AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3AgAINNCT04632927

Efficacy of Secukinumab Compared to Ustekinumab in Adults With Active Psoriatic Arthritis and Failure of TNFα-Inhibitor Treatment

A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of secukinumab and ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who showed failure to previous TNFα-inhibitor treatment Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Secukinumab and Ustekinumab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
119 participants
Where
28 sitesGermany
Study dates
21 Dec 2020to 22 Oct 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of PsA as classified by CASPAR criteria for at least 6 months before randomization.
  • Active PsA at baseline defined as ≥ 3 tender joints out of 68 and ≥ 3 swollen joints out of 66 (dactylitis of a digit counts as one joint each).
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to previous or current treatment with at least one TNFα inhibitor
  • Inadequate response or intolerance to conventional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (cDMARDs)
  • Diagnosis of active plaque psoriasis, with at least one psoriatic plaque of ≥ 2 cm diameter and/or nail changes consistent with psoriasis and/or documented history of plaque psoriasis.
  • Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibodies negative at screening.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or nursing women,
  • Previous exposure to secukinumab, ustekinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17, IL-17 receptor, IL-12 or IL-23.
  • Patients for whom the use of secukinumab or ustekinumab is contraindicated.
  • Use of any other investigational drug. Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies including but not limited to anti-CD20 or investigational agents
  • Evidence of ongoing infectious or malignant process
  • Subjects receiving high potency opioid analgesics
  • Ongoing use of prohibited psoriasis treatments/medications
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

28 sites in 1 country.

28 sites in 1 country

Germany28 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aachen, 52074

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bad Bentheim, 48455

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bad Doberan, 18209

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 12435

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 13125

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Berlin, 13353

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bochum, 44791

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, 51149

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cottbus, 03042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01067

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dresden, 01307

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ehringshausen, 35630

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Erlangen, 91056

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gommern, 39245

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hamburg, 22391

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herne, 44649

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Magdeburg, 39104

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Magdeburg, 39110

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mainz, 55131

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    München, 81541

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Planegg, 82152

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ratingen, 40878

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein, 24768

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A 28-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered Secukinumab Compared to Ustekinumab in Adult Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Failure of TNFα- Inhibitor Treatment (AgAIN)

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of secukinumab and ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who showed failure to previous TNFα-inhibitor treatment

Being tested
Secukinumab, Ustekinumab
Keywords
Psoriatic Arthritis, Psoriasis Arthropathica, Psoriatic Arthropathy
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SecukinumabBiological

    Also called AIN457

    Eligible subjects are randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio

  • UstekinumabBiological

    Eligible subjects are randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio

Study groups in NCT04632927
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SecukinumabExperimentalAIN457
Receives: Biological: Secukinumab; Biological: Ustekinumab
UstekinumabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: Secukinumab; Biological: Ustekinumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Patients With Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response at Week 28

    The disability assessment component of the HAQ evaluated a subject's level of functional ability through 20 questions grouped into 8 categories: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Each item began with the prompt "Over the past week, are you able to…" and is scored on a 4-point scale: 0 (no difficulty), 1 (some difficulty), 2 (much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). The overall score was calculated by averaging the scores across all answered domains, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability).

    A HAQ-DI response was defined as an improvement of ≥0.35 points from baseline at Week 28. Missing values were imputed as non-responders

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Number of Participants Achieving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 28

    The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.

    The number of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  2. Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain on VAS at Week 28

    The patient's level of pain was evaluated using a horizontal Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on which individuals marked their pain intensity with a vertical tick. The scale ranged from 0 mm (indicating "no pain") to 100 mm (indicating "unbearable pain").

    The change in the patient's pain assessment on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  3. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) 68 at Week 28

    Tender joint count (TJC) 68 was a method of assessing joint inflammation. Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The 68 joints assessed for tenderness included the 2 temporomandibular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 acromioclavicular joints, 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal, 8 distal interphalangeal joints of the hands, 2 hips, 2 knees, 2 talo¬tibial, 2 mid-tarsal, 10 metatarsophalangeal, and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet.

    The change from baseline in TJC68 at Week 28 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  4. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) 66 at Week 28

    Swollen Joint Count (SJC) 66 was a method of assessing joint inflammation. The number of swollen joints was determined by examining 66 joints and identifying those with visible or palpable swelling suggestive of synovitis. The 66 joints assessed for swelling included the 2 sternoclavicular, 2 acromioclavicular joints, 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal, 8 distal interphalangeal joints of the hands, 2 knees, 2 talotibial, 2 mid-tarsal, 10 metatarsophalangeal, and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet.

    The change from baseline in SJC66 at Week 28 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  5. Number of Patients Achieving PASI 100 at Week 28

    The PASI was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.

    The number of participants who achieved 100% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.

    Measured: Bseline, Week 28

  6. Number of Patients Achieving PASI 75 at Week 28

    The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.

    The number of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  7. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity on VAS

    The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm (VAS) ranging from 0 (='very good') to 100 (='very poor') after the question 'Considering all the ways Psoriatic Arthritis affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are today'.

    The change in the patient's global assessment on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  8. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Psoriasis and Arthritis Disease Activity on VAS

    The patient's assessment of psoriasis and arthritis was performed using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (='Excellent') to 100 (='Poor') after the question 'Considering all the ways PSORIASIS and ARTHRITIS affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are doing over the past week'

    The change in the patient's global assessment of psoriasis and arthritis disease activity on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  9. Number of Patients Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 28

    MDA was a composite endpoint used to assess low disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. A patient was considered to have achieved MDA if they met at least 5 of the following 7 criteria:

    • TJC (0-68)≤1
    • SJC (0-66 joints)≤1
    • PASI ≤1 [the total score ranged from 0 (no disease) to 72 (maximal disease)] or body surface area≤3%
    • Patient's pain VAS ≤ 15 mm on a 100 mm scale, where 0 ="no pain" and 100= "pain as severe as can be imagined"
    • Patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA) ≤ 20 mm on a 100 mm scale, where 0 represented the lowest level of disease activity and 100 the highest
    • HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5, where 0 represented no difficulty and 3 represented inability to perform activities
    • Enthesitis count ≤ 1, based on the Leeds Enthesitis Index, where 0 indicated no tenderness and 6 indicated tenderness at all assessed tendon insertions

    The number of participants achieving MDA at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 28

  10. Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)

    The LEI was a validated enthesitis index that used six sites to evaluate enthesitis: the left and right lateral epicondyles of the humerus, the left and right proximal Achilles tendon insertions, and the left and right medial femoral condyles.Each site was scored as 0 (non-tender) or 1 (tender), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 6. A higher score reflected a greater burden of enthesitis.

    The change in the LEI score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in enthesitis severity

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  11. Change From Baseline in the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI)

    The LDI was used to quantitatively assess dactylitis by measuring the circumference of affected digits and their corresponding control digits, along with the tenderness of each affected digit. Digits were classified as dactylitic if there was a ≥10% difference in circumference compared to the contralateral digit. When both digits were affected or a contralateral control was unavailable, a standardized reference range was applied.

    For each dactylitic digit, the ratio of the affected to control circumference was multiplied by a binary tenderness score (1 = tender, 0 = non-tender). The resulting values were summed across all affected digits to calculate the total LDI score. Scores ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe or widespread dactylitis.

    The change in the LDI score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in dactylitis severity.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  12. Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Quality of Life (PsAQoL)

    The PsAQoL questionnaire was used to assess the impact of psoriatic arthritis on patients' quality of life. The PsAQoL is a validated, disease-specific, self-administered instrument consisting of 20 items with binary response options ("true" or "not true"). Items covered physical, emotional, and social domains, including fatigue, independence, and interpersonal relationships. The total score ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.

    The change in the PsAQoL score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Response at Week 28

    The FACIT-Fatigue Scale was used to assess fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the previous 7 days. The instrument consisted of 13 self-administered items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). The total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.

    Response was achieved if the score had improved by at least 4 points from baseline. Missing values were imputed as non-responders

    Measured: Baseline, Week 28

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Response at Week 28

    The DLQI was used to evaluate the impact of dermatological conditions on patients' quality of life over the previous 7 days. It consisted of 10 self-administered items covering symptoms, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment burden. Each item was scored from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Very much"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated greater impairment.

    Response was achieved if the absolute score was either 0 or 1. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.

    Measured: Week 28

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2020
  2. Study start21 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion22 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion22 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
119 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04632927
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAIN457FDE04
Other IDs
2019-004246-15, 2019
Acronym
AgAIN
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
4 Nov 2020
Last updated
16 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 28 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 28 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Patients With Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response at Week 28 (time frame: Baseline, Week 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in