed at encouraging healthier food consumption have been pursued by many countries. These can be broadly grouped into the following categories: price manipulations, food labeling, and behavioral nudges.

No study has previously assessed the potentially interactive effects of a multi-component intervention that incorporates the strongest features of each intervention component while discarding those that do not meaningfully contribute to healthier consumption. That is the goal of this effort.

To this end, the investigators chose a full-factorial design because this experimental design allows us to estimate not only the independent (main) effects of the interventions but also their interaction effects. The full-factorial design includes all possible combinations of the interventions' status. Because the investigators have four interventions, each of which has two levels (intervention On or Off), there are 16 (i.e. 2^4) experimental conditions/arms in total. The four interventions for this study are outlined below:

  • Explicit Tax: To impose an explicit tax on food and beverage items that are eligible for red stop-sign (explained in b.) as less healthy foods.

Foods and Beverages: The investigators will impose a 20% tax on sales price of the food items.

  • Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets \& targets): To provide the green circle 'healthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "A" and "B", the amber circle 'in between healthy and unhealthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "C", and the red stop-sign 'Unhealthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "D" and "E". In the presence of food labels, before shopping, subjects will watch a video briefly explaining the food labels on the store and be provided a live visual indicator of the healthiness of shoppers' current basket (called "My Cart Summary") with the recommended healthy baskets goals (i.e., Green logo products ≥ 60% and Red logo products ≤ 15% of the weighted number of servings of products.). My Cart Summary will be displayed as a pie chart with the proportion of servings in their current shopping baskets, according to the three food labels. This way, as shoppers add to their basket while browsing the store, they will have visual feedback on how their latest addition contributes to their total basket healthiness.
  • Ordering: To order food items by Nutri-Score such that healthier items are shown upfront on NUSMart.
  • Within Group Substitution: At the checkout, to provide consumers with an opportunity to replace their original items with an item chosen from two or four recommended substitutes that are healthier within their corresponding food categories based on the similarities of price, ingredients, flavor, and other characteristics.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the 16 arms and instructed to perform a one-time hypothetical grocery shopping on NUSMart.

The investigators will collect participants' demographic and health characteristics as well as hunger at the time of the survey and their self-control in the baseline survey. The collected data will be used to precisely estimate the causal effect of the interventions and address their underlying mechanism to change consumers' food choices.

Our hypotheses about the effects of the interventions on diet quality, measured by the weighted average Nutri-Score (primary) of finalized shopping baskets, are as follows:

  1. There will be significant and positive main effects of each of the interventions.
  2. There will be significant and positive interaction effects on diet quality of: Explicit tax \& food labels, Food labels \& ordering.

We will also run models both with and without including covariates that include demographic variables (e.g., age, minority status, income, BMI, sex, and household size) and measurements of self-control, hunger, and health-status. To test the moderating effects of hunger, self-control, health-status, and education level, we will include interaction terms between the intervention arms and these variables.

Conditions
Diet Quality
Being tested
Explicit Tax, Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets), Ordering, Within-Group Substitution
Keywords
Multi-component Intervention, Multi-phase Optimization Strategy, Tax, Food Labels, Quality based ordering, Within group substitutes, Full-factorial design

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Explicit TaxBehavioural

    To impose an explicit tax on food and beverage items that are eligible for red stop-sign food logos (explained in Intervention 2) as less healthy foods. Explicit tax shows pre-tax prices and a label indicating that the price includes a corresponding tax on the less healthy products.

    Food and Beverages: we will impose a 20% tax on sales price of the food items

  • Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets)Behavioural

    To provide the green circle 'healthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "A" and "B", the amber circle 'in between healthy and unhealthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "C", and the red stop-sign 'less healthy choice' food label to items with Nutri-Score "D" and "E".

    In the presence of food labels,

    • Video: subjects will watch a video briefly explaining the food labels on the store.
    • My Cart Summary: subjects will be provided a live visual indicator of the healthiness of shoppers' current basket with the recommended healthy baskets goals.
  • OrderingBehavioural

    To order food items by Nutri-Score (high to low).

  • Within-Group SubstitutionBehavioural

    To provide substitutes within corresponding food categories that are better than the items that subjects chose in terms of Nutri-Score based on the similarities of price, primary ingredients, flavor, and other characteristics.

Study groups in NCT04632212
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (ON) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Ordering; Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
2ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (ON) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Ordering
3ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
4ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets)
5ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (ON) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Ordering; Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
6ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (ON) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Ordering
7ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax; Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
8ExperimentalTax (ON) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Explicit Tax
9ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (ON) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Ordering; Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
10ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (ON) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Ordering
11ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets); Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
12ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (ON) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets)
13ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (ON) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Ordering; Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
14ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (ON) Substitution (OFF)
Receives: Behavioral: Ordering
15ExperimentalTax (OFF) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (ON)
Receives: Behavioral: Within-Group Substitution
16No interventionTax (OFF) Food Labels (OFF) Ordering (OFF) Substitution (OFF)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diet Quality

    Diet quality measured by the weighted average of all purchased products' Nutri-Score for the shopping trip. Nutri-Score is an individual dietary index based on the British Food Standard Agency Nutrient Profiling System.

    Measured: At the end of data collection, up to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Proportion of products

    The proportion of products eligible for the green circle label and the red stop-sign label respectively, of the purchased products.

    Measured: At the end of data collection, up to 8 weeks

  2. Average nutrients per serving

    Average calories, sodium, sugar, fat, and saturated fat per serving, which will be calculated based on all purchased products' total nutritional value.

    Measured: At the end of data collection, up to 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2020
  2. Study start2 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion14 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion14 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
756 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04632212
Sponsor's protocol ID
MOH-000263
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
2 Nov 2020
Last updated
4 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shin S, Chakraborty B, Yan X, van Dam RM, Finkelstein EA. Evaluation of Combinations of Nudging, Pricing, and Labeling Strategies to Improve Diet Quality: A Virtual Grocery Store Experiment Employing a Multiphase Optimization Strategy. Ann Behav Med. 2022 Aug 30;56(9):933-945. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab115.

    PubMed 35195704

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Explicit Tax, Food Labels (with the summary of healthiness of shopping baskets & targets) and Ordering in people with Diet Quality, run by Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diet Quality (time frame: At the end of data collection, up to 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04632212, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in